IBC reforms will benefit distressed real estate projects, experts say
The overhauled IBC will also give property developers greater access to capital and lower funding costs, and help reduce project delays with a creditor-led, out-of-court insolvency route, they said.
Tweaking incentives
The IBC Amendment Bill proposes an ingenious way to encourage creditors to choose a restructuring plan that benefits homebuyers over liquidation. It does so by introducing a new benchmark to decide the payout for dissenting creditors. Banks that don't back a restructuring plan will receive the lesser of the following two – their liquidation entitlement, or what they would have received if, hypothetically, the resolution plan value was disbursed based on the "waterfall mechanism" for distributing proceeds under the IBC.
Banks that don't back a restructuring plan will be paid less than their liquidation entitlement or what they would have received if, hypothetically, the resolution plan value was disbursed based on the "waterfall mechanism" for distributing proceeds under the IBC.
This is expected to discourage banks from blocking resolution plans that benefit homebuyers and insisting on their liquidation entitlement, experts said. Anoop Rawat, national practice head (insolvency and restructuring) at law firm Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co, said the dissenting payout provision appears to remove the motivation to dissent on the basis of a higher liquidation value.
'While the liquidation value (LV) assurance is a globally recognised principle, LV assurance under the code is frequently used for recovery-based decision-making, which adversely impacts successful resolution. The new provision will be of help for real estate projects where the high LV motivates dissentbysecuredfinancial creditors," he said.
Project-wise resolution
The proposed amendments also allow the administrator of the company, hired by lenders, to sell individual assets when required. This enables project-wise resolution while ring-fencing other viable projects from insolvency proceedings.
The proposed creditor-initiated debt resolution scheme allows existing management to continue to run the operations under the oversight of administrator while new investors, shareholders and lenders explore informal restructuring measures.
Experts also said flexible settlement terms could attract a wider pool of investors and boosting valuations. The ability to restructure debt more efficiently would improve cash flow for stressed real estate firms, they added.
'The real estate sector attracts a lot of private and foreign credit. With the proposed reforms in IBC, credit will be more accessible," said Ashwin Bishnoi, partner at law firm Khaitan & Co.
IBC cases have dragged on in recent years owing to a growing number of cases and limited bandwidth of courts, and the overhaul makes clear the government's intent to speed up the process, he said.
'This is good news for both homebuyers and lenders, and will give more confidence.Out-of-court settlement also means that the company doesn't go into insolvency and the business can continue under supervision. This can prevent further delays in such cases," Bishnoi added.
Streamlining insolvency
The government has taken a series of steps of late to make IBC more effective. In February, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), the rule maker for the sector, made amendments to streamline the corporate insolvency resolution process with a special focus on real estate projects. For instance, the resolution professional can, after obtaining necessary approvals, hand over possession of plots, apartments or buildings to homebuyers even during an ongoing resolution process.
The latest IBC reforms will make things even easier for the sector, experts said.A creditor-led insolvency process could speed up resolutions, especially in real estate, they said, reducing the time lost to litigation.
'A quick and predictable process will not only protect brand credibility but also attract more private credit to help complete stuck projects efficiently and provide viable solutions to all stakeholders including homebuyers," said Dinkar Venkatasubramanian,partner and national debt and special situations leader, EY India.
'The bill also has a number of amendments that can help fast-track resolutions and optimise outcomes, including mandatory admission within 14 days, clarity of creditor dues and flexibility to opt for group insolvency or project insolvency," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
Expert view: SKG Investment's director on Nifty's short-term target, earnings revival, impact of Trump tariffs and more
Expert view: Kush Gupta, Director at SKG Investment & Advisory, believes the Indian stock market may remain sideways in the short term, with Nifty trading range-bound between 24,500-26,000 in the coming few months. In an interview with Mint, Gupta shared his views on the potential impact of tariffs, earnings revival and the IT sector's outlook. Here are edited excerpts of the interview Trump's tariffs came as a big surprise to India Inc. We have always enjoyed a healthy relationship with the US through various bilateral engagements, IT services exports, and a huge NRI community, so it is certainly disappointing that they specifically target Indian companies with the highest possible tariffs. We started the year with a lot of positivity, domestic equity inflows were strong, but geopolitical developments such as this one have definitely hampered the outlook and shifted moods. The collateral damage in terms of FIIs pulling out of Indian equities also can't be ignored. This weak global sentiment, along with weak earnings, has led to a lacklustre performance from Nifty, with only nearly 6 per cent YTD returns. Going forward, to hit a record mark of 27,000 this year, Nifty has to go up by 5 per cent within 5 months. While it may not look like a very uphill