Iran's Parliament votes to suspend cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog
Iranian lawmakers have overwhelmingly voted to suspend Tehran's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) after the country's nuclear sites were bombed over the weekend in the 12-day conflict with Israel.
The bill, which state media reported on June 25 as passing by a 221-0 vote, will need to be approved by the constitutional watchdog, the Guardians Council. The decision to implement it ultimately lies with the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC).
The SNSC is technically led by the president, but like all key state institutions, it answers to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Israel launched an unprecedented attack on key Iranian nuclear and military sites as well as residential areas on June 13 in a war that claimed scores of civilian lives on both sides before it came to an end in a fragile cease-fire brokered by the United States on June 24.
On June 21, the United States struck three nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.
'In view of the violation of the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Iran by the Zionist regime and the United States of America regarding the country's peaceful nuclear facilities, and the endangerment of the supreme interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran… the government is obligated to immediately, upon the ratification of this law, suspend all cooperation with the IAEA under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [NPT] and its related safeguards,' the text of the bill reads.
The bill, if ratified, will condition the lifting of the suspension to guarantees that Iranian nuclear sites and scientists are safe and that Tehran's right to enrich uranium domestically is assured.
Among Israel's targets in its attacks on Iran were scientists involved in Iran's nuclear program. Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful and does not seek to weaponize it.
Suspending cooperation with the IAEA means Iran will halt inspections, reporting, and oversight activities under the NPT.
Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf criticized the IAEA for what he said was the UN nuclear watchdog's failure to 'even pretend to condemn attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities' and accused it of 'putting its international credibility for up for sale.'
Tehran has long accused the IAEA of bias and working with Western powers and Israel against Iran.
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi has for years complained about what he describes as Iran's lack of cooperation with the agency over investigations into old but undeclared nuclear sites.
'The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran will suspend its cooperation with the agency until the security of nuclear facilities is guaranteed, and Iran's peaceful nuclear program will advance at a faster pace,' Qalibaf said in comments that were followed by lawmakers chanting 'death to' America and Israel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
8 hours ago
- NBC News
What a summit win looks like for Trump – and for Putin: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, a newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, Kristen Welker outlines the stakes for the in-person meeting between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, their first since 2019, as they arrive in Alaska. After shaking hands on the tarmac, Putin joined Trump in his car. . Plus, Rob Wile answers this week's reader question on what happens to the money the government collects from tariffs. — Adam Wollner The high stakes for Trump as he comes face to face with Putin Analysis by Kristen Welker President Donald Trump's summit today with Russian President Vladimir Putin comes with incredibly high stakes for the future of Russia's war with Ukraine — and for Trump himself. The president seemed to be lowering expectations ahead of the face-to-face meeting, telling Fox News Radio yesterday that 'there a 25% chance that this meeting will not be a successful meeting.' So what does a win for Trump look like? A senior administration official also told me that Trump 'is realistic that this is likely a multistep process and he's ready and positive about this step forward.' But Western and U.S. officials say that a victory for Trump is an unconditional and immediate ceasefire, and that if there are conditions attached, that's a win for Putin. It remains to be seen if Putin will try to cloud these talks by raising other issues on his agenda, like a nuclear arms deal and easing sanctions against Russia. It's also unclear whether Trump will offer any incentives to the Russians, and keep his promise to Ukraine and European allies that he will not negotiate territory. All of this underscores the political risk for Trump as he navigates a war that has cost hundreds of thousands of lives and fueled a robust debate over how long the U.S. should provide financial and military support to Ukraine. Trump said during the 2024 campaign that he would end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours upon taking office, but he has acknowledged that doing so is far more complicated than he could have anticipated. Meanwhile, recent polling has found that more voters disapprove of his handling of the war. A recent Wall Street Journal poll found a slim majority of voters (51%) disapproving of Trump's handling of the Russia-Ukraine war, while 41% approved (the survey had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points). That poll also showed that 58% of voters were in favor of sending additional financial aid to Ukraine, a 10-point increase since January, while 36% were in opposition. We'll be delving into the fallout from the high-stakes summit on 'Meet the Press' this Sunday with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn. ✉️ Mailbag: Where does the tariff money go? Thanks to everyone who emailed us! This week's question comes from Tara Vargas: 'Trump claims to be raking in trillions from tariffs. I read that the money goes into the general fund. But does it really? And if not there, where?' To answer that, we turned to business reporter Rob Wile. Here's his response: Yes, it does go into the U.S. Treasury's General Fund — something the department calls 'America's Checkbook' — and is used to finance both daily and long-term government operations, ranging from federal employee salaries to interest payments. Congress establishes how the general fund is spent in its appropriations bills. While the Treasury Department tracks where revenues come from, it generally does not individually earmark a set of funds from a given revenue source for a specific purpose. 'You can think of [tariffs revenues] as helping reduce the overall deficit, or offsetting the costs of the One Big Beautiful Bill,' said Marc Goldwein, senior vice president and senior policy director at the nonpartisan think tank Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. 'It doesn't go into any kind of dedicated trust fund.' In July, the Treasury took in about $29 billion in tariffs. Every month since April, when Trump announced 'reciprocal' tariffs, has seen record tariffs revenues come in. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget projects that the tariffs could bring in as much as $1.3 trillion of net new revenues through the end of Trump's current term, and $2.8 trillion through 2034 — though it cautions these estimates are 'very rough' and intended to reflect 'the general magnitude' of Trump's overall approach to the import taxes 'given the complexity of the tariffs and their impacts.' The U.S. Government Accountability Office, the chief auditing agency of the federal government, has found significant, long-running issues with how General Fund payments are tracked and reported, though it does not suggest any funds are actively being misappropriated. The Treasury, it said in March, 'records transactions as a group total instead of individual balances and then processes them through a variety of systems.' It continued: 'As a result, we did not have enough information to determine if the amounts reported are reliable, and therefore, the Schedules were not auditable. More recently, we've identified additional challenges that impact the ability to clearly track funds. This includes oversight of information coming from outside entities, such as banks, that collect money on behalf of the federal government.'
New York Times
9 hours ago
- New York Times
Mali's Junta Accuses Frenchman of Plot to Overthrow the Military Government
The junta that governs Mali said Thursday that it had foiled an attempted coup and arrested several individuals, including Malian military personnel and a French national it accused of organizing the plot. Mali, a landlocked country in Western Africa, has typified the turmoil that has rocked countries across the Sahel for more than a decade, including Islamist insurgencies, political instability, military takeovers and a decline in their relationship with France, a former colonizer. Among those arrested was a man the government identified as Yann Vezilier, a French citizen whom it accused of being a spy. In a statement broadcast by state television on Thursday, Gen. Daoud Aly Mohammedine, Mali's minister of security, accused Mr. Vezilier of working 'on behalf of the French intelligence service, which mobilized political leaders, civil society actors and military personnel.' The French Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately respond to a request for comment or even confirm Mr. Vezilier's nationality. Several other civilians and Malian military officials were also arrested for 'criminal offenses' related to a plot that General Mohammedine said began on Aug. 1. The general released scant other details about the nature or extent of the crimes. Mali has been ruled by a military government since August 2020, when the military exploited widespread public anger over a disputed parliamentary election. A second coup followed just nine months later. France maintained a contingent of troops in the country from 2013 until August 2022, when the junta expelled the forces in exchange for Russian mercenaries. That coup set into action a chain of similar military takeovers across the region, with soldiers seizing power across a belt of countries nine times between 2020 and 2023. Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger — all ruled by military governments — officially withdrew from the West African alliance known as ECOWAS in January after the bloc pressured them to restore civilian leadership. Since Mali's government came to power, human rights groups have accused it of cracking down on dissent and political opposition.
Business Insider
10 hours ago
- Business Insider
How Russia is building a crypto-powered shadow economy to dodge sanctions
Russia has quietly developed a crypto-fueled network of payments systems that's helped it evade Western sanctions over its war in Ukraine. That assessment comes from blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, which said it believes Russia had created a "shadow crypto economy" in the years following its invasion of Ukraine in order to sidestep financial punishment by the US and its allies. The report highlighted one crypto token in particular tied to Russian businesses trying to trade under the radar. The coin, called A7A5, has been used to process over $51.1 billion worth of transactions from the time it was issued through the end of July, per Chainalysis data. The crypto, which is backed by the Russian ruble, was transacted on a "fairly small subset" of crypto exchanges, many of which had "notable" ties to Russia, Chainalysis researchers said. Garantex, a crypto exchange with heavy ties to Russia on which the A7A5 was largely traded, was sanctioned by the US in 2022. Grinex, which was created by Garantex employees in 2024 to bypass sanctions, according to the US Treasury Department, was also sanctioned by the US this week. Old Vector, the Kyrgyzstan-based issuer of A7A5, which is backed by Russia's state-owned Promsvyazbank, has also been sanctioned. A7A5 was largely traded during the workweek, with transaction volumes collapsing over the weekend. That suggests the cryptocurrency was used primarily for business exchanges, Chainalysis said. "These trading patterns suggest that A7A5 is primarily being used by businesses operating Monday through Friday, which would align with Russia's legislative goals of facilitating cross-border transfers for Russian businesses via cryptocurrency," the report said. The firm pointed to recent updates to Russia's crypto legislation in the past year. The nation recently legalized crypto mining and cross-border crypto payments, a move that was likely a "deliberate effort to build alternative financial infrastructure" in response to tariffs, Chainalysis said. "The emergence of the A7A5 network sanctioned today further illustrates how Russia is operationalizing these alternative payment rails," the report said. "Backed by sanctioned Russian institutions, A7A5 is providing a new, crypto-native avenue to bypass the ever tightening sanctions against Russia. Time will tell if A7A5 will expand to a larger retail market," it added. Russia has embraced alternative assets, like gold and crypto, as a means to bypass sanctions since invading Ukraine in 2022. In July, Russia's top financial regulator said that the nation's cross-border transactions were on the rise with countries in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and Central Asia. The nation's share of global trade in crypto and gold have also increased, he added.
