&w=3840&q=100)
'Wanted to make flying robots, not...': Developer upset as Ukraine uses his open-source code to make deadly drones
A 20-year-old open-source code powered Ukraine's Operation Spider Web that destroyed a third of Russian bombers that were hidden miles away from Ukraine. The creators of the code expressed surprise over the matter read more
As Ukraine's Operation Spider Web rocked Russia, it has been revealed that open-source software used by hobbyist drones powered the attack that wiped out a third of Russia's strategic long-range bombers. The attack that took place on Sunday afternoon was seen as one of the most daring and technically coordinated attacks in modern warfare.
In broad daylight, explosions rocked air bases in Belaya, Olenya, and Ivanovo in Russia, which are hundreds of miles from Ukraine. However, the Operation , which took over a year of planning, was carried out using a nearly 20-year-old piece of open-source drone autopilot software called ArduPilot.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The original creator of ArduPilot expressed shock over the matter, recalling how the drone company just started out of a basement. 'That's ArduPilot, launched from my basement 18 years ago. Crazy,' Chris Anderson said in a comment on LinkedIn below footage of the attack.
'Just wanted to make flying robots': Anderson
Anderson eventually took to X, formerly known as Twitter, and tagged his co-creators, Jordi Muñoz and Jason Short, in a post about the attack. 'Not in a million years would I have predicted this outcome. I just wanted to make flying robots,' Short said in a reply to Anderson. 'Ardupilot-powered drones just took out half the Russian strategic bomber fleet.'
18 years after @Jrdmnz @jason4short and I created ArduPilot, here it is destroying large parts of the Russian air force. Crazy https://t.co/2SfPQHrcuA — Chris Anderson (@chr1sa) June 1, 2025
ArduPilot is an open-source software system that takes its name from the Arduino hardware systems it was originally designed to work with. The work on the source code began in 2007 when Anderson launched the website DIYdrones.com and cobbled together a UAV autopilot system out of a Lego Mindstorms set.
DIYdrones eventually became a home for UAV enthusiasts, and for two years, Anderson's Lego UAV took flight. According to 404 Media, Muñoz and Anderson eventually founded 3DR, an early consumer drone company, and released the earliest versions of the ArduPilot software in 2009. Despite its popularity, the software system remains free to use and can be modified for various purposes.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Wow. Ardupilot powered drones just took out half the Russian strategic bomber fleet. https://t.co/5juA1UXrv4 — Jason Short (@jason4short) June 1, 2025
'ArduPilot is a trusted, versatile, and open source autopilot system supporting many vehicle types: multi-copters, traditional helicopters, fixed-wing aircraft, boats, submarines, rovers, and more,' the project's website reads. 'The source code is developed by a large community of professionals and enthusiasts. New developers are always welcome!' Interestingly, the website analytics from 2023 showed that the project was very popular in both Ukraine and Russia since the start of the war.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Musk vs Trump Feud: 10 ways they can destroy each other—legally
When Thomas Anderson is first unplugged from the Matrix, his body convulses. His mind rejects the truth. 'He's going into arrest,' they warn, as his world crumbles. Because when you've lived too long in an illusion, reality doesn't just disappoint—it short-circuits you. That's where Elon Musk is now. He's been yanked out of the warm, binary womb of TrumpWorld. No more bromance tweets. No more wink-wink White House briefings. No more red-carpeted corridors of power where he could whisper about AI doomsday while nudging SpaceX contracts. Just cold, hard betrayal. And now? Now he wants revenge. Here are 10 gloriously real, absurdly powerful, and completely legal ways that Trump and Musk can rip each other apart—like Neo and Agent Smith in an alley full of bad ideas. 1. Trump Pulls the Plug on Musk's Federal Billions Trump, fresh off a fiscal sobriety bender and looking for budgetary scapegoats, has a new mantra : 'No woke space toys on my dime.' He's already floated cutting $3 billion worth of contracts to Musk's empire. That's not just pruning—it's taking a chainsaw to the money tree. Tesla loses its tax credits. Starlink gets kicked out of the Pentagon's good books. SpaceX is told to sit in the corner while Blue Origin waves from the Oval Office with a smug Bezos smirk. This isn't just defunding—this is strategic neutering. 