battle, I would be cautious in predicting that. I think there will be a sideways movement, with Nifty range-bound between 24,500 and 26,000 in the coming few months. A better earnings season in October has the potential to reverse the sentiment, though. India has become a target in Trump's tariff wars, but it has also been a tool for the US administration to achieve political goals, such as exerting pressure on Russia. Whatever the reasons may be, the Indian economy will surely take a punch in the gut when the tariffs kick in. With a 50 per cent rate hike, almost all of India's $86.5 billion [£64.7 billion] in annual goods exports to the US stand to become commercially unviable once it kicks in. The US is India's top export market, accounting for 18 per cent of exports and 2.2 per cent of GDP. A 25 per cent tariff could cut GDP by 0.2–0.4 per cent, risking growth slipping below 6 per cent this year. India's electronics and pharma exports remain exempt from additional tariffs for now, but the impact will be felt domestically, with labour-intensive exports like textiles, gems, and jewellery taking the fall. Apart from the economic setback, this is a major sentimental dent on Indian exporters and the government, which is trying very hard to push the vision of Atmanirbhar Bharat and grow its manufacturing sector. June 2025 quarter earnings for Nifty 50 companies have so far delivered a largely in-line performance. Growth was powered by a few key sectors: BFSI (4 per cent YoY), technology (7 per cent), oil and gas (7 per cent), cement (47 per cent), and utilities (13 per cent). While broader participation would have been better, one has to understand that not all cylinders fire at the same time in an economy. Global institutions such as Jefferies stated that the results were better than expected, and the downgrade ratio is improving sequentially. Motilal Oswal Financial Services (MOFS) also reported that earnings for 38 Nifty firms grew 7.5 per cent year over year, ahead of their estimate of 5.7 per cent. In light of the above, I think revival in earnings is showing positive signs, we can continue the momentum going into the festive months, and Q3 and Q4 are expected to outperform (as they usually do) the first two quarters. While Q1 earnings were not great and did not give a reason to stand up and cheer for India Inc., they have not disappointed us either. In fact, given the global circumstances, a slowdown in earnings for the last three to four quarters and a slight revival shown in FY26 are reasons to cheer. However, going forward, there have been mixed forecasts. MSCI India's FY26 EPS has been trimmed by 1.7 per cent, and Nifty EPS for FY26 has been cut by 1.1 per cent to ₹ 1,110. FY27 EPS estimates have also been trimmed by 0.8 per cent to ₹ 1,297 (from ₹ 1,308). We are underweight on IT, Metals and textiles. I think tariff wars will continue to create havoc in the manufacturing sector while IT is battling a massive transformation led by AI. Key upgrades include healthcare, infra, financial services, and telecom. While there has been a steady flight of foreign funds at a market-wide level, these sectors witnessed a strong rebound in foreign portfolio investment flows in May and June 2025. Domestic consumer spending remains a reliable pillar. The Reserve Bank of India has implemented a 100-basis-point rate cut over three consecutive policy meetings, aiming to drive credit growth and boost both investment and consumer spending. Owing to policy making and a young demographic, we are overweight on Consumer Durables as well. India's growth narrative is going strong, and our macroeconomic fundamentals have shown remarkable resilience. The economy grew 7.4 per cent year over year in the final quarter of fiscal year 2024 to 20252—with 6.5 per cent growth for the whole year—setting the stage for a more confident outlook for fiscal year 2025 to 2026. India's economic outlook is buoyed by three factors: a growing consumer base, a broadening investment landscape, and a digitally skilled workforce. Urban spending is rising, and private capital expenditures are showing positive signs. According to a Deloitte report, India went from being the 11th largest economy in the world in 2009 to fifth in 2024, so there is definitely momentum to go far. On the reforms side, I feel there is still a lot of work to be done in improving 'ease of business', land acquisition laws to promote manufacturing, and relaxation of FIIs / FDI norms to facilitate more investments. While there has been significant growth in infrastructure, India is a very big country, connectivity is still not at its best, and there is a lot of headroom in Infrastructure growth that can change our economic landscape. India's IT sector is a $280 billion industry that serves as the backbone of our services-led economy. While IT is not directly hit by the tariffs raised by the Trump administration, we expect that collateral damage in terms of client sentiment, discretionary spending, and the flow of large deals cannot be ignored. Tighter or delayed client spending can cause downstream ripple effects and affect the performance of companies. IT is already undergoing transformation due to the AI revolution, companies are forced to change their business models and adapt to the new norm, so the timing also doesn't help. While spending on technology, data systems, and automation has increased, other factors may slow overall growth. We are maintaining a wait-and-watch view on IT companies, refraining from taking any calls until there is more clarity on the tariff front. With an erratic geopolitical situation and a dynamic environment with AI and GPUs replacing the old established order, it is difficult to predict a short-term trend. While most economies are battling tariff wars and the US is trying to establish a new world order, I believe that the Indian growth story is intact. We are going strong in sectors like financial