Italy to vote in two-day referendum on citizenship and labour reforms
Opposition leftist and centrist parties, civil society groups and a leading trade union have latched on to the issues of labour rights and
Italy
's demographic woes as a way of challenging prime minister
Giorgia Meloni
's right-wing coalition government.
They gathered more than 4.5 million signatures, according to the
CGIL labour union
– far more than needed to trigger the referendum, which will comprise five questions: four on the labour market and one on citizenship.
However, opinion polls suggest they will struggle to persuade the required 50 per cent plus one of the electorate to turn out to make the outcome of the vote binding. Ms Meloni and senior government ministers have indicated they will not vote.
READ MORE
'Meloni is afraid of participation and has understood that many Italians, even those who voted for her, will go to vote,' said
Elly Schlein
, leader of the main opposition Democratic Party (PD), who is spearheading the campaign along with Maurizio Landini, the CGIL labour union chief.
A Demopolis institute poll last month estimated turnout would be in the range of 31-39 per cent among Italy's roughly 50 million electors – well short of the required threshold.
'Securing a quorum will be hard. The opposition's minimum aim is to show strength and bring to vote more people than the 12.3 million who backed the centre-right at the 2022 general election,' said Lorenzo Pregliasco, from YouTrend pollsters.
The citizenship issue has garnered most public attention in a nation where concerns over the scale of immigration helped propel Ms Meloni's anti-migration coalition to power in late 2022.
The question on the ballot paper asks Italians if they back reducing the period of residence required to apply for Italian citizenship by naturalisation to five years from 10. This could affect about 2.5 million foreign nationals, organisers say.
[
'Trump likes this German': Merz Oval Office test gets approval back home
Opens in new window
]
With Italy's birth rate in sharp decline, economists say the country needs to attract more foreigners to boost its anaemic economy, and migrant workers feel a lot is at stake.
'If you just look at the time frame, five years are a huge gain for us migrants, if compared to 10,' said Mohammed Kamara, a 27-year-old from Sierra Leone who works in a building construction company in Rome.
Francesco Galietti, from political risk firm Policy Sonar, said keeping such rules tight was 'an identity issue' for Ms Meloni, but she was also being pushed by business to open up the borders of an ageing country to foreign workers.
'On the one hand there is the cultural identity rhetoric, but on the other there are potential problems paying pensions and an economy that relies on manufacturing, which needs workers,' he said.
The questions regarding the labour market aim to make it harder to fire some workers and increase compensation for workers laid off by small businesses, among other things, reversing a law passed by a PD government a decade ago.
The leaders of two of the governing coalition parties,
Antonio Tajani
of Forza Italia and
Matteo Salvini
of the League, have said they will not vote on Sunday, while Ms Meloni, who heads Brothers of Italy, will show up at the polling station but will not vote.
'She will thereby honour her institutional duty but avoid contributing to the quorum,' said pollster Pregliasco. – Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
European leaders eye Trump-Putin talks on Ukraine with anxiety
The further east you travel across Europe, the higher the anxiety levels are in national capitals about what US president Donald Trump might do when he meets Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. The terms of any future truce in Ukraine feel existential to EU states closer to Russia , more than the seemingly averted trade war between the European Union and the US does. Following Wednesday's online meeting with Mr Trump, European leaders were quick to put a positive spin on the outcome. German chancellor Friedrich Merz told reporters that Trump knows Europe's position and shares that 'extensively', while French president Emmanuel Macron said Trump will 'fight' for a trilateral meeting with both Putin and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy . READ MORE The reality, however, is that Zelenskiy has been kept out of the sit-down by Trump and Putin in Alaska, as have other European leaders, who fear Putin will use the opportunity to manoeuvre Trump into supporting a peace deal more favourable to Russia. France's president Emmanuel Macron, European Council president Antonio Costa, France's foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot and France's minister for the armed forces Sebastien Lecornu attend a video conference with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy and German chancellor Friedrich Merz on Wednesday. Photograph: Philippe Magoni/AFP/Getty The EU has tried and failed to get a seat at any table discussing the possible end of the war, which Russia started when it invaded Ukraine in early 2022. The Ukrainian president has done what he can to stay on Trump's good side and had seemed to convince the US president that Putin was the real obstacle to any ceasefire. [ Trump-Putin meeting: After months strengthening its hand, Ukraine is back to square one Opens in new window ] That was the message Zelenskiy and the leaders of Germany, France, the UK, Italy, Poland and Finland stressed in their video call with Trump on Wednesday. The big fear is that Trump will come out of the Alaska talks with the outline of a deal which sells Ukraine short in a bid to bring about a quick end to the conflict. Politically, Kyiv will surely not give up any territory held by Russian forces as the price of a shaky ceasefire alone. In a worst-case scenario, the White House could pressure Zelenskiy to make significant concessions by threatening to cut off vital support the US is providing to Ukraine, from weapons to battlefield intelligence. The Ukrainian leader would then be faced with accepting a bad deal, or fighting on without the help of the US. [ Zelenskiy says Trump promised postwar security guarantees for Ukraine Opens in new window ] Officials in Brussels are concerned that a truce on Russia's terms could undermine the future of Ukraine and, by extension, the security of Europe. Despite commitments to spend huge sums on defence over the coming years, Europe still relies on the security blanket Washington has provided for the Continent since the end of the second World War. The EU has bent over itself to keep the fraying transatlantic bond from breaking altogether. Ukraine could become the latest flashpoint in those tensions. German chancellor Friedrich Merz and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy attend a joint press conference following a virtual meeting hosted by Mr Merz between European leaders and US president Donald Trump in Berlin, Germany. Photograph: Omer Messinger/Getty 'It's not quite a case of panic; EU capitals are taking this very seriously, but let's see,' said one Brussels-based diplomat. 'There might be something that could come of this, some dynamic that might lead somewhere.' It is fair to say nobody really knows what to expect.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Russia tries to align stars for historic deal with Trump at Alaska summit
As allies of US president Donald Trump try to reassure Kyiv and other European capitals that he will not do anything rash at Friday's summit in Alaska, Russia wants the talks to mark a dramatic – even historic – shift in relations between the nuclear powers. US secretary of state Marco Rubio has said it will be just a 'feel-out meeting', and White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt has called it a 'listening exercise,' amid concerns that Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin could make sweeping decisions about the war in Ukraine and the continent's security without Kyiv or Europe being at the table. The rhetoric in Russia is very different. The Kremlin often says that Putin sees no point in talks for the sake of talks, and Moscow expects the summit to deliver concrete benefits that were unimaginable before Trump returned to power in January. 'The Alaska summit could be historic in terms of delivering complex solutions to key problems. Including in Russian-American relations,' said Leonid Slutsky, chairman of the foreign relations committee in Russia's lower house of parliament. READ MORE 'Most constructive politicians in the world are hoping for this ... At the same time, putting pressure on our country or speaking in the language of ultimatums is useless.' Politicians and state media in Moscow say the summit could deliver not only a favourable outcome to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but set the stage for grand US-Russia agreements on everything from arms control to co-operation in the Arctic. Kirill Dmitriev, the senior Russian finance official and former Goldman Sachs banker who has become a key point man in Moscow for Trump's team, said the choice of Alaska as the summit venue had particular significance. 'Born as Russian America – Orthodox roots, forts, fur trade – Alaska echoes those ties and makes the US an Arctic nation. Let Russia and the US partner on environment, infrastructure and energy in Arctic and beyond,' he wrote on social media. Dmitriev described Alaska – a Russian colony from 1799 to 1867 – as the 'perfect stage' for the summit, because of its history and its location as the closest US point to Russia, where they are separated by the Bering Strait and the international date line. 'Let us go from yesterday to tomorrow in peace,' he said. [ Why Putin has good reasons to be hopeful for Friday's summit meeting with Trump Opens in new window ] Dmitriev's posts on X relentlessly amplify Maga talking points: that Trump and Putin want peace and their critics are warmongers; media that question Trump's attitude to Russia are the same ones that pushed the 'Russia hoax' about alleged collusion between the Trump camp and Moscow in 2016; advocates of tougher action against Russia are repeating the 'failed' policy of Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden. 'Neocons and other warmongers won't be smiling on Aug 15, 2025. Putin-Trump dialogue will bring hope, peace and global security,' he wrote. In a subsequent post, referring to one of Trump's books, he said: 'The Art of the Deal on Friday August 15.' The Art of the Deal on Friday August 15. — Kirill A. Dmitriev (@kadmitriev) Russia has been assiduously preparing the ground for the sort of deal, or deals, that it desires from the summit. Over several months this year, Kyiv and Europe strengthened co-ordination with the White House over the war in Ukraine, as Trump become increasingly annoyed by what he called Putin's 'bullshit' on the issue. Putin changed the mood music simply by agreeing to meet. It prompted Trump to quietly shelve plans to impose sanctions on all countries that buy Russian oil, and pitched Ukraine and Europe back into the position of trying to rein in Trump – a dynamic that is only likely to renew friction between the US and its erstwhile allies. Putin has also brought Trump to the table without agreeing to a ceasefire or any concessions. Russia still demands permanent control of five regions of Ukraine and limits on its future sovereignty, including a ban on joining Nato. Kyiv says that would be a capitulation, and European states insist borders cannot be changed by force – leaving them vulnerable to allegations from Moscow and some US politicians that they are blocking a deal and should be ignored by America's self-declared 'president of peace'. Moscow also knows that Trump wants a bigger US role in the resource-rich and strategic far north – having threatened to take over Greenland – and more than half the entire coastline of the Arctic Ocean is Russian territory. 