Congress highlights 'background' to Op Sindoor debate, Trump's '26' ceasefire claims
The Opposition party said the debate was a long time coming, but "better late than never."
The Lok Sabha is scheduled to begin a 16-hour debate on Pahalgam-Op Sindoor tomorrow and the Rajya Sabha is set to do so day after tomorrow. The INC had been demanding a special two-day session of Parliament immediately after Operation Sindoor was abruptly halted. That demand was… — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) July 27, 2025
"The Lok Sabha is scheduled to begin a 16-hour debate on Pahalgam-Op Sindoor tomorrow, and the Rajya Sabha is set to do so the day after tomorrow. The INC had been demanding a special two-day session of Parliament immediately after Operation Sindoor was abruptly halted. That demand was ignored. Nevertheless, better late than never," party leader Jairam Ramesh said in a post on X.
Also Read | Five jets shot down during India-Pakistan conflict, claims U.S. President Donald Trump
The Pahalgam terror attack took place on April 22, but the terrorists directly responsible have still not been brought to justice, the party's general secretary, in-charge, communications, said.
Reportedly, they were involved in earlier terror attacks in Poonch (December 2023) and Gangagir and Gulmarg (October 2024), Mr. Ramesh said.
At the request of the Congress, an all-party meeting was held and chaired, not by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as demanded, but by the Defence Minister on April 24, where questions on intelligence lapses were raised, he said.
On May 30, Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan made significant revelations on tactical mistakes in the first two days of Operation Sindoor, he said. These revelations were made in Singapore.
"On June 29, 2025, the Indian Defence Attache in Indonesia, Group Captain Shiv Kumar, said that political decisions hampered military operations during Operation Sindoor and also appeared to have indicated the extent of our aircraft losses," he said.
On July 4, Deputy Chief of Army Staff Lt Gen Rahul R Singh revealed that India contended with and battled against China during Operation Sindoor, both in terms of hardware and software, Mr. Ramesh said, calling it a "completely new scenario." "On July 14, 2025, the LG of J&K Manoj Sinha publicly admitted that the Pahalgam terror attacks were undoubtedly a security failure," he said.
Mr. Ramesh also highlighted that since May 10, Mr. Trump has claimed "26 times" that he stopped Operation Sindoor by threatening to cut off trade with India.
Mr. Trump also claimed that five fighter jets may have been shot down, the Congress leader pointed out.
"He (Trump) has hosted the Pakistan Army Chief for lunch which has never been done before. The US Central Command Chief, Gen. Michael Kurilla, had called Pakistan a phenomenal partner in counter-terrorism operations. And just the day before yesterday the US Secretary lauded Pakistan in his meeting with its Deputy PM," Ramesh said.
He said the outlandish claims made by sections of the Indian media during Operation Sindoor, "with instigation by the PM's media managers," led to a mockery of whatever serious narrative was sought to be built up.
The narrative had more takers at home than in countries where an outreach took place, Mr. Ramesh said.
Opposition parties have agreed to a special discussion on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor on Monday in Lok Sabha and the next day in Rajya Sabha.
The debate is hoped to bring normalcy to Parliament after a virtual washout of the first week's proceedings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
13 Allahabad High Court judges urge Chief Justice to not follow Supreme Court's directive
Three days after the Supreme Court issued a scathing order barring an Allahabad High Court judge from hearing criminal cases until his retirement, several judges of the High Court have come out in support of their fellow judge opposing the implementation of the apex court's directive. Thirteen judges of the Allahabad High Court have written to Chief Justice Arun Bhansali, requesting the convening of a Full Court meeting and urging that the apex court's order removing Justice Prashant Kumar from the criminal roster not be implemented. The letter was circulated on Thursday (August 7, 2025), even as the Supreme Court relisted the case in which it made the remarks against Justice Kumar for allowing criminal proceedings in a civil dispute case. 'The Full Court resolves that direction made in para 24 to 26 in the subject order dated August 4, 2025 is not to be complied with as the Supreme Court does not have administrative superintendence over the High Courts,' the letter said. The High Court judges also recorded their 'anguish in respect of tone and tenor of said order'. On August 4, 2025, a Supreme Court Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan had reprimanded Justice Kumar for 'cutting a sorry figure for himself' and making 'a mockery of justice'. The apex court had taken stern exception to Justice Kumar finding nothing wrong in a litigant filing a criminal case against a buyer in a purely civil dispute over an unpaid balance of money in a sale transaction. The Bench said the High Court judge had found nothing wrong in allowing a criminal case for 'criminal breach of trust' registered in the civil dispute. 'We are at our wits' end to understand what is wrong with the Indian judiciary at the level of the High Court. At times we are left wondering whether such orders are passed on some extraneous considerations or it is sheer ignorance of law. Whatever it be, passing of such absurd and erroneous orders is something unpardonable,' the Bench said. The Indian legal system has been witnessing a troubling trend of the increasing misuse of criminal law in matters that are fundamentally civil in nature. This tendency has been seen in civil disputes, such as money recovery, cheque bounce case, contractual disagreements, inheritance, property partitions, commercial transactions and others. In April this year, then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna came down heavily on the Uttar Pradesh government over the growing trend of ordinary civil disputes being converted into criminal cases. His remarks came during the hearing of an appeal filed by two individuals facing a cheque bounce case, who were also slapped with criminal charges, including breach of trust, intimidation, and criminal conspiracy.
