Mendham borough voters approve $20M school referendum. What's it mean for local tax bills?
Preliminary results posted by the Morris County Board of Elections shows a 701-203 vote in favor of the first question to authorize $9.96 million worth of spending. About $3.4 million of state aid is available to offset that cost. "High priority" projects funded with the passage include renovations to a library, science lab and heating systems at the two school buildings in the K-8 district.
Hilltop School also would get a security vestibule for entering the building. Mountain View Middle School already has one.
The second question authorized an additional $9.33 million in expenditures, but only if the first question passed. It passed with a vote of 601-300. Those funds will be used to construct an auditorium at Mountain View for a district that hasn't had one since a 2001 referendum funded work that necessitated the demolition of the last auditorium there.
'On behalf of our district administration and the Board of Education, I would like to extend our sincere gratitude to community members for taking the time to learn about this proposal and voting,' Superintendent Mitzi Morillo wrote in a statement following the vote.
With the pending retirement of debt from a 2001 referendum, residents would have seen a small decline in their annual school taxes if only the first question passed, the district said.
With both halves of the referendum approved, the monthly tax bill for the average homeowner will increase by $22 a month, or $264 a year, over the 25-year term of the bonds issued to pay for the referendum. That's based on the average assessed home value in the borough of about $690,000.
The new debt would not be assessed until the previous bond is paid off in July 2026, at which point the increase will kick in.
More: Morristown councilman runs for NJ Assembly. Can he flip a seat in GOP stronghold?
"Mendham Borough School District will now take the next steps," the district announced in its statement. "Our professional consultants will begin by selling the bonds at the most favorable rates. Architects and engineers will prepare project specifications for the bidding process. Contracts will be awarded to the lowest qualified bidders, per state regulations. The district will continue to keep the community updated throughout this process."
The K-8 district serves nearly 500 students. Mendham borough and township high school students attend West Morris Mendham Regional High School.
The vote awaits certification by the Morris County Clerk after mail-in and provisional ballots are counted.
This article originally appeared on Morristown Daily Record: Mendham borough voters OK $20M school referendum. What's that buy?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Put pressure on Putin, Mr. President — it's the only way to end this war
President Trump said he wanted to meet Russian dictator Vladimir Putin to 'see what he has in mind.' 'Probably in the first two minutes,' he added, 'I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can get done.' Mr. President, you have your answer: Putin doesn't want peace, he simply wants conquest. Putin put on his best fake smile, waved for the cameras, then ominously pointed out how many parts of Alaska have Russian names. He rejected a ceasefire, and instead demanded long negotiations for a comprehensive treaty. This is the dictionary definition of 'tapping along.' While he says he wants more talks and ridiculously floats 'next time in Moscow' — an invitation to be dismissed out of hand — his bombardment of Ukraine continues. You're right, Mr. President, that the killing must end, and Alaska showed that the only way to do that is to squeeze Putin. Mr. President, you have your answer: Putin doesn't want peace, he simply wants conquest. AFP via Getty Images Trump said that he would not sanction Russia further after the summit. But he should increase sanctions on Russia immediately — particularly secondary sanctions on oil and other goods that are keeping Putin's war machine afloat. The president should make clear arms supplies will continue, particularly now that Europe is footing the bill, and our military industry is benefiting. Putin did not move on his demands. He must be forced to move — with cash and steel. Tariffs. Weapons. Strong security guarantees for Ukraine. Pressure is the only language Putin understands. According to reports, Putin said that 'if he wanted' he could take all the land he's fighting for in Ukraine. What lies. He's been battling over this territory for three years, and if he really had that kind of advantage, why would he be pushing for a 'land swap' that pole vaults him to the other side of the Ukrainian front lines? He's pretending his victory is a fait accompli, when the reality is he is, at best, grinding along at a pace that would take years for him to complete his 'special operation.' We cannot afford to wash our hands of Ukraine, even if it is true that it is 'Biden's War' and it would never have started during a Trump presidency. First, your voters believe in the fight — 51% of Republicans believe we should be supplying more arms and military support to Ukraine (up from 30% six months ago), and 84% of GOP voters have an unfavorable view of Putin. Second, while we understand you envision Russia as a strategic partner, a weakened Russia benefits your world vision. Consider what has happened already. Iran is providing drones to Russia, yet when you bombed Tehran's nuclear facilities, Putin could provide his ally no help. He has alienated Azerbaijan, and you were able to step up and negotiate a peace deal between that country and Armenia. Putin has less resources to put into the Arctic. Some advisers say this is a distraction from the real enemy, China. But standing up for Ukraine, showing strength for our allies, sends a message to Beijing. There is also a widening rift between China and Russia as Putin's moves become more destructive. In Alaska, Putin again floated the blackmail of nuclear war, the 'point of no return' as he said. President Xi already has bristled at such rhetoric, saying that China 'opposes . . . the threat to use nuclear weapons.' China should make it clear that it is still unacceptable. By rejecting a ceasefire, Putin wants to push a bad deal at the point of a gun. We fall for his flattery, his bluster and his threats at our peril.
