We want to ‘give as much information as possible' on suspects
Speaking on LBC, Mr Guildford said he would have taken the same action as his colleague from Warwickshire Police, amid an alleged 'cover-up' of details about two men, reported to be Afghan asylum seekers, who were charged over the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said that he 'absolutely' believes that information about charged suspects' immigration status should be made available by police.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has called for more transparency from police about suspects, and said it was an 'operational decision' for forces and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) over what information to release.
During the phone-in, when asked about the Home Secretary's comments, Mr Guildford said: 'We're always striving to be transparent in everything that we do, but we're governed by rules. Rules are often set by Parliament, they're set by the CPS, the courts.
'We have to be really careful that we do follow the rules, so we don't just make rules up as we go along. I spoke to my colleague next door in Warwickshire, he's followed the rules. He's done the right thing.
'At the moment, the rules are under review, and they're under review by the CPS, the National Police Chiefs' Council and, also, there's a Law Commission review ongoing.
'And I think what we need to do is wait and see what comes out of there, and then act accordingly and act properly.
'But in terms of the broadest theme of transparency, absolutely, we produce loads of data, and of course we want to give as much information as possible, but we have to operate within the bounds of the rules of the law.'
Asked if he would take the same action as his colleague in Warwickshire over the alleged rape case, Mr Guildford said: 'Yes, that's right.'
He said: 'I think the problem with providing more information is you've got to be so careful with the protocol that we've got and the guidance that we've got, which comes actually from a few years ago, sort of post-Leveson, post-Jimmy Savile, post some of the issues around the Cliff Richard inquiry, and we need to make sure that we follow the rules.
'And if we don't, we don't want to come on the wrong side of the argument or prejudice any live proceedings. And that is really key. Can't underline that enough.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
17 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Man arrested following controlled explosions of viable devices in Tyrone
A man has been arrested after controlled explosions of viable devices were carried out in a residential area in Co Tyrone. Homes were evacuated overnight after a suspicious object was found in the Oakfield Gardens area of Moy on Friday afternoon. Advertisement A local sports club was used as a rest centre and people were advised to avoid the area while the police operation was being carried out. On Saturday afternoon, police said there was no further risk to the public. Detective Sergeant Dougherty said police received a report of a suspicious object at a residential property shortly before 4.40pm on Friday. 'Officers attended the scene, and a public safety operation commenced,' he said. Advertisement 'Cordons were put in place and a number of local residents had to be evacuated from their homes overnight. 'Ammunition technical officers determined that there were a number of viable devices in the property and carried out controlled explosions, before residents were able to return to their homes on Saturday morning. 'There is no further risk to the public, but officers remain in the area this morning as part of our ongoing investigation. 'This was an extremely distressing experience for residents, and we understand the impact of the disruption faced. Advertisement 'We are grateful for their support and cooperation as we worked to keep everyone safe. 'One man, aged in his 30s, was arrested on suspicion of possessing explosives under suspicious circumstances. 'He remains in custody at this time, assisting with inquiries. 'A number of items have been taken away for further examination and as inquiries are ongoing, we appeal to anyone with any information to contact us on 101, quoting reference number 1138 of 8/8/25.' Advertisement
The Sun
17 minutes ago
- The Sun
How safe is Times Square for tourists visiting NYC?
TIMES Square's bright lights and bustling energy make it one of New York's biggest tourist magnets, but recent events have left many wondering: Is it safe to visit? With a shooting incident on August 9, 2025 that left three people injured, it's natural for travellers to have concerns about venturing into the famous "Crossroads of the World." 2 The truth is, Times Square remains one of the most heavily policed areas in Manhattan. But like any major tourist destination, it comes with its own set of safety considerations that smart visitors should know about. What's been happening in Times Square? Saturday morning brought sobering news when three people were wounded in a shooting in Times Square. The incident occurred between West 44th Street and 7th Avenue, with victims taken to Bellevue Hospital, where they were reported in stable condition. While any violent incident is concerning, it's worth noting that such serious crimes in Times Square are relatively rare, given the millions of people who pass through the area annually. The NYPD responded quickly to the scene, demonstrating the robust police presence that's maintained in the area around the clock. Previous incidents have also occurred, including surveillance footage showing a shooting at a Times Square store where a tourist was shot in the leg. But these remain isolated events rather than indicative of widespread danger. How common are serious crimes in Times Square? Despite its reputation in films and older media, modern Times Square is dramatically different from its grittier past. The area underwent massive revitalization in the 1990s and early 2000s, transforming it into a family-friendly destination. The NYPD maintains a significant presence in Times Square year-round, with both uniformed officers and plainclothes detectives patrolling regularly. The Times Square Alliance also employs private security personnel who work alongside law enforcement to maintain order. Statistically, your chances of experiencing serious crime in Times Square are relatively low. The area sees minor crimes like pickpocketing and scams targeting tourists, but violent incidents like shootings remain uncommon, given the foot traffic volume. 2 What safety measures are in place in Times Square? Times Square benefits from some of the most comprehensive security infrastructure in New York City. The area features extensive CCTV coverage, with cameras positioned throughout the pedestrian plazas and surrounding blocks. Police substations are strategically located within Times Square itself, ensuring rapid response times for any incidents. You'll typically see mounted police, foot patrols, and police vehicles circulating the area, especially during peak tourist hours and evening entertainment periods. The Times Square Alliance coordinates with the NYPD to provide additional security layers, including trained personnel who can assist with directions, answer questions, and identify potential problems before they escalate. During major events, holidays, and New Year's Eve celebrations, security measures are significantly enhanced with additional barriers, screening procedures, and expanded police presence. Should you still visit Times Square? Despite recent incidents, Times Square remains one of New York's safest tourist areas due to its high-profile nature and corresponding security measures. According to Gothamist, "Violent crime there — which includes murder, rape, robbery and assault — has gone down in Times Square compared to pre-pandemic levels, according to Times Square Alliance reports based on NYPD data." Millions of visitors experience Times Square without incident every year. The key is exercising the same common-sense precautions you'd use in any major urban tourist destination. Stay alert, travel in groups when possible, and trust your instincts if something feels off. Recent events serve as reminders that no urban area is entirely risk-free, but they shouldn't deter you from experiencing one of New York's most iconic destinations. The overwhelming majority of Times Square visits are completely uneventful. If you're still concerned, consider visiting during daytime hours when foot traffic is heaviest and visibility is best. Early evening can also be ideal, as the area comes alive with theater-goers and diners while maintaining good lighting and police presence.
