Taylor Swift, Lady Gaga Dominate Webby Awards 2025
Published By :
Trending Desk
Kendrick Lamar's Not Like Us won the Webby Award for Music Video, Creator Excellence, bringing another feather to the rapper's cap.
The winners of the 29th Annual Webby Awards have been announced, celebrating excellence across the internet. This year, several musical powerhouses were recognised, including Kendrick Lamar, Lady Gaga, Ariana Grande, Taylor Swift, Rihanna, Selena Gomez and Cynthia Erivo. Alongside these celebrated artists, notable brands and digital creators also secured wins, reflecting the diverse range of talent honoured at the event.
To begin with, Kendrick Lamar's Not Like Us went on to win the Webby Award for Music Video, Creator Excellence, bringing another feather to the rapper's cap. Gracie Abrams' The Secret of Us (Short Film) I Vevo Extended Play bagged the People's Voice Award for Music, General Video & Film, whereas Gaga's A Digital Home for a Global Pop Icon won the award for Entertainment, General Desktop & Mobile Sites (Websites and Mobile Sites).
Others to win from the field of music included Taylor Swift, Gomez, Rihanna, Benson Boone, Mariah Carey, Laufef, Jelly Roll with MGK, and Questlove for their digital achievements.
The Webby Awards also dished out special achievement awards to Snoop Dogg (Entrepreneur of the Year), Amelia Dimoldenberg (Webby Special Achievement), Walton Goggins (Best Actor for The White Lotus), Jasmine Crockett (Advocate of the Year), and Marcello Hernandez (Outstanding Comedic Performance). Additionally, Dr Fei-Fei Li is set to receive the lifetime achievement award.
The 2025 Webby Awards will be held on May 12 at the Cipriani Wall Street in New York City. It will be hosted by Ilana Glazer. Presented by the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences (IADAS), the Webbys honours excellence in major media types including Websites and Mobile Sites; Video & Film; Advertising, Media & PR; Apps & Software; Social; Podcasts; AI, Immersive & Games, followed by a new addition this year with Creators.
First Published:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
21 hours ago
- NDTV
Taylor Swift Now Owns All The Music She Ever Made. Why That Wasn't The Case
On Friday, Taylor Swift announced she now owns all the music she has ever made. This reported US$360 million acquisition includes all the master recordings to her first six albums, music videos, concert films, album art, photos and unreleased material. The purchase of this catalogue from private equity firm Shamrock Capital is a profoundly happy event for Swift. She has expressed how personal and difficult it was not to own these works. In her announcement, Swift acknowledged that it was due to her fans purchasing her rerecorded music (known as 'Taylor's Version') and the financial success of the record-breaking Eras Tour which enabled this purchase. The story behind 'Taylor's Version' and why she didn't own the catalogue to her original six albums is due to copyright, music industry practices and contractual terms. Let's break it down. What's in a music catalogue? When it comes to valuing a music catalogue, it largely comes down to two types of rights: master rights and publishing rights. Master rights are rights pertaining to the ownership of the actual sound recordings – the final recorded version. These are called 'masters' because they're the original source from which all copies are made. Under traditional music industry contracts, record labels usually hold ownership of masters and associated materials. This can be music videos, tour videos, unreleased works, photographs and album covers. Through licensing, the label controls the use of this material and retains the majority of the royalties. In return, the label provides the artist with financial backing, recording resources and marketing. Publishing rights, on the other hand, relate to the underlying composition – the music and lyrics. The rights to music publishing usually belong to the songwriter, regardless of who performs the song. Publishing rights govern how a song can be used and who earns royalties from that use. For example, a song may be played on a streaming platform, covered in a live performance or licensed for a commercial or film. Swift's contracts Swift was 15-years-old when she was signed to Scott Borchetta's Big Machine record label. The agreed contractual terms were typical of the music industry. In exchange for the financial support to make, record and promote her subsequent albums and tours, Big Machine held the rights to Swift's master recordings and associated materials in her first six albums. Her relationship with the label lasted 13 years. As a songwriter, Swift retained separate publishing rights to her songs (the music and lyrics) from her first six albums, which she licensed through Sony/ATV Music Publishing. In 2018, Swift was reportedly offered to re-sign with Big Machine, in a deal which would involve her 'earning' the rights to one original album for each new one she produced. Swift did not renew her contract and moved to Republic Records (Universal Music Group), who allow her to own her masters. She also moved to Universal Music Publishing Group for her music publishing. Subsequent sales In June 2019, Big Machine's catalogue was sold to Scooter Braun's Ithaca Holdings, for a reported US$330 million, with US$140 million representing Swift's catalogue. Swift described this as her ' worst case scenario ', as she had a tumultuous history of alleged bullying from Braun. She also alleged she found out about the acquisition at the time it was announced to the world, without being given the opportunity to purchase her catalogue. Throughout 2019 and 2020 it was reported she attempted to regain ownership, but negotiations fell through. In October 2020, Swift's catalogue was sold to Shamrock Capital, a private equity firm, for an estimated US$300+ million. In recent years, private equity firms have been purchasing music catalogues as profitable long-term financial assets, rather than for artistic or cultural reasons. These events led Swift to rerecord her first six albums, branding them 'Taylor's Version'. Four have been released. She was able to create new versions of her songs, with their own intellectual property rights attached. As owner of these new masters, she has control over where these songs are used, and she receives a greater portion of the income from the streams, downloads and licensing. The decision was enormously successful. Mobilising her fans' support via social media, they prioritised purchasing 'Taylor's Version' over the original masters, diluting the value of the originals. Successful futures Swift has repeatedly emphasised the need for artists to retain control over their work and to receive fair compensation. In a 2020 interview she said she believes artists should always own their master records and licence them back to the label for a limited period. This would mean the label could monetise, control and manage the recordings for a certain time, but the artist retains the ownership. They eventually gain back full control, rather than handing over permanent rights to the label. Swift's experience has sparked conversations within the industry, prompting emerging artists to approach record labels with caution and advocate for fairer deals and ownership rights. Olivia Rodrigo negotiated her contract with Swift's saga as a cautionary tale. Purchasing her catalogue and masters gives Swift autonomy about how the rights to all of her music is used. Her fans are likely to continue to support her and purchase both the originals and 'Taylor's Version', so the value of her original albums may rise. And, in the long-run, her new acquisition will likely make her much wealthier. (Author: Wellett Potter, Lecturer in Law, University of New England)
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift Age Gap: How many years apart are the NFL star and pop icon?
