Taiwan votes to decide whether to oust lawmakers from China-friendly party in closely watched poll
The independence-leaning ruling Democratic Progressive Party won last year's presidential election, but the China-friendly Nationalists, also known as the KMT, and the smaller Taiwan People's Party have enough seats to form a majority bloc.
Those who support removing the 24 lawmakers are angry that the KMT and its allies have blocked key legislation, especially the defense budget, and passed controversial changes that are seen as diminishing the power of the executive and favoring China, which considers the island its own territory. The opposition parties' actions sparked concerns among some Taiwanese about the island's democratic integrity and its ability to deter Chinese military threats, leading to the recall campaigns. The scale of the recall elections is unprecedented, with another seven KMT lawmakers facing similar votes on Aug. 23.
But the KMT alleged the ruling party was resorting to political retaliation after it lost the legislative majority, saying the recalls were undermining and challenging Taiwan's democratic system. The KMT holds 52 seats, while the ruling DPP holds 51 seats. For the DPP to secure a legislative majority, at least six KMT lawmakers would need to be ousted, and the ruling party would need to win all by-elections, which would need to be held within three months following the announcement of results. For the recall to pass, more than a quarter of eligible voters in the electoral district must vote in favor of the recall, and the total number of supporters must exceed those against.
If KMT loses its seats in the recall elections, the party can file new candidates for the by-elections and may be able to win back the seats.
Outside a Taipei polling station, voters old and young were waiting in line to cast their ballots. The poll will close at 4 p.m. local time, with results expected on Saturday night. The elections have intensified tensions between those backing the status quo and those favoring improved ties with Beijing. Critics accuse China-friendly politicians of compromising Taiwan and take issue with their meetings with mainland Chinese politicians. But these Taiwanese politicians claim their connections are vital for dialogue given Beijing's refusal to interact with the DPP.
When asked about the recall election, China's Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian said in June that since the administration of Taiwan President Lai Ching-te came into power, it has sought to achieve 'one-party dominance' and practiced 'dictatorship' under the guise of 'democracy,' state broadcaster CCTV reported. She was quoted as saying that Lai's government has spared no effort in suppressing opposition parties and those who supported the development of cross-strait relations. Taiwan's mainland affairs council said Wednesday that the Chinese authorities and state media had tried to blatantly interfere with the vote.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
4 minutes ago
- Hans India
‘Trust but verify' holds the key for improving ties with China
The thaw in India-China ties, strained by the 2020 border clash, is a welcome development. The recent visit of Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to New Delhi has resulted in several tangible outcomes, including the decision to resume direct flight connectivity and strengthen trade and investment flows. There are also unconfirmed reports that Beijing is willing to address India's concerns regarding fertilisers, rare earths, and tunnel boring machines. However, our policy and decision makers must not go overboard about the thaw. The two governments have decided to facilitate visas for tourists, business professionals, media personnel, and other visitors, aiming to improve people-to-people and commercial exchanges. In a symbolic move to enhance cultural and religious linkages, they will resume the Indian pilgrimage to Mount Kailash (Gang Renpoche) and Lake Manasarovar (Mapam Yun Tso) in Tibet from next year. Additionally, border trade will reopen through three designated points-Lipulekh Pass, Shipki La Pass, and Nathu La Pass. These arrangements underscore efforts to gradually normalise border-related interactions and build confidence. On the sensitive boundary question, the two sides agreed to establish at least three new mechanisms dedicated to managing disputes. Both countries reaffirmed their commitment to using existing diplomatic and military channels for border management and to advance discussions on de-escalation. The Ministry of External Affairs highlighted that these steps were aimed at preventing misunderstandings and ensuring stability along the Line of Actual Control. Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Wang at his residence following a round of high-level talks with National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar. In a post on X, the Prime Minister noted that 'stable, predictable, constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional as well as global peace and prosperity.' Modi is scheduled to visit Tianjin for the SCO Summit on August 31 and September 1, a trip that adds significance to the renewed dialogue. According to China's foreign ministry, Wang conveyed to Doval that maintaining stable relations serves the core interests of both nations. He called for building trust through dialogue, broadening cooperation, and working toward consensus on sensitive issues, particularly boundary management. Doval emphasized that the special representatives' talks hold 'very special importance' considering Modi's upcoming visit. All these are nice expressions, but the Indian side should never forget the fact that the Chinese are adept at interpreting the otherwise unexceptional phraseology as it suits them—often in a most disingenuous manner. This diplomatic engagement has come against the backdrop of growing sourness in New Delhi's relations with Washington. US President Donald Trump's decision to raise tariffs on Indian exports—doubling them to 50 per cent, including an additional 25 per cent levy—over India's purchase of Russian crude has created new challenges for India. Against this shifting geopolitical landscape, India's balancing act with China acquires added urgency. Still, enthusiasm must be balanced by prudence. New Delhi must assess every assurance by Beijing carefully. The current rapprochement should not obscure the reality of unresolved border disputes (primarily because of China's stubbornness), deep mistrust, and divergent strategic goals. Rebuilding ties with China may indeed open new avenues for cooperation, but it must proceed with vigilance and verification at every step. India should follow the adage 'trust but verify.'
