
Examining Tariffs Through A Latino Lens
Prices for Colombian coffee are increasing.
The impact of President Trump's tariffs on Latinos will likely affect not only that community but also produce a domino effect of negative consequences for the overall economy.
Although most consumers and workers will suffer from the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, Latinos will likely experience the most significant economic impact. The nonpartisan policy research group The Budget Lab at Yale calls the Trump tariffs a regressive policy. Whenever a regressive tax is imposed, those with the lowest incomes pay the most and face the most significant negative economic consequences. In 2017, the Heritage Foundation noted, 'Tariffs are just taxes on Americans by another name,' adding, 'Cutting tariffs could be the biggest tax cut low-income families will ever see.'
Per capita income is a barometer that measures the ability to afford essential goods and services. According to the U.S. Census Bureau's most recent American Community Survey, Latinos have the lowest per capita income among racial and ethnic groups. Their per capita income is $27,653, 9% lower than that of Blacks, 49% lower than that of Asians, and 44% lower than that of whites. This means that when prices of goods and services increase due to tariffs, Latinos will be the least able to purchase even the most essential goods and services.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, for the first quarter of 2025, Latinos had the lowest median weekly earnings among racial and ethnic groups. At $929, Latinos' median weekly earnings are 41% lower than Asians, 7% lower than Blacks, 24% lower than whites, and 22% lower than the overall population.
According to the nonpartisan policy institute, the Center for American Progress, in the United States, Latinos represent the demographic group with the highest percentage of workers classified as low-wage. The Latin Times points out that 21% of white workers fall into the low-wage category, compared to 33% of Latinos. Tipped employees are one example of low-wage workers, and among them, Latinos are overrepresented at 24% while accounting for 17% of the country's overall workforce.
A Latina who works for tips and declined to give her name to protect her privacy, said, 'When shoes and clothes and even food costs more, people still eat out, but they tip less. That means I make less money, and then I cannot buy what I need because I do not have the money.'
A Latina small business owner in Minnesota worries about the imposition of tariffs.
Latino entrepreneurs play a significant role in shaping and expanding the U.S. economy, as stated in the 2024 State of Latino Entrepreneurship report from Stanford University. The report highlights the fact that Latino-owned businesses represent the fastest-growing and most dynamic segment in the entrepreneurial landscape, and while Latino-owned businesses are more likely than white-owned businesses to provide employer-sponsored benefits and demonstrate a larger commitment to upward mobility for their workers, the Latino entrepreneurs face funding challenges. Despite those funding challenges, the number of Latino-owned businesses and the revenue they generate have consistently increased.
The U.S. Small Business Administration defines small businesses as those with fewer than 499 employees. Currently, 99% of U.S. businesses are defined as small enterprises and are critical to the U.S. economic landscape. According to McKinsey & Company, 'Latino owners of {small} businesses are the most entrepreneurial ethnic group in the economy.'
At the same time, many Latino-owned businesses operate with razor-thin profit margins and are disproportionately concentrated in industries such as construction, retail, and hospitality. These industries are among the most susceptible to price fluctuations. Tariffs cause significant and often unpredictable price changes, leading to substantial challenges for many Latino business owners.
One Latino business owner in Chicago, who did not give his name to protect his privacy, employs about 15 people. He vividly described what the tariffs are doing to his business. 'I have a number of clients who wanted construction work done this spring. I provided them with bids last December and January. They signed the contract and provided a third of the total cost as a down payment, understanding that work would be done in the late spring of this year. I have begun to buy the materials for the projects, and my costs have increased by 15% since I provided the bids. I cannot pass those costs onto the client, but I still have to pay my workers and bills. We will likely lose a lot of money this year. But we also cannot raise our prices too much because the cost of everything is high for our clients, and if our prices are too high, they will not use our services. Then I will be forced to put people out of work. These tariffs are damaging to my business and my family's future.'
Latina/o laborers are waiting for an opportunity to work.