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
They want Pedro Pascal to do WHAT?
Former Vice President Kamala Harris could have been the predictable frontrunner in California's gubernatorial race, but ever since she announced her decision not to run, the once subdued campaign to lead America's most-populous state has broiled with uncertainty. Most voters are undecided. Most of the declared candidates are people you haven't heard of. Which has politics-watchers from Sacramento to Washington wondering: Who, oh who, could it be? So we asked a range of experts from within and beyond the POLITICO newsroom — journalists, academics, political operatives and others — how they'd answer that question. And we added an important caveat: They could pick anyone, no matter how unlikely it is that they'd ever make a bid for the governorship irl. Realistic or not, their choices reveal a lot about this moment. Some of their picks spoke to the long arc of California politics. Some engaged with the ever-evolving relationship between politics and culture. All of them made one thing clear: The race to lead the state President Donald Trump loves to hate is going to be a doozy. Read the story.'I'm not naive enough to think that the president is going to get rid of RFK, but I will say that … there are concerns about some of the staffing decisions over at HHS.' Can you guess who said this about HHS? Here's a hint: They seemed to direct this at RFK Jr.'s principal deputy chief of staff, Stefanie Spear. Scroll to the bottom for the answer.**Why Is D.C.'s Mayor So Zen? ... For a blue-city mayor, Washington's Muriel Bowser has made a lot of concessions to President Donald Trump — from tearing up the Black Lives Matter street mural to launching a hate-crime investigation over anti-Tesla graffiti to pushing through a football-stadium subsidy favored by the GOP. 'And he kicked her in the teeth anyway,' writes Capital City columnist Michael Schaffer. With the White House assuming control over the police department, Schaffer spoke to insiders — and Bowser herself — about her strategy for dealing with all this about a deposition? We get it — no one can keep up with everything Laura Loomer says or does. But her deposition for her case against comedian Bill Maher, who speculated that Loomer might be having an affair with Trump during the 2024 campaign, is sure to come up in conversation this weekend, so make sure to throw out these talking points. Otherwise, your friends in Washington might look down on you for being a well-adjusted person with a life beyond social media. (From Associate Editor Dylon Jones) — Everyone will immediately reach for the most outlandish pull quotes, but as a refined student of cyber-MAGA, you can provide background context on the key players: 'It's interesting that the whole basis of Loomer's lawsuit is that Maher is the reason she isn't working in the White House, because she seems to have quite a lot of influence over staffing the federal government herself. The Daily Beast found at least 16 people who got fired after she called them out.' — Show off your knowledge of this whole scandal by pointing out something important that the wild parts of the deposition have overshadowed: 'Why do we even have this deposition? Puck wrote that Loomer's legal team released it, even though the judge wanted it to be confidential.' — Bring the conversation up out of the gutter and try for a serious point about geopolitics: 'The MTG vs. Loomer feud actually speaks to the broader rift within MAGA over Israel, with MTG, Rep. Thomas Massie and others in the party growing increasingly skeptical of our support of the country.' — Do not say anything about that fast-food restaurant. Special Forces Made Her Life 'a Living Hell' ... Courtney Williams' job was to help the Army's most elite and top-secret unit cover its tracks in the field. But when she got to Fort Bragg in North Carolina, she says she faced a culture of misogyny, harassment and discrimination — turning her life into 'a living hell.' Williams shares her story with investigative journalist Seth Harp in this excerpt adapted from his new book, The Fort Bragg Cartel: Drug Trafficking and Murder in the Special Forces. 'Her story is a cautionary tale for just how bad it can get for female service members and civilian employees in elite units shrouded in secrecy and steeped in privilege and impunity,' Harp writes. 'It is a rebuke to those who believe, wrongly, that the military panders to women and minorities.'Dining With Putin's 'America Guru' ... Russian President Vladimir Putin has a top foreign policy adviser who spent 10 years in Washington as Russia's ambassador to the United States. It's because of that background that he's known as Putin's 'America guru.' But before that, back in Washington, he'd get lunch every few months with Toby T. Gati, who used to work for the State Department and the National Security Council. 