Mint
8 minutes ago
- Mint
Pushed by the US, India may return to the world's largest trading bloc
New Delhi: Pushed by escalating trade tensions with Washington and with its relations with Beijing on the mend, New Delhi is warming up to a deeper embrace of the East by signalling a potential return to an eastern trade bloc that it had walked out of nearly five years ago. According to two senior government officials aware of the matter, India is weighing the possibility of rejoining the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a trade group of 15 countries. India had left the group in November 2019 just before the pact was signed, citing concerns over market access, widening trade deficits, and risks to farmers, domestic manufacturing, and small businesses. According to one of the officials cited above, internal discussions have begun in the Indian government on reassessing the costs and benefits of RCEP membership in light of global supply chain realignments, tariff wars, and the urgency of diversifying export markets. The second official cited above said, 'The fresh rethink is being explored as part of a broader strategy to deepen India's trade engagement with neighbouring countries, especially after strained trade talks with the US." Both officials spoke to Mint on condition of not being named. In the latest development, China has lifted export curbs on rare earth magnets, fertilizers, and tunnel-boring machines for India following a meeting between Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi and India's external affairs minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar on Tuesday, a move seen as a thaw in India-China trade relations amid the current US tariff regime. On its part, India is weighing easier rules for Chinese investments in select sectors as part of another step to improve ties ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the eastern neighbour to participate in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit, as reported byMint on 18 August. The Research and Information System for Developing Countries (RIS), an autonomous body under the ministry of external affairs, has been tasked with conducting an impact assessment of India becoming a member of RCEP, particularly as the Trump tariffs are expected to remain in place for a long period, the second official said. 'India is pushing for written assurances from China and ASEAN nations to ensure greater market access for Indian products in order to make the pact a more balanced agreement," said the first person. 'The idea at this point of time is largely in terms of the opportunities that an FTA can create, and India has also brought in some changes," said Sachin Chaturvedi, director-general of RIS. 'If you look at trade compatibility and scope, the ambit within which we had earlier thought of two- or three-tier tariff structures, and the new momentum we are seeing in India-China trade relations, both would have to be factored in. Then some framework for assessment should come up." Queries sent to the spokespersons of the Prime Minister's Office, Chinese Embassy in New Delhi, and the ministries of commerce, external affairs remained unanswered till press time. The RCEP is the world's largest free trade agreement. As per World Economics, a UK-based data and analysis platform, the RCEP group accounted for 32.6% of Global GDP in 2025 and is home to over 2.35 billion people. The trade bloc comprises 15 member countries, including all the ASEAN member states — Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam — plus China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand. Notably, Japan and Singapore had included a special provision allowing India to return to the bloc at any time. Pushed by the US Experts said punitive US tariffs are pushing eastern economies to make RCEP a more compelling platform. 'The US under President Donald Trump has imposed tariffs of 15-20% on several ASEAN economies, with higher duties of 40% on Laos and 19% on Cambodia," said Srikanth Kondapalli, professor of China Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU). 'Such tariff barriers have made exports uneconomical, pushing these countries to reconsider their trade options within the RCEP framework." Trump, meanwhile, imposed the highest 50% tariffs on India, including a 25% penalty for buying Russian oil. The first set of duties came into effect on 7 August, while another 25% is scheduled to come into force on 27 August. 'Since both China and India are among the largest markets in the region, it is essential that they work out a more workable arrangement to make effective use of the RCEP platform," said Dattesh Parulekar, assistant professor of International Relations at Goa University. 'Without mutual understanding between the two, the benefits of such a mega trade pact will remain underutilised." Why India left RCEP in 2019 India's earlier opposition was shaped by key concerns such as an unfavourable trade balance with China, fears that Chinese goods would flood Indian markets through third countries, and New Zealand's plan to supply milk and milk products to India that would hurt India's small farmers and dairy cooperatives, experts said. 