Powys County Council's budget black hole value queried
HOW big a funding gap Powys County Council is expected to fill with cuts and savings over the next four to fove years varies by over £20 million – a councllor has pointed out.
Calls were made to clarify the figures that the council is using to explain their predicted financial black hole during a joint meeting of all of the council's scrutiny committee's on Wednesday, June 11.
At the meeting, councillors looked at the council's draft Corporate and Equalities Strategic Plan which has been updated from the version that was agreed earlier this year.
The plan sets out the council's well-being objectives, and what action they need to take to deliver them up the next local election in 2027.
All the departmental strategies, action and business plans are linked by a 'golden thread' into this document which encompasses them all.
This plan is supposed to keep track of how the council is performing against the three objectives of the Liberal Democrat/Labour cabinet's Stronger Fairer, Greener agenda.
Cllr Gareth E Jones (Powys Independents) highlighted the problem and said: 'If you go to the leader and deputy leader's introduction (to the document) there's a statement there that the funding gap is £60 million but on the MTFS (Medium Term Financial Strategy) the funding gap on those assumptions is shown as £39.1 million.
'I think they two figures need to be the same for consistency.'
Director of corporate services and section 151 officer, Jane Thomas replied: 'We can and will amend that to the latest figure, it should reflect what was approved in council back in February.
'We will see the gap change quite often now as we go through the years and we develop our five year plans.'
Making sure that the figure changes forms one of the recommendations made by councillors at the meeting – which will be added to the report when it goes before cabinet at a later date.
Another recommendation by councillors is that members of the Liberal Democrat/Labour cabinet should attend the joint scrutiny meeting to explain and if needed defend the council's performance.
Cllr Jones said: 'It was very disappointing about the number of cabinet members that were present today, we should have a recommendation at future meetings that they have more presence.
'This is the council's performance document ,officers develop the plan but cabinet member sign it off.'
Learning and skills committee chairman who chaired the joint-scrutiny meeting, Cllr Gwynfor Thomas (Conservative) said: 'I'm happy to do that as they (cabinet members) are the line holders and are responsible for the different measures and things.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
36 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Will Scots Labour MPs be Starmer's lapdogs over Palestine?
Labour MP Richard Burgon said this was 'truly sickening, especially given the genocide being carried out' in Gaza. It's also a flagrant violation of international law. The International Court of Justice has been totally clear that all states must stop any co-operation that aids Israel's illegal occupation of Palestine'. So not only are we supplying Israel with weapons: we are also, quite disgracefully, training their soldiers on UK soil. It is surely now imperative that we have a full, independent public inquiry into the UK's role in the slaughter in Gaza as quickly as possible. This new development must, inevitably, only add to the suffering already being endured by the Palestinian people. It will be interesting to see if any Scottish Labour MPs will protest about it or whether they will continue to act as if they were the Prime Minister's lapdogs and remain silent. Alan Woodcock, Dundee. A simple question for the taxman The reason that all pensioners should receive the winter fuel payment is the same reason that all children should be eligible for primary education, free school meals, free nursery places and for child benefit, and why the state pension should not be means-tested. We should never have a system where someone earning one extra pound is worse off than those without it when they were below a threshold. There should be no cliff edges. If we decide that someone should only keep 45p of that extra pound (the Universal Credit taper for someone below the tax threshold), 32p (the taper combined with basic rate income tax and national insurance), 50p (the top rate of income tax and national insurance above £125,140, and also between £43,663 and £50,000), 79p (the intermediate tax rate for a pensioner), or 91.25p (basic rate dividend tax), or all of it, then that should be a simple question for the tax system. The tax system will also collect more of whatever you do keep if you spend it on cigarettes instead of on food or children's clothes, or other zero-VAT items. If we decide that pensioners need some extra cash to heat their homes during the winter, as we don't expect them to be at school or at work during the day, we should give them all the extra cash, and expect them all to contribute towards it with the same rates of taxation that everyone else pays. While Brian Wilson ('A universal truth: not all pensioners deserve the winter fuel allowance. But U-turn is welcome', June 12) might complain that a pensioner in Scotland receives £100 more in their winter fuel payment, those with incomes above the £35,000 threshold are paying most of it back in extra tax compared to England, and those above £40,000 will be paying all of it back. Will Mr Wilson stick to his newly revealed principles and argue in a future column that parents above a certain income threshold should pay for primary school education? Or will he return to the old-fashioned Labour principle of universalism? Alan Ritchie, Glasgow. Turning a defeat into near-victory I see that SNP MP Pete Wishart is bigging himself up on social media, telling us how long he's served as an MP and informing us that he's one of the separatist politicians who 'almost won an independence