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump's executive orders today: What's new with 401k, debanking and Bitcoin? All FAQs answered
Millions of Americans are going to be affected by President Donald Trump's latest 'Make America Wealthy Again' executive order. The 79-year-old has directed federal agencies to enable 401(k) and similar retirement plans to offer investments in alternative assets, including cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks, as he makes an announcement on the economy(REUTERS) The sweeping new directive could eventually reshape how Americans invest for retirement, though changes won't be immediate. The order, issued to the Labor Department and other federal agencies, instructs them to redefine what qualifies as an eligible investment under 401(k) retirement rules. Currently, most retirement plans are built around traditional assets, stocks, bonds, and, to a lesser extent, cash and commodities like gold. These are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), which requires employers to act in the best interests of workers when offering investment options. Trump's order addresses the contentious issue of 'debanking', sparking widespread discussion. What Does Debanking Mean? Debanking refers to banks denying or closing accounts, often citing reputational, financial, or regulatory risks. While it can affect various groups, such as undocumented individuals or those with poor credit, conservatives and crypto advocates claim it disproportionately targets them due to political views. Trump alleges personal experience, claiming JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America rejected his business post-tenure, though banks deny political bias, attributing closures to compliance with laws like the Bank Secrecy Act. Are New Charges Coming? There's no evidence of new criminal charges tied to these orders. The debanking order directs regulators to review past account closures for violations of laws like the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, with possible fines or referrals to the Justice Department, but this targets banks, not individuals. The 401(k) order focuses on regulatory changes, not legal actions, though financial advisors warn of increased litigation risks for plan administrators offering riskier assets. Other FAQs Will 401(k) Changes Affect My Retirement? The orders allow but don't mandate alternative investments, potentially raising returns but also risks. Participation depends on employers, and experts caution about fiduciary and compliance challenges. Does This Help Crypto Investors? Yes, it opens 401(k)s to cryptocurrencies, aligning with Trump's pro-crypto stance, though volatility remains a concern. Why Focus on Debanking? Trump frames it as protecting conservatives and crypto firms, citing personal grievances, though data proving systemic bias is lacking, suggesting a political narrative. When Do These Changes Take Effect? Implementation hinges on regulatory guidance, likely months away, with reviews and strategies still in development.
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump adds private equity and cryptocurrency as 401(k) retirement options
Millions of Americans saving for retirement through 401(k) accounts could have the option of putting their money in higher-risk private equity and cryptocurrency investments, according to an executive order signed Thursday by President Donald Trump that could give those financial players long-sought access to a pool of funds worth trillions. US President Donald Trump order directs the Labor Department and other agencies to redefine what would be considered a qualified asset under 401(k) retirement rules.(AP) There is no immediate change in how people invest part of their work earnings. Federal agencies would need to rewrite rules and regulations to allow the expanded choices, and that would take months or more to complete. But once done, employers could offer a broader array of mutual funds and investments to workers, according to the White House. New plans could invest in alternative assets, particularly private equity, cryptocurrencies and real estate. The Republican president's order directs the Labor Department and other agencies to redefine what would be considered a qualified asset under 401(k) retirement rules. Americans' retirement plans are governed by a law known as the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, better known as ERISA. Employers are required by law to offer retirement options that are in the best interest of their employees, not Wall Street. Most retirement plans for Americans are made up of stock and bond investments, and to a much lesser extent, cash and heavily traded commodities such as gold. Donald Trump's move rewards both the $5 trillion private equity industry, which for decades has wanted to compete for a role in retirement plans, and the cryptocurrency industry, whose executives strongly supported Trump's 2024 campaign as they aimed for more mainstream acceptance among Americans. The price of bitcoin was up 2% on Thursday to $116,542 and has nearly doubled since Trump was elected. Under Democratic President Joe Biden, federal regulators were to treat cryptocurrency investments with 'extreme care' because of the extreme volatility of crypto. It is not uncommon for bitcoin, ethereum and other big cryptocurrencies to move up or down 10% in a single day, whereas a 2% or 3% single-day move in the stock market would be considered historic. For cryptocurrency companies, which donated millions to Trump's campaign as well as his inauguration, one goal was to get their industry qualified under ERISA. Coinbase, one of the largest crypto companies in the United States, was also a major donor toward Trump's military parade in Washington this summer. Under Trump, the Securities and Exchange Commission dropped its lawsuit against Coinbase, where the Biden administration said crypto should be treated as a security. Crypto is particularly popular among young Americans. While volatile, bitcoin has generally moved upward since it was created by an anonymous programmer nearly 20 years ago. 'It was inevitable that bitcoin would make its way into American 401(k)'s,' said Cory Klippsten, the CEO of Swan Bitcoin. 'As fiduciaries realize bitcoin's risk-adjusted upside over the long term, we'll see growing allocations, especially from younger, tech-savvy workers who want hard money, not melting ice cubes.' Private equity firms rely heavily on high-net-worth individuals and state and private pension plans, which have extremely long investment timelines. But having access to Americans' retirement assets would open up a deep pool of cash. Blackstone CEO Steve Schwarzman has told investors going back to at least 2017 that it was a 'dream' of his and the industry to be able to draw upon these retirement assets. Previous administrations, Republican and Democrat, have agreed that private equity investments, which can be riskier, more expensive and less liquid than traditional stock and bond market mutual funds, should not be included in 401(k) plans. Even after the regulations are written, it will take time for the major retirement plan companies such as Fidelity, Vanguard, T. Rowe Price and others, to develop appropriate funds for employers to use. Employers are not likely to revise their retirement plan options quickly as well, so it may take several years before crypto and private equity investments are mainstream in an individual's retirement plan. 'While Vanguard has not committed to launching a product for defined contribution plans, Vanguard is dedicated to educating retirement investors to ensure a clear understanding of the opportunities and risks of investing in private assets,' the company said in a statement.
