‘I don't expect to live a normal life': how a Leeds teenager woke up with a Chinese bounty on her head
Media outlets across east Asia were reporting that Cheung, who had just finished her A-levels, had been declared a threat to national security by officials in Hong Kong. There was an offer of HK$1m (£94,000) to anyone who could assist in her arrest or capture.
News reports included a photograph of her aged 11, seemingly the only picture officials had of her before she and her family left to resettle in the UK in 2020. 'I couldn't even really recognise myself,' she says.
Cheung says she was still in a state of shock as friends started jokingly congratulating her on her infamy. After finishing school, she had been working as a communications assistant for a campaign group in the UK that advocates for democracy in Hong Kong.
She could barely believe that Chinese officials would care about a teenager living thousands of miles away. Yet, as friends started unfollowing her on social media, the life-changing consequences of what had just happened became clear.
'They were saying 'sorry, but you are a criminal in Hong Kong now so we can't be associated with you.' Even friends here in Leeds said they would have to stop seeing me as they wanted to be able to go back to Hong Kong,' she says.
Cheung had dreamed of a gap year travelling the world and visiting friends in Hong Kong. Neither was possible now, after Chinese officials vowed to 'pursue for life' Cheung and others they accuse of promoting democracy. Beijing has a history of targeting critics in exile and pressuring countries to detain and deport them.
'The bounty will follow me for ever. It's a form of psychological warfare – telling the world that dissent has no safe haven. Even if you were just a teenager when you spoke out, you're not safe,' says Cheung.
But if China's aim was to dissuade her from taking a public stance on Hong Kong or criticising it, it has not worked. Cheung says she has no intention of staying quiet.
Growing up in Hong Kong, Cheung says she always felt patriotic and used to 'love running home for the flag-raising ceremony that happened on TV at 6.30pm'. But that all changed in 2019-20 when millions of people took to the streets of Hong Kong.
The demonstrators were protesting against the increasingly autocratic authority of Beijing and the control it wanted to exert over the former British territory, which since 1997 has been classified as a 'special administrative region' – part of Chinese territory but governed under separate rules and laws to the mainland.
Transnational repression is the state-led targeting of refugees, dissidents and ordinary citizens living in exile. It involves the use of electronic surveillance, physical assault, intimidation and threats against family members to silence criticism. The Guardian's Rights and freedom series is publishing a series of articles to highlight the dangers faced by citizens in countries including the UK.
Until then, Hong Kong had been allowed a degree of autonomy from mainland China, including a partially democratically elected executive and an independent media.
From 2020, after several years of pro-democracy protests known as the 'umbrella revolution', Beijing began to impose closer control over the territory, including changing election laws so that only pro-Beijing 'patriots' could run for office, and introducing extradition powers allowing it to transfer fugitives to the mainland.
The constitutional principle of 'one country, two systems', agreed with the British before the handover in 1997, was abandoned, with Hong Kong's pro-democracy parties later disbanding as the possibility of peaceful political change receded.
'At the time I attended my first protest, I was expecting it to be completely peaceful because I was taught at school that we have freedom of speech and press in Hong Kong,' Cheung recalls.
'Then suddenly, the police started shooting teargas and rubber bullets at us and started arresting people really violently; dragging protesters and standing on their necks. I was just 14 and my worldview completely changed.
'I realised whatever we had been learning in school was a lie,' she says. 'I'd been brainwashed. I felt helpless and fooled.'
Sign up to Global Dispatch
Get a different world view with a roundup of the best news, features and pictures, curated by our global development team
after newsletter promotion
Thousands of protesters and opponents of the new powers were arrested and charged in a brutal crackdown that led to condemnation from countries including the UK, which offered residents in Hong Kong the chance to resettle. Although her parents were not political, Cheung says they could see that it was better for her and her younger brother's future to move to the UK.
Her family, says Cheung, 'knew I was someone who doesn't know how to shut up. They didn't want either of us to end up in prison for speaking our mind, because my mum said, 'You are kind of nobody. No one would know that you're in prison.''
The family arrived in Leeds in 2020, where Cheung, then 15, threw herself into studying for her GCSEs. With the UK going through Covid lockdowns, she spent most of her time at home catching up on the syllabus and practising past exam papers. After a successful first year, she went on to study maths, further maths and economics for A-level.
Her first taste of activism outside Hong Kong came at 18 after she made a submission to the UN on the experiences of women during the 2019-20 protests in the city. She was later invited to the UN office in Geneva to join an NGO meeting on the topic. It was here that she met members of the Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong, which advocates for democracy.
'At that point I knew I could not afford to go to university yet [as she would have to pay the higher overseas tuition fees] so asked the committee if I could take a job working for them,' she says.
'I didn't imagine it would be a career and when I was hired it was just on a short-term contract, more or less as an intern,' says Cheung. 'I was happy just to save up money.'
