logo
More than $220 million in contracts canceled by Musk and DOGE have been brought back

More than $220 million in contracts canceled by Musk and DOGE have been brought back

Yahoo09-05-2025
More than $220 million worth of contracts cancelled by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) have been brought back.
Forty-four of the government contracts ended by DOGE and Musk have been revived by federal agencies, according to a federal spending data review by The New York Times.
However, DOGE still lists 43 of those contracts on its website as having been terminated, and some were added after they had been restored. This led to several data errors on the site.
The White House told the outlet that the paperwork lag would be fixed. The contracts that have been rekindled include everything from software license agreements to partnerships with vendors in charge of data and records for the government. Most of the contracts came to an end in February and March amid demands that agencies make massive cutbacks.
Agencies subsequently restored the contracts, at times only days after they had been cancelled. For instance, the Environmental Protection Agency restored a contract after two and a half hours, but DOGE still listed the contract as canceled for weeks. The contract was subsequently extended, now costing more than previously.
Musk and DOGE set out to cut $1 trillion out of the $7 trillion federal budget, but the backtracking on cancelled contracts revealed the difficulties of making such expansive cuts. Contractors told the paper that as DOGE rushed to urge agencies to cancel contracts that were likely to be revived, as some were required by law, and some required skills that the government doesn't have.
'The DOGE Wall of Receipts provides the latest and most accurate information following a thorough assessment, which takes time,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told The New York Times. 'Updates to the DOGE savings page will continue to be made promptly, and departments and agencies will keep highlighting the massive savings DOGE is achieving.'
DOGE has listed over 9,400 contracts it claims to have cancelled, totalling $32 billion in savings. The group claims to have saved $165 billion in taxpayer funds in total.
The White House spokesperson told The New York Times that the reversals it had found were 'small potatoes' in comparison.
Musk has said from the beginning that the government would most likely have to backtrack on some of its spending cuts. Appearing on the Joe Rogan podcast in February, Musk said, 'We need to act fast to stop wasting billions of dollars of taxpayer money. But if we make a mistake, we'll reverse it quickly.'
However, Musk also said that DOGE would share the details of its work publicly, saying that they 'can name the specifics, line by line.' But The New York Times found several errors on the so-called 'Wall of Receipts,' often inflating the supposed savings. DOGE has taken credit for ending programs that finished years or at times decades ago. It has also counted the same cancellations more than once and, at one point, shared a claim that jumbled 'billion' and 'million.'
This month, DOGE removed a contract that had been cancelled for less than a day, but also added five revived contracts to its 'terminations' list, claiming $57 million in savings, which had already been restored, according to the paper.
Contractor Larry Aldrich was told in February that his contract doing web design and making videos for the Department of Veterans Affairs site for veterans with PTSD had been cancelled. The agreement was reinstated two weeks later.
'The V.A. cannot do this work on its own,' Aldrich told the paper. 'They don't have the manpower or the skill set.'
The reversal started in the middle of February, less than a month into President Donald Trump's second stint in the White House. On February 14, Raquel Romero and her husband lost their contract offering leadership training to Agriculture Department attorneys. They regained $45,000 in revenue when all their other federal business had dried up.
'We had lost all of the income that we were planning for calendar year 2025. We've had to sell our house. We're in the process of moving into a condo,' she told The New York Times.
The department told the paper that it revived the contracts after finding that it was required by law. Romero added that she believed the reversal was due to a personal intervention by one attorney in the department, who Romero said retired two weeks later.
Regarding contract reversals, the Department of Veterans Affairs comes on top with 16 cancelled and revived contracts. According to veterans' groups speaking to the paper, some of the contracts were required by law, noting that one contract was for a contractor who helped veterans search for military records as evidence when applying for benefits, which was restored after just eight days.
Even with the revived contracts, experts say DOGE's cuts have damaged the quality of government services.
'There doesn't seem to be an approach to dig in on places where government services could really be improved,' the executive director of the Yale Budget Lab, Martha Gimbel, recently told The Guardian. 'Any improvement in government services takes time. You have to invest. You have to build it out. You have to figure out how to fix it.'
'There has clearly been a degeneration of government services,' she added.
DOGE claimed to have saved $38 million over several years at the Department of Education after ending a contract to manage a data repository about schools across the country. However, lawmakers and advocates pushed back, arguing that the law required the information to be gathered for the government to know which schools were eligible for some grants. The contract was resurrected after 18 days; however, $17 million in funding had been removed.
The E.P.A. signed a contract with a company in Maryland in 2023 to help raise awareness about asthma. Contracting data revealed it was cancelled just after 4.30 p.m. on March 7 of this year. That same night, shortly before 7 p.m., it was reinstated. The E.P.A. told the paper that the reinstatement of a contract shows that the agency found that 'funding action supported Administration priorities.'
The agency extended the contract for another year last month, agreeing to pay $171,000 more than before the contract was cancelled.
The Independent has contacted the White House for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poll: 14% of Americans would consider supporting Elon Musk's America Party
Poll: 14% of Americans would consider supporting Elon Musk's America Party

