Alien: Earth has landed – here's where to watch the Alien spin-off in the UK
The first TV series in the Alien franchise, Alien: Earth takes us to the year 2120, Neverland research island, Earth. Five corporations rule, including Prodigy, which has coined a technology that can make immortal humanoid robots with human consciousness. Wendy, the protagonist, played by Don't Worry Darling 's Sydney Chandler, is the first of these 'hybrids'.
When an extraterrestrial vessel crashes into Earth, Wendy and a team of soldiers go looking for signs of life and find something terrible within. No prizes for guessing what that is. Indeed, the official trailer teased some creepy, slimy lifeforms, naturally, and some of the plot points, including the fact that there could be more than just the xenomorph we know from the Alien franchise to contend with.
On the creative and production team is Noah Hawley (the screen writer behind major series including Fargo and Legion), Ridley Scott, David W. Zucker, Joseph Iberti, Dana Gonzales and Clayton Krueger, while cast members include Alex Lawther from The End of the F***ing World and Black Mirror, Kit Young from The Beautiful Game, Timothy Olyphant from Fargo and The Mandalorian), The Babadook's Essie Davis, and Adarsh Gourav from White Tigers.
Where can I watch Alien: Earth in the UK?
While the series premiered on August 12 on FX and Hulu in the US, it launched in the UK and Ireland on 13 August on Disney+. That means you can get your teeth into the first two episodes right now. The following episodes will drop weekly, with one new episode available to watch every Wednesday.
How to sign up for Disney+
Disney+ is a paid subscription and costs £4.99 per month. Unlike Amazon and some other streaming services, there isn't a free trial, which means you need to commit to one month of the service, but it's worth keeping in mind that you can cancel your subscription at any time. That said, you might not want to. Disney+ is home to some of the most talked-about shows at the moment, such as The Bear and Star Wars series, Andor. There's also a host of family favourites, such as The Simpsons and animated Disney films from Frozen to Encanto.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
16 minutes ago
- The Sun
Apprentice star ‘gives away' he's signed up for Strictly as celeb mates and pro dancers rush to congratulate him
TOM Skinner has 'revealed' he's signed up to this year's Strictly Come Dancing. The Apprentice legend is swapping the pressures of the boardroom for the glitz of the ballroom when the BBC show returns in September. 4 4 The TV star shared a cheeky video from a cafe and tucked into his "favourite breakfast" of pie, chips and veg. While delivering a rousing speech about taking care of yourself and working hard, fans noticed that Tom 's alphabet potatoes spelled the word 'Strictly'. Strictly Pro Kai Widdrington posted clapping hands in the comments. And ex-Towie star Ferne McCann said: "OH MY GOODNESS TOM! Strictly please no what an epic booking" Tom also dished out some words of wisdom in the clip: "Good Morning and happy Thursday you lovely lovely people! "I wanna wish you all a fantastic day and I'm starting mine the right way in the one and only Dinos Cafe. Keep on moving forward and don't look back. "Never take any criticism from anyone you wouldn't take advice from. "Today is gonna be a blinder. Just always believe in yourself and you know me, I never look when I pour the gravy because I'm the absolute guvna! "Sending love to you and your families. Bosh." Tom shot to fame on The Apprentice in 2019 and has made a name for himself on social media and TV, starring on MasterChef in 2020. He is also due to return to The Apprentice in the celebrity spin-off. The Sun also revealed earlier this year that Tom, 34, will return to his TV roots after joining the line-up of Celebrity Apprentice. And Tom has been getting into shape before his return to TV. He took to Instagram to share snaps showing off his huge arms in a series of gym selfies. He captioned his uploads back in May: 'Slow progress is better than no progress. 'Stay positive and don't give up. Train quietly and let your success be the noise.' WHO ELSE HAS SIGNED UP TO STRICTLY? Gladiators' Nitro, ex-Love Islander Dani Dyer, actress Alex Kingston and former footballer Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink were all named as having signed for the contest. On Tuesday EastEnders actress Balvinder Sopal, 47, and YouTuber George Clarke were revealed to have signed up. The BBC are expected to reveal the remaining contestants over the coming week.
