
Unwritten Report Speaks Volumes About CFO Uncertainty
Study after study, headline after headline, and now earnings report after earnings report are showing the same thing: Business leaders are having a difficult time planning and managing in the current situation of economic volatility. But Deloitte's annual Q1 CFO Signals report likely captures the CFO's situation more clearly than anything else right now: The firm opted not to issue the report given the major changes in the macroeconomic picture in such a short amount of time.
An email Deloitte sent me last week said that they fielded the survey in late February. In just two months, 'we believe the results may no longer accurately reflect the current sentiment of CFOs.'
Today is President Donald Trump's 100th day in office, and the administration's new policies have forced business leaders to reassess their long and short-term plans, supply chains, budgets, customer base, and go-to-market strategies. And then, sometimes just days later, changes or reversals come from the executive branch, forcing businesses to start from zero and start figuring out their plans again. The outlook and ideas from late February can seem like they're from a past year, not just a past month.
It's not known if and when the frenetic pace of change will slow down, and what it will mean for business. Trump received some support as he campaigned on tax cuts and fewer regulations. The tax cuts he instituted in his first term are on their way to an extension, and regulatory changes have been relatively slow to come. But without some clarity and stability on the economy and global trade, it may be hard for any business to plan much further than the immediate future, which could make for a very long 1,361 days left in Trump's presidency.
One company that is optimistic about its future is fast-casual restaurant chain Cava. The Mediterranean food eatery has been on a growth path not only through its food choices, but by making customers and employees feel welcomed. I talked to CFO Tricia Tolivar about Cava's view of the future. An excerpt from our conversation is later in this newsletter.
Brand new Subaru cars sit in a storage lot at Auto Warehouse Co. in Richmond, California last month.
Last week was very good on Wall Street, especially compared to earlier this month. The Nasdaq rose 8.29%, while the S&P 500 saw gains of 5.59% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 3.1%. Markets mostly held steady on Monday. What caused the markets to rise last week seemed to be the absence of chaos and optimism that new tariff deals would be announced soon. Last Tuesday, Trump said that he had 'no intention of firing' Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, following several days of insulting and threatening him with termination on social media. On Wednesday, he said the current 145% tariffs on Chinese goods would 'come down substantially.'
Even though Trump sounded like he was softening his tariff stance, there wasn't much progress in the last week. On Thursday, Chinese officials said there had been no motion in trade negotiations with the U.S., and reiterated that they want Trump to drop all unilateral tariffs. Chinese Ministry of Commerce spokesperson He Yadong said China is open to talks, but any such dialogue must be 'conducted on an equal footing and based on mutual respect,' and the U.S. must correct its 'wrong practices' before engaging with Beijing.
Tuesday morning, the Trump Administration confirmed a Wall Street Journal report that the 25% tariffs on foreign-made auto parts will be indirectly lowered gave automobile stocks a brief bump trading on Tuesday. Prices fell again as General Motors reported earnings and pulled its full-year guidance on tariff uncertainty.
More economic indicators may be on their way down. Wednesday morning, the Bureau of Economic Analysis will issue its estimate of GDP in Q1, and forecasts from economists are expecting quarter-over-quarter growth of 0.4%—a huge decrease from last quarter's 2.4% growth rate. The U.S. hasn't had negative quarterly GDP growth since Q1 2022, as post-pandemic inflation and supply chain woes battered the economy. If GDP growth is slow enough, it may signify that the U.S. is on the road to an economic recession.
ANDREW THOMAS/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images
Over the weekend, Trump posted on Truth Social that his new tariffs could end income taxes for 'many people.' Economists are skeptical of the claim, to say the least. Trump said that the increase in revenue collected from tariffs, coupled with the 'massive number of jobs' that will be created will make tariffs 'a BONANZA FOR AMERICA!!!' Studies on the probable impact of tariffs say it is not possible to generate enough money through tariffs to offset income taxes—especially because the goal is to reduce imports into the U.S., which would mean less money paid into the U.S. Treasury.
Many economists say that the cost of tariffs is ultimately borne by the consumer, meaning that any savings that may come to income taxes would be paid back to the federal government in another way. Tariffs are already impacting container shipping from China, which currently has a 145% tariff rate, writes Forbes senior contributor Pamela Danziger. U.S.-bound containers are down 40%, and given the long shipping route to the U.S. and the goods that usually come this time of year, analysts are expecting emptier shelves to greet consumers in the second half of 2025, just in time for back-to-school shopping.
