Who's getting sacked in Australia?
The ABS just dropped some new data on jobs in Australia and one of my favourite things to do is look in it to see who is getting fired, getting sacked, getting the old heave-ho.
The ABS calls it getting 'dismissed'.
Being dismissed in Australia is kind of rare. It's not like the American TV shows where the boss shows up at your desk and shouts at you and that's it. Lol, if that happens in Australia you take your employer to court and stroll home with a tidy payout of up to six months pay.
Even if they think they have a strong case against you, and you're racked up thousands on your corporate card, you can still win.
To get sacked in Australia you have to do something pretty damn bad. Which is what makes the statistics so intriguing. I'd love to see how many sackings are in December, right after the Christmas party, but the ABS only has annual statistics.
Here we can see that the number of Aussies who got sacked last year, and it is up slightly on the year before. In the last year, people have bee running amok and getting fired at quite high levels. Unsurprisingly it is us menfolk getting dismissed more often than women. But are we getting fired disproportionately? When you consider that men still make up more of the workforce than women the difference disappears a bit. Women are up to no good at work too!
The young are also more likely to be sacked, as the next chart shows. Is that because of skylarking and pranks, or is it just because bosses get rid of the least skilled workers when things go bad, it's not clear.
While firing the youth is the general trend, shout out to the Gen Xers who got themselves fired last year – in large numbers! The 45-64 year bracket was actually second-most likely to get fired last year.
One more chart: Here we can see which states have the highest rate of sackings, and in this particular State of Origin showdown the Maroons have the edge. Shout out to Victoria which despite a lower population than NSW is ahead on sackings in 2024-25.
In Australia we have labour laws and one of the things they do is make sacking rare. (Even if you sexually harass the customers, you can still win in court if you are not sacked in the exact right way).
These strict laws are awesome 99 per cent of the time because it means an angry boss can't boot you if they're having a bad day. But it also means we've all worked with someone who desperately needed to be sacked but instead carried on, doing stuff-all and making work life very, very painful for everyone else.
Instead of sacking people, which is an administrative and legal nightmare, sometimes what an organisation will do to shuffle out a bad egg is totally restructure itself. With a new structure, some jobs can be made redundant. Problem solved. Of course that's not the main reason for redundancy. You also get redundancies when a company genuinely isn't doing very well and needs to cut costs. There's voluntary ones and involuntary.
In the next chart we can see redundancies, which the ABS calls retrenchments. The most important thing to notice is there's way more of them than there were sackings. There were 25,000 people being sacked each year, but 250,000 retrenchments. Men are still leading here, but again, since men hold more jobs than women, it's not out of line.
Getting sacked in Australia is rare, you're certainly not going to get the old heave-ho for
reading the internet at work.
So settle in, have a browse around. Maybe you'll like to read about this guy: a very senior police officer, who had '13 beers and eight spirit drinks' and was 'dancing drunk in a McDonald's' ('flossing', apparently) before he 'crashed [his] unmarked car into a concrete barrier in Sydney's NorthConnex tunnel' and then 'deliberately left the scene'.
And he didn't even lose his job – he's reportedly on paid leave!

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Two winning tickets have shared in the $30m Oz Lotto jackpot on Tuesday night
Life's about to change for at least two lucky Aussies who hold the winning tickets in Tuesday's Oz Lotto's draw, sharing the division one $30m jackpot. The winning tickets are worth $15m each. It is not yet known where the winning tickets were purchased. The winning numbers in Tuesday's draw are: 11, 32, 40, 42, 38, 29, 34 and the supplementaries are 15, 3 and 47. Six tickets across Australia will also share in the division two prize pool worth $448,521. Last month, a Tasmanian man become that state's biggest Lotto winner when he claimed the $70m jackpot. There have been 310 division one winning Lotto tickets across Australia this year taking home almost $1bn in prize money.


SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Australia set to seal $10 billion warship deal with Japan with long-term cost unclear
Australia set to seal $10 billion warship deal with Japan with long-term cost unclear Published 5 August 2025, 8:12 am It's been lauded as a significant moment in Australia's relationship with Japan. The government is poised to sign a $10 billion deal with one of the nation's largest shipbuilders, for the design and build of the next generation of Australia's naval frigates. It came following an intense bidding process, but the long term cost to taxpayers is not yet clear.

