David Ellison's plan to rebuild Paramount: ‘Top Gun 3' and more ‘Star Trek'
Nearly a week after taking the keys to the battered media company, Ellison and his top executives met with reporters at the Paramount Pictures lot Wednesday to show that they mean business.
Ellison and his team will be based in Hollywood — not New York — and they plan to view the entertainment industry through a California lens by making big investments, leaning into technology and building on popular franchises, including 'Top Gun,' 'Star Trek' and 'Yellowstone.'
Last week, Ellison's Skydance Media and its backer RedBird Capital Partners closed their $8-billion takeover of the firm that includes CBS, Comedy Central, MTV Networks, Showtime and the Melrose Avenue movie studio.
'One of our biggest priorities is actually restoring Paramount as the No. 1 destination for the most talented artists and filmmakers in the world,' Ellison said. 'Very simply, great filmmakers make great movies.'
Such a Paramount comeback would be long overdue.
The film studio has suffered from decades of under-investment, and was often bypassed by many of Hollywood's biggest filmmakers. The studio plans to release eight films next year, but that's too small an output to sustain a theatrical film business, Paramount executives said.
The plan is to nearly double the number of feature films to 15 and, and eventually, 20 movies a year.
Ellison, the 42-year-old chairman and chief executive, was eager to bury his days of being a political target, following the lengthy regulatory review of the deal and President Trump's lawsuit against CBS for its edits of a '60 Minutes' interview with Kamala Harris last fall. Paramount settled the lawsuit last month, agreeing to pay $16 million.
Days later, CBS notified Stephen Colbert that it was ending his late-night talk show in May — prompting howls among some fans and raising speculation the show was sacrificed to appease Trump. CBS has said the decision was 'purely' based on economics; the show has been losing money.
Programming will be created with broad audiences in mind, Ellison and his lieutenants said. Ellison said his goal is to move the company away from political divisions in an effort to reach a wider audience.
'One of the things I think is important is I don't want to politicize this company,' Ellison said. 'We're an entertainment company first, and I genuinely believe if you're breathing, you're our audience. We want to be in the business of speaking to everybody.'
For Ellison, movies have been a lifelong interest. He recounted his days growing up when he, his mother and sister would go to the cinema or pick from their extensive home library of video cassette tapes.
He intends to 'significantly scale' the amount of content the studio produces and has entrusted his longtime deputy Dana Goldberg and Josh Greenstein, a former Sony executive, as co-chairs of Paramount Pictures. The studio plans to concentrate on key intellectual property such as 'Star Trek,' 'World War Z' and 'Transformers,' with Goldberg saying that 'Star Trek' is a priority across the company.
Paramount executives are also interested in filmmaker-driven original films. Late last week, Paramount said it landed an original project called 'High Side,' helmed by 'A Complete Unknown' director James Mangold, which reunites him with actor Timothée Chalamet.
In addition, Paramount Pictures plans to greenlight family films, with classic movies like 'The Goonies,' 'Gremlins' and 'Night at the Museum' as touchstones, Goldberg said. There's also interest in R-rated comedies, horror and stories that appeal to Middle America.
Paramount has no plans to crank out low-cost films for its Paramount+ streaming platform, said Cindy Holland, the new head of streaming for Paramount.
'The movies that we make will be made for theatrical,' Ellison said, adding that there is cultural significance to making films for the big screen.
Ellison also praised actor Tom Cruise, whom he met when he founded his Skydance Media company in 2010. Skydance co-produced 'Top Gun: Maverick' and recent 'Mission: Impossible' installments. Goldberg recounted how she and Greenstein called Cruise after Paramount unveiled its new leadership structure.
'It was to thank him for, frankly, the huge piece he's been in Paramount's history, Paramount's present and how important he is for Paramount's future,' Goldberg said. ''Top Gun 3' is a massive priority for us.'
The new corporate ownership structure gives the family of Larry Ellison (David's billionaire father) and RedBird the ability to build the company for the future, rather than manage for quarter-by-quarter earnings.
The Ellison family now owns 50% of the company, and RedBird holds 20% — a dominant position. Regular shareholders have 30% of the stock in the new company. Shares soared more than 36% on Wednesday to $15.
