Scots couple who were ordered to demolish £20k summer house win planning battle with council by making tiny change to it
'GLAD IT'S OVER' Scots couple who were ordered to demolish £20k summer house win planning battle with council by making tiny change to it
A COUPLE have won a long planning battle with the council by moving their £20k summer house - one metre.
Defiant Martin Keyes and Catherine Curran have renamed their outhouse 'Victory Bar' after finally meeting the demands of planners.
3
Martin Keyes had been ordered to tear down his summer house
Credit: SWNS
3
The council said that it was considered to be too close to a neighbouring home
Credit: SWNS
They were shocked to get a letter out of the blue last year telling them that retrospective planning permission had been refused for the building.
Despite no objections or complaints, the summer house - which was built more than three years ago - was considered too close to a neighbouring home.
It was then rejected on appeal and following a site visit from Inverclyde councillors.
In the end, the couple forked out more money to move the summer house further away from the fence.
Martin, of Glasgow, said: "To be honest, I think it is less private than before, but we did what they wanted.
"Now we are looking forward to enjoying our summer house.
It has been very stressful and we are glad it is over. We won and we have our summer house
Martin Keyes
"We are just waiting for the official paperwork.
"But we were never going to be forced to tear it down. That was not an option.
"We decided to call it Victory Bar, because it is still standing.
"I can't wait to enjoy more nights in our summer house now it is finally safe."
I'm being forced to tear down my loft conversion - my neighbours call it a 'monstrosity' but I'm going to fight back
Last year, the couple were told that retrospective planning permission had been refused nearly four years after it was built.
At the time, the couple said that they would refuse to tear it down and lodged an appeal.
Following a site visit by members of the local review body, the decision was taken to refuse an appeal.
Catherine added: "We tried to explain to the officers that the summer house was in the best position."
The couple even submitted a petition to the council from neighbours and friends in support.
But determined not to be beaten, Catherine and Martin took action to secure the future of their summer house.
With guidance from council planners, they moved the summer house and restructured their garden.
What happens if retrospective planning permission is refused?
According to experts at Planning Direct, if retrospective planning permission is refused, you need to act quickly. They say:
"Fortunately, you do have a right to appeal the refusal in the same manner as a normal planning application.
"Find out more about submitting a planning appeal using the button below.
"However, your council is likely to take formal enforcement action unless you promptly state your intention to appeal.
"If you do appeal, most councils will wait for the appeal to be decided before they take enforcement action.
"Should the appeal be allowed, the development will become lawful and no enforcement action can be taken against it.
"If the appeal is dismissed, it's likely that a formal enforcement notice will shortly be issued by the LPA.
"Occasionally, a local council will decide to take enforcement action whilst a retrospective planning application is still under appeal.
"Unfortunately, you must also appeal the enforcement notice if this happens."
Relieved Catherine, 50, said: "It has been very stressful and we are glad it is over.
"We won and we have our summer house.
"We would like to thank our neighbours and friends for their support."
She added: "We can move on now and enjoy our summer house stays."
