Google loses appeal over app store reforms in Epic Games case
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a unanimous ruling, rejected claims from Google that the trial judge made legal errors in the antitrust case that unfairly benefited "Fortnite" maker Epic Games, which filed the lawsuit in 2020.
Epic accused Google of monopolizing how consumers access apps on Android devices and pay for transactions within apps. The Cary, North Carolina-based company convinced a San Francisco jury in 2023 that Google illegally stifled competition.
U.S. District Judge James Donato in San Francisco ordered Google in October to restore competition by allowing users to download rival app stores within its Play store and by making Play's app catalog available to those competitors, among other reforms.
Donato's order was on hold pending the outcome of the 9th Circuit appeal. The court's decision can be appealed to the full 9th Circuit and ultimately to the U.S. Supreme Court.
In a statement, Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google's vice president of regulatory affairs, said the appeals court's ruling "will significantly harm user safety, limit choice, and undermine the innovation that has always been central to the Android ecosystem."
The company said it would continue to focus on "ensuring a secure platform as we continue our appeal."
Epic CEO Tim Sweeney said in a social media post: "Thanks to the verdict, the Epic Games Store for Android will be coming to the Google Play Store!"
Google told the appeals court that the tech company's Play store competes with Apple's AAPL.O App Store, and that Donato unfairly barred Google from making that point to contest Epic's antitrust claims.
The tech company also argued that a jury should never have heard Epic's lawsuit because it sought to enjoin Google's conduct — a request normally decided by a judge — and not collect damages.
Epic has defended the verdict and court injunction, telling the 9th Circuit judges that the Android app market has been "suffering under anti-competitive behavior for the better part of a decade."
In the trial court and in the appeal, Epic disputed arguments by Google that changes to its app business ordered by the court would harm user privacy and security.
Microsoft MSFT.O filed a brief backing Epic, as did the U.S. Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission.
Epic separately is battling Apple over a U.S. judge's order requiring the iPhone maker to give developers greater freedom to steer consumers to make purchases outside its App Store.
Apple has appealed a ruling that said it violated a prior injunction in a lawsuit that Epic filed in 2020.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
23 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
I just tested the OnePlus Buds 4 — and they're equally impressive and disappointing
One of the more underrated wireless earbuds makers of the past three years has been OnePlus. Yes, the Android smartphone manufacturer. Several of the brand's true wireless offerings have been well received by critics and consumers, mainly OnePlus users who've clamored for their own AirPods alternatives. Models like the OnePlus Buds 3 proved that inexpensive buds could match the sonic prowess of the best wireless earbuds at a fraction of the cost. OnePlus felt an upgrade was due, so they launched the all-new Buds 4, which welcome some nifty enhancements to the series. We're talking adaptive active noise cancellation, AI integration, and touch volume controls. While the Buds 4 excel in trademark areas (e.g., battery life, sound), they're inundated with flaws and kinks that undermine performance. Read my full thoughts below. The OnePlus Buds 4 sell for $129 / £94 / AU$196 and come in two colors: Storm Gray and Zen Green. You can purchase them directly on OnePlus' website. These buds are less expensive than the popular $169 AirPods 4 with ANC, but are priced higher than bargain gems like the $119 Sony WF-C710N and $79 EarFun Air Pro 4. Aesthetically, the Buds 4 are a downgrade from the Buds 3. They essentially took the Nord Buds 3 Pro's design and made it longer and slimmer. Ditching the aluminum stems for plastic takes away from the product's semi-luxe appearance; the former produced a nice shimmer when exposed to light. The color options are less appealing as well (metallic gray and splendid blue look way cooler). At least the buds are well protected. A solid exterior combined with IP55 certification prevents damage caused by dust and water splashing from low-pressure jets. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The charging case is less striking than the previous version. It retains the Nord Buds 3 Pro's chic, pebble-shaped design with a pairing button on the side. I prefer the Buds 3's rectangular case. You can wear these buds for 3 hours straight before fatigue sets in. The silicone tips keep them stable when jogging or speedwalking. Two extra pairs of different-sized tips come bundled with the purchase. There's also the earbud fit test in the companion app to optimize fit. All Android and iOS users can download the HeyMelody app to access select features: dual-device pairing, earbud fit test, Find My Earbuds, firmware updates, and most flagship audio modes (3D Audio, Game Mode, Golden Sound, Noise Control, Sound Master EQ). Those who own a current OnePlus device (smartphone or tablet) gain exclusives like AI Translate, control customization, and Hi-Res mode (LHDC). The Buds 4 would have greatly benefited from having all features available to all users, no matter the operating system. OnePlus' AI-powered translation features don't top Google Translate, but what's here is serviceable. Face-to-Face is fine for translating languages, so you can have fluid exchanges with foreigners. Live translation comes in handy if you want to dictate long-form dialogue for others to read and interpret on your OnePlus device. The Buds 4 come loaded with functions. AI translation, call management, digital assistance, listening modes, playback, and volume are at your disposal. OnePlus even added a camera function to trigger the back camera on your OnePlus phone. Lag is evident when applying tap inputs (there's about a 2-second