Trump has eliminated some taxes, however. The Treasury Department and IRS announced they were scrapping new rules to audit business partnerships—an area that the Biden-era IRS said was rife with 'sophisticated maneuvers' to rack up undeserved tax benefits, writes Forbes contributor Joshua D. Smeltzer. Trump also quieted talk among Republicans of a potential new tax on millionaires, saying it would 'be very disruptive because the millionaires would leave the country.'
getty
Potentially good news on the economic front: Small businesses are still borrowing, and doing it responsibly. Live Oak Bancshares, a North Carolina-based bank that had the second most SBA loan originations last year, reported that so far in FY 2025, it originated $1.5 billion in loans, writes Forbes' Brandon Kochkodin. In comparison, FY 2024 saw $2 billion in loan origination all year. 'We have not yet seen a decline in potential borrowers' appetite,' said CFO Walt Phifer during the bank's earnings call last week. So far, delinquencies are low, and credit standards are tightening, the lender said.
Cava CFO Tricia Tolivar.
Mediterranean fast-casual restaurant chain Cava has seen a string of success, growing its profit by more than 35% last year with 388 locations nationwide. Tricia Tolivar has been the chain's CFO since 2020, and talked to me about her employee- and customer-centered approach to the company's finances. This conversation has been edited for length, clarity and continuity. A longer version is available here.
What does the business space look like now for fast-casual restaurants?
Tolivar: At Cava, we've been very fortunate to be able to deliver some of the strongest traffic growth of anyone in the public environment. We believe that's because of our strong value proposition with our guests, where quality, relevance, convenience and experience are incredibly important. The quality of food that we offer, the relevance of the Mediterranean diet, as well as the convenience. [Customers are] able to experience us in our restaurants, as 65% of our guests do, or enjoy our digital platforms where you're able to either have it delivered or pick up.
Last is the experience. We believe that right now, more than ever, it's incredibly important to reinforce the human connection and our Mediterranean hospitality. The experience in our restaurant is that we welcome everyone to our table and want to encourage those who come to share a meal with us and to enjoy this incredible cuisine. In this environment, it's important to leverage those aspects of the business so that we can continue to deliver on those strong traffic results that we've seen.
There is so much uncertainty today about the economy in general, about supply chains and consumer confidence. How are you seeing that at Cava? How does the fast-casual restaurant industry as a whole see it?
One of the other competencies that we admire in our organization is our ability to act with agility. Certainly in this environment, there have been a lot of changes, a lot of things to navigate, but our team is well positioned to adjust and adapt to those changes, while staying focused on our strategic objectives and what we want to deliver for the business overall.
For example, making sure that we're being thoughtful around pricing and the consumer. We believe it's important to make appropriate investments in team members and guests, so over the years we've been more modest in price increases on our menu. This year, we raised prices 1.7%. If you look at pricing from the end of 2019 to the end of '23, our pricing only went up 15%, where CPI went up 23%. That's an eight-point difference, and many in fast food went up over 30%. Making sure that we're not reacting to swings and some fluctuations in the short or medium term, and that we're being thoughtful in those changes.
I heard you had talked to some team members about how they don't like to chop onions and you made changes with your supplier to make sure they came pre-chopped. What kinds of things like that should a CFO be doing to work with employees and customers to create a better fit?
We believe that it's incredibly important to continue to work with our team members and our guests. Every quarter we do what's called a shoulder-to-shoulder in our restaurants so we can learn more about how to be better partners for the business overall. Last month, I worked in one of our restaurants. We are testing an expanded catering program this year, so I was capturing insights from the general manager on how we might be able to make enhancements from a technology perspective to make their jobs easier. The more we can take complexity out of our general managers' and team members' daily lives—like slicing pickled onions—and make it easier, the more they can focus on an even better guest experience.
I think it's critically important to spend time in the environment in which you're working, and bring that back to become a better finance leader and business partner overall.
I think it's critically important to spend time in the environment in which you're working, and bring that back to become a better finance leader and business partner overall.
What is one experience from Cava that is helpful to pass along to other CFOs?
The one experience I've learned is the importance of listening, and how listening thoughtfully to partners in the business, the guests in the organization and team members can drive outsized performance as you go forward.
