South Korea's Lee and US President Trump to hold summit on security alliance and economy, World News
Lee, who was elected president in a snap election in June, has made it a top priority to help his export-dependant country navigate the dramatic changes in the global trading environment triggered by Trump's tariff policies.
"The two leaders will discuss ways to develop the US-South Korea alliance into a comprehensive strategic alliance of the future in response to the changing international security and economic environment," presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung told a briefing.
Based on the tariff deal reached last month, the two leaders will seek to push forward a partnership in the manufacturing sector, including in semiconductors, batteries and shipbuilding, as well as critical minerals and technology, Kang said.
Trump announced on July 30 the countries had reached a trade deal that would subject South Korean goods to 15 per cent import duties, lowering the tariff he had initially set against one of America's top trading partners.
In return, Trump has said South Korea will announce investment plans at the upcoming summit and that Seoul had committed to making US$350 billion (S$450 billion) of investments to be "selected" by him.
South Korean officials have offered differing details, however, and topics left unresolved by the deal — which has yet to be committed to writing — provide scope for more disputes between the allies.
Trump may use the summit to seek more concessions on defence costs and corporate investments, left out of the deal, while non-tariff barriers and currency could prove thorny issues, experts said.
Defence costs are expected to emerge as a key issue during the upcoming summit, with Trump having long said South Korea needed to pay more for the roughly 28,500 American troops based there as a legacy of the 1950-1953 Korean War.
The Washington Post reported on Saturday that the Trump administration wanted Seoul to boost defence spending to 3.8 per cent of GDP, up from 2.6 per cent last year, and to increase its US$1 billion-plus contribution toward the troops.
Jeremy Chan, a senior analyst at the Eurasia Group, said it was unclear if such issues will be raised directly by Trump, but he said he expected that at least at the working level, discussions are going to move beyond trade and investment to the broader alliance.
"I think it is more likely that Trump and his team are going to raise at least quietly, issues related to the security alliance," he said. "So that could be putting pressure on President Lee to increase the defence share of government spending."
[[nid:720893]]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
19 minutes ago
- Business Times
CK Hutchison's ports deal in focus as conglomerate reports 11% rise in H1 underlying profit
[HONG KONG] CK Hutchison posted a 11 per cent rise in first-half underlying profit on Thursday (Aug 14), as investors look for comments on the status of the Hong Kong conglomerate's US$22.8 billion ports business sale to a consortium. The ports-to-telecoms group said in a filing that underlying profit climbed to HK$11.3 billion (S$1.9 billion) on a post-IFRS 16 basis. It compares with UBS forecast of a 6 per cent rise. However, including one-time non-cash accounting loss, including from the merger of 3UK and Vodafone UK, the net profit dropped 92 per cent from a year ago to HK$852 million. CK Hutchison is due to discuss its interim results with analysts, offering the first opportunity to quiz the management about the plan to sell the ports business since it was announced in March. Departing from its usual practice, CK Hutchison did not brief analysts or media about its 2024 earnings, released in March after it made public its plan to sell the business, which includes two ports along the strategic Panama Canal. Since the plan to sell 43 ports in 23 countries to a group led by BlackRock and Italian billionaire Gianluigi Aponte's family-run shipping firm MSC was announced, CK Hutchison has faced a firestorm of criticism from China. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In the latest announcement on Jul 28, the conglomerate said it was in talks with the consortium pursuing its ports business to add a Chinese 'major strategic investor' to the bid, after their exclusive talks ended. It said changes would be necessary to secure regulatory approval in relevant jurisdictions and that it would allow as much time as needed to achieve that. Sources have told Reuters the investor was Cosco – one of the world's dominant, vertically integrated marine transportation firms. They said Cosco was seeking a bigger stake while the other parties in the consortium were keen to keep it a minority. While any stake by Cosco is not yet clear, an inclusion of a Chinese investor would alleviate China's national security concerns and have its blessing, the sources and other experts have said. Cosco did not respond to a request last month for comment. US President Donald Trump had also earlier called for the removal of Chinese ownership in the Panama Canal. More than 40 per cent of US container traffic, valued at roughly US$270 billion annually, transits the Panama Canal. Shares of CK Hutchison closed down 0.4 per cent on Thursday ahead of the results, in line with the Hang Seng Index. Morgan Stanley rated CK Hutchison 'overweight' last month, citing potential strategic transactions, attractive valuation, and a strong balance sheet. REUTERS
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Trump's data war risks creating false calm
POLITICAL pressure on government statisticians and private forecasters risks sending markets down a rabbit hole, which could suppress volatility today but lead to seismic reality checks in the future. US President Donald Trump has side-swiped both private and public sector economists this month, firing the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) boss for what he described as 'rigged' jobs data and then lambasting Goldman Sachs for tariff-related research he did not agree with. These moves seem alarming, even if there are some mitigating factors. Trump is hardly the first person to criticise BLS payrolls data. It has been under scrutiny for years, not because of fears of bias, but because of low survey response rates and delays, which have often resulted in large changes to past data. The most recent report contained one of the biggest downward revisions in decades. The BLS can argue that it has suffered from years of underfunding, but it is still not a good look. What is more, similar questions about data collection have been lobbed at the BLS regarding its compilation of monthly consumer and producer price reports, which are critical now in assessing the impact of Trump's tariff rises on inflation. These statistics, along with the US employment report, are the most important monthly updates for financial markets, mainly because they play a pivotal role in Federal Reserve thinking, given its dual mandate to maintain maximum employment and stable prices. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 3 pm Thrive Money, career and life hacks to help young adults stay ahead of the curve. Sign Up Sign Up Trump this week appointed Heritage Foundation economist EJ Antoni – a contributor to the controversial Project 2025 wish list of policies for a second Trump term – to run the BLS. Antoni recently suggested suspending the monthly payrolls report until data problems were fixed, which could result in long data gaps at a critical moment for the US economy, monetary policy and markets. Importantly though, the White House and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have pushed back on that idea. But then came Tuesday's (Aug 12) attack on Goldman boss David Solomon, with calls for him to appoint a new chief economist following the release of a report on Sunday by his colleague Jan Hatzius. The report estimated that US consumers had so far borne less than a quarter of the cost of tariffs, but could see that rise to two-thirds over time. This may simply be nothing more than Trump complaining about a forecast he does not like, but it is still a move that risks tinkering with one of the most basic market tenets: the plurality of views. Fantasy calm? There is an obvious concern that – intentionally or not – these public attacks could cause economic data, research and forecasts to become more pro-government or lead to self-censorship by those keen to avoid seeing their business or careers damaged by presidential opprobrium. To its credit, Goldman said it would keep doing its job regardless of the political pressure. But it would hardly say otherwise. Perhaps more telling was the lack of public outcry from other economists who might reasonably be concerned that Trump's attacks on unflattering forecasts represent a worrying trend for their profession and market transparency overall. Of course, they or their institutions may simply have thought it best to stay quiet, assuming the issue would blow over soon. Does any of this matter in the long term? To be sure, economic forecasting can hardly be held up as a sacred cow if accuracy is what matters. A University of California, Berkeley, study late last year looked at more than 16,000 forecasts by banks and large firms and concluded that while 53 per cent of forecasters were confident in their predictions, they were correct only 23 per cent of the time. But economists' forecasts still play a role, accurate or not. So any type of bias, even unintentional, could have a significant impact on market thinking. Of course, if there was a consensus that official data was likely to be biased to flatter the government, then the process of forecasting those official numbers may just be to mechanically move in that direction. But that would undoubtedly create confusion. To better capture what is really going on, investors may be more inclined to commission private economic data. And yet the cost of doing that on a frequent basis would be prohibitive for smaller players, meaning that big information gaps could open up, making markets less efficient overall. If political bias in official data and forecasting were to emerge in the current environment, one might expect to see firmer job creation and softer inflation read-outs. That could keep markets calm in the short term. But any weakness in the real economy would emerge eventually, likely resulting in a rude awakening for many, no matter what the official data says. REUTERS
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
China Aviation Oil H1 profit rises 18% to US$50 million on higher gross profit and associates' share of results
[SINGAPORE] Asia-Pacific's largest physical jet fuel buyer China Aviation Oil (CAO) posted a net profit of US$50 million for the first half of its financial year ended Jun 30. This was an 18 per cent year-on-year increase from US$42.4 million. The growth was attributed to increases in gross profit and share of results from associates, the Singapore Exchange-listed group said on Thursday (Aug 14). Earnings per share jumped 18.1 per cent to US$0.0582 from US$0.0493 previously for the company, which is a key supplier of imported jet fuel to China. CAO attributed the rise in business volume to higher trading volumes of crude and fuel oils. The increase in jet fuel supply volume and optimisation gains from trading activities thus led to a jump in revenue and gross profit. Gross profit was US$30.4 million, a 25.7 per cent increase from US$24.2 million recorded in the same period the previous year. Revenue rose 13.6 per cent to US$8.6 billion, from US$7.5 billion in the first half of 2024, underscored by a 'strong uptick' in demand. Total supply and trading volume went up 35.4 per cent to 13.8 million tonnes in H1 FY2025 from 10.2 million tonnes previously. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The share of results from CAO's associates rose 18.6 per cent to US$27.4 million. This was largely down to higher refuelling volumes from the sole supplier of jet fuel at Shanghai Pudong International Airport (leading to a 13.9 per cent increase in contributions to US$25.5 million), and higher contributions from petroleum complex logistics terminal company Oilhub Korea Yeosu. The volume for middle distillates for H1 grew 18.7 per cent to 7.4 million tonnes from 6.2 million tonnes, while the trading volume of other oil products rose to 6.4 million tonnes, from 4 million tonnes in the same period in the previous year. This was due to higher trading volumes for fuel and crude oils. CAO also stated that it has zero net-interest-bearing debt. Outlook CAO chief executive Lin Yi said his company is 'cautiously optimistic' about its medium-term outlook. The company pointed out the International Air Transport Association forecast that the total operating profits for the global civil aviation industry are set to grow 6.6 per cent to US$66 billion this year. It added that relaxed visa requirements across countries in the Asia-Pacific mean that the region is expected to account for 52 per cent of the global aviation industry's revenue passenger kilometre increase. China is set to be a 'significant contributor', accounting for more than 40 per cent of the region's aviation traffic, said CAO. 'CAO remains confident about the aviation industry's trajectory amidst a dynamic global landscape,' said Lin, referring to the geopolitical instability, trade tensions and supply-chain disruptions seen in the first half of the year. He added: 'Supported by healthy recovery in the global aviation industry, rising demand across our key markets, and new opportunities posed by the low-carbon business, CAO is well-positioned to benefit from these opportunities.' CAO executive chairman Shi Yanliang stated that the company is also 'committed to' its development goals in the sustainable aviation fuel business, alongside business innovation and strengthened risk management. At the mid-day break on Thursday, shares of CAO were flat at S$1.23 compared with its closing price the previous day.
