logo
Vanguard Vs. Fidelity Index Funds: Which Is Best For Your Investments In 2025?

Vanguard Vs. Fidelity Index Funds: Which Is Best For Your Investments In 2025?

Forbes13 hours ago

Vanguard and Fidelity have sufficient index fund options to fulfill simple or complex investing ... More strategies.
Vanguard and Fidelity offer popular index funds with competitive expense ratios. Is one fund family better for your investment portfolio than the other? This detailed comparison of Vanguard and Fidelity index funds—covering fees, performance and selection—helps you decide.
Vanguard Index Funds Overview
One fun fact sums up Vanguard's investment philosophy: Under the direction of company founder John Bogle, Vanguard created the world's first index fund in 1976. Bogle's innovation gave investors convenient access to a low-cost portfolio that could be held for decades.
Bogle also decided to market Vanguard funds directly to investors, bypassing brokers, and to eliminate sales loads. Both moves, unconventional in the 1970s, showed Vanguard's commitment to the individual investor's success. The move to drop sales charges has spared investors from hundreds of millions in fees over the past several decades.
Today, Vanguard retains its reputation as a leader in low-cost funds and a champion of retail investors.
Fidelity Index Funds Overview
According to Morningstar, Fidelity is the third-largest fund family after Vanguard and BlackRock in terms of U.S. market concentration. The company was formed to take over the Fidelity Fund in 1946 and launched its first index fund in 1988.
Fidelity's index fund strategy emphasizes low costs and fund performance that aligns closely to the target index. Both objectives benefit index fund investors by minimizing dilution of underlying investment returns.
Comparing Vanguard and Fidelity Index Funds
Below are head-to-head comparisons for Vanguard and Fidelity on expense ratios, fund selection, fund performance and minimum investment requirements.
Vanguard expense ratios on index funds with investment minimums of $3,000 or less range from 0.03% to 0.2%. Per author calculations, the average expense ratio is 0.07%, which equates to $7 annually for every $10,000 invested.
Fidelity expense ratios across 82 index funds for retail investors range from 0% to 0.4%. The average is 0.12%, per author calculations. This translates to $12 annually per $10,000 invested.
Vanguard has the lower average expense ratio, but Fidelity offers a selection of zero-expense funds. Also, Fidelity's S&P 500 fund, FXAIX, has lower expenses than Vanguard's S&P 500 portfolios. FXIAX charges 0.015%, while Vanguard's VOO ETF and VFAIX fund charge 0.03% and 0.04%, respectively.
Both companies beat broader expense ratio averages. A Morningstar report concludes that the average fees for passively managed funds in 2023 was 0.55%.
Vanguard has more index funds with low investment minimums than Fidelity, but both families cover these popular market segments:
Cryptocurrency is one point of differentiation and Fidelity has the edge. Fidelity has funds stocked with bitcoin (FBTC) and ethereum (FETH). Vanguard does not offer crypto funds.
Performance comparisons for index funds can be tricky because the underlying index is primarily responsible for defining the portfolio. So, the comparison is most telling when two funds are targeting the same index. In that case, sampling methods and trading efficiency can introduce a higher-than-necessary tracking error—causing one fund to underperform.
The table below compares returns for S&P 500 funds and U.S. bond market funds from both families. Fidelity performed slightly better on the S&P 500 fund and in the one-year period for the bond fund. Lower expense ratios on the two Fidelity mutual funds contribute to the outperformance.
More generalized comparisons can be made between funds that offer similar exposures but rely on different target indexes. The index gets most of the credit for outperformance, particularly when both compared funds have low tracking errors. Even so, the fund family can take responsibility for choosing the stronger index.
This table compares Vanguard and Fidelity funds with similar strategies, implemented through different target indexes. You can see the performance gaps are larger vs. the prior comparison. The Vanguard index funds mostly outperformed here, despite Fidelity's funds having lower expense ratios.
Both Vanguard and Fidelity have at least 80 index funds with a $0 or $1 investment minimum. These are predominantly exchange-traded funds. Vanguard additionally has about 50 mutual funds with a $3,000 minimum investment.
Which Is Better For Beginner Investors?
Both Vanguard and Fidelity are appropriate for beginner investors. Those who plan to own only an S&P 500 fund and a bond fund might earn slightly higher returns with Fidelity, thanks to the ultra-low expense ratios. On the other hand, Vanguard's website and fund research tools are somewhat easier to navigate than Fidelity's.
Fortunately, choosing one fund family doesn't mean you give up access to the other. If you are trading in a Vanguard brokerage account, you may pay extra fees to buy Fidelity mutual funds and vice versa. You can avoid the fees by purchasing ETFs instead or by opening a new account with the other fund family.
Expert Opinions And Analysis
Morningstar is a leading researcher of mutual funds and fund families. The company's Fund Family Digest summarizes research and ratings on the 150 largest fund families in the U.S.
According to the 2024 Fund Family Digest, Vanguard is the largest fund family with $8.5 trillion in U.S. assets under management (AUM). Fidelity is ranked third with $2.95 trillion in AUM.
Vanguard also has the highest Parent Rating by Morningstar Manager Research analysts. Only 10 fund families earn this rating, based on manager tenure, risk management, performance, fees and other factors. Additionally, 99% of Vanguard's assets are in share classes with Gold, Silver or Bronze Medalist Ratings. Morningstar analysts assign these ratings to funds that are expected to outperform their category index after fees.
Fidelity's parent rating is Above Average and 95% of its assets are in funds with Gold, Silver or Bronze Medalist Ratings.
Is Vanguard Or Fidelity Better For Your Investments?
Vanguard and Fidelity have sufficient index fund options to fulfill simple or complex investing strategies. Fidelity does have cryptocurrency funds, which may be an advantage if bitcoin or ethereum exposure is part of your allocation plan.
Vanguard has more assets under management and slightly higher Morningstar ratings, implying a more stable fund management team and better performance potential.
Bottom Line
You can implement many passive investment portfolios with Vanguard or Fidelity. To choose the right family, review Vanguard.com and Fidelity.com. See if one brand speaks to you over the other. If not, identify which exposures you'll invest in first, such as the S&P 500 or all U.S. stocks. Compare your options across the two families and select the one with lower tracking errors. That hopefully keeps much of the underlying investment returns flowing into your net worth.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DJI ‘remains committed to the US market' as shelves go bare of drones
DJI ‘remains committed to the US market' as shelves go bare of drones