Toymaker Hasbro posted strong earnings last week, beating analysts' expectations and reassuring investors that tariff impacts on the company would be minimal.
17%: Q1 revenue growth across the company, driven by 46% growth in the Wizards and Digital Gaming segment
$1.07: Adjusted EPS, which was more than 50% higher than analysts projected
'Driven by a strategic shift toward higher-margin businesses': The strategy CFO Gina Goetter said led to the company's strong revenue growth and profit increase
Corporate leadership isn't easy by any means, but many of the larger challenges you face are shared across companies, industries and executives. Here are five of the top issues that leaders today deal with—from navigating uncertainty to AI—and tips for responding to them.
With so much uncertainty in today's business world, it's extremely difficult to make decisions—but you still have to. Here are five steps to assess the right decision for your business.
Which company's stock has had the best performance during Trump's first 100 days in this term?
A. Netflix
B. Palantir
C. VeriSign
D. Dollar General
See if you got the right answer here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
20 minutes ago
- Associated Press
INVESTOR DEADLINE APPROACHING: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Investigates Claims on Behalf of Investors of Zenas BioPharma
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $75,000 In Zenas To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you purchased or otherwise acquired stock of Zenas pursuant and/or traceable to Zenas' registration statement for the initial public offering held on or about September 13, 2024 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). [You may also click here for additional information] New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 8, 2025) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Zenas BioPharma, Inc. ('Zenas' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: ZBIO) and reminds investors of the June 16, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company. [ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: ] Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) Zenas BioPharma materially overstated the amount of time it would be able to fund its operations using existing cash and expected net proceeds from the IPO; and (2) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times and negligently prepared. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Zenas' conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. To learn more about the Zenas BioPharma class action, go to or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook. Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP ( ). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner. To view the source version of this press release, please visit


Business of Fashion
23 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
This Week: Are Tariff Price Hikes Finally Here?
What's Happening: On Wednesday, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics will release inflation data for May, the first inflation reading taken entirely after Trump's tariffs went into effect. In April, consumer prices rose 2.3 percent, just under the economists' consensus. Delayed Impact: Forecasters are calling for a mild uptick in prices, if that. Many fashion and beauty brands have announced price increases, often to be implemented on select products over the summer rather than right away. This gives consumers a bit of time to acclimate to their new, more expensive reality. And it builds in room to change course on the off chance Trump calls the whole trade war off in the meantime. Rock and a Hard Place: This strategic approach to price increases is savvy, but for many brands also borne out of a lack of options. After raising prices so much in the post-pandemic years, companies are worried they'll lose customers by hiking further, even if they have a good reason. Questioning Reality: Whether consumers believe prices are rising can have a big impact on inflation, so all those early warnings from brands may become a self-fulfilling prophecy even if Trump doesn't announce a single new tariff. There are also growing questions about the numbers themselves. Last week, economists raised questions in the financial press about whether inflation data could still be trusted, noting hiring freezes and layoffs had curtailed the government's ability to conduct its massive monthly survey of consumer prices. What to Expect at The Business of Beauty Global Forum 2025 What's Happening: On June 9 and 10, The Business of Beauty holds its third annual gathering in Napa Valley. A second class of entrepreneurs will also receive The Business of Beauty Global Awards. In the News: Speakers include Hailey Rhode Bieber, fresh off her $1 billion deal. Tracee Ellis Ross will share her observations on the needs of the Black and texturised hair community at a time when DEI is under siege. Global Perspective: Founders from international brands including Beauty of Joseon, Ultra Violette, Byoma and Nykaa will address challenges and opportunities in the global beauty market. Attorney Lindsay Toczylowski will speak on her efforts to help her client, Andry José Hernández Romero, the Venezuelan makeup artist currently detained in an El Salvador prison. See for Yourself: If you won't be in Napa Valley, catch these speakers and more on the livestream. The Week Ahead wants to hear from you! Send tips, suggestions, complaints and compliments to


Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
LA Protests: Trump's National Guard Move Sparks Legal Concerns
