1% hold 40% wealth: Financial analyst says income gap in India now worse than under British rule
Comparing present-day inequality to colonial India
Joshi drew comparisons between present-day inequality and the British colonial period, arguing that economic disparity has widened to levels not seen even under foreign rule. 'This is not an accident. It's policy,' he wrote in a LinkedIn post. 'Half the country is fighting for crumbs while a tiny fraction lives in unimaginable luxury.'
Top 10% earn most of national income
The analysis highlights that the top 10% of Indians earn 57.7% of the national income, leaving the bottom half with a much smaller share. Joshi attributed this to several factors including favorable tax laws for the wealthy, weak labor protections, and growing corporate consolidation. 'Real estate and stock market gains mostly help those who already have capital,' he said.
Power and wealth remain concentrated
Joshi claimed that the existing system reinforces inequality rather than correcting it. 'Inequality doesn't hurt those with power — it helps them,' he wrote. 'They fund elections. They shape the media narrative. They lobby against redistribution.'
Although India's economy has been expanding, Joshi said the growth is not inclusive. He pointed out that the challenge is not the amount of wealth India generates but how it is distributed. 'We produce enough wealth. We just don't share it fairly.'
Live Events
Calls for urgent reforms
To address the issue, Joshi urged the government to consider wealth taxes, stronger labor protections, and greater investment in healthcare and education. 'Until there's real political will,' he warned, 'this will keep getting worse.'
Concluding his remarks, Joshi questioned the idea that inequality is a natural outcome. 'The system isn't broken — it's rigged,' he wrote. 'It's time we stopped pretending this is inevitable. It's time to ask whose interests the system really serves.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Zelenskyy Meets Trump as EU and NATO Leaders Gather at White House
Zelenskyy Trump meeting, which also included crucial European Union( EU) and Nato leaders rally, marks a turning point in the tone of US tactfulness towards Ukraine. Meeting Zelenskyy visit photos: A Change in US Diplomacy With Ukraine Europeans such as British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer were delighted at the meeting – which was conducted in a much more amiable atmosphere than Zelensky's previous encounter at the White House. The main result is the potential for face-to-face meetings between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Zelensky and, potentially, Trump. A Kremlin spokesman, Yuri Ushakov, issued a noncommittal statement on Monday evening which merely said it was "worthwhile" to "explore the possibility of raising the level of representatives" from the Russian and Ukrainian negotiating teams. 'We're auspicious about the conversations we've had moment. We have a lot of work to do,' British Prime Minister Keir Starmer told reporters after the meeting. European leaders also reiterated their support for Ukraine, with a focus on strong security guarantees, but there were differences with Zelenskyy on whether a ceasefire was needed for further talks. Plans for a Peace Deal President Trump also reiterated his commitment to a peace deal with Russia, despite ruling out an immediate ceasefire. He suggested a possible trilateral summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Zelenskyy to work towards direct negotiations. Zelenskyy, for his part, said he was ready to hold direct talks with Putin, but US diplomacy warned that the road ahead would be difficult. Offering Apologies to Melania Trump In a personal letter to Melania Trump, Zelenskyy responded to the First Lady's recent open letter to Putin calling for an end to the war in Ukraine. Zelenskyy wrote to the former First Lady thanking her for 'your heartfelt words and support' in a letter delivered to the EU leaders White House on Friday, offering his own apology. The Zelenskyy-Trump meeting with EU and NATO leaders shows a significant shift in the diplomatic approach of the US towards Ukraine.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
UK's Royal Navy appoints Himachal Pradesh cadet as first-ever Hindu chaplain
The UK's Royal Navy has appointed its first-ever Hindu chaplain, the first non-Christian to be appointed for the official role of offering spiritual support to fellow naval officers based on the tenets of Hinduism. Bhanu Attri, originally from Himachal Pradesh, took over his new role last week after undergoing a somewhat different course from other Navy cadets. 'To become the first-ever Hindu chaplain in the fleet is a profound honour,' said Attri. 'As a Hindu brought up in India, the chance to represent individuals from other diverse religions brings meaningful representation for the Hindu community and reflects the Navy's commitment to diversity, inclusion, and spiritual care for all,' said the 39-year-old. 