The Verge

time21 minutes ago

  • The Verge

DJI ‘remains committed to the US market' as shelves go bare of drones

Is DJI exiting the US drone market? The company says no — but it would not explain to The Verge what has changed such that it can't even keep a single drone on shelves. When I walked into my local Best Buy store today, June 24th, there were zero DJI drones available to purchase. There wasn't even an empty spot for each drone to go. The entire DJI aisle had been swept clean of price tags, lockers, and products — save a handful of motorized gimbals, action cameras, a single lone RC controller, and an almost empty premium endcap spot where a flagship drone would normally go. 'We're not really carrying DJI drones anymore because of the US-China thing,' a store employee told me. Best Buy is not alone. DJI's own US webstore no longer has any drones in stock, as DroneDJ reported Monday. Despite DJI having an official presence on Amazon, all remaining drones there are sold by third parties with low or unknown quantities of stock. Nor will Best Buy's website be much more help than its physical store: As of Tuesday, its only remaining DJI drones are the last-gen Mavic 3 Pro, priced at $3,890, a refurbished version of that same Mavic 3 Pro, and a refurbished version of the 2022 DJI Avata. DJI has already released successors for both. Even Adorama and B&H, the specialty camera stores, appear to be running low on late-model DJI drones. As of Tuesday, most current-gen drones were listed as 'temporarily on backorder' or 'temporarily out of stock,' save this specific model of the DJI Air 3S, these two specific models of the DJI Flip, and some variants of the budget DJI Neo. What's going on? DJI spokesperson Daisy Kong shared the same explanation DJI's been sharing for the past eight months, accusing US Customs of unfairly scrutinizing its drone imports. Here's the latest version: DJI remains committed to the US market. As we've previously shared, DJI has been working with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to resolve a custom-related misunderstanding. Unfortunately, this has impacted our ability to stock and import drones and parts. We understand the frustration among our customers, but remain hopeful that this will be resolved. When we asked DJI whether any other factor might be responsible — like the US's tariffs on China, or China's own export controls that have reportedly seen drone component prices triple for US buyers — the company had no further comment. Companies like DJI have been wary of blaming either country's leaders. In October 2024, DJI told its partners the 'misunderstanding' was that US Customs and Border Protection had citing the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) as a reason to stop DJI drones from being imported into the United States, following reports that DJI allegedly provided drones to the Chinese government so it could conduct surveillance of Uyghurs. (The Verge has not independently confirmed those reports, DJI has denied it manufactures anything in Xinjiang where China employs forced labor, and DJI is not a listed entity under the UFLPA.) It's worth noting we've only ever heard DJI's side of that story, though: to our knowledge, US Customs and Border Protection has never commented on blocking DJI's drone imports. CBP didn't respond to The Verge's request for comment last year, and it didn't immediately have a response today. Best Buy denied to The Verge that it is no longer carrying DJI drones, without offering any further explanation. A company spokesperson, responding anonymously from Best Buy's press email address, did not provide a name when we asked. If DJI did decide to proactively exit the US drone market, or if Best Buy did decide to proactively cut ties, it wouldn't be all that surprising. The company has less than six months before a de facto ban on all its new products entering the United States, unless it can convince the US