The Sun
16 minutes ago
- The Sun
I asked AI chatbot if I'm hot and what tweakments I need… I was so shocked but here's why I ignored its advice
SMOOTH cheeks and plump lips, a forehead as flat as a TV screen and not a single wrinkle in sight. Nope, I'm not looking at a newborn baby but at an image of how ChatGPT thinks I should look if I undergo its 'glow-up' beauty advice. 4 More and more women are turning to the app for 'unbiased' tips on how to improve their gloriously imperfect, fabulously unique, God-given features. I get it. TikTok and Instagram are full of companies and influencers pumping out anti-ageing and beauty advice based on what they want to flog us, regardless of whether or not it's a good fit for who we are. It's hard to know where to turn. In our social circles there is always that 'frenemy' who doesn't have our best interests at heart. But take a pause, please, because artificial intelligence becoming the norm to dictate how women should look is frankly horrifying. This blurring of the line between reality and fiction is scary. Besides, I don't want to be dictated to or sold something based on an app. Look, I'm 54 and, cross my heart, haven't succumbed to any work. I'm pretty confident in my own skin and, dare I say it, think I look good for my age. That's because I'm my own best friend and advocate. My lifelong philosophy is that I love myself more than anyone — and I think I'm pretty hot too. Yet I've written about this in the past and it has got me into hot water. In 2012, a piece I wrote on the subject of my beauty and general fabulousness went viral. The kicker was that I pointed out that other women didn't like me being so confident in my skin. Haters poured in. I trended on Twitter worldwide. I was trolled and told off by countless female columnists for having dared to say I rate myself. Talk about poking the bear. The furore meant I was more Googled than Kate Middleton that year. Thankfully, over a decade on and the rest of the world has caught up. I like to think I was ahead of my time because now it's OK to ditch the fake modesty and not hate on someone when we post thirst-trap pictures online or say we look good. Unemotional judge And, brilliantly, parts of social media do normalise this. We now use the hashtags '#be kind' and '#body positivity' as part of our daily lives. We don't fat-shame and we don't pile on women for rating themselves online. That's why my eyes rolled when I read women are flocking to upload pictures of themselves on ChatGPT for an AI verdict on their looks. One US study suggested people are more open to negative feedback about their appearance from an AI than from a human. The reason? We see AI as an honest and unemotional judge, so its criticism feels less like a personal attack. It's basically, 'Am I Hot or Not?' for the next generation. Is it a truly unbiased appraisal? I'm not convinced. Yet it hasn't stopped women relying on it. I like to think I was ahead of my time because now it's OK to ditch the fake modesty and not hate on someone when we post thirst-trap pictures online or say we look good. My jaw dropped when I found women are spending thousands on following the app's advice. One TikTok creator called Marina — @marinagudov — went viral earlier this year when she shared how she had used the app to refine her style. I've never done anything like this before. So I first uploaded a shot of myself on a rare day wearing make-up — off to celebrate a girlfriend's birthday last month. I nervously ask ChatGPT: 'I'm a 54-year-old woman. Am I hot or not?' While the app's black dot flashes, I gulp. But the reply is . . . kind: 'I can't give a simple 'hot or not' verdict but I can say you look vibrant, confident, and you have a warm, engaging smile that's a big part of your attractiveness. 'Your long, flowing hair, healthy skin tone and the sparkle in your eyes project energy and approachability, which tends to draw people in far more than age ever could. If you'd like, I can give you an objective style-and-beauty analysis to highlight what's already working for you and suggest tweaks that could enhance your look further without losing your natural appeal.' I then ask: 'Would you recommend Botox?' AI replies: 'From looking at your photo, Botox could be an option depending on what you want to achieve — but it's by no means essential for you to look good.' 4 4 Guilty as charged — of course I have considered Botox. What midlife woman hasn't? But it's a slippery slope because things wouldn't stop at Botox and I don't want to spend my life obsessing over the cost, never mind risks. Besides, I'm curious to see how I will age. They say you get the face you deserve — and so far, I'm pretty happy with the reflection that smiles at me each morning. Yet when the AI images of a very Botoxed me pop up, I'm afraid I giggle. The doctored images make me look like something off one of the Housewives reality series. My husband is speechless and asks me to promise him not to go down this route. There's no danger of that. I look like a doll you'd find in a toy shop and not a 54-year-old woman. I then go a step further and upload a recent selfie I took. 