US banking giants ride tariff volatility to beat estimates but risks remain
Though JP Morgan Chase, the biggest US lender by assets, reported a 17 per cent year-on-year drop in its net income for the quarter to the end of June, its earnings per share of $5.24 topped the average analysts' forecast of $4.48, according to estimates compiled by LSEG.
The bank's profits for the three-month period fell to $15 billion, reflecting a one-time accounting gain in the same period last year that skewed comparison.
'The US economy remained resilient in the quarter,' JP Morgan chief executive Jamie Dimon said.
The April-June quarter earnings of large financial institutions in the US reflect a volatile three-month period, which was dominated by President Donald Trump's tariff agenda that spooked global markets initially. However, major indexes on Wall Street recovered quickly and soared to their record-highs in recent weeks.
In the same period came the passage of Mr Trump's landmark 'One Big Beautiful Bill', which non-partisan analysts estimate will add trillions of dollars to the US deficit. Hostilities between Israel and Iran also led to fears of a potential crunch in the energy market.
'The finalisation of tax reform and potential deregulation are positive for the economic outlook, however, significant risks persist – including from tariffs and trade uncertainty, worsening geopolitical conditions, high fiscal deficits and elevated asset prices,' Mr Dimon said.
One of the most outspoken voices in the banking industry, Mr Dimon has previously warned of ballooning US debt and widening fiscal deficit.
Net interest income boost
JP Morgan on Tuesday also boosted its guidance on net interest income (NII) to about $95.5 billion in 2025.
Bank of New York Mellon also raised its outlook for NII this year, expecting to hit 'high-single-digit' year-on-year growth compared to its previous outlook of 'up mid-single-digits'. The company posted adjusted earnings per share of $1.94, topping analysts' projections of $1.75.
Meanwhile, Wells Fargo cut its 2025 guidance for NII to $47.7 billion, citing lower income in its markets business.
Citigroup also posted a rise in its second quarter net income to $4 billion on Tuesday, up from $3.2 billion in the same period last year. The global lender's earnings of $1.96 per share for the reporting period also beat analyst estimates of $1.60 per share.
'Markets had their best second-quarter performance since 2020 with a record second quarter for equities,' Citigroup chief executive Jane Fraser said.
Citigroup said total market revenue was 16 per cent higher than the same time last year, while equity revenue increased 6 per cent on an annual basis. "With revenue up 8 per cent, services continue to show why this high-return business is our crown jewel,' Ms Fraser said.
Citigroup said it expects $84 billion in revenue for the full year.
BlackRock, among biggest asset managers in the world, also said it has benefited from Wall Street's second-quarter rally, reporting assets under management climbing to $12.53 trillion from April-June, up from $10.65 trillion on the same period last year.
Goldman Sachs, Bank of America and Morgan Stanley are scheduled to report earnings on Wednesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Pakistan says it wins US tariff deal; Trump cites oil reserves pact
The United States and Pakistan hailed a trade deal on Thursday that Islamabad said would lead to lower tariffs and increased investment, but without specifying the level of tariff to be levied on Pakistani exports. "This deal marks the beginning of a new era of economic collaboration especially in energy, mines and minerals, IT, cryptocurrency and other sectors," the Pakistan finance ministry said in a statement following a final round of talks in Washington. Islamabad described the deal as a marker of a broader partnership with Washington, and Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, who led the final round of talks, said there was a larger economic and strategic agreement. "From our perspective, it was always going beyond the immediate trade imperative, and its whole purpose was, and is, that trade and investment have to go hand in hand," he said, in video-taped remarks. Pakistan had faced a potential tariff of 29%, which was later suspended - as with other nations - to allow trade talks up to an August 1 deadline. Islamabad was aiming at a tariff less than regional trade rivals such as Vietnam, which had a 20% tariff imposed by Trump, and India, which is threatened with a 25% tariff. Islamabad's trade surplus with Washington was around $3 billion in 2024, mainly due to textile exports. The United States is Pakistan's biggest market for textiles. The finance ministry said the agreement would lead to a "reduction of reciprocal tariffs, especially on Pakistani exports to the United States", but stopped short of revealing the figure. U.S. President Donald Trump meanwhile trumpeted a pact to help develop Pakistan's oil reserves. "We have just concluded a Deal with the Country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive Oil Reserves," Trump wrote on social media. "We are