'My family feels immense pride, a pride grounded in generations of faith, service, and resilience,' he said. The Hindu Council UK (HCUK) welcomed the move after proposing Attri as fitting the criteria for the role: personal fitness both physical and mental, principled in faith and philosophy, reflective and pastoral; professional eligibility of education equivalent to Hindu scriptural degree level and post accreditation experience in leadership capacity, with a sound sense of spirituality and interfaith relations; and general outlook for integration into the British culture and having good English communicative skills. 'The training can be arduous, which requires medical fitness standards, ready for duty 24/7 at short notice,' said HCUK's Anil Bhanot, Hindu Advisor to the UK's Ministry of Defence (MoD). 'MoD careers are sometimes neglected by our Hindu youth and we will try and do more community meetings at temples to raise awareness. British Hindus have settled here from all corners of the world, and although our spiritual bhoomi (land) is India, our karmabhoomi is the United Kingdom and MoD represents our protective arm,' he said. Attri was among 148 new officers among the so-called 'leaders of tomorrow', including warfare specialists, engineers, overseas and all cadets who joined from civilian life who completed their 'Initial Officer Training' last week. After up to 29 weeks of demanding instruction at Britannia Royal Naval College (BRNC) in Dartmouth, south-west England, they transformed from civilian to sailor and formally passed out at a BRNC ceremony in front of friends, family and senior naval officers. 'We live in a perilous world and as a service we must respond to the challenges to our nation's security, also with confidence – and that means we need people like you that can offer leadership of the highest quality,' said Andrew Burns, Vice-Admiral and the Royal Navy's senior operational commander who was the guest of honour at the ceremony. 'There is no greater commitment than to serve your country, and to lead others to do the same,' he said. The training is designed to teach the basics of serving in the military, such as drill and uniform, through the fundamentals of leadership, seafaring, naval history and strategy. In addition to extensive time in the classroom and on the parade ground, cadets head out on to Dartmoor to learn and develop leadership and teamwork skills, spend time at sea aboard an operational warship, and conduct training on specialist Vahana boats on the River Dart and in the English Channel. 'Commissioning into the Royal Navy is a moment none of us forget, and it has been a privilege to follow these officers through their training. What awaits is a life of duty and frontline service,' said Captain Andy Bray, Captain Britannia Royal Naval College.
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Is India stumbling on Trump's tariffs by dancing with Russia and China?
The recent tariff blows administered by President Trump upon India, accompanied by his dismissive "dead economy" remark, has led to us unfurling foreign policy moves involving Russia and China. These offer a textbook case of strategic signaling, demonstrating a preparedness to exercise all available levers of statecraft. Prime Minister Modi's telephone conversation with President Putin, coupled with NSA Ajit Doval's visit to Moscow, served to not only reassure Russia but also sent a calculated message to Washington. This was further bolstered by our Prime Minister's visit to China for the SCO Summit and the subsequent visit of Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to New Delhi, where he held extensive talks with NSA Ajit Doval and other Indian leaders. Notably, Doval himself visited China in June 2025 for the SCO Security Council Secretaries' meeting and held direct discussions with Wang Yi in Beijing. President Putin has now called PM Modi to brief the latter about his discussions with President Trump. And PM Modi has in turn thanked President Putin for doing so. The dance is well and truly on. Moments such as these have the tendency to revive Cold War reflexes and it must come as little surprise to hear many voices urging India to reassert its strategic autonomy. However, the fact that India along with Brazil has fared the worst among major economies in trade negotiations with the United States raises questions of whether this is far deeper than just short-term friction. To understand, we must unpack the developments before rushing into any conclusions. First, there needs to be the realisation that the nostalgia for a 146-million-strong Russia—rooted in its historic use of the UNSC veto—to shield a 1.4-billion-strong India is no longer enough to meet rising aspirations in our nation. Around 7 to 8 million young Indians enter the labour market each year. For an India, where more than 65 percent of the population is under the age of 35, relations with Russia offer limited prospects to expand economic opportunities or strengthen the country's manufacturing base. What we must instead understand is that certain structural realities will continue to shape the US–India