Exploring the age difference between Taylor Swift & Travis Kelce (Getty Images) In the whirlwind romance between Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce and pop music sensation Taylor Swift , fans and followers have zoomed in on everything — from their fashion choices to public outings. But one detail that continues to intrigue the internet is their age gap. So, how many years apart are the NFL star and the Grammy-winning artist? A closer look at the actual ages and birthdates of Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Taylor Swift was born on December 13, 1989, while Travis Kelce's birthday falls on October 5, 1989. That means they're both part of the same birth year, with just over two months separating them. Yes, despite the ongoing discussions, Travis is only two months older than Taylor. This technically makes them the same age, debunking the perception that there's a significant age gap between them. This tiny age difference, however, hasn't stopped the speculation and chatter from fans online. Whether it's because of their different industries or contrasting public personas, many assumed a much wider age gap existed. But the reality is that their timelines have always been close — both personally and professionally. Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce (Getty Images) Public reactions and the cultural fascination with age gaps In celebrity culture, age differences often dominate headlines, especially when they stretch across generations. But in Kelce and Swift's case, the irony lies in the fact that people are discussing a gap that barely exists. One fan humorously tweeted, 'Wait... the 'age gap' between Travis and Taylor is two months? That's my cue to log off.' While some joked about the non-issue, others pointed to a broader obsession with celebrity relationships, where fans often create drama out of ordinary facts. Their age parity actually lends them a unique compatibility — both grew up during the same cultural milestones, which possibly strengthens their shared understanding of fame, pressure, and public scrutiny. Though their professions differ vastly — one dominates stadiums on Sundays, the other sells them out on tour nights — Travis and Taylor's near-identical ages may play a role in how easily they relate to one another. They've both spent over a decade in the limelight, growing through highs and lows of global stardom. Also Read: Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce spark fresh buzz with intimate Palm Beach date night amid career milestones In an age when celebrity romances are scrutinized under a microscope, it's refreshing to see two icons connect not because of spectacle, but because of a shared foundation. Their minimal age gap simply underscores how aligned their journeys truly are — more proof that sometimes, love really is about timing.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Taylor Swift's inner circle says she's wondering when Travis Kelce will pop the question, is a ring coming soon?
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce 's romance is heating up, but so is the speculation about a possible proposal. The pop sensation is probably wondering when he will get down on one knee. The timeline of Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's engagement has piqued the interest of both the singer and internet users Is Travis Kelce planning a summer proposal? Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are one of the most powerful couples, and fans are eagerly waiting for their engagement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Has Toyota Done It Again? The New RAV4 Is Finally Here (Take A Peek) FrequentSearches | Search Ads Learn More Undo The NFL player has already been working on the ring, so it appears that the couple's engagement window is set, according to an insider. Taylor Swift would adore getting engaged by the time Travis Kelce rejoins the NFL. A lot of people even think Kelce is considering a summer proposal, as per a report by Reality Tea. Live Events A RadarOnline source has now revealed more details about the most anticipated major event. The insider claims that the tight end for the Kansas City Chiefs wants the proposal to be flawless. Why hasn't he proposed yet? Travis Kelce wants to craft a spectacular proposal that surpasses other significant and memorable events in his girlfriend's life. The NFL player is facing pressure not only from Swift but also from Swifties and the media, who are exaggerating their relationship. ALSO READ: Big win for users! EU's new rules force Android makers to offer 5 years of software and 7 years of repairs - key points This pressure is enough to make anyone freeze, according to the insider. Travis Kelce has been meeting with a private jeweler to design "custom" rings. According to a report by Reality Tea, the eagerly awaited proposal would proceed, but not just yet. How does Taylor Swift feel about the delay? It is widely believed that Kelce is aiming for a summer proposal before starting his NFL training. Taylor is not pressuring him to get engaged before football season ends, but she would love it if he did. While Swift is entangled in Blake Lively's legal battle against Justin Baldoni, the NFL star also wants to make sure the timing of the proposal is perfect. He wants the moment to be free of the ongoing drama. But according to reports, Swift is "a little anxious" about the proposal. She reportedly maintains her optimism in the face of this. She trusts him; however, she is undoubtedly beginning to question how long this will continue. FAQs Is Taylor Swift expecting a proposal soon? According to sources, she hopes Travis Kelce proposes this summer. Why is Travis Kelce delaying the proposal? He wants the timing to be right while avoiding any surrounding drama.