in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership." OFFSHORE EXPLORATION However Pakistan has seen a series of unsuccessful offshore exploration attempts. Its proven recoverable conventional crude oil reserves of between 234 million and 353 million barrels by different estimates place it around 50th in the world. Shale oil extraction has not been developed in Pakistan, though a 2015 study by the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimated a technically recoverable shale oil resource of 9.1 billion barrels for Pakistan. Oil is Pakistan's biggest import item, $11.3 billion in the year ended June 30, 2025, accounting for nearly a fifth of its total import bill, central bank data showed. The agreement does have potentially wider diplomatic aspects. Washington has been concerned to wean Pakistan, a nuclear-armed country of 240 million people, away from its increasing dependence on China. Before the Trump administration, Islamabad's relationship with Washington had cooled in recent years, as the U.S. had drawn closer to Pakistan's traditional adversary India. There was also resentment from Washington over Afghanistan, especially under the administration of President Joe Biden, which oversaw a chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan and the handing over of the country to the Taliban insurgency that Washington accused Islamabad of backing. Pakistan denies the charge. Under Trump, Washington has sought to renegotiate trade deals with many countries which he threatened with tariffs for trade relations he calls unfair, a characterization many economists dispute. In South Asia, Trump has repeatedly taken credit for a ceasefire agreed between India and Pakistan on May 10, after four days of conflict, saying he used the threat of restricting trade to get the two sides to halt hostilities. Islamabad embraced that version of events, praising him for intervening and then nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize. India disputes Trump's claims that the ceasefire resulted from his involvement and trade threats. (Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington, Asif Shahzad in Islamabad and Ariba Shahid in Karachi; Writing by Saeed Shah; Editing by Clarence Fernandez and David Holmes)
Khaleej Times
3 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Trump's tariff on India to do little to upset iPhone manufacturing plans
President Donald Trump's 25% tariffs on Indian goods will do little to slow the role of the Asian country as a key hub for manufacturing iPhones, even when it means more expensive smartphones for U.S. consumers, analysts and industry executives said. Apple has realigned its India exports to almost exclusively serve the U.S. market, with nearly all the $3.2 billion-worth iPhones exported by Foxconn from India going to the United States between March and May. It's "too early to say" if recent events or future changes in Trump's stance will alter Apple's manufacturing plans in India, an industry executive familiar with Apple's strategy said. "These plans are made with a longer window." Trump on Wednesday imposed a 25% tariff on goods imported from the country, effective Friday, a move that sent jitters across India Inc, though some view it as a negotiation tactic. For Apple, India is now central to its strategy of diversifying manufacturing beyond China, where geopolitical pressures have pushed it to consider alternative bases. India supplied 71% of all iPhones sold in the U.S. market between April and June, up from 31% a year earlier, driven by a corresponding decline in shipments from China, according to Counterpoint Research. Despite the newly announced tariffs, manufacturing iPhones in India would continue to remain cost-competitive, with expenses lower than when Apple began production there eight years ago, narrowing the cost gap with China, analysts said. Factors like growing local component availability, federal government incentives, and wages nearly half those in China have positioned India as one of the top two iPhone-producing countries, alongside China. "Making supply chain adjustments, particularly with new iPhone models nearing release, is unlikely due to the complex factors involved. It is expected to be business as usual, especially with a resilient supply chain like Apple," said Tarun Pathak, a research director at Counterpoint. Trump's ire Trump has repeatedly targeted Apple for making U.S.-sold iPhones outside the country by threats including company-specific tariffs, but hurdles like high costs, technological shortcomings, and legal issues have stood in the way. In May, he recalled telling Apple CEO Tim Cook: "we put up with all the plants you built in China for years ... we are not interested in you building in India, India can take care of themselves". Apple would rather absorb the higher costs for iPhones sold in the United States than to slam the breaks on its India expansion, said Faisal Kawoosa, chief analyst at Indian research firm Techarc. "Given that sales in the U.S. are largely operator-driven and sold as part of plans, it might mean adding a few more dollars to monthly plans rather than giving an upfront blow to consumers".