2. Musk Threatens the Republic via Rocket Blackmail Musk didn't wait to be hit first. He threatened to decommission the Dragon spacecraft —the one that ferries NASA astronauts and lunch packets to the International Space Station. The unspoken message? Nice space programme you've got there. Be a shame if something happened to it. Suddenly, space diplomacy looks more like a hostage negotiation with a Bond villain in a Twitter hoodie. 3. Trump Can Yank Elon's Security Clearance Every time Elon boasts about top-secret briefings, there's an Air Force general somewhere crying into his gin. His clearance—granted through his role in military space launches—could be revoked with one swipe of Trump's Montblanc pen. Without it, Musk becomes a liability rather than an asset. He can still launch memes, just not missiles. And without Pentagon favours, his whole 'Iron Man meets Ayn Rand' routine collapses into a Reddit thread. 4. Elon Funds a Third Party Just to Spite Him In classic Musk fashion, the Tesla tzar tweeted a poll asking if he should start a new centrist political party. It was part libertarian fantasy, part MAGA middle-finger, and 100% chaos. Over 1.8 million people voted 'Yes.' Even if it doesn't win , a Musk-backed third party could siphon off enough voters to sabotage Trump's 2028 ambitions. Think Ross Perot meets a Neuralink experiment gone rogue. 5. Trump Targets Musk's Ketamine Chronicles Bannon has demanded a drug probe into Musk's ketamine-fuelled soirées, suggesting the billionaire is 'not of sound mind.' That's ironic coming from a man who looks like he was raised on moonshine and conspiracy theories. But in TrumpWorld, personal destruction is political strategy. Imagine Musk dragged into a Senate hearing with Marjorie Taylor Greene asking, 'Were you or were you not high when naming your child X Æ A-12?' 6. Musk Unleashes Epstein Allegations Without warning, Musk lobbed a digital hand grenade: that Trump's White House deliberately delayed the release of Epstein files because his name may have been in them. He offered no evidence—just vibes and vengeance. But in a country where 30% of voters think Wayfair sells children, that's enough to spark headlines, hearings, and hashtags. When Elon says, 'Mark this post,' he's not just trolling—he's threatening to turn on the lights in a room no one wants to see. 7. Trump Ends DOGE—the Bureaucratic Crypto Baby The Department of Government Efficiency, nicknamed DOGE, was Musk's vanity project: part startup, part prank, part Silicon Valley fever dream. Its mission? Replace Washington's bureaucratic sludge with blockchain optimism and quarterly reports. Trump could axe it tomorrow and return the halls of power to their natural state: clogged, confused, and blissfully analog. No more agile government. No more 'lean federalism. ' Just 500-page PDFs printed in triplicate. 8. Elon Withholds the Final $100M Musk had pledged a total of $350 million to support Trump's 2024 run. But the final $100 million is still hanging —like a Sword of Damocles in a cryptocurrency wallet. Trump, a man who treats loyalty like a Costco membership, doesn't forgive open wallets with closed zips. This isn't just about money—it's about respect. And Musk knows just how much Trump hates being ghosted, especially by someone richer. 9. Trump Questions Musk's Citizenship The Birther playbook is back. Bannon claims Musk is an 'illegal alien.' Never mind that Elon's been a naturalised American citizen since 2002. Trump doesn't need facts—just vibes, slogans, and a red hat. Expect rallies where Trump says, 'Elon? Great guy. But I'm hearing things. People are saying.' That's how the political meat grinder starts: with an innuendo and ends with a Senate subcommittee. 10. Musk Starves MAGA's Internet Starlink, Musk's satellite internet service, powers vast swathes of rural America—aka MAGA heartland. One well-timed update and Fox Nation stops loading. Steve Bannon's podcast gets frozen mid-rant. Truth Social becomes Truth Unavailable. Musk doesn't even need to admit fault. He can just smirk and say, 'Server overload. We're working on it.' MAGA may love him, but they'll riot if they miss Tucker's rerun. Final Thought: Welcome to the Unplugged War This isn't a feud—it's a glitch in the Matrix. Two megalomaniacs, both convinced they are The One. Trump, the spiritual father of populist politics. Musk, the meme-mad prophet of techno-libertarianism. They fed each other, validated each other, needed each other. But now the code is breaking. And if The Matrix taught us anything, it's this: when reality reasserts itself, the ones who rejected it scream the loudest. Musk took the red pill. Trump wrote the damn pill into law. Now they're locked in a fight to see who can bend reality back first. Only one can emerge from the simulation. The other gets ratioed on his own app.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