services, telecommunications, cement and consumer durables. Earnings growth in Q1 FY26 showed revival in these pockets with double-digit growth. Consumption spending is on a sustained rise, and in the near term, easing inflation and proactive monetary policy are expected to further fuel consumption spending. By 2030, the country is expected to add around 75 million middle-income households and 25 million rich and affluent households. This demographic shift will position India as one of the fastest-growing consumer markets globally. With an increase in 5G adoption and Jio announcing its plans for 6G expansion, telecom should continue its robust growth as the country gets connectivity in the remotest corners. The government's initiatives to push infrastructure and the recent real estate boom are turning out to be a much-needed lifeline for the cement sector. The industry faced many challenges in 2024, but this year, it has seen revival, and we expect 8-10 per cent growth going forward. I think, firstly, retail investors should not panic. Market volatility is part of the stock market. It may seem like there is a lot of tension with tariff wars, geopolitical unrest, and earnings slowdown, but there are always factors affecting the market. Today, the Nifty is at the same level as it was one year ago, and in spite of that, its five-year absolute return is 118 per cent. That shows significant growth and should give investors confidence to stay put, ride out the storm, and wait for the next upcycle. A good investment strategy should be to identify sectors that are likely to do well through these turbulent times. India's consumption is growing, infrastructure and telecom services are expanding, and financial services are being penetrated deeper. Investors can focus on these sectors to generate returns on their portfolios before the dust settles and we see broader market growth, like we saw post-COVID. Read all market-related news here Read more stories by Nishant Kumar Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations expressed are those of individual analysts or broking firms, not Mint. We advise investors to consult with certified experts before making any investment decisions, as market conditions can change rapidly and circumstances may vary.
Fibre2Fashion
38 minutes ago
- Fibre2Fashion
US' Levi's names Chris Callieri as chief supply chain officer
Levi Strauss & Co. (LS&Co., NYSE: LEVI) announced the appointment of Chris Callieri as senior vice president and chief supply chain officer, effective September 15. Reporting to Michelle Gass, president and chief executive officer, Callieri will join the company's executive leadership team and will be responsible for the global supply chain operations for the Levi's brand. His responsibilities include product development, sourcing, global supply management, sustainability, and distribution and logistics. Levi Strauss & Co has appointed Chris Callieri as SVP and chief supply chain officer, effective September 15. Reporting to CEO Michelle Gass, he will oversee global supply chain operations, including sourcing, sustainability and logistics. Callieri brings 20+ years' experience from Victoria's Secret, Tory Burch and Adidas, with a strong focus on innovation and sustainability. 'We're excited to welcome Chris to LS&Co. at this pivotal moment in our evolution into a DTC-first denim lifestyle company," said Gass. "With a proven track record of delivering results at scale, he's the right leader to strengthen our end-to-end supply chain agility, drive innovation, and advance our sustainability goals — all while delivering exceptional value to our fans worldwide. " Callieri brings more than 20 years of international supply chain experience in the retail and consumer goods industries. He joins LS&Co. from Victoria's Secret & Co., where he served as chief supply chain officer, leading a global team across multiple geographies and overseeing product development, sourcing, production, and distribution and logistics for various categories including intimates, apparel, accessories and beauty. Previously he was at Tory Burch, where he was pivotal in implementing systems like PLM, Merchandise Planning and SAP, and led the transformation of the supply chain. Chris has a long-standing commitment to sustainability and established Tory Burch's sustainability team and strategy. Prior to Tory Burch, Callieri held senior roles at Adidas, including senior vice president, product operations, where he was responsible for materials development, product development, sourcing and logistics for Adidas Lifestyle Brands. Callieri's extensive experience also includes leadership roles at HRC Advisory and A.T. Kearney, where he led various transformation initiatives and developed strategies to improve supply chain responsiveness and product innovation for leading retailers. 'I'm thrilled to join LS&Co. at such an exciting time for the iconic Levi's brand, a true category leader that thrives at the center of culture," Callieri said. "I look forward to working with the talented LS&Co. team to deliver strong performance, serve our fans around the world, and strengthen Levi's position as the world's definitive denim lifestyle brand." Note: The headline, insights, and image of this press release may have been refined by the Fibre2Fashion staff; the rest of the content remains unchanged. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (HU)
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Online gaming ban: Startups prepare Supreme Court challenge