Farm, retail, and construction industries will see a swift and significant impact from the tariffs. The workers in those industries will likely face a cutback in their hours and even job loss. Latinos disproportionately fill those jobs. For example, according to the 2023 American Community Survey from the U.S. Census Bureau, Latinos account for 40% of workers in crop production and nearly 1/3 of construction and retail trade workers. Many Latino workers will face reduced hours or job loss when those industries experience an economic downturn. That, in turn, lowers their ability to make discretionary consumer purchases, save, make major purchases such as a home, car, appliances, or even pay for essential goods and services. That change in consumer behavior undoubtedly will have negative consequences for the country's overall economic growth and stability.
A recent study by the Latino Donor Collaborative documents that between 2021 and 2022, U.S. Latino purchasing power rose by $338 billion to $3.78 trillion. This increase is 2.5 times faster than for the rest of the economy. According to that report, 'U.S. Latinos purchased $2.25 trillion of final goods and services in 2022. This represented 2.72% real growth for U.S. Latinos compared to 1.99% real growth nationwide. U.S. Latino imports (the share of goods produced abroad purchased by U.S. Latino consumers) increased by 9.51% to $509 billion.'
When Latinos face a reduction in wages, job loss, and ever-increasing consumer prices due to tariffs, their ability and willingness to make consumer purchases will be dramatically reduced. When that happens, profits and the demand for labor will decline. That decline will have a ripple effect throughout the economy. Recovery from that impact is likely to take years, even decades. The impact of Latinos reducing their expenditures will affect every corner of the American economy and have a measurable and adverse effect on overall economic growth.
The significant economic challenges that Latinos face due to tariffs include an inability to buy goods and services, maintain a profitable small business, and a reduction or loss of wages. These challenges will impact their ability to save and accumulate wealth. How much of an impact on wealth accumulation is an open question, but any roadblocks Latinos face in accumulating wealth will likely result in widening, not narrowing, the wealth gap. This will affect the ability of Latinos to get ahead and eventually pass on wealth to younger generations, which for many is a necessary condition for continuing wealth accumulation across generations.
Policymakers must address the negative economic impacts of the Trump tariffs on all workers and consumers, particularly the low-wage-earning population. The negative financial consequences associated with tariffs will likely persist far longer than the tariffs themselves. In the case of Latinos, these adverse effects are expected to impact current and future generations. Additionally, given the significance of Latino contributions to population and economic growth in the U.S., this will likely result in long-lasting adverse effects on the overall economy. Policymakers must ensure that any potential short-term economic leverage gained from imposing tariffs does not lead to long-term detrimental economic outcomes for Latinos or any other demographic group, thereby compromising whatever long-term economic benefits may accrue to the country.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
South Korea Plans $22 Billion Extra Budget as Tariffs Hit Growth
(Bloomberg) -- South Korea unveiled an extra budget worth billions of dollars, in a bid to support an economy struggling with sluggish consumption and mounting trade headwinds from Donald Trump's tariffs. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown How E-Scooters Conquered (Most of) Europe NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports The 30.5 trillion won ($22.2 billion) proposal includes 15.2 trillion won for economic stimulus and 5 trillion won for supporting livelihoods like small businesses, the finance ministry said in a statement. Another 10.3 trillion won is set aside to cover revenue shortfall for this year's existing budget, as taxation income fell due to weaker corporate performance and consumer spending. The proposal comes after President Lee Jae Myung took office earlier this month, vowing to boost growth and improve livelihoods. He had pledged over 30 trillion won in fresh spending through extra budgets to support small businesses and offset trade shocks. Before the election, 13.8 trillion won had already been approved as part of the first supplementary budget. Lee has inherited an economy already under pressure from weakening demand, compounded by months of political turmoil triggered by former President Yoon Suk Yeol's failed martial law bid. The country's gross domestic product shrank in the first quarter, prompting the Bank of Korea to slash its 2025 growth forecast to 0.8% from 1.5%. The central bank also cut its key interest rate to 2.5% and signaled more easing may follow. Of the 10.3 trillion won tax revenue shortfall, nearly 9 trillion won stemmed from declines in corporate and value-added taxation income. The figures point to deepening economic strain, and help explain why policymakers are leaning more heavily on fiscal stimulus. As a leading semiconductor manufacturer and a key player in global supply chains, South Korea remains particularly vulnerable to trade risks from US tariffs. Exports are equivalent to more than 40% of the country's GDP, and are a key driver of the the country's growth rate. Trump's across-the-board tariffs for South Korea, which are set to jump to 25% in early July from a baseline 10%, are among the highest imposed on US allies. Other sector-specific levies by the Trump administration threaten key South Korean industries, including semiconductors, cars, steel, and aluminum. 