The Australian
3 hours ago
- The Australian
TPG Telecom reveals $4.7bn plan to slash debt, free up share registry
The Australian Business Network The bulk of the mobile operator came about following a truce between bitter telco rivals based in London and Hong Kong. Then five years ago, Vodafone Australia combined with broadband upstart TPG, itself a product of a string of telco buyouts, including iiNet and AAPT. Even that $10bn mash-up between Vodafone Australia and TPG almost didn't go ahead when the competition regulator attempted to thwart the deal. Along the way, there have been efforts by TPG to hook up with big rival Telstra to secure better coverage in the bush, but this eventually switched to Optus. It's been a wild ride for the little telco now called TPG Telecom. Flush with cash, chief executive Iñaki Berroeta reckons his telco has the best shot yet of becoming more than the third force. After coming off a massive 5G investment cycle, Berroeta doesn't need to spend more building out TPG's network. This time, it's about getting the back end of his business in shape, including slashing debt. Berroeta spelt out his plans for the $4.7bn windfall from last year's sale of its fibre network to Macquarie-backed Vocus. Berroeta says there were three aims from this: return funds to shareholders, slash debt and free-up the register. This will create what TPG has always craved, a simpler, leaner telco. As expected, $3bn of the funds will go back to shareholders, but under a simultaneous 'de facto' $688m capital raising, this also frees up billions to pay down debt. It's not all that simple. In an elegant solution thrashed out by TPG's bankers, Bank of America, a capital return has been structured as a share reduction, but minority shareholders can elect to take their returns in either cash or new TPG shares. This 'reinvestment' is the trigger which raises the additional funds to slash its debt pile almost in half. It is designed as a way to loosen up a tight — but friendly — shareholder grip on the registry. 'Shareholder curse' TPG has suffered from the shareholder 'curse' where several big investors crowd the share registry. In this case, the holdings are split between Hong Kong's Hutchinson, London's Vodafone, TPG founder David Teoh and long-time TPG/Teoh-backer Soul Patts. Combined, they have 77 per cent. The low liquidity has turned off some investors. All the big shareholders support the plan to take this stake proportionally down to 70 per cent, without triggering massive tax liabilities which would have otherwise come from a share sale. The exercise will be closely watched as one of Australia's most ambitious efforts yet in trying to free up the share registry while keeping big shareholders happy. It can only happen where everyone is on the same page and agrees to sit out of the reinvestment. The next step, the debt reduction, is just as critical. Wiping as much as $2.4bn from debt is set to deliver TPG a long-sought after investment grade credit rating (S&P issued a BBB rating on Tuesday). At the same time, lower debt repayments will free up substantial spare cash for future capex while underpinning dividends. There's also another $100m of costs to come out of TPG's business in coming years, adding to the free cash it generates. Given the ongoing demands of heavy spending and saturation of the market, telcos are no longer the growth animals they once promised. Now, the name of the game is keeping costs and debt down to generate as much cash as possible to return to investors. Even with 5.5 million mobile customers, Berroeta reckons TPG can do both — grow and return cash to investors. 'It's not that we choose between one or the other,' Berroeta says about growth versus income. 'We are a good income company, at the same time growing higher than the industry. 'That is a spot where we want to be'. He is anticipating a market share boost coming with its entry into regional Australia through last year's landmark network sharing deal with Optus. This will see it compete not only against Optus in the regions, but also Telstra. Although 5G is behind it, the next big investment phase is still coming over the horizon — the move to 6G services, which should start from the end of the decade. The demands won't be anywhere on the scale of the billions spent by the industry, however, in the switch from 4G to 5G and further upgrades. The 6G network will mostly be on software spending, which can leverage existing and mobile wireless equipment. With lower demands for capex spending, this means the telco race won't be won purely who has the bigger balance sheet. It will be built around who has the best offer for Australian consumers. johnstone@ Eric Johnston Associate Editor Eric Johnston is an associate editor of The Australian. He has more than 25 years experience as a finance journalist, including a former business editor of The Australian. He has been business editor of The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age and financial services editor with The Australian Financial Review. His work has also appeared in The Wall Street Journal.