NEW DELHI: India's online gaming startups are preparing to take the Centre to court after the government unveiled a sweeping ban that could wipe out their businesses overnight. The looming legal clash is expected to test whether New Delhi can override states in regulating a sector long considered a state subject. On Tuesday, the Union cabinet cleared the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, which seeks a complete ban on any game involving money. The bill prohibits not only play but also payments and advertising for services such as fantasy sports apps Dream11 and My11Circle, online rummy platforms RummyCulture and RummyCircle, and casual games like Pool Champs and Online Carrom. Lawyers representing startups told Mint the legislation is almost certain to be challenged in the Supreme Court, with the dispute likely to centre on whether the Centre has authority to legislate in a domain historically overseen by states. Crucially, the bill does not distinguish between games of 'skill" and games of 'chance"—a line the Supreme Court itself has previously ruled upon. That omission is expected to become the central point of contention. Meanwhile, with the Bill being tabled in Parliament today, industry groups have begun lobbying for political intervention. Earlier today, Mint reported that representative bodies wrote to union home minister Amit Shah, warning that the ban would lead to the loss of 200,000 jobs and force 400 companies to shut down. Legal pushback Five lawyers representing various online gaming startups at the top court confirmed that legal recourse is under consideration. Lawyers say the Supreme Court can step in to shield the industry with interim relief if the proposed bill becomes law and is immediately challenged. 'If the bill becomes law and is immediately challenged, the Supreme Court may not strike it down at the very first hearing. But there is a strong likelihood that it will grant interim relief—such as a stay on prosecutions or a status quo order—to prevent irreparable harm while arguments are heard. The Court could also issue notice to the government to explain the rationale behind introducing such a law," said Sahil Kothari, associate partner, Economic Laws Practice. According to Kothari, since the Supreme Court has already reserved its verdict on the challenges to the 28% GST levy on gaming companies, the new law cannot automatically come under consideration in that matter. To bring it before the court, parties would either have to file a fresh petition or move an application or additional affidavit highlighting the new provisions. Even with interim relief possible, the stakes remain high. 'There were no consultations held with the industry, and if it becomes law, we're staring at a game-changer for online gaming firms that were growing fast and generating significant revenue," said Sajan Poovayya, senior advocate at the Supreme Court. 'There is no doubt that it would be challenged in court—there is precedent of such challenges having been made before, especially since the proposed bill makes no effort to distinguish between a game of chance and skill—and paints any title with the same brush." He added that the bill will 'hit the startups hard." Arun Prabhu, partner and co-head for digital and tech-media-telecom (TMT) at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, said the government is overlooking existing frameworks. 'There is already a long-standing body of law recording the distinction between games of skill and games of chance, which has distinguished permitted and non-permitted formats in online games," Prabhu said. 'While the Bill apparently aims to make distinctions in favour of some formats like esports and social games through certification, a more nuanced and granular co-regulatory framework was already created as rules for online gaming intermediaries (in 2023). This provided mechanisms to regulate or even ban operators, including offshore platforms. If the government simply implements these frameworks effectively, many of the sector's concerns—such as unregulated operations and social risks—could be addressed without resorting to a blanket ban," he said. Other lawyers warned that the legislation conflates gaming with gambling and could push players to unregulated foreign platforms. 'The Centre's legal move would basically destroy the startups in terms of being able to operate anywhere, and lead to interested players moving to offshore operators and playing such games anyway. The bill leaves no room for interpretation, and correlates money games to gambling—which too is unconstitutional since gambling itself is a state subject," said Jay Sayta, a technology and gaming lawyer. The government, however, has defended its position. A senior official involved in drafting the bill told Mint that, 'the law is not unconstitutional at all, because on behalf of the Centre, we are cracking down on the industry and its role in cross-border money laundering—which is clearly a central subject, and not for states to adjudicate." 'Plus, the sector has for long been clamouring to get regulated by the Centre. Them claiming now that the industry was a state subject is rather unfair," the official added. Lawyers said the broad scope of the bill, covering criminal liability, advertising, and classification, gives startups multiple grounds for challenge. 'Startups could argue that the law is arbitrary or irrational, particularly if it criminalizes activities previously recognized as legal under the 'game of skill' framework. Secondly, the provisions on criminal liability and advertising are broadly drafted, raising questions about intent, responsibility, and fairness. Thirdly, since betting and gambling are state subjects, conflicts could arise between state-permitted formats—like those in Nagaland and Sikkim—and a central prohibition, opening the door to challenges," said CAM's Prabhu. He added that stakeholders may also question whether the Centre has legislative competence to impose such a ban, and whether 'such a classification fairly balances public interest with the right to conduct legitimate business." The looming battle adds to the industry's troubles. A separate dispute is already before the Supreme Court over retrospective goods and services tax demands of more than ₹2 trillion, dating back to fiscal year 2017.