government to 1) audit the company, and 2) get that audit to positively confirm that the dronemaker doesn't pose a national security threat. That's a very high bar. In February, DJI's head of public policy suggested that in the event of a US ban, DJI could continue to sell current products in the US while it offers new products elsewhere, in an interview with The Verge. But that is already happening ahead of a potential ban. In May, the company skipped the US with its most advanced drone yet, the Mavic 4 Pro. In addition to drones themselves, DJI's support website is now warning that it may take 60-90 days for repairs. And in May, we reported how DJI's back-to-back price hikes took the popular Osmo Pocket 3 camera from $519 to $799 in just two months. There, DJI was willing to say that US-China tariffs were 'among the key considerations.'

Minnesota Timberwolves' $1.5 Billion Sale Approved By NBA
Minnesota Timberwolves' $1.5 Billion Sale Approved By NBA

Forbes

time23 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Minnesota Timberwolves' $1.5 Billion Sale Approved By NBA

A $1.5 billion deal for former MLB star Alex Rodriguez and e-commerce mogul Marc Lore to purchase the Minnesota Timberwolves was approved by the NBA on Tuesday, following a yearslong dispute with former owner and billionaire Glen Taylor. Billionaire Glen Taylor backed out of an earlier agreement to sell the team, leading to a ... More months-long arbitration process. Getty Images The NBA Board of Governors unanimously approved the sale of the controlling interests in the Timberwolves and the WNBA's Minnesota Lynx from Taylor to Lore and Rodriguez, with the transaction expected to close later this week, the NBA announced. Rodriguez and Lore, the Wonder Group's chief executive, submitted a $1.5 billion bid for the Timberwolves in April 2021 with financial backing from Dyal Capital Partners, a private equity firm linked to former Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Taylor backed out of the deal in March 2024 and claimed Lore and Rodriguez missed a deadline to submit a final payment for the Timberwolves and Lynx and other terms of their agreement, though Lore and Rodriguez disputed this and said they submitted paperwork for the deal ahead of the deadline. An arbitration panel ruled in favor of Rodriguez and Lore in February, requiring Taylor to sell the franchises. Taylor has a fortune valued at $2.9 billion, making him the 1,302nd-wealthiest person in the world, according to Forbes' latest estimates. We valued the Timberwolves as the 28th-most valuable NBA franchise in October 2024, ranking 28th at a $3.1 billion valuation—more than double the amount agreed to in the 2021 deal. Surprising Fact Billionaire Michael Bloomberg reportedly agreed to join the group to purchase the Timberwolves as they invested an additional $600 million in the team in June 2024, though it's not immediately clear how much Bloomberg contributed to the investment or how much of the team he would own. A spokesperson for Bloomberg declined to comment to Forbes at the time. A deal transferring ownership of the Timberwolves and Lynx to Rodriguez and Lore follows failed rounds of mediation. Rodriguez, a three-time MLB MVP, and Lore initially purchased a 40% stake and planned to purchase an additional 40% stake by a deadline set for March 2024. Taylor released a statement just before the deadline, claiming the prospective buyers lacked the money to complete the deal and failed to meet unspecified terms of the agreement. At the time, Taylor said the Timberwolves and Lynx were 'no longer for sale,' as Rodriguez and Lore argued money to acquire the franchises was available. Forbes Timberwolves Ownership Fight Pits Alex Rodriguez Against Billionaire During Generational Playoff Run: Here's What To Know By Brian Bushard Forbes Billionaire Michael Bloomberg Reportedly Joining Timberwolves Ownership Bid With Alex Rodriguez—Amid Messy Dispute By Ty Roush