'It is in Alaska and in the Arctic that the economic interests of our countries converge and prospects for implementing large-scale mutually beneficial projects arise,' said senior Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov. Trump said last month that he wanted to begin work on arms control with Moscow before the expiry next February of the 2010 New Start agreement, which is the last remaining US-Russia nuclear arms pact. The Kremlin flagged the issue last week by saying it had scrapped a self-imposed moratorium on deployment of short- and mid-range missiles and would now place them wherever it liked, in response to alleged US threats in Europe and Asia. On the battlefield too, Moscow is trying to strengthen its position before the summit. In recent days, Russian troops have pierced a section of the front line in eastern Ukraine and advanced about 10km near the mining town of Dobropillia, as they try to encircle the nearby small cities of Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka and put more pressure on Kyiv's two main strongholds in Donetsk region – the cities of Slovyansk and Kramatorsk. Kyiv says these are very small groups, moving on foot or in light vehicles, who cannot hold territory but aim to sow chaos behind the front line and – above all – give the impression that Ukraine's defences are collapsing on the eve of the summit. Russian media claim Ukrainian troops are nearly surrounded in some areas, which Kyiv denies. It recalls how Trump said in March that he had asked Putin to spare the lives of 'thousands' of Ukrainian soldiers who were supposedly encircled in Russia's Kursk region. The claim was false, but no one in Trump's administration acknowledged that fact or explained why Trump was unquestioningly repeating Kremlin propaganda. While Moscow's preparations for the summit have been meticulous, Washington's look haphazard, even amateurish. The meeting was agreed when Steve Witkoff, one of Trump's special envoys, visited Moscow last week. US and European media reports say Witkoff – a real-estate developer and donor to Trump's re-election campaign – may have misunderstood Putin's position on Ukraine. He has also been accused of parroting positions espoused by the Kremlin. To compound the sense of chaos, Trump has placed inexperienced loyalists in important intelligence and foreign policy roles, and approved massive cuts at the state department that have culled many of its analysts on Ukraine and Russia. With so many factors in its favour, Russia wants to strike a deal now, not least to gain relief from western sanctions that are combining with high inflation and labour shortages to slowly strangle its economy. Ukrainian drone strikes on oil facilities are also taking their toll, and petrol prices in Russia are now at record highs despite an export ban. Russia's main stock market reflects the national mood, having surged by more than 8 per cent since the summit was announced. 'Everyone is expecting a breakthrough in Russia-US relations,' said Alexei Antonov at Moscow investment firm Alor Broker, 'and also the beginning of a resolution to the Ukrainian problem.'
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Appeal Court overturns requirement for councils to get members' consent before defending legal actions
Local authorities do not have to seek the approval of councillors before deciding to enter a defence to a court challenge to council decisions, the Court of Appeal has held. The three-judge court's decision overturns a High Court ruling from June last year that found councils must take the 'positive step' of securing express authorisation from elected members before defending a case. The question of whether authorisation from councillors is required has been raised in several High Court challenges related to decisions of elected members, such as votes on local development plans. Every local authority must have a development plan, a document with maps that guides how certain areas should be zoned and developed. READ MORE It is used to guide planning decisions in those areas, but is sometimes the subject of litigation by interested parties who could be affected by any changes. In this case, developer Oceanscape Unlimited Company brought a legal challenge over the Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council development plan and the decision to rezone its lands at Stillorgan Business Park for educational facilities. Oceanscape contended the rezoning amounted to a 'sterilisation' of its site and would cause the company 'serious and irreparable' harm as well as costing it millions of euro. The council filed legal documents opposing the developer's claim, but Oceanscape argued the local authority had no power to do this as it had not sought prior authorisation from elected members, which it argued was required under the Local Government Act, 2001. It asked the court to strike out the council's opposition statement on these grounds. Section 153(2) of the Act states that where a legal action relates to the performance of functions reserved to the elected members, the chief executive 'shall' act with the 'express authorisation of the elected council'. It provides that such authorisation 'shall be deemed to have been given unless or until the contrary is shown'. The council asked the court to interpret the section which, it said, relies on an assumption that the chief executive has a 'deemed authorisation' that is lost only where elected members actively direct him not to do something in a case. It said no formal resolution was passed by elected members, but they were aware of the proceedings and were formally briefed on them in March 2023. The High Court had ruled in Oceanscape's favour, finding the required authorisation was not secured in this case. Soon afterwards, the High Court introduced new practice rules requiring local authorities to inform the court early on whether councillors had given express authorisation to defend a challenge to their decision. However, the Court of Appeal has now overturned the High Court decision and has ruled in favour of the council in a recently published judgment. Explaining the appeal judges' rationale, Ms Justice Nuala Butler said entering into litigation was an 'executive function' and could be taken by the chief executive without requiring a vote of elected councillors. 'In these circumstances, the appeal taken by the local authority will be allowed and the order striking out its statement of opposition will be set aside,' she said.