She soon began taking on a more public role at the committee, speaking to MPs and journalists while using her real name. She thinks it was this that irked Chinese officials.
'I spoke with a lot of media and my quotes were used as someone who was born and grew up in Hong Kong and so with a personal connection. The authorities saw that and intentionally want to target people who have got a profile.'
After the bounty and warrant for her arrest were announced, Cheung says she did consider taking herself out of the public spotlight. 'But I thought if I do this now everyone will know it is because I am scared and giving up,' she says.
'They [China] want to stop others from speaking out publicly, but I know I am fortunate to have my family here in the UK.'
However, it has not been easy. Cheung has faced an onslaught of sexual harassment and abuse via social media and was followed by two 'suspicious-looking' Chinese men to a restaurant after an event. She reported the incident to the police.
She has had to change her address and is now cautious about meeting new people. In 2022, a pro-democracy protester demonstrating on the pavement was dragged into China's consulate in Manchester before being beaten up in a 'barbaric' attack.
'It was certainly because a UK police officer broke diplomatic protocol and stepped into the grounds of the consulate to save him that something worse didn't happen to that protester,' she says.
'He could have disappeared. It's just a matter of time before someone is kidnapped or killed, given how much China is escalating their overseas repression.'
Aside from her personal safety, Cheung realises her public profile is now limiting her future choices in life. 'I have shut off a lot of job opportunities with any company that has business ties or trade with China. They won't hire me now.
'I don't expect to live a normal life, but compared with the people in prison back in Hong Kong, my sacrifice is nothing. I really want to see a free Hong Kong so if my public role can help the situation a little bit, it will be worthwhile.'
A spokesperson for the government of the Hong Kong special administrative region said Cheung was an 'absconder hiding in the UK' and wanted for 'blatantly engaging in activities endangering national security'. They added that she would be 'pursued regardless of distance'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Minister admits government hasn't tackled small boats crisis as crossings set to hit 50,000
A minister has admitted that the government has so far failed to tackle the small boats crisis, as the number of people who have crossed the Channel since Labour took power looks set to surpass 50,000. Home office minister Baroness Jacqui Smith said the number of people coming to the UK after making the dangerous crossing is 'a problem that, up to this point, we haven't managed to tackle' – but insisted that it was the fault of the previous government. 'The last government enabled this hideous criminal activity to really get its roots across Europe', she said, adding that there is now 'really important action being taken to tackle it.' It comes as the government ramps up its efforts to bring down migration amid growing public anger over the issue, announcing on Friday that the new 'one in, one out' returns deal with France was up and running. The Home Office has also expanded its 'deport now, appeal later' scheme, which sees foreign criminals deported before their appeals have been heard. But the government is yet to get a grip on the numbers of people making the dangerous crossing, with the latest Home Office figures showing that 49,797 people have arrived on British shores by small boat since Labour won last year's general election. It took Rishi Sunak 603 days in office to surpass the 50,000 milestone, while it took Boris Johnson 1,066 days - a figure which spanned over the Covid-19 pandemic. When the figure was put to the home office minister on Sky News, she said: 'This is a problem that has, up to this point, we haven't managed to tackle in terms of the numbers who are coming here. 'But it is a completely legitimate claim to say that is happening is the result of the last government who chose to focus on gimmicks, the Rwanda scheme which returned four volunteers.' She added: 'We're taking responsibility. I don't believe it was our fault that it was enabled to take root in the way in which it has done by a government who failed to do what was necessary.' But asked at what point in Labour's government the numbers of boat crossings would become their fault, Baroness Smith declined to say. 'What I'm pointing out is that we've taken our responsibility to work internationally, to change the law... the last government did none of those things and focused on gimmicks', she said. 'It's because of that that the crime behind this got embedded in the way in which it did and that won't be solved overnight. And we're absolutely clear about that responsibility.' Labour has put a pledge to crack down on the number of people coming to the UK on small boats at the centre of its plan for government. But with boat crossings at a record high, and the asylum backlog still above 75,000, there is mounting pressure on ministers to take more drastic action, pressure which is exacerbated by the success of Reform UK in the polls. The government is hoping its latest measures will turn the tide on the numbers of people arriving in the UK after crossing the Channel, amid mounting tensions over the issue in recent days. There have been protests across the UK opposing the use of hotels to house asylum seekers, with a number of people arrested. Figures from last month showed that the number of migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel topped 25,000 – the earliest point in a calendar year at which the 25,000 mark has been passed since data on Channel crossings was first reported in 2018.
BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man faces jail in US for shipping 850 turtles in socks to Hong Kong
A Chinese man has pleaded guilty in a US district court to exporting around 850 protected turtles wrapped in socks and falsely labelled as toys, the US Department of Justice August 2023 and November 2024, Wei Qiang Lin exported to Hong Kong more than 200 parcels containing the turtles, according to a Justice Department statement on boxes packed with the turtles had been labelled as "containing 'plastic animal toys', among other things", the authorities primarily shipped eastern box turtles and three-toed box turtles. Both species are native to the US and highly prized by some pet owners. The turtles have unique markings on their shells, and are seen as a status symbol in China where they are often kept as pets. US authorities estimated that Lin's seized turtles had a combined market value of $1.4m (£1m). He was caught when the animals were intercepted by law enforcement during one border species, which were smuggled in large quantities in the 1990s, are protected by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Trade of the turtles can only be authorised with export permits or re-export eastern box turtle is also deemed vulnerable by the International Union for Conservation of the turtles, Lin also exported 11 other parcels filled with reptiles, including venomous snakes, according to the Justice who is set to be sentenced on 23 December, faces up to five years in March, another Chinese national was sentenced to 30 months in prison for smuggling more than 2,000 eastern box turtles. The amphibians were also wrapped in socks and packed in boxes, which were labelled as containing almonds and chocolate cookies. US authorities estimated at the time that each turtle could have been sold for $2,000 (£1,500).
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Telling a female colleague they dress conservatively could get you fired for sexual harassment
Telling a female colleague that she dresses conservatively compared to her co-workers could be heard as a 'slur' and get you fired for sexual harassment, a tribunal has ruled. Describing a colleague as 'conservative' could be interpreted as 'frumpy' and a male employee who makes such a remark is guilty of 'objectifying' his co-worker, the employment judge explained. The ruling came in the case of Jessie Danquah, a business consultant at Shell, who told Naima Masud on a work night out that she was 'conservative compared to other woman at the social who have their boobs out'. Mr Danquah claimed that his comment was 'objectively true', however, employment Judge Adam Leith said the comment was 'objectively inappropriate' and likely to be a breach of workplace equality laws. Judge Leith told the tribunal in Croydon, London: 'It was objectively capable of having the effect of violating Ms Masud's dignity, and creating a degrading and humiliating environment for her. 'That was two-fold - firstly, his comments comparing Ms Masud to other colleagues suggested a degree of objectification of other female colleagues. 'And secondly, we consider that it would have been objectively reasonable for the recipient of the comment describing Ms Masud as 'conservative' and contrasting her with other female colleagues would hear that as a slur. 'When [he] used the word "conservative", that could, objectively speaking, be heard as "frumpy" or any number of other adjectives that could reasonably be regarded as somewhat less than complimentary. 'It does not matter that that was not what [he] intended, since the test for harassment looks at either purpose or effect.' Mr Danquah began working as a business consultant for FDM group, a business support services supplier in April 2022 and in August was sent on placement to Shell. The following month, he went to a work social organised by the oil and gas giant at Bar Elba, a cocktail bar in London. The hearing was told that during the evening he made a series of alleged comments to Ms Masud including telling her: 'I didn't expect people like you to be out that late'. 'When asked what he meant, he responded "Muslim girls",' the tribunal heard. Mr Danquah admitted the 'conservative' remark, telling the tribunal it was 'intending to affirm my belief that she carried herself modestly'. A few days after this incident, Ms Masud told Mr Danquah that she thought his behaviour had been 'unprofessional' and that his comments about her being conservative were 'inappropriate'. He denied acting unprofessionally, and responded 'You are conservative compared to other women at the social who have their boobs out'. Ms Masud reported the remarks to HR and when Mr Danquah found out he sent an email saying he would 'voluntarily suspend' his own work with Shell and FDM. Later that month he was suspended. In an investigation meeting Mr Danquah apologised for the 'conservative' remark but said 'It's objectively true on how someone dresses and it wasn't meant to demean her'. Bosses decided that he wouldn't return to his placement at Shell. Following this, he was found to have been 'aggressive' or even 'bullying' towards Ms Masud as he emailed her about his intention to sue her for defamation, copying in various other employees. He also 'indicated that if Ms Masud did not acknowledge receipt of his letter before claim within less than 24 hours, he would message all of her managers and colleagues with details of the investigation'. In November, he attended a disciplinary meeting in which it was found that this email was 'gross misconduct'. He was subsequently fired. Mr Danquah was separately told that his 'conservative' comment was a breach of the 'Bullying and Harassment policy and was associated with Ms Masud's sex, religion and belief'. He then sued FDM for race, sex and belief discrimination claiming that he held a 'philosophical belief in modesty'. Dismissing his claims, EJ Leith said: 'Based on the evidence before us, we are not satisfied that [Mr Danquah] genuinely held the belief he professed to believe at the relevant times. 'He may hold the belief now; the belief may even have developed as a result of his view of the events of September to December 2022. 'But there is simply no evidence before us on which we can be satisfied that he genuinely held a cogent philosophical belief at the relevant times.'