Khaleej Times
3 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
UAE: 25% US tariffs on India likely to weaken rupee further, boost remittance
The US decision to impose 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods is likely to further weaken the Indian rupee against the US dollar. For non-resident Indians (NRIs) in the UAE and other countries, this depreciation presents an opportunity — they will be able to remit more money to India, capitalising on favourable exchange rates. The Indian rupee has already been on a declining trend, losing nearly one rupee against the UAE dirham over the past two months — falling from 22.9 in early May to 23.89 by July 31. With the new tariffs set to take effect from August 1, analysts expect the rupee to drop further, potentially hitting 24 against the dirham. 'The rupee has the potential to weaken to 24 as it comes under pressure from US President Donald Trump's tariff decision,' said Vijay Valecha, chief investment officer at Century Financial. 'This opens a window for NRIs to remit funds at more favorable rates. A strengthening US dollar is compounding the rupee's weakness, and we could see a surge in remittances as NRIs look to maximise value.' Valecha also noted that the likelihood of further interest rate cuts in India has diminished despite inflation hitting a six-year low. 'After the RBI surprised markets with a 50-basis-point cut in June, most economists weren't expecting a follow-up. Now, with the rupee under pressure, the case for additional easing has weakened.' There are an estimated 3.7 million Indian nationals living in the UAE, sending billions of dirhams home annually. As the rupee declines, remittances from the UAE are expected to increase, as NRIs look to take advantage of more favourable exchange rates for personal and investment purposes. In addition to the 25 per cent tariffs, President Trump has also warned of further, unspecified penalties — citing India's continued purchase of Russian crude oil and military hardware. The White House is aiming to reduce the $42.7 billion trade deficit with New Delhi by pressuring India to boost imports from the US, possibly at the expense of its deals with Moscow. However, Trump has left the door open for negotiations, suggesting a trade agreement may still be in the works. NRI investments in Indian stocks NRIs with exposure to Indian equities or who run export businesses may face short-term headwinds. 'Exporters operating in sectors with significant US demand could see their profit margins shrink, and demand could soften due to higher prices,' said Valecha. 'NRIs who have invested in Indian firms with heavy US exposure — particularly in IT, pharma, and manufacturing — may also see pressure on their portfolios.' Indian stock markets have reacted negatively to the tariff announcement. 'This pressure is likely to continue until a trade deal is finalised — possibly by September or October,' Valecha added. 'The risk appears to be partly priced in already, with US-exposed Indian equities underperforming the broader market.' According to data from Century Financial as of July 29, the market capitalisation of US-exposed Indian companies is around 16 per cent lower than the benchmark index. Despite short-term volatility, Valecha remains optimistic about the long-term outlook for Indian equities, citing strong fundamentals and economic growth. Costlier Indian exports The new tariffs will make Indian exports more expensive in the US market. 'A 25 per cent tariff increase essentially raises the cost of Indian goods for American consumers,' Valecha explained. 'This could discourage purchases of Indian products, especially in price-sensitive sectors like textiles, auto parts, and consumer goods.' Exporters may be forced to absorb these additional costs rather than pass them on to buyers, in order to stay competitive and avoid losing market share. 'If American buyers switch to cheaper alternatives, India's export-focused industries may need to seek new markets or restructure their supply chains to offset potential losses,' he concluded.