'Bold and timely fiscal support is essential for the economy to return to a solid upward trajectory,' second Vice Minister of Finance Lim KiKeun said in a briefing Wednesday. 'While the supplementary budget cannot solve all challenges at once, it represents the first crucial step forward.' The government plans to fund the extra budget through a mix of spending cuts and debt issuance. About 5.3 trillion won will come from restructuring existing outlays, while 2.5 trillion won will be drawn from surplus balances in public funds. Another 3 trillion won will come from changes to foreign exchange stabilization bonds, while the bulk — 19.8 trillion won — will be financed through new sovereign bond sales. The fiscal push will raise the nation's debt-to-GDP ratio to 49% this year, from 47.4% in 2024, as total government spending climbs 6.9%, the ministry said. Even before the election, the need for more fiscal stimulus was clear. BOK Governor Rhee Chang-yong warned that additional measures would likely be required in 2025, underscoring the challenges facing Asia's fourth-largest economy. As part of the stimulus package, the government plans to distribute vouchers worth between 150,000 and 500,000 won per person. The payments will be provided to the general population rather than targeted groups. The issuance of regional gift certificates will also be expanded to encourage spending, with policymakers hoping the combined measures will deliver a swift injection of cash into the real economy. The proposal still needs parliamentary approval, and opposition lawmakers have raised concerns about the rapid debt buildup and potential inefficiencies in spending. Song Eon-seog, a lawmaker from the People Power Party, warned that 'reckless extra budgets' could actually harm both livelihoods and the broader economy. Earlier this month, the central bank stressed the importance of swiftly drafting and implementing an extra budget to boost domestic demand, saying the stimulus would have only a limited impact on inflation. --With assistance from Seyoon Kim and Shinhye Kang. Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

Miami Herald
25 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Trump's immigration crackdown straining labor force for Minnesota ag, food operations
As agricultural and canning operations are ramping up for the summer, they are trying to figure out the possible repercussions of stepped-up immigration enforcement. The workforce for these businesses has become tighter over the past few years, and many were worried that the threat of raids coupled with increased security at the Mexican border would further deplete summer help. "It's kind of a freak-out time [for the agriculture supply line]," said Fernando Quijano, economics educator with the University of Minnesota educator in Moorhead. "We're talking about agriculture, man, some of the most serious business we have in the United States." This week many farm groups and commodity associations are staying quiet about the latest guidance from the Department of Homeland Security. Just a week ago, DHS reportedly paused raids on rural areas, after pressure from those same groups. But on Monday, the Trump administration reversed course. DHS officials said there would be "no safe spaces" for companies that use undocumented labor. The policy whipsaw came after a meatpacking plant raid in Nebraska last week and heavy lobbying of U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and other officials by farm and food companies. The mixed signals carry another level of worry for those who rely on immigrant labor, say Minnesota rural economic experts. Most of these dairy and pork farms, meat processors and vegetable canneries are in rural Minnesota, where support for President Donald Trump remains close to 50%. Still, many believed last week the behind-the-scenes pleadings had softened the administration's stance, Quijano said. "It seems to me Trump is realizing that we need some sort of protections (for farm workers)," he said. Tracking undocumented labor is difficult. Minnesota was home to anywhere between 50,000 to 70,000 unauthorized immigrant workers in 2022, according to estimates from the Center for Migration Studies and the Pew Research Center. A large share of them work on farms or food and meat processing. But those numbers are down significantly from previous estimates a decade ago. Immigration policies have affected how willing undocumented laborers are to seek jobs in the state, and businesses hiring those labors are struggling to make up the difference. "A lot of those industries have been dealing with a really tight labor market since 2017," said Cameron Macht, a regional labor analyst manager for the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. "Constraining the number of available workers is a challenge ... they're already looking for more workers and so not having access to a portion of workers is going to create an extra challenge." Only 27% of farms hire outside help in Minnesota, according to the USDA census, said Lauren Heers, a University of Minnesota extension educator for the central part of the state. A good number of those workers are immigrants. "Depending on who you ask, you'll hear different experiences - many migrant workers, documented or not, report fears of workplace immigration raids," she said. "Some operators are seeing this reflected in day-to-day labor availability, while some operators report this isn't an issue." In southwestern Minnesota's Lyon County, farmer Dennis Fultz, 78, said Trump's change of course regarding the food and ag industries is another example of how inconsistent federal government policies are this year. "It's frustrating," said Fultz, who describes himself as a lifelong Republican who voted for Kamala Harris last November. But he also said that he and other farmers in Lyon County, which is home to a turkey processing site among other food operations, are finding the workers they need. Yet for areas in the state starting to see a tightening, the anxiety immigrants have felt this year is another barrier to finding enough workers. And in Minnesota, fear is spreading that the first, big raid of a packing house or farm site could be near. "The Trump administration's whiplash approach to immigration enforcement is creating uncertainty all across rural communities," said Sen. Tina Smith, the Democrat from Minnesota. "Families, farmers and food workers deserve stability, not political stunts that disrupt lives and hurt rural economies." Last week, Immigrations and Custom Enforcement agents detained 100 workers at a JBS meatpacking plant outside Omaha. In Worthington, Minn., home to a large pork slaughterhouse owned by JBS, the Brazilian-owned meat giant, residents reported ICE knocking on doors. Of the 120,448 job openings in 2024, according to a state website, over 18,000 were in food preparations. Fewer than 500 were in farming. When the HyLife pork plant in Windom, Minnesota, shuttered two years ago, roughly half of its 1,000-person workforce was on foreign labor visas, including many from the same hometown of Salvatierra, Mexico. As of 2024, Minnesota has around 4,000 ag workers with H-2A visas, meaning they're temporarily employed for seasonal work as farmers and ag concerns can't find enough domestic workers. H2A visa records in the state show Stevens County, home to mega dairy farms, as the largest recipient of H2A labor. But experts say these populations often are different. H2A workers may come from eastern Europe or South Africa. Meanwhile, a majority of undocumented workers, often those working livestock operations, hail from Mexico or Central America. Various statewide business and community groups are lobbying for immigration and visa reform to bring in more foreign workers, arguing Minnesota won't be able to continue growing without foreign-born labor. A Minnesota Chamber of Commerce report in February highlighted how the state's immigrant population is driving population and labor gains. Employment among immigrant workers increased by 7% between 2019 and 2023, compared to less than 1% for native Minnesotans. "Over the past 10 years, half of the new labor force in the state has come from foreign-born workers," said Macht, the DEED analyst. "The match with job vacancies and available openings in the state and the industries that they have helped fill jobs in is just incredibly important to the vitality of the state." Nationwide, the number of certified H-2A workers grew by 64.7%, from 224,965 to 370,628, according to numbers from the Washington-based American Immigration Council. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-Russia's Dmitriev says Russia, US and Saudi Arabia could act jointly to stabilise oil markets
By Gleb Bryanski ST PETERSBURG (Reuters) -Russia, the United States and Saudi Arabia could act jointly to stabilise oil markets if needed, Russia's investment envoy Kirill Dmitriev told Reuters. Oil prices surged on Thursday after Israel said it attacked Iranian nuclear sites in Natanz and Arak overnight and as investors grappled with fears of a broader conflict in the Middle East that could disrupt crude supplies. Dmitriev, chief of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, said there was a precedent for similar joint action in 2020. "There was an example when (Russian) President Putin, (U.S.) President Trump and (Saudi) Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman played a key role in stabilising markets," Dmitriev said on the sidelines of the St Petersburg International Economic Forum. "It is early to talk about concrete joint action yet but based on an earlier precedent, such action is possible." In the spring of 2020, as oil prices plummeted amid the COVID-19 pandemic, Trump brokered a deal with top crude producers Russia and Saudi Arabia to cut output and calm the markets. "Events in the Middle East create conditions for oil price rises. The dynamics of these events will define how dramatic this rise will be," Dmitriev said. "The dynamics of such rises sharply reduce the possibility of further restrictions on Russia's energy sector," he said, referring to European Union deliberations on tightening sanctions against Moscow.