A spokesperson for Inverclyde Council said: "In the event of a retrospective planning application and any subsequent appeal both being refused due to breaches of the planning guidelines, we will endeavour to work with the applicant to explore options available to them and whether there are ways to meet relevant planning guidelines."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
9 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Parents who took time off work to look after kids 'could be owed thousands'
Martin Lewis has warned a certain group of people that they could be owed 'thousands,' and there's a way to check online whether you could be owed money as part of a scheme Martin Lewis has shared that if you're a parent who took time off to look after your children between certain dates you could be owed "thousands". He revealed "the decades-old error that could mean you're owed" the money, explaining what happened on ITV's This Morning. Some have hailed Martin Lewis a "saint" for sharing this information far and wide. The money expert explained that this information "primarily impacts women," but he did say it wasn't "solely women," but whoever is impacted will be between "the ages of 41 and 90". He did say, however, that "most generally they'll be in their 60s and 70s, but it could be of any age". He said: "It's those who took time away from paid work to look after their child or look after someone with a long-term disability or illness between 1978 and 2010. "But they also needed to have been claiming child benefit before May 2000, which is why we tend to be talking women in their 60s and 70s because they fit that age profile. "Or your partner could've claimed child benefit but you were then the one staying at home". Martin then went on to explain that there was a "thing called Home Responsibilities Protection," and he said: "What this did is, if you stopped working to look after your child or someone who was sick, it gave you the National Insurance contributions that you would've otherwise got from working. "And National Insurance Contributions are what's needed for you to get the full state pension. So there could be many women who are not getting the full state pension, because they should've got Home Responsibilities Protection, and they didn't get it because of an error". He continued: "So, this is what you need to do. If all of those things ring true - you took time off between 1978 and 2010, you claimed child benefit before 2000, you need to go onto You need to check your state pension forecast. "If you're not forecast to get a full state pension when you hit retirement age, then you need to go and look have you got any missing National Insurance years. "If those years are missing at the same time that you were off work to pay for the childcare or for the long-term, then you were probably due Home Responsibilities Protection and you need to go and check that". Martin then said that he was going to be "really honest," saying it's a "bit too complicated to do on the telly," referring to it as a "clarion call". "If that all rings a bell, go and look it up," he urged. In the comments, someone wrote: "What about if your national insurance contributions are missing after those dates - because you chose to not work so that you could look after your children?" Another replied: "Then there will be a shortfall in your pension, one would presume". Others said they found it "impossible" to fill in the form as they wanted precise dates when they were off work.
Scotsman
a day ago
- Scotsman
Survey reveals 51% in Scotland admit to asking a neighbour to keep it down as noisy neighbours named No.1 most irritating sound
Loud music, shouting, stomping feet, and banging doors—while these may be everyday sounds to some, they're a living nightmare for others. A new survey reveals that more than 6 in 10 (63%) of people in Scotland find noisy neighbours to be the most irritating sound. From gorgeous Georgian town houses to jaw-dropping penthouses, converted campervans to bargain boltholes. Take a peek at the finest homes across the UK. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The study, conducted by electronics and tech retailer Currys surveyed 2,000 people across the UK to uncover the nation's biggest noise-related grievances and right after noisy neighbours, the next most annoying sound is screaming children as 62% of Scots say this annoys them. While noisy neighbours and their screaming children are 'other people's noise,' snoring—the third most annoying noise—isn't as easy to deal with, as it's probably your partner's fault. That sound annoys more than half (56%) of Scots. Top 10 most annoying sounds according to Scots Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Currys Rank Sounds % of Scots that find it annoying 1 Noisy neighbours 63% 2 Children screaming 61% 3 Snoring 56% 4 Car alarms/House alarms 53% 5 Construction sounds (e.g., jackhammers, drills) 49% 6 Loud chewing 47% 7 Cutlery squeaking/scraping on a plate 47% 8 Other people's music (e.g., from phones or headphones in public) 45% 9 Dog barking 42% 10 Slurping 41% Car and home alarms landed just after snoring on the annoying top list, with more than half (53%) of Scots agreeing it annoys them, followed by construction sounds—a noise nuisance for nearly half of Scots (49%). Other top offenders include loads of eating-related sounds like loud chewing and slurping, along with an old-time classic—cutlery squeaking on a plate. Dogs barking and people playing their music too loud also made the top 10 list. 83% of people in Scotland say excessive noise negatively impacts their physical health The findings highlight a serious issue: nearly a quarter of people in the country (24%) say they suffer from stress and anxiety due to high noise levels where they live, while a staggering 83% believe it also negatively impacts their physical health. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But Scots aren't simply suffering in silence. More than half (51%) admit to asking a neighbour or local business to 'keep it down,' while more than 1 in 10 (14%) have gone a step further by filing an official noise complaint with their local council. The survey results align with recent official figures, as the Chartered Institute for Environmental Health (CIEH) recorded 356,367 noise complaints across 144 local authorities in England in its most recent study—an average of 149 complaints per 10,000 people. Too loud to sleep, read, or even watch TV According to the survey,79% of Scots believe noise has a definite negative impact on their mood. Unsurprisingly, sleep disruption is the most frustrating consequence of noise (62%), as interrupted sleep can lead to increased heart rate, heightened stress, difficulty falling back asleep, and reduced focus the next day. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Beyond sleep, 4 in 10 (40%) of people say they hate noise interruptions when they're trying to read, more than a third (36%) when at the cinema, and slightly less people (34%) find noise disturbing when they are watching TV. Noise also affects productivity, with 15% of respondents in the region saying it disrupts studying and exams, while 10% report that it interferes with work. Music to the ears: rain, fire and the sound of silence A 2021 study with 59 participants found that working in silence resulted in the lowest cognitive load and stress, compared to working with speech or background noise. The Currys survey is further proof that people long for silence: more than half (51%) of respondents in Scotland listed it as the most enjoyable sound. The only sound they love slightly more is rainfall, with over half (52%) saying they find it enjoyable. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Top 10 most enjoyable sounds according to Scottish residents Rank Sounds % of Scots that find it enjoyable 1 Rainfall 52% 2 Silence 51% 3 Crackling fire 48% 4 Birdsong 46% 5 Crashing waves 39% 6 Green noise (a steady gentle hum or rumble, a natural sound like wind or ocean waves) 38% 7 The wind 37% 8 Cats purring 36% 9 Leaves rustling 32% 10 Water bubbling 30%
Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
Scots couple who were ordered to demolish £20k summer house win planning battle with council by making tiny change to it
The couple said that they would refuse to tear it down and lodged an appeal after getting a letter out of the blue last year 'GLAD IT'S OVER' Scots couple who were ordered to demolish £20k summer house win planning battle with council by making tiny change to it A COUPLE have won a long planning battle with the council by moving their £20k summer house - one metre. Defiant Martin Keyes and Catherine Curran have renamed their outhouse 'Victory Bar' after finally meeting the demands of planners. 3 Martin Keyes had been ordered to tear down his summer house Credit: SWNS 3 The council said that it was considered to be too close to a neighbouring home Credit: SWNS They were shocked to get a letter out of the blue last year telling them that retrospective planning permission had been refused for the building. Despite no objections or complaints, the summer house - which was built more than three years ago - was considered too close to a neighbouring home. It was then rejected on appeal and following a site visit from Inverclyde councillors. In the end, the couple forked out more money to move the summer house further away from the fence. Martin, of Glasgow, said: "To be honest, I think it is less private than before, but we did what they wanted. "Now we are looking forward to enjoying our summer house. It has been very stressful and we are glad it is over. We won and we have our summer house Martin Keyes "We are just waiting for the official paperwork. "But we were never going to be forced to tear it down. That was not an option. "We decided to call it Victory Bar, because it is still standing. "I can't wait to enjoy more nights in our summer house now it is finally safe." I'm being forced to tear down my loft conversion - my neighbours call it a 'monstrosity' but I'm going to fight back Last year, the couple were told that retrospective planning permission had been refused nearly four years after it was built. At the time, the couple said that they would refuse to tear it down and lodged an appeal. Following a site visit by members of the local review body, the decision was taken to refuse an appeal. Catherine added: "We tried to explain to the officers that the summer house was in the best position." The couple even submitted a petition to the council from neighbours and friends in support. But determined not to be beaten, Catherine and Martin took action to secure the future of their summer house. With guidance from council planners, they moved the summer house and restructured their garden. What happens if retrospective planning permission is refused? According to experts at Planning Direct, if retrospective planning permission is refused, you need to act quickly. They say: "Fortunately, you do have a right to appeal the refusal in the same manner as a normal planning application. "Find out more about submitting a planning appeal using the button below. "However, your council is likely to take formal enforcement action unless you promptly state your intention to appeal. "If you do appeal, most councils will wait for the appeal to be decided before they take enforcement action. "Should the appeal be allowed, the development will become lawful and no enforcement action can be taken against it. "If the appeal is dismissed, it's likely that a formal enforcement notice will shortly be issued by the LPA. "Occasionally, a local council will decide to take enforcement action whilst a retrospective planning application is still under appeal. "Unfortunately, you must also appeal the enforcement notice if this happens." Relieved Catherine, 50, said: "It has been very stressful and we are glad it is over. "We won and we have our summer house. "We would like to thank our neighbours and friends for their support." She added: "We can move on now and enjoy our summer house stays." A spokesperson for Inverclyde Council said: "In the event of a retrospective planning application and any subsequent appeal both being refused due to breaches of the planning guidelines, we will endeavour to work with the applicant to explore options available to them and whether there are ways to meet relevant planning guidelines."