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Groups clash as hotel near Cardiff takes in Afghans
The demonstration was called by a group identifying itself as Concerned Local Families, who voiced opposition to the UK Government's relocation of Afghan nationals to the site. Among its members were leaders of 'Voice of Wales', an online platform that challenges official immigration policy. In response, people describing themselves as anti-racism campaigners, mostly from Stand Up to Racism (SUTR) and allied groups, staged a counter-demonstration. The hotel is currently housing Afghan nationals who supported British forces during the war in Afghanistan and have been granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK, known as Entitled Persons (EPs). The Ministry of Defence selected the site as part of a relocation programme, with the first intake including 19 families, three couples, and one single person. The arrangement is expected to last up to nine months while permanent housing is secured. The protest began at 6pm on the access road leading to the hotel. Protesters on one side (Image: NQ) People gathering outside the hotel (Image: NQ) From the perspective facing the hotel, the 'Concerned Families group' stood to the left, while SUTR and their supporters gathered to the right. Initially, the two groups remained largely self-contained, but tensions escalated, prompting police to establish a cordon and instruct attendees not to cross sides. In the middle of the road stood aid worker Nizar Dahan, known as 'Neezo,' who was told by police to choose a side. At first he declined, and then reluctantly complied, saying: 'I don't believe in sides, I am a human being, and I don't believe in all these divisions. There is no left and right, just humans and we all need to think that way.' Neezo also said he was perfectly happy to chat to all at the protest and would respect all views. The SUTR side, led by human rights lawyer Hussein Said, appeared more organized and unified in its protest behaviour. Protesters carried printed signs and banners, including those from the National Education Union. Chanting was coordinated and persistent, with slogans denouncing fascism and racism. Hussein said: 'These people fought for this country and are in danger. We have a duty to take them in.' When asked about the nature of fascism, he did not define it but said: 'The threat of fascism anywhere is a threat that must be taken very seriously. "Of course, we weren't sure if fascist people would turn up today, but there was enough to concern the police and the council so we felt we must be loud and clearly visible here today to say we won't stand for this.' On the opposite side, Stan Robinson of 'Voice of Wales' challenged the official narrative surrounding the Afghan families. He said: 'You shouldn't believe these figures. Only one in sixteen (of the people moving into the hotel) is genuine, and all their families are entitled to come.' Mr Robinson expressed concern about the long-term impact on local services and questioned the transparency of the relocation process. He added that the only exception to his hard-nosed approach would be care and resettlement of Gurkhas and their families. While the protest remained relatively peaceful, both sides exchanged heated accusations. Despite this, attendees from both sides described the police operation as effective and well-managed. However, Mr Robinson voiced dissatisfaction with the policing approach, accusing officers of bias. He claimed that police cameras were focused only on his side and that officers failed to act on provocative chants from the counter-protesters. Stan Robinson (Image: NQ) By 7.40pm, the SUTR group was led off the site under police supervision, with the visible police presence swelling from around 20 officers at 6pm to about 40. Officers blocked traffic to allow for an orderly evacuation of the site, and by 8pm the site was almost entirely cleared. The protest highlighted deep divisions over migration, national identity, and public accountability, with each side insisting it spoke for the true interests of local residents and the wider community. At the end of July, Vale Council provided clarity on the situation, saying: "As Entitled Persons (EPs), this group have the right to live in the UK following their efforts supporting the British military in Afghanistan. "These households are not illegal immigrants, asylum seekers or refugees. The UK Government has granted them indefinite leave to remain in this country, which is now regarded as their home. "The first of two intakes, which is expected shortly, will consist of 19 families with children, three couples and a single person. "This temporary arrangement, lasting up to nine months, is in place while they are helped to find more permanent accommodation across the UK." As of writing there were no reports of arrests.