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's announcement of the deployment of the National Guard in California to quell protests against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions has raised legal concerns. Why It Matters Federal immigration enforcement operations sparked protests across California for a second day in a row on Saturday. ICE carried out raids in Paramount, Los Angeles County, following similar actions at several locations throughout other parts of city on Friday. Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the move, saying that local law enforcement was already mobilized and the presence of the National Guard was "purposefully inflammatory," would "escalate tensions" and "erode public trust." What To Know On Saturday, the White House ordered the deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles under a provision called Title 10 to "temporarily protect ICE and other United States government personnel who are performing federal functions." The National Guard is a state-based military force that serves as both a state and federal reserve branch of the U.S. Army and Air Force. It typically operates under state command and is funded by the state. However, in some cases, troops may be assigned to federal missions while still under state control, with funding provided by the central government. The law referenced in Trump's proclamation allows National Guard troops to be placed under federal command, and permits this under three conditions: if the U.S. is invaded or faces the threat of invasion; if there is a rebellion or imminent rebellion against federal authority; or if the president is unable to enforce federal laws using regular forces. A protester stands on a burned car holding a Mexican flag at Atlantic Avenue on June 7, 2025, in Paramount, Los Angeles County, California. A protester stands on a burned car holding a Mexican flag at Atlantic Avenue on June 7, 2025, in Paramount, Los Angeles County, California. Apu Gomes/GETTY The memorandum from the White House reads: "To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States." However, the law also stipulates that such orders should be "be issued through the governors of the states." It is not immediately clear if the president can activate National Guard troops without the order of that state's governor. Newsweek contacted the White House for clarification via email outside of regular working hours. "President Trump's deployment of federalized National Guard troops in response to protests is unnecessary, inflammatory, and an abuse of power," said Hina Shamsi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's National Security Project. The Trump administration has not invoked the Insurrection Act, according to anonymous U.S. officials who spoke to Reuters this weekend. The act of 1807 serves as the primary legal authority allowing a president to deploy the military or National Guard during times of rebellion or civil unrest. A memo issued by the White House on the matter specifies that the National Guard has been deployed to "temporarily protect ICE and other United States government personnel who are performing federal functions, including the enforcement of federal law, and to protect federal property, at locations where protests against these functions are occurring or are likely to occur based on current threat assessments and planned operations." This means that National Guard troops will not be permitted to aid local law enforcement—they will be used to protect and provide logistic support to federal ICE agents. "There's nothing these troops will be allowed to do that, for example, the ICE officers against whom these protests have been directed could not do themselves," Steve Vladeck, a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center who specializes in military justice and national security law, wrote in a blog post. "There is the obvious concern that, even as they are doing nothing more than 'protecting' ICE officers discharging federal functions, these federalized troops will end up using force—in response to real or imagined violence or threats of violence against those officers. In other words, there's the very real possibility that having federal troops on the ground will only raise the risk of escalating violence—not decrease it." What People Are Saying A White House memo reads: "Numerous incidents of violence and disorder have recently occurred and threaten to continue in response to the enforcement of federal law by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other United States government personnel who are performing federal functions and supporting the faithful execution of federal immigration laws. In addition, violent protests threaten the security of and significant damage to federal immigration detention facilities and other federal property." Border czar Tom Homan on Fox News: "We're already mobilizing. We're gonna bring the National Guard in tonight and we're gonna continue doing our job. This is about enforcing the law." He continued: "American people, this is about enforcing the law, and again, we're not going to apologize for doing it." California Governor Gavin Newsom on X, formerly Twitter, following the National Guard announcement: "The federal government is moving to take over the California National Guard and deploy 2,000 soldiers. That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions. L.A. authorities are able to access law enforcement assistance at a moment's notice. We are in close coordination with the city and county, and there is currently no unmet need." Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project: "By taking this action, the Trump administration is putting Angelenos in danger, creating legal and ethical jeopardy for troops, and recklessly undermining our foundational democratic principle that the military should not police civilians." Newsom's office also told Newsweek on Friday: "Continued chaotic federal sweeps, across California, to meet an arbitrary arrest quota are as reckless as they are cruel. Donald Trump's chaos is eroding trust, tearing families apart, and undermining the workers and industries that power America's economy." Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law, told the Los Angeles Times: "It is using the military domestically to stop dissent. It certainly sends a message as to how this administration is going to respond to protests. It is very frightening to see this done." What Happens Next After Trump announced he was deploying National Guard troops on Saturday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said other measures could follow. Hegseth wrote on X that active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton, south of Los Angeles, were on "high alert" and could also be mobilized "if violence continues."