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Poll: 14% of Americans would consider supporting Elon Musk's America Party

In contrast, 55% say they would not consider supporting Musk's party. On July 4, Tesla CEO Elon Musk asked his followers on X — the social media platform he owns — whether he should 'create' something called the America Party to give them 'independence' from the country's 'two-party (some would say uniparty) system.' More than 1.2 million users responded to Musk's snap poll: 65% said yes; 35% said no. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' Musk vowed the following day. Since then, however, Musk hasn't taken any visible steps to deliver on his promise. A new Yahoo/YouGov survey — which captures a representative sample of the U.S. population, in contrast to informal social media polls — suggests possible challenges ahead: Just 14% of Americans say they would be open to 'supporting a third party created by Musk.' In contrast, 55% say they would not consider supporting Musk's party. Why Musk wants a new party The survey of 1,729 U.S. adults, which was conducted from July 24 to July 28, comes a little more than a month after Musk and President Trump had a public falling-out over Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Trump claimed that Musk was 'upset' about 'losing his EV mandate' (the $7,500 federal tax credit that has made buying or leasing electric vehicles such as Teslas more attractive and affordable for consumers). Musk insisted he was concerned only with the legislation's effect on federal spending — namely, initial estimates that showed it would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit ... and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt,' as he wrote on X. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk continued. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' When a revised version of Trump's bill passed the Senate in early July with a $3.3 trillion deficit projection, Musk unveiled his America Party idea. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk wrote on X. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' People don't love the 2-party system Americans aren't opposed to having alternatives at the ballot box — in theory. The new Yahoo/YouGov poll finds that more of them approve (39%) than disapprove (28%) of the concept of creating a 'third major U.S. political party to compete with the Democratic Party and the Republican Party'; 33% say they are not sure. Naturally, the idea of creating a third party is more popular with Americans who already identify as independents (56%) than with those who identify as Democrats (34%) or Republicans (32%). But the two parties themselves aren't especially well liked either. Majorities see both unfavorably (55% for the GOP, 56% for the Dems) rather than favorably (38% for the GOP, 36% for the Dems). And when respondents are asked how well each major party represents their views, more than half say 'not very well' or 'not at all' for both the Democrats (51%) and the Republicans (52%). Yet the overlap between these two categories — individuals who say they don't like either party — is relatively small, which may pose difficulties for Musk. About a quarter (22%) have an unfavorable view of both the Republicans and the Democrats, and fewer (18%) say neither side represents their views 'very well' or 'at all.' Musk keeps getting less popular In the Yahoo/YouGov poll conducted immediately after Trump won reelection last November, Musk earned a net positive rating (49% favorable, 39% unfavorable). That made him the most popular of the eight incoming Trump Cabinet members and senior advisers respondents were asked to appraise. Yet by April 2025 — following several months as the leader of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — Musk's ratings had flipped to 39% favorable, 55% unfavorable. Today, he is further underwater (32% favorable, 59% unfavorable). Musk is currently seen in a negative light by a clear majority of Democrats (9% favorable, 88% unfavorable) and nearly two-thirds of independents (30% favorable, 64% unfavorable). He still gets a net positive rating from a majority of Republicans (59% favorable, 30% unfavorable), but their enthusiasm has cooled; while 52% of Republicans saw Musk 'very favorably' last November, only 17% now feel that way about him. Since March, the number of Americans who think Musk is 'mostly trying to help the country' has fallen from 36% to 23%, whereas the number who think he is 'mostly trying to help himself' has risen from 52% to 56%. The share of Republicans who think Musk is mostly trying to help the country, meanwhile, has declined by 30 points — from 73% to 43%. The proposed policy focus of Musk's America Party — stopping the federal government from 'bankrupting our country with waste & graft,' as he put it — isn't people's top priority either. Asked what they would want a 'third major political party' to 'focus mostly on,' 26% of Americans said 'cutting government spending.' Significantly more (46%) said 'other issues.' __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,729 U.S. adults interviewed online from July 24 to July 28, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.1%.