relations regardless of leadership changes. Both Trump and Modi are well above their nations' median age 40 and 29 respectively, yet their personal styles have disproportionately influenced bilateral narratives. It would, though, be short-sighted to reduce the overall trajectory of the relationship to this specific political moment. India is more than Modi and the US is more than Trump Long-term trends such as shifting demographics, immigration patterns from India to the US, rapid technological change—an area where the Indian diaspora in the US has a significant role to play—and China's steady rise will keep drawing the two countries into deeper engagement. Broadly, the United States can't be reduced to President Trump, just as India is more than Prime Minister Modi. As former US National Security Adviser and Republican John Bolton recently hinted, with a passing of a few more quarters, the world can get on with the normal realities. That said certain elements of Trump-era politics are likely to leave a lasting imprint on US domestic and foreign policy. With this being the case, while India can and should diversify its partnerships, particularly with Southeast Asia and Northeast Asia along with Latin America and Africa, its engagement with the United States must continue to be given a unique place. With nearly a quarter of the global GDP and as the world's leading technological innovator, the US offers India the opportunity to leapfrog technologically, bolstered by the influence and resources of a vast and well-integrated Indian diaspora. Therefore, it is essential to view this relationship within the broader strategic canvas, one in which US–India engagement remains among the most consequential. This relationship could also benefit India–Europe ties, given the transatlantic interdependencies. Now, coming specifically to the present. It seems President Trump had been irked by India. There might have been a discernible US role in dousing the latest India–Pakistan conflagration. It was so even in past episodes like the 1999 Kargil war and 2001-02 Operation Parakaram. The only difference is that President Trump jumped in to claim credit this time around. President Trump's limited sensitivity to the nuanced history and to India's established red lines, which the career diplomats of the US State Department would have been expected to convey to him, hasn't helped matters. With India rebuffing the US President's claims, a significantly weaker Pakistan, with far fewer levers of influence, managed to secure comparatively better economic outcomes from Washington. This included President Trump's high-profile lunch meeting with Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir. But the natural trajectory of US–India relations that had been on the upswing ever since President Bill Clinton's landmark visit to India in March 2000, will likely reassert itself over time. Need for a foreign policy reboot What this episode underscores is the urgency we must show in absorbing and acting upon the lessons from this diplomatic setback. There must be a sharper reading of the tea leaves in Washington and a more agile foreign policy. Along with this must come a rethink of personality-driven approach adopted by the Modi government. Nowhere is this more evident than in the foreign policy establishment. Under Foreign Minister S Jaishankar, a seasoned career diplomat, the Ministry of External Affairs has increasingly resembled an event-management outfit rather than a strategic command center. Much of Jaishankar's public visibility comes through carefully curated interviews with sympathetic think-tank interlocutors or appearances at international forums that resemble PR showcases rather than substantive policy engagements. This performative style, which privileges clever soundbites and applause-winning lines, risks turning diplomacy into a spectacle where optics overshadow outcomes. More importantly, it also overlooks a central strength of India's foreign policy tradition: its domestic inclusivity and bipartisan consensus. For decades, India's external posture derived stability from a broad political agreement that foreign policy must remain above partisan divides. This consensus, whether on non-alignment, nuclear policy, or neighborhood engagement or even the US, allowed India to navigate shifting global dynamics with continuity and credibility. By contrast, the current approach sidelines wider political dialogue. Without investing in institutional resilience, regional expertise, and cross-party ownership, India risks hollowing out the very foundations that once made its foreign policy distinctive and served it well. In a century defined by multipolar uncertainty, shifting alliances, and technological disruption, India must embrace a foreign policy that is inclusive, bipartisan, and future-ready; but definitely not one reduced to the cadence of a public-relations campaign. Only then can we as a nation soar onwards. (Views are personal. The author has over 25 years of experience as a practitioner, researcher, and analyst in international affairs.)