How Trump-Musk break-up can severely affect NASA and its future space missions
America's ambitious space plans for the coming years could become one of the biggest casualties of the sudden and dramatic falling out of United States President Donald Trump and the world's richest person Elon Musk. Over the last few years, the US space agency NASA has developed a significant dependency on Musk's company SpaceX that would inevitably set back NASA's plans by several years if a decoupling were to occur. It would also seriously jeopardise space missions such as the one being executed by Axiom Space, a private US company, next week. This mission, Axiom-4, is carrying four astronauts, including India's Shubhanshu Shukla, to the International Space Station (ISS). The rocket as well as the main spacecraft being used for this mission are those of SpaceX. Musk and Trump are engaged in a bitter war of words on social media, triggered by Musk's strong criticism of a Congressional tax Bill that he claims will result in a massive increase in the national debt. Trump has hit back saying Musk was concerned about the bill's provisions relating to tax credits on electric vehicles (EVs), which could adversely affect Tesla, the EV company of Musk. Trump went on to say that the easiest way to save government money — 'billions and billions of dollars' — was to terminate government contracts and subsidies for Musk's companies. Musk retorted that in the light of the President's statement, SpaceX would begin decommissioning of its Dragon spacecraft 'immediately'. He relented a few hours later, saying the decommissioning won't happen. The incident might have cooled down for now, but Musk's threat to decommission the Dragon spacecraft revealed the vulnerability of NASA which is now dependent on private companies for many critical systems in the space programme. Much of it has been actively encouraged by NASA to create a vibrant public-private space ecosystem that allows it to focus mainly on more ambitious planetary exploration activities while leaving the more routine and mundane jobs like transportation to private companies. NASA's reliance on SpaceX The Crew Dragon spacecraft of SpaceX is currently the only reliable vehicle that NASA has to transport astronauts to and from the ISS, a permanent laboratory in space, about 400 km from Earth, that is manned throughout the year. The ISS is used mainly by astronauts from the US and Russia, but occasionally those from other countries also make short visits, just like Shukla's crew would be doing next week. The astronauts on ISS are typically changed twice a year. In addition, three to four cargo missions are also sent to the ISS every year. Russian astronauts typically travel in the Soyuz spacecraft built by the Russian agency Roscosmos. But NASA has discontinued its space shuttle programme, which included vehicles such as Atlantis, Discovery or Endeavour, primarily on cost considerations. The last NASA space shuttle mission was flown in Atlantis in 2011. These space shuttles used to be launched by NASA's own rockets. The discontinuation of the space shuttle programme stopped the production of these rockets as well. Between 2011 and 2020, NASA used the Russian transport, Soyuz, for travel to the ISS. After that, it has been hiring SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which launches exclusively on the Falcon 9 rocket, also of SpaceX. NASA has also contracted other companies, notably Boeing, to transport astronauts and cargo to the ISS. Boeing's Starliner has carried out a few cargo sorties but its first crewed mission, carrying Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore, last year was a troubled one. The Starliner, which uses Boeing's Atlas rockets to launch, managed to drop the astronauts at the ISS, but was rendered risky for a return journey due to a technical glitch. The two astronauts were stranded at the ISS for nine months before a SpaceX mission brought them back in February this year. The ISS missions are only one part of NASA's increasing reliance on SpaceX. Musk's company, which started in 2006 and has grown to become the largest private space corporation, is heavily involved with the Artemis programme as well, the ambitious NASA plan to get humans back to the Moon, this time for extended periods of time. The crewed missions under the Artemis programme are expected to use the Starship spacecraft of SpaceX. The first of the crewed missions is scheduled