Seattle City Council approves ban on tech used by landlords to allegedly set higher rents
Seattle City Council approves ban on tech used by landlords to allegedly set higher rents

Geek Wire

time29 minutes ago

  • Geek Wire

Seattle City Council approves ban on tech used by landlords to allegedly set higher rents

A Seattle apartment complex. (GeekWire File Photo / Nat Levy) The Seattle City Council today unanimously approved a bill banning the use of software that critics allege allows for collusion among landlords and drives up rental prices. Council Bill 121000, which now goes to Mayor Bruce Harrell for approval, prohibits tech companies from providing algorithm-driven, rental-cost services in the city; orders landlords not to use these services; and creates civil penalties for violations. The bill was proposed by Councilmember Cathy Moore and is based on a measure that was passed earlier this year by the Washington State Senate, but not the House. Before the vote, Moore said 'rent really is too darn high' in Seattle. 'This is one small way that we can contribute to making this a more diverse and equitable city,' she added. State and federal leaders have filed lawsuits to curb the use of the technology. Washington Attorney General Nick Brown filed a lawsuit in April against property management software company RealPage and nine Seattle-area landlords, accusing them of colluding to inflate rental costs. He alleged the plaintiffs are illegally engaging in 'price fixing.' The U.S. Department of Justice took a similar step in 2024. Seattle City Councilmembers praised the bill and called out Moore's efforts to address affordable housing during her roughly 18-months in office. She is resigning from the council on July 7, citing 'health and personal reasons.' Councilmember Rob Saka called the measure 'landmark legislation' and said Moore was a 'steadfast champion of renters rights.' Tuesday's City Council hearing did not include comments from RealPage. But Mike Semko, the Texas-based company's associate general counsel and vice president, testified in opposition to the state legislation in March. He said the company primarily uses publicly available data to generate rental rate suggestions, does not encourage landlords to keep properties off the market to create scarcity, and does not push managers to select higher rental rates. 'This is simply market research and analysis with a suggested price,' Semko said of RealPage's services, adding that the legislation 'essentially bans math.' The City Council was set to vote on the local bill last week, but members decided to delay the action. Carter Nelson, director of government affairs for the Washington Multi-Family Housing Association, raised concerns 'about the speed of this process and the lack of outreach to impacted stakeholders, including our industry.' She asked for more time to help refine the language in the proposed rule. Moore had urged the council to proceed to a vote, saying the policy 'was thoroughly vetted statewide' when lawmakers considered a similar measure in Olympia. On Tuesday she conceded the delay was the right move as the final legislation included multiple amendments that addressed four key issues: Provides outreach to landlords informing them of the rent algorithm ban. Clarifies that the measure does not apply to the prices set for short-term rentals such lodging offered by Airbnb or hotels. Makes clear that the rules do not extend to basic record-keeping software. Establishes penalties to provide a deterrent to the use of the algorithm software and enables renters to take legal action against landlords who violate the law. In April, RealPage filed a federal lawsuit against the city of Berkeley, Calif., which had recently passed an ordinance aimed at regulating algorithmic rental software. Almost three years ago, ProPublica published a report that found in Seattle's Belltown neighborhood, 70% of the apartments were being offered by 10 property managers who all used RealPage.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store