The event included Ellison's co-investor, RedBird founder Gerry Cardinale, who stressed his confidence in Paramount's prospects.
Cardinale noted that he dispatched two of his top executives to join the company — Andy Gordon, a former Goldman Sachs banker is now Paramount's chief operating officer and chief strategy officer, and Jeff Shell, the former NBCUniversal executive who's now Paramount's president — to signify the importance of rebuilding.
'I'm betting my firm and my career on this deal,' Cardinale said.
On Wednesday, longtime Paramount shareholder Mario Gabelli sued Redstone and Paramount, alleging the deal structure disadvantaged shareholders other than Redstone, who received a premium for her stock.
As part of the deal, the Redstone family was paid $2.4 billion for their National Amusements Inc. firm, which held the controlling shares. After their considerable debts are paid, the family should come away with $1.75 billion. Paramount's B-class shareholders received $15 a share.
Skydance and RedBird have promised investors that it will find $2 billion in cost savings, which means further belt-tightening and layoffs. Shell said he didn't want Paramount to become a company that had perpetual layoffs, saying the plan was to have one restructuring and 'then be done with it.'
The executives also showed no interest in cleaving off the cable channels, unlike Comcast or Warner Bros. Discovery, which are preparing for spinoffs. Shell said the diminished status of the channels gives the company opportunities to rebuild those brands.
In their first week, Ellison and RedBird have made big bets. On Monday, the company said it would spend $7.7 billion over seven years to lock up U.S. streaming and television rights to UFC mixed-martial arts fights for the Paramount+ streaming service and CBS.
In addition, Paramount in July agreed to pay $1.25 billion over five years to the creators of Comedy Central's 'South Park.' A separate deal with Trey Parker and Matt Stone allows the cartoon to run exclusively on Paramount+.
When asked what Paramount assets were underappreciated, Ellison talked about the broad reach of CBS, which just ended the regular television season in first place in prime-time among broadcast networks for the 17th consecutive year. He also mentioned CBS' relationship with the NFL, Masters golf tournament and NCAA March Madness.
Gordon added, 'I actually think every asset is underappreciated here.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Next Step: Can a millionaire store clerk retire at 55?
There's low-cost living, and then there's the freegan-living millionaire featured in this edition of The Next Step, Financial Planning's newest series. The series explores one simple question: What's the single most impactful move someone can make toward a stronger retirement? Here's how it works: We invite Americans to share basic details about their savings, income and goals. We anonymize their data and present it to professional financial advisors, asking what one step could make the biggest difference. READ MORE:The Next Step: Is this young lawyer on track to retire?As insurers axe Medicare plans, here's what advisors should knowTrump order opens 401(k)s to private assets: What advisors need to knowBetting on bitcoin is the smart move for financial advisors Each edition features one individual's story and practical advice from advisors. In this installment, we heard from a 42-year-old store clerk in Caldwell, Idaho. Here's how his finances stack up against the average American his age. The saver makes just about $37,000 a year, roughly 47% less than the median full-time worker in his age range. Currently, 60% of his income goes toward retirement savings. After taxes and withholdings, he receives $2,500 in monthly income, more than enough to cover his average monthly expenses of $900. Despite having a lower income than the typical American his age, the saver owns his home and has no debt. That puts him well ahead of the median debt figure for someone in his age bracket. The typical American between 35 and 44 years old reports a median debt figure of just over $140,000. "I purchased a home when I was 23 — when someone like me, making $12 per hour, could purchase a home," the saver said. "And have since paid it off." Along with owning his home, the saver keeps costs down by practicing freeganism, a lifestyle focused on cutting consumption and reducing food waste. Freegans often rely on discarded goods, using practices like dumpster diving, foraging, bartering and sharing. The saver has $1.1 million stowed away for retirement, nearly 25 times more than the median adult in his age range. About 20% of that is in pretax retirement accounts, while the other 80% is evenly split between Roth accounts and nonqualified accounts. Based on his current income and contribution rate, he saves about $1,850 every month toward retirement. His journey to this point wasn't linear. On the path to becoming a millionaire, he faced a handful of significant financial setbacks. He invested in his employer and lost everything when the company restructured, he said. After the housing crisis, he put significant money into mortgage-backed REITs, only to lose most of it. One of his earliest investments, General Motors at age 18, was wiped out when the automaker went bankrupt in 2009. Still, he said he's had some sizable successes as well. He purchased Meta on its IPO day and added Nvidia shares to his portfolio a few years ago. He also bought a few bitcoins at $400. Although he sold half of them in 2019, he