for 2027. Extra-planetary exploration missions, like those to Saturn, are also being done in collaboration with SpaceX. In many segments, SpaceX has developed superior technologies that have increased NASA's dependence on it. SpaceX has also created a constellation of satellites to provide Internet services around the world. NASA is not linked to this network, but some other US government agencies are, creating dependencies elsewhere too. A Reuters report said SpaceX had about $22 billion worth of government contracts, across different agencies. The contract to transport astronauts to the ISS on the Dragon spacecraft was alone worth about $5 billion, it said. Feud not over Musk may have tried to dial down a bit, but it would be premature to suggest that his feud with Trump is over. The US President has been unrelenting on the issue of continued tax concessions for EVs, even when Musk supposedly was a close friend. Now that Musk has opened a public battle, making personal attacks, the possibility of Trump suspending government contracts of Musk's companies, as he suggested in one of his social media posts, cannot be ruled out. If that happens, the implications for NASA, and America's space programme, are going to be huge. The Artemis programme would almost certainly be pushed back, and the schedule for the ISS would get badly affected. It might force NASA to scale back its involvement with other private players as well, and return to more in-house production of space systems. NASA is not expected to receive much support from Trump either. The space agency is already having a tough time under his Presidency, with prospects of big budget cuts, reduction of workforce, and shutting down of some of its offices.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Musk's threat to pull Dragon capsule leaves Nasa reliant solely on Russia
As President Donald Trump and Elon Musk argued on social media on Thursday, the world's richest man threatened to decommission a space capsule used to take astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. After Trump threatened to cut government contracts given to Musk's SpaceX rocket company and his Starlink internet satellite services, Musk responded via X that SpaceX "will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately. It's unclear how serious Musk's threat was. But the capsule, developed with the help of government contracts, is an important part of keeping the space station running. Nasa also relies heavily on SpaceX for other programmes, including launching science missions and, later this decade, returning astronauts to the surface of the moon. The Dragon capsule SpaceX is the only US company capable right now of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon capsules. Boeing's Starliner capsule has flown astronauts only once; last year's test flight went so badly that the two Nasa astronauts had to hitch a ride back to Earth via SpaceX in March, more than nine months after launching last June. Starliner remains grounded as Nasa decides whether to go with another test flight with cargo, rather than a crew. SpaceX also uses a Dragon capsule for its own privately run missions. The next one of those is due to fly next week on a trip chartered by Axiom Space, a Houston company. Cargo versions of the Dragon capsule are also used to ferry food and other supplies to the orbiting lab. Nasa's other option: Russia Russia's Soyuz capsules are the only other means of getting crews to the space station right now. The Soyuz capsules hold three people at a time. For now, each Soyuz launch carries two Russians and one Nasa astronaut, and each SpaceX launch has one Russian on board under a barter system. That way, in an emergency requiring a capsule to return, there is always someone from the US and Russian on board. With its first crew launch for Nasa in 2020 the first orbital flight of a crew by a private company SpaceX enabled Nasa to reduce its reliance on Russia for crew transport. The Russian flights had been costing the US tens of millions of dollars per seat, for years. Nasa has also used Russian spacecraft for cargo, along with US contractor Northrup Grumman. SpaceX's other government launches The company has used its rockets to launch several science missions for Nasa as well as military equipment. Last year, SpaceX also won a Nasa contract to help bring the space station out of orbit when it is no longer usable. SpaceX's Starship mega rocket is what Nasa has picked to get astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon, at least for the first two landing missions. Starship made its ninth test flight last week from Texas, but tumbled out of control and broke apart.