'Looking back, I can see now how my interactions with [Yuri] Ushakov reflected larger trends in U.S.-Russian relations,' he writes. 'They feel the U.S. is the enemy; their hope had been that making money would always be more important to us than anything else. That hope was misplaced. As the Russians see it, the U.S. is now driven by hegemonic aspirations.'A Shift on Israel ... Amid starvation in Gaza, the longstanding bipartisan consensus in the U.S. of supporting Israel is beginning to shift on both sides of the aisle. 'Strategically and militarily, Israel is more powerful in the Middle East now than at any time in this century,' writes Daniel Drezner. 'The price Israel has paid for these military successes, however, is considerable. The erosion of public support could have long-lasting effects on Israel and its relationship with vital allies.'From the drafting table of editorial cartoonist Matt Wuerker.**Who Dissed? answer: It was conservative influencer and longtime Kennedy critic Laura Loomer, speaking to POLITICO Playbook. politicoweekend@
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Redistricting in Indiana: Republicans raise questions, Democrats have limited options if special session called
As Texas Democrats eye an end to their nearly two-week walkout to block Republican efforts there to redistrict, a growing number of Indiana Republicans have been voicing questions and concerns about redistricting in Indiana. The Texas Democrats announced Thursday they will return provided that Texas Republicans end a special session and California releases its own redrawn map proposal, both of which were expected to happen Friday. Democrats did not say what day they might return. Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott still intends to push through new maps that would give the GOP five more winnable seats before next year's midterm elections. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows has said that if Democrats don't return the next time lawmakers reconvene on Friday, the session will end and the governor will immediately benign another one. Abbott put redistricting on the agenda at the urging of President Donald Trump, who wants to shore up Republicans' narrow House majority and avoid a repeat of his first presidency, when the 2018 midterms restored Democrats to a House majority that blocked his agenda and twice impeached him. It is unusual for redistricting to take place in the middle of the decade and typically occurs once at the beginning of each decade to coincide with the census. Last week, Vice President JD Vance visited Indiana to meet with Gov. Mike Braun and other state Republican leaders to discuss redistricting Indiana's nine congressional districts. Braun told the Indiana Capital Chronicle Tuesday that he hasn't yet decided if he'll call a special session for redistricting, but said he and state leaders are 'considering it seriously' as they wait to see what comes out of Texas. 'I think mostly what happens here is going to depend on where Texas goes, because I think they've got five seats in play,' Braun said. The Indianapolis Star reported Friday that Trump invited Indiana Republican lawmakers to the White House for an Aug. 26 meeting. Molly Swigart, a spokeswoman for Senate Republicans, said the meeting was scheduled 'to discuss President Trump's agenda.' Indiana University Professor Emeritus of Political Science Marjorie Hershey said the effort to redistrict is 'a power politics move' because the Republican majority in the U.S. House of Representatives is 'as narrow as it could be.' In the last 100 years, there have been two midterm elections where the party that holds the White House hasn't lost seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, Hershey said. If Republicans lose a handful of seats, they would lose control of the House, she said. 'That would essentially mean the end of President Trump's dominance of the political agenda. He's gotten where he has as a result of having complete control of the Congress,' Hershey said. 'In order to maintain his edge in the House of Representatives in 2026, Trump wants a cushion for Republican House members because he's afraid that otherwise he's almost guaranteed to lose the House.' Historically, redistricting has occasionally occurred between censuses, Hershey said, but it goes against precedent. 'This is not normal in American politics,' Hershey. 'It's not the way that the constitution was written. It's not the way the supreme court has structured election law over time.' Indiana Republican response Indiana was last redistricted in 2021, which left Congressional Republicans with seven seats and Democrats two seats. 'It's not as though Indiana isn't already redistricted in a highly partisan way to favor Republicans, it is,' Hershey said. 