has held onto the rest. "I did all this while never making over $20 per hour at my job," he said. "It has been a kind of wild adventure accumulating something for the future." The saver said he wants to retire at 55, with plans to spend slightly less per month than he currently does. Based on his desired retirement age, FP projected how much money he can expect to have at 55, given a $1.1 million starting base and a monthly contribution of $1,850. In the calculation, FP assumes an average inflation-adjusted return of 7%. General savings guidelines suggested by Fidelity Investments recommend having savings equaling one year of your annual salary by age 30, with the goal of having 10 times your annual salary saved by age 67. With current savings far beyond Fidelity's milestones, the saver said he's very confident about his ability to retire. The saver also said he does not have a spouse with whom he shares a retirement strategy, or any children. Based on the information he shared, Financial Planning asked advisors: "What single step could make the biggest difference in this person's retirement readiness?" Here's what they said: Responses have been edited for length and clarity. Bridging the gap for an early retirement John Power, principal of Power PlansThe most important thing he can do is refine his income needs in retirement based on what he wants retirement to look like. Retiring at 55 means he will need private health insurance for 10 years until he is Medicare eligible, and it can be quite expensive. He also needs to craft a withdrawal plan for the next five years to avoid penalties, then the next several years until he chooses when to claim Social Security. Jamie Ebersole, founder of Ebersole FinancialThe significant challenge will be that the individual will have no steady income stream starting at the age of 55, which means there is a significant gap between the time that he will be able to take Social Security payments and when it will be optimal to start drawing down on retirement accounts. So finding a way to fund the years from 55 to 67 or 68 will be critical. This usually is most tax efficient when assets are taken from taxable accounts, so building up those balances in addition to retirement accounts will be important for this interim period. Switching investment gears Carlos Salmon, partner at Wooster Square AdvisorsThe key next step is to move from aggressive growth to a more balanced and risk-aware strategy. He should consider converting pretax funds to a Roth account for better tax efficiency and plan ahead for health care costs before he becomes eligible for Medicare. In short, what got him to this point won't necessarily carry him through the next phase. Figuring out what retirement could look like Michael Espinosa, president of TrueNorth RetireThe single biggest thing this individual can do to prepare for retirement has little to do with money. This person needs to make sure that he has purpose, so that he is retiring to something and not just from something. I could give some specific pointers around optimizing his portfolio, and making sure he is prepared for medical coverage and all that good stuff, but I have seen where good savers have a hard time flipping the switch to spending. This, above all else, needs to get worked out: envisioning how he will spend his time, energy and focus once work is optional. Jamie Ebersole, founder of Ebersole FinancialObviously, he has done a great job of saving up to this point in his life. With what can be seen as a modest amount of income, he has been able to accumulate a very significant pool of assets for retirement. The next big step is to psychologically prepare for what it means to live in retirement. With a target retirement age of 55 and another 13 years to go until he wishes to retire, there's plenty of time to accumulate additional assets and to develop a plan for what retirement may look like. The key to successful retirement will be figuring out what he wants to do and how to budget for that. Psychologically, it can be very difficult to go from working to retirement if there is no plan in place that lays out what retirement would look like. I would suggest that the individual take some time to really think about what he wants to do when he retires and then try it out. He may also consider working part-time in order to stay active and smooth the transition. Lindsey Young, founder of Quiet WealthThe question is: Given the large amounts of savings relative to his lifestyle, what kind of retirement would this person like to have? Maybe he enjoys living a modest life, and in that case an earlier retirement is something to discuss. But it's also possible that he might want to buy a house, move to a larger house, go on trips, support family members or increase his charitable giving. Or maybe this person simply enjoys his work and would want to keep working even if he has enough money to retire today. In this situation, the right financial steps depend greatly on what this person's vision is for the next 10-20 years. That is why the best next step for this person is working with a financial planner to understand how different life paths would likely play out financially. For people who surprisingly find themselves being able to retire sooner rather than later, exploring different life options through a financial lens plays an invaluable role in clarifying a life vision for the coming years, which then can lead to the development of recommended financial actions. Ready to contribute? Financial advisors who are interested in contributing to future editions of The Next Step can submit their names and emails below, and Financial Planning will contact them when there is another opportunity to participate. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Chicago Tribune