referendum'. So, in SNP la la land, must we assume clearly that losing means almost winning? Martin Redfern, Melrose, Roxburghshire. Russia's military incompetence Britain was spending about 7% of GDP on defence in the 1950s. This has now shrunk to little more than 2%, less if we remove service pensions from the calculation. This makes us as one of the top spenders in Western Europe. The USA spends 3.19%. Russia is spending 6.3%. I suggest it is a little fanciful for George Morton (letters, June 8) to claim that Nato was gearing up for any sort of conflict with a nuclear-armed Russia. When the Ukraine war began, Germany offered Zelenskyy 7,000 helmets. That's how war-like they were. Russia has a long history of extreme military incompetence. They keep attacking smaller neighbours and either get beaten (Japan 1904) or do badly initially, but grind on and eventually extract some territorial concessions as they did with Finland in the Winter War (1939-40) or Poland (c 1920-21). Ukraine seems to be an example of the latter situation. Russia's position would be much worse if Nato had made a serious attempt to supply arms before and after the invasion. If Russia is being attacked every day, as Mr Morton suggests, it is only because, in the words of Donald Trump, they are 'bombing the hell out of Ukraine'. Russia bombs hospitals, schools and apartment blocks. Ukraine shoots up some warplanes. Putin denounces this as terrorism and bombs some more civilians. Nato did take action over Kosovo to prevent the Serbs massacring the Kosovars as they had the Bosniaks. The UN should have done it but Russia would have vetoed any such move. Mr Morton's view on EU democracy seems to come directly from the Putin/Trump/Farage book of propaganda. The EU Commission is accountable to the directly elected European Parliament. Each EU member sends a commissioner, chosen by their elected government. The commission, like the US presidency, is therefore an example of indirect democracy, which is a whole lot more democracy than Putin is willing to tolerate. We live in dark times but the darkest hour is just before the dawn. Ronald Cameron, Banavie. Why we need a Scottish Trump Every day under the SNP administration we hear of more Scottish companies closing down in Scotland. The latest news this week concerns yet another two companies – bus maker Alexander Dennis and the Scotbeef abattoir. This leaves me to believe that we need a Scottish Donald Trump to save our Scottish industries. The SNP's banning of fracking led to the closure of Grangemouth refinery and they are intent in closing down the entire North Sea operation to keep the Green party happy. Perhaps it is time to give Nigel Farage and Reform a chance to show how they can save Scottish industries instead of running them down. Dennis Forbes Grattan, Bucksburn, Aberdeen. Medicine demands world leadership Robert Kennedy Jr, as US health secretary, has appointed eight replacement vaccine advisers to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention panel since he fired all of the previous scientific experts. Is this a misnomer, as many of them could be considered anti-vaccine and their scientific expertise could be questioned? For the US, the recent measles outbreaks provide evidence for the need for more vaccines. Measles is not just annoying spots: it can kill. For the rest of the world the danger is in both the possible spread of diseases and more in the lack of support for the development of further vaccines by American scientists. The world needs leadership in medicine and medical research. Dennis Fitzgerald, Melbourne, Australia. Joined-up thinking must be a priority We welcome the Chancellor's announcement of £2.6 billion to decarbonise the UK's transport system. The commitment to electric vehicles, particularly vans and HGVs, is a vital step towards a lower-emission future. It's especially encouraging to see £400 million ringfenced for the rollout of charging infrastructure. This investment must be focused on delivering a public charging network that is reliable, accessible, and fit for commercial vehicle use. The commercial vehicle sector is responsible for 10% of UK emissions but decarbonising it at scale means creating confidence in infrastructure, not just vehicles. Infrastructure developers are already making progress, but a joined-up approach between government, developers and fleet operators will be key to accelerating the transition. Michael Shaw, CEO, Aegis Energy, Wakefield.
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Thousands of UK drivers face huge speed limit change under new road rules – is your route affected?
THOUSANDS of UK drivers will face a huge speed limit change under new road rules - is your route affected? The Welsh Government announced plans to lower the default speed limit from 30mph to 20mph, in 2023. 1 Welsh councils can revert to a 30mph speed limit Credit: Getty The decision sparked major public backlash, with hundreds of thousands of locals signing petitions calling for the rule to be scrapped. It appears residents were heard, as the Government later confirmed that councils could opt out by restoring some roads to the original 30mph limit the following year. This prompted fresh discussions, as local authorities began working with drivers to decide which roads should return to the higher speed limit. Some areas have since reverted to the 30mph limit, while others are still in the process of making the change. At the time, plans to slash the threshold for drivers being fined on 20mph roads have been branded "utter madness" as the Welsh Labour Government continues to develop the controversial policy. Motorists across Wales were still getting used to the 20mph speed limits on restricted roads as the Government worked with local authorities to make necessary changes. Following the heavily criticised rollout, Labour announced it would look to amend the policy so it was more focused on roads that actually need it - instead of it being