'China had been using Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, and other ASEAN nations as platforms to reroute exports into India under existing free trade arrangements, leading to charges of unfair trade practices," said Kondapalli. 'Out of nearly 14,000 tariff lines offered to China under its trade pact with India, Beijing increasingly exploited indirect channels, which became a major sticking point for New Delhi." In the present setup, India's strongest export sectors, such as pharmaceuticals and IT services, face heavy restrictions in China and do not have market access there. Recalibrate China trade strategy Amidst the thaw in India-China relations, a new study by Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (Icrier) has called for a recalibration of India's trade strategy with Beijing, noting that the trade deficit touched a record $99.2 billion in FY25. According to data from the ministry of commerce & industry, India's imports from China increased from $94.57 billion in FY22 to $113.45 billion in FY25. In contrast, exports to China declined from $21.26 billion in FY22 to $14.25 billion in FY25. In the current fiscal, inbound shipments from China during April-July stood at $40.66 billion, up 13.1% from a year earlier. Exports to China, too, jumped 20% to $5.76 billion during the same period. While India's FDI (foreign direct investment) inflows from China have been negligible at $886 million over the past decade, the Icrier study led by professor Nisha Taneja highlighted that India's untapped export potential to China is as high as $161 billion —nearly 10 times the current exports. Strikingly, 74% of this potential lies in medium and high-technology sectors, compared to the present export basket that is dominated by primary and resource-based goods, the report noted. The study highlighted that the realisation of large additional export potential with China has been constrained by several tariff and non-tariff barriers (NTBs). To address market access barriers, it recommended that India and China set up a joint task force to resolve NTBs, and improve transparency through fair testing and WTO-compliant communication. It further suggested diversifying the export base towards high-value products such as telephone sets, aircraft, turbojets, motor vehicle parts, and photo-semiconductor devices. On the import side, the report underscored that complete decoupling from China is unrealistic given its role in global value chains. Instead, India should cut uncompetitive imports worth nearly $30 billion—mainly machinery, electronics, and chemicals—by sourcing from more competitive suppliers such as Vietnam, South Korea, and the UAE.
Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
Nikki Haley urges Trump to treat India as ‘prized free, democratic' partner amid tariffs, warns of ‘Strategic disaster'
As 50 per cent tariffs against India threatens the relationship between India and the United States, former US ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley urged President Donald Trump to view India as a 'prized free and democratic partner' in countering China, warning that undoing 25 years of progress in ties with New Delhi would amount to a 'strategic disaster.' In an opinion piece for Newsweek, Nikki Haley said that the rise of India does not threaten the free world unlike, 'Communist-controlled China.' Nikki Haley said, 'India must be treated like the prized free and democratic partner that it is – not an adversary like China, which has thus far avoided sanctions for its Russian oil purchases, despite being one of Moscow's largest customers.' 'If that disparity does not demand a closer look at U.S.-India relations, the realities of hard power should. Scuttling 25 years of momentum with the only country that can serve as a counterweight to Chinese dominance in Asia would be a strategic disaster,' she said. 'Unlike Communist-controlled China, the rise of a democratic India does not threaten the free world. Partnership between the U.S. and India to counter China should be a no-brainer,' she added. Nikki Haley highlighted India's capacity to manufacture at a scale comparable to China, which she said could help the US shift critical supply chains away from Beijing. She said that China's ambitions will have to shrink as India's power grows. "In the short term, India is essential in helping the United States move its critical supply chains away from China. While the Trump administration works to bring manufacturing back to our shores, India stands alone in its potential to manufacture at a China-like scale for products that can't be quickly or efficiently produced here, like textiles, inexpensive phones, and solar panels," Nikki Haley said in the opinion piece. "India's growing clout and security involvement in the Middle East could prove essential in helping to stabilise the region as America seeks to send fewer troops and dollars there. And India's location at the centre of China's vital trade and energy flows could complicate Beijing's options in the case of a major conflict," she added.
