Tim Davie isn't fit to lead the BBC

Spectator

12 hours ago

Those within the BBC might be afraid to say so, but an ex-producer like me has no such qualms: Tim Davie, the BBC's Director-General, isn't cut out for the job. For the good of the BBC, Davie must go.
The last few weeks have been painfully bad for Davie. The Masterchef saga, which led to the departure of not one, but both main presenters, is the final nail in the coffin, after blunders over Glastonbury and Gaza.
A review of the BBC's February documentary Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone, which was released last week, found the programme had breached editorial guidelines for accuracy, having failed to disclose that its child narrator was the son of a Hamas agricultural official.
The review didn't, however, find any breaches of impartiality. The BBC exonerated, then. Except Davie himself wasn't. Because instead of having backed the filmmakers over the row, he and the BBC Chair, Samir Shah, ran for cover as hard as possible and let them take all the incoming flak.
The feeling within the BBC is that both Davie and Shah have been hopeless and craven in their response to this saga. The programme was not 'a dagger to the heart' of the BBC's claim to impartiality, as Shah jumped the gun by saying in March. But don't hold your breath for Shah to apologise for those comments, and to reassure filmmakers that, as their boss, he is protecting their backs. Or for Davie to do so.
BBC management's main concern has been to put the blame on somebody else. Some hapless line producer will be made to walk the plank – and the independent company that made the film hung out to dry – so they can retain their crowns, as happened at Glastonbury, where the BBC failed to cut the live stream of an act leading an anti-IDF (Israel Defense Forces) chant.
Part of the problem stems from Davie's background. As Ben de Pear, director of another film, on Gaza medics, which Channel 4 screened after the BBC refused to show it, said recently: Davie is 'a PR person' who doesn't understand journalism.
'Davie is taking editorial decisions which, frankly, he is not capable of making,' said de Pear. It's hard to fault that analysis: Davie has never made a programme in his life. When he worked in PR, the only thing he is remembered for is his role in helping Pepsi turn their cans blue (sales went up by 0.1 per cent, so that went well).
As an ex-BBC producer, I know things would have been different under Davie's predecessors. BBC Chairs like Michael Grade would have been bullish in their defence of their staff. Alasdair Milne resigned as DG rather then let the government walk all over the BBC in the 1980s.
Both men had been filmmakers themselves. Unlike Davie, they had served on the front line. They knew what it means to make difficult editorial judgments. And they knew, above all, they would only retain the loyalty of their own staff if they defended them when it was right to do so. Davie doesn't.
If things were going fine for the Corporation, having a lightweight at the helm wouldn't matter. But there are some weighty issues the BBC needs to address and is conspicuously failing to do.
The BBC strategy over recent years has been to compete with streamers like Netflix and Amazon by producing its own prestige dramas as justification for the licence fee. This strategy has been failing, and licence fee avoidance growing, because it simply does not have the same deep pockets as its rivals. The BBC couldn't even afford the proper shooting of a sequel to Wolf Hall, which should have been a shoo-in. Producer Peter Kosminsky has revealed that many scenes had to be cut because there simply wasn't the money.
Instead, the BBC needs to regain its ambition when it comes to factual television. That this can be hugely successful has been shown by both Netflix – their recent Trainwreck series on disasters – and HBO. It also has the signal advantage of having become far, far cheaper. While drama has got absurdly expensive, technology allows documentaries to be shot by just a handful of people these days and edited on a laptop.
There is a real and unfulfilled appetite for knowing how others live in our increasingly compartmentalised world. Yet not only is the BBC failing to meet this challenge, Davie seems blithely unaware it's a challenge at all. The BBC's Annual Report last week – top-dressed with bland words that read as if written by AI, like 'Our goal is to deliver outstanding value' – didn't bother even to properly quantify their documentary output. Davie and the BBC are in a unique position to make factual programmes about Britain for a British audience very cheaply, if they wanted to, and secure the corporation's place as a national treasure.
But that would need a huge reset to direct resources away from the current dull schedule of occasional marquee drama projects and police procedurals, bulked out with endless repeats ('Who do you think you are kidding Mr Hitler?' – for the thousandth time). It would need a Director-General with vision and drive and the confidence of his staff to make this change. Instead, 100 BBC staff recently wrote to complain about the behaviour of BBC management over the Gaza medics documentary, but had to do so anonymously. It's hardly the sign of a happy organisation.
Davie has had five years in post, with nothing to show for his £547,000-a-year salary (executive 'remuneration' is another issue at the BBC that needs addressing). It is simply not enough for Davie to manage decline and deal with the regular upsets which broadcasting, like politics, will always provide; particularly when he is reacting to them so badly.
Never has the BBC needed to have a visionary in post more if it is to survive. And never has it had someone so clearly inadequate for the job.
Davie needs to go. Not just because of the MasterChef and Gaza and Glastonbury mistakes, but because, in five years, he has shown no vision for the direction the BBC needs to take to reclaim its position as a broadcaster worthy of the licence fee.
When the BBC comes to replace Davie, as it soon surely will – and should – perhaps they might choose somebody who's actually made a programme in their lives. Or Netflix will be making 'Trainwreck: The BBC'.
Hugh Thomson won the Grierson Award and has been BAFTA-nominated for his series for the BBC