Microsoft tries to keep its consumer Copilot out of New York Times AI copyright case
Microsoft tries to keep its consumer Copilot out of New York Times AI copyright case

Geek Wire

time25 minutes ago

  • Geek Wire

Microsoft tries to keep its consumer Copilot out of New York Times AI copyright case

Mustafa Suleyman, Microsoft AI CEO, leads the consumer Copilot team. (GeekWire File Photo / Kevin Lisota) Microsoft is fighting to keep its consumer AI division, led by its AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman, from getting dragged into the copyright lawsuit filed by The New York Times and other news organizations against Microsoft and OpenAI. In a court filing Thursday, Microsoft argued that the current version of its Copilot AI assistant for consumers should be excluded from the process of legal discovery — opposing an effort by the plaintiffs to require the team behind the product to turn over documents and materials deemed relevant to the case. The product 'did not exist at the time News Plaintiffs filed their complaints, is built on a different platform with new system architecture than the products named in News Plaintiffs' complaints, and involves hundreds of potential new custodians given that the back-end code was written by an entirely new team,' the filing said, using the legal term for people in possession of materials subject to discovery. But lawyers for the news organizations contend that Copilot is powered by the same core AI systems, performing the same functions, with the same alleged harms. 'Microsoft's refusal to provide discovery into the 'refreshed' version of consumer Copilot hamstrings News Plaintiffs' ability to investigate evidence critical for its case and to rebut Microsoft's fair use defense,' lawyers for the news organizations wrote in a filing Monday. They noted that Microsoft has confirmed that the new Copilot is powered by GPT-4o, an OpenAI model that's already involved in the litigation. They argued that this undermines Microsoft's claim that the new Copilot is fundamentally different, for purposes of the suit and the process of discovery. The lawsuit, filed in December 2023 in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleges that Microsoft and OpenAI engaged in large-scale, unauthorized scraping of copyrighted news articles to train AI models. By using their reporting to generate answers, the plaintiffs contend, the AI tools divert readers that would otherwise visit their news sites, impacting the market for their work and undermining their business models. The suit targets both companies due to their close partnership. Microsoft has invested billions of dollars into OpenAI, and the ChatGPT maker uses Microsoft's Azure cloud computing platform to build and train its AI models. These kinds of discovery battles are common in complex litigation. Lawyers for both sides have been arguing for more than a year over discovery issues related to everything from reporters' notes to OpenAI user data. No definitive court rulings have yet been made on the central question of the suit: whether the AI models infringe on copyright. Amazon reached a deal in May to license the New York Times' editorial content for use in its AI platforms, reportedly paying at least $20 million annually. The latest legal wrangling puts a spotlight on the Microsoft consumer AI division created last year under Suleyman, a high-profile figure in the AI world who co-founded Google's DeepMind. Suleyman joined Microsoft in March 2024 in a deal that saw the tech giant also hire a number of employees from his AI startup, Inflection AI. His team launched the new consumer version of Copilot in October 2024, separate from the Microsoft 365 Copilot business AI product. It has a redesigned user interface with features such as a personalized daily news summary, natural voice interactions, and the ability for the AI to act as a companion while browsing the web. Suleyman is not named in the filings, but the language refers to his team — noting, for example, that 'New Consumer Copilot was developed and marketed by a group of people who recently joined Microsoft.' Joining the New York Times in the suit are Daily News LP (parent of the New York Daily News), and the Center for Investigative Reporting.

In Trump's Washington, Palantir is winning big
In Trump's Washington, Palantir is winning big

Washington Post

time27 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

In Trump's Washington, Palantir is winning big

Elon Musk has left government, but another Silicon Valley player is making its mark in President Donald Trump's Washington: Palantir. The software and data analytics company has garnered at least $300 million in new and expanded business since Trump took office for his second term, helping to make it the S&P's top performing stock of 2025. That includes contracts at the Federal Aviation Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as Fannie Mae, according to federal records.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store