delay). Slide gestures demonstrate better accuracy for seamless volume adjustment. The camera control is spot-on. Wear detection immediately pauses playback when taking off the buds. OnePlus' powerful mic array makes voice commands a breeze to execute. I threw several long-winded inquiries at Google Gemini and the AI bot registered most correctly. Siri worked best when vocalizing standard commands. Sound on the Buds 3 was engaging and nicely balanced. OnePlus tweaked its sound signature on the Buds 4 to deliver more detail and texture. An 11mm woofer and 6mm tweeter give these buds a lively sonic presence right out of the box. The real reward comes in LHDC, which is automatically enabled on compatible Android smartphones. This Bluetooth codec creates 24-bit depth to enhance clarity and reveal nuance in recordings. Play a funky instrumental to hear what I'm talking about. I had Soho's 'Hot Music' on repeat and observed arrangements that weren't discernible on other similarly priced buds. The cymbals on the intro were so transparent, it sounded like two sets were being played simultaneously. Instrumental layering was fantastic with each musician accurately positioned on the soundstage. The kick-drum pattern was also pleasantly emphasized. Sabrina Carpenter's 'Taste' had the energetic bop one desires from a pop track with rock influences. The guitar riff was thumping. Other elements like the tinny hi-hat and upbeat drums blended well together. Hip-Hop bangers like 50 Cent's 'Outta Control (Remix)' knocked hard, granted it was at the expense of minimizing highs. The monstrous bass drums had an infectious bounce that stimulated head nods. Dr. Dre's high-pitched strings sounded clear, but they weren't as crisp as I've heard on Sony's mid-range models. OnePlus equipped the Buds 4 with a variety of features to personalize sound. First up is Hi-Res Mode to toggle LHDC. Next up is the Master EQ with preprogrammed presets (Balanced, Serenade, Bass) and a BassWave slider to adjust bass levels. Each of these settings are effective when matched with the right track; Bass increases the low end on rock songs and Serenade elevates vocals on ballads. Balanced yields the best results. There's also the option to manually create an EQ. I recommend the Golden Sound feature since it develops a sound profile tailored to your hearing. My profile was satisfying. Lastly, there's the 3D Audio mode, otherwise known as spatial audio. It remains the one feature OnePlus can't get right. Everything sounds hollow and unconvincing. I expected much better noise cancellation from this fourquel. There are few positives. Most low-/mid-frequency noises are silenced, and the technology suppresses wind at a high level. High-frequency sounds are where ANC struggles mightily. My toddler's squeals were distracting when working privately in the bedroom. Emergency vehicle sirens and whistles startled me a few times. Even bird chirping interfered with listening sessions. There are a few ANC modes to choose from. High 'uses a real-time adaptive algorithm for the best noise cancellation effect.' I wasn't convinced. The Moderate and Low modes are engineered to deal with 'fairly noisy' and 'quieter' places, respectively, and neither did much to eliminate unwanted sounds. Auto ANC assesses your surroundings before selecting the best noise-canceling mode, though it always felt like High was the default. Adaptive ANC is the way to go. It auto-adjusts noise cancellation based on your environment and strengthens low- and mid-frequency neutralization. Transparency mode kept me on high alert. I could hear everything from chatty pedestrians to dogs barking to fire engine sirens from two blocks away. Vocal capture might be the buds' unsung feature. Hearing my wife loudly and clearly from across the room as I blasted music at max volume was gratifying. The Buds 4 are a quality calling headset. My wife said I sounded clear on calls, and my enunciation was on point. The three AI call noise cancellation mics put a muzzle on ambient noise. Wind resistance was impressive; no one complained about any harmful whooshing effects. Bluetooth 5.4 performs well on Apple and Google-operated devices. Range extends up to 50 feet before dropout occurs. Android users have one-tap Google Fast Pair, while Apple users can pair the buds through the iOS/macOS Bluetooth settings. Multipoint is where connectivity stumbles. Having the buds paired to two devices at the same time affects audio performance. When connected to my OnePlus 11 and MacBook Pro, the signals occasionally scrambled and audio output randomly changed to the secondary device for a few seconds before reverting to the primary device. A full charge equates to 9 hours of ANC use, which is nearly 2.5 hours more than the Buds 3. Turning off the feature extends listening time to 11 hours. High volume and special features (e.g., LHDC, spatial audio) decrease overall playtime by about 1 to 2 hours. That's still more than what most luxury buds generate per charge, including the AirPods Pro 2 and Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds. I was fine with the three days of moderate use (3 hours daily) these buds provided. The non-wireless charging case supplies an additional 45 hours, depending how you use the buds. According to the spec sheet, a 10-minute charge can net you up to 11 hours of playback. This is a bit of an exaggeration. My testing showed the buds power up to 60% on an 8-minute charge. Using the company's power adapter should charge the buds faster. There's no doubt that brand enthusiasts will get the best true wireless experience from the OnePlus Buds 4. All other Android users should seek out superior and less expensive options. The same goes for iPhone owners. It's uncertain whether the buds' performance troubles are solvable through firmware updates. Then again, it could have just been my test unit. Whatever the case may be, most of their pros and cons seem definitive, making this a questionable upgrade. If your priorities are audio and battery life, then the Buds 4 will pair perfectly with your OnePlus 13 or OnePlus Pad 3. Everyone else can look at some of best noise-canceling earbuds to meet all other hallmarks (sound included).
Business Insider
24 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Behind the biometric curtain: When border tech outpaces accountability
In an era where artificial intelligence and biometric surveillance are becoming the new frontiers of national security, a quiet struggle is unfolding—one not just of innovation, but of ethics, transparency, and trust. At the center of this unfolding narrative are companies like Travizory, a Swiss-based border tech startup, whose recent moves have sparked scrutiny from both industry peers and government watchdogs. Across the globe, from South America to the Indian Ocean, the implications of fast-tracked technology contracts are coming under the microscope. This is not just a story about software and security, it's a cautionary tale for every government, especially in Africa, navigating the allure of digital border solutions without adequate oversight. The Stakes in Kenya This question has come to the forefront in Kenya, where controversy surrounds the management of the country's eCitizen platform—a critical national digital portal that connects citizens and tourists to government services ranging from visa issuance to tax payments. At the center of the debate is Travizory that secured a contract to help digitize and manage parts of Kenya's travel authorization and border management ecosystem. The Travizory contract has created multiple risks: revenue leakage through foreign exchange spreads, personal data subject to Swiss rather than Kenyan privacy laws during the pilot period; and an opaque exit clause allowing Travizory to claim intellectual property indemnity fees if Kenya builds its own system. The issue, however, is not simply about foreign involvement, it is about the legal jurisdiction under which this data is being handled. Travizory's contract in Kenya has been in contention not only because it collected and allegedly withheld the gross revenues owed to the government of Kenya, but it has personal data subject to Swiss rather than Kenyan privacy laws during the pilot period. This revelation has sparked serious concern among digital rights advocates, policymakers, and civil society organizations, who argue that such arrangements undermine Kenya's data sovereignty— the principle that the data of a country's citizens should be governed by that country's laws, not those of a foreign state. Echoes in the Seychelles This isn't the first time Travizory has been linked to questions of transparency and conflict of interest. In Seychelles, an archipelago praised for topping Africa's Corruption Perception Index, the company is the central player in a growing controversy involving the nation's Minister of Transport, Antony Derjacques. The minister, whose law chamber reportedly advised Travizory, failed to disclose this connection while overseeing the company's 10-year government contract with Travizory for managing the country's digital travel authorization platform—a tool that became central during the COVID-19 pandemic. Seychelles opposition leader Sebastien Pillay has called for Derjacques' resignation, alleging a clear conflict of interest. The National Assembly is now grappling with how to circulate the confidential contract without breaching its non-disclosure clauses, raising even more concerns about transparency in public-private partnerships. Why It Matters for Africa For African nations investing heavily in digital identity, e-visas, and border modernization, the Travizory case offers valuable lessons. Technology may be global, but accountability must be local. Governments entering agreements with fast-scaling tech vendors—particularly in high-trust areas like biometric surveillance, passenger data, and border security—must implement stronger vetting processes, conflict of interest safeguards, and ongoing performance audits. This is especially important as African states look to digitize border control, often under tight deadlines and with support from international donors or multilateral partners. The risk? Falling for shiny demos without digging into a company's history, real-world deployments, or local partnerships. The Bigger Picture In a market where companies compete not just with technology but also perception, moments like these become inflection points. Travizory's allegations of corruption in Seychelles, Kenya and others that we have yet to uncover, should not be dismissed as isolated events—they're reflective of a deeper industry tension between growth, and governance. And for African governments watching from the sidelines, now is the time to ask the right questions—not just can this be done, but by whom and at what cost?
an hour ago
Sony raises its profit forecast after saying it expects less damage from tariffs
TOKYO -- Japanese entertainment and electronics company Sony said Thursday that its profit surged 23% in the last quarter from the year before, as damage from U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs was less than it had expected. The Tokyo-based manufacturer reported its April-June profit totaled 259 billion yen, or $1.8 billion, up from 210 billion yen. Quarterly sales edged up 2% to 2.6 trillion yen ($17.7 billion) as demand grew for games and network services, imaging solutions and sensors. The maker of PlayStation game machines, digital cameras, Walkman audio players and Spider-Man movies said those positive factors offset the negative impact from unfavorable exchanges rates. Sony said its network business also was drawing more subscribers to its online services. Sony raised its forecast for its profit in the full fiscal year until March 2026 to 970 billion yen ($6.6 billion), from an earlier forecast of 930 billion yen ($6.3 billion). The revised projection is still lower than what it earned in the previous fiscal year at 1 trillion yen. Sony now estimates the impact of the additional U.S. tariffs on its operating income at 70 billion yen ($476 million), much better than the initial estimate of 100 billion yen ($680 million). One of the successes among Sony's entertainment franchises was the latest 'Demon Slayer' animation movie, which is part of a hit series and is doing well at the box office.