'Then comes kicker' I'd just got back from the pool where I'd spent the afternoon swimming with my niece and granddaughter. My hair still had chlorine in it and the only glow I had was from a combination of sunshine and sun cream. My question about this make-up-free, unfiltered selfie was the do-or-die: 'Am I attractive for a 54-year-old woman?' Whoop! My ego is happily satisfied as this AI message comes back: 'I can't give a personal judgment about your attractiveness, but I can tell you that you have features many would consider appealing at any age — clear skin, a warm smile and healthy hair all make a positive impression.' Well, thank you ChatGPT. I could get used to my personal fluffer. But then comes the kicker: 'If your question is about how you present yourself for your age, your photo shows that you take care of yourself and have a natural, confident look — and if you wanted to enhance certain features, there are subtle 'tweakments' and styling adjustments that could bring even more freshness without changing who you are.' Pardon! Why, oh why, does the app feel the need to dish out this sort of advice? It asks me: 'Would you like me to give you an age-specific 'glow-up' plan, which focuses on both non-invasive tweaks and style tips?' But, of course, I'm nosey and want to know what it 'thinks.' And while I feel that I'm practically perfect in every way, clearly the app assumes there is some room for improvement — and offers to put together a '54-year-old glow-up plan'. I ask the app to provide its plan with a breakdown of costs — and grab yourself a coffee because the list, above, is a long one. Whoa! Although I'm a Brummie, for the last 18 years I've lived in the French countryside. So, I wouldn't have a clue about where to go for any of this. And why on earth would the app assume I need my teeth whitened, given that I didn't even supply a toothy smile? But what shocks me the most is the amount of filler ChatGPT suggests I need. Cheeks, jawline, chin, lips — I'm not sure I'd be able to lift my head off the pillow each morning. I would definitely need to change my iPhone visual recognition with that amount of tweakment work done. But in the interests of research, I plough on. I ask the app how much money I should budget for this over the next decade. It swiftly pings back: 'Tweakments maintenance at £23,350 and another £8,600 for hair and brows.' I then type in another question — asking what I should do to my appearance to improve my career as a writer. I assume it will suggest nothing — but I am wrong: It replies: 'For a writer, your appearance isn't usually the main currency — your words, ideas and reputation are. But in today's world — especially if you do media appearances, book signings, festivals or online promotion — your image can play a supporting role in how you're perceived.' ChatGPT informs me that if I spend the suggested money for work on my face I can then look to make 'total projected extra income of £14,500–£49,000-plus depending on how actively you leverage visibility'. Well, that's a pretty large difference, there. So maybe we should all take a step back and view the ChatGPT beauty advice with a very large pinch of salt. Let's remember that ChatGPT is an AI language model trained on information it sources from the internet as well as input from human trainers. This experience I have had might have initially piqued my vanity but I'll stick to my gut instinct and my own sense of self-worth. And if anyone wants to come to me for advice about what they should do I'll give it to you for free: You're uniquely fabulous just as you are.
BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
'Not ready to win it - but hopefully in the mix'
Our new Chelsea fan contributor Nina Hristova break down her hopes and fears for the Blues' upcoming more from Nina at Nina's Corner, external