25 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump's tax law could cause Medicare cuts if Congress doesn't act, CBO says
WASHINGTON — The federal budget deficits caused by President Donald Trump's tax and spending law could trigger automatic cuts to Medicare if Congress does not act, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported Friday. The CBO estimates that Medicare, the federal health insurance program for Americans over age 65, could potentially see as much as $491 billion from 2027 to 2034 if Congress does not act to mitigate a 2010 law that forces across-the-board cuts to many federal programs once legislation increases the federal deficit. The latest report from CBO showed how Trump's signature tax and spending law could put new pressure on federal programs that are bedrocks of the American social safety net. Trump and Republicans pledged not to cut Medicare as part of the legislation, but the estimated $3.4 trillion that the law adds to the federal deficit over the next decade means that many Medicare programs could still see cuts. In the past, Congress has always acted to mitigate cuts to Medicare and other programs, but it would take some bipartisan cooperation to do so. Democrats, who requested the analysis from CBO, jumped on the potential cuts. 'Republicans knew their tax breaks for billionaires would force over half a trillion dollars in Medicare cuts — and they did it anyway,' said Rep. Brendan F. Boyle, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, in a statement. 'American families simply cannot afford Donald Trump's attacks on Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare.' Hospitals in rural parts of the country are already grappling with cuts to Medicaid, which is available to people with low incomes, and cuts to Medicare could exacerbate their shortfalls. As Republicans muscled the bill through Congress and are now selling it to voters back home, they have been highly critical of how CBO has analyzed the bill. They have also argued that the tax cuts will spur economic growth and pointed to $50 billion in funding for rural hospitals that was included in the package.
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Treasury sets limits on remaining wind and solar tax credits
The Treasury Department issued guidance on Friday that narrows which wind and solar energy projects can receive the remaining tax credits that were largely eliminated under the Republicans 'big, beautiful bill.' The legislation passed by Republicans last month axes the credits for projects that don't begin producing electricity by 2028. However, it contains an exemption for projects that begin construction over the next year. Under the law, those projects would remain eligible for the subsidies even if they don't produce electricity under the specified time frame. The Trump administration's new guidance, however, sets further restrictions on which projects are considered having begun construction. It says that construction of these projects must be 'continuous.' It also defines 'having begun construction' as having done 'physical work of a significant nature.' This includes activities like manufacturing equipment and excavating land to begin placing equipment in it. But it excludes activities like only having done surveys, test drilling or excavation for purposes of altering the landscape. The guidance also says that even if the project meets those other requirements, it still must produce electricity by the end of the fourth calendar year after it begins construction. The renewable energy industry criticized the guidance, saying it would slow the buildup of low-carbon energy sources. 'This is yet another act of energy subtraction from the Trump administration that will further delay the buildout of affordable, reliable power. American families and businesses will pay more for electricity as a result of this action, and China will continue to outpace us in the race for electricity to power AI,' said Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, in a written statement. Climate advocates hurled similar criticisms. 'The Trump administration's new tax credit guidance represents yet another senseless attack on clean energy that will drive up electricity costs, make our energy grid less reliable, harm our economy and lead to more deaths and disease from harmful air pollution. The guidance places significant new obstacles on solar and wind projects,' said Vickie Patton, general counsel, Environmental Defense Fund, in a written statement. The maneuvers come after disagreements between more moderate and conservative Republicans over how rapidly to eliminate the credits. President Trump apparently told House Freedom Caucus members he would further restrict the tax credits if they supported his bill. After it passed, he issued an executive order telling the Treasury Department to take a strict approach to limit the tax incentives. Trump has also in recent weeks used other policies to go after renewables, including efforts to slow federal approvals of wind and solar projects. Even before it came out, Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and John Curtis (R-Utah), who are more supportive of renewables than many of their GOP colleagues, raised concerns about the Treasury guidance.