'Even squeezing out one more Republican district in Texas or in Indiana might save President Trump from becoming as much of a lame duck as he otherwise would in 2026.' Indiana's First District, held by Democrat U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, D-Highland, would be the most under threat for redistricting because it's become more Republican over time — though still Democratically held, Hershey said. The First Congressional District remains Indiana's most competitive seat. In 2022, Mrvan won nearly 53% of the vote against Republican Jennifer-Ruth Green. In 2024, Mrvan saw a small increase in the number of votes to just over 53% when he won against Republican Randy Niemeyer. The problem for Republicans with redistricting the First District, Hershey said, would be Democrats from the First District would be moved into other districts, which could make the other districts more competitive for Democratic candidates. 'Sometimes the majority party in a state gets a little too greedy and thinks, 'we might have a shot at this one additional seat,' and then they end up losing the seat next door and not winning the seat that they had hoped to gain,' Hershey said. Aaron Dusso, an associate professor of political science at Indiana University Indianapolis, said he hasn't seen an appetite from Indiana Republicans to redistrict because of the risk that it will make safe Republican congressional districts more competitive. State Rep. Ed Soliday, R-Valparaiso, said party leadership has reached out to him to gauge his thoughts on redistricting Indiana. Soliday said he told the leadership 'show me the facts, tell me the unintended consequences, then I'll tell you how I'll vote.' 'I haven't seen anyone show me about how this would work,' Soliday said. 'I have a lot of questions before I jump on board with this.' Sen. Rick Niemeyer, R-Lowell, said he's discussed redistricting with his colleagues but he's still thinking about his position on redistricting. 'I'm not committing one way or the other,' Niemeyer said. 'We're looking at it and have not made a decision yet. That's where I'm at.' State Rep. Mike Aylesworth, R-Hebron, said the state legislature 'did a good job' redistricting in 2021, but he's waiting to see what the leadership decides about a special session for redistricting. 'I don't think it's necessary, but we'll wait and see what the caucus says,' Aylesworth said. 'I'm hesitant to change things, but we'll see what leadership says.' State Sen. Dan Dernulc, R-Highland, said he's spoken with leadership about redistricting, but that he needs more facts and the 'why' of redistricting. 'I don't see a need for it. I don't want to say yes or no, we're a work in progress on it,' Dernulc said. Indiana Democratic redistricting maneuvers In the Indiana House and Senate, two-thirds of members — or 67 House members and 34 senators – have to be present to call a quorum, according to each chamber's rules. In the House, Republicans hold 70 seats to Democrats 30. In the Senate, Republicans hold 40 seats to the Democrats' 10 seats. Indiana Republicans have enough members to call a quorum. Indiana Democrats 'wouldn't have a lot of options,' Dusso said, other than short-term delay tactics, like requiring readings of the whole redistricting bill or talking for long periods of time on the floor. Democrats can talk about the issue publicly to try to rally support from voters to put pressure on Republicans to not hold a special session on redistricting. 'It doesn't really stop anything from happening, it just slows it down,' Dusso said. The best move, Dusso said, would be for Democrats and lobbyists to talk with Braun now to persuade him not to call a special session. 'I think that's where they can win. Once it's called, I don't think they have a chance,' Dusso said. 'If you can get Braun to relent, I think that's where they're going to have their success.' If redistricting were to occur in Indiana, Hershey said it's likely that lawsuits would be filed. 'I'm sure that the Democrats will fight as hard as they can because there's a point at which the party that's trying to take this unfair advantage just starts to look bad,' Hershey said. 'It's a game of chicken, and we'll have to see who it is who veers away first.' State Sen. Rodney Pol Jr., D-Chesteron, said it's 'problematic' that President Trump has been pressuring Republican states to redistrict in the middle of a census. Trump's decision to do so shows he's scared to face the voters given the policies he's passed. 'He's afraid of his own base,' Pol said. 'It's not how our democracy works.' Given Indiana's Republican supermajority, Pol said Indiana Democrats couldn't leave the state to delay the vote. If a special session were called, Pol said the Democrats would attend and voice their opposition from the House and Senate floors. 'The only thing that we have is our voice,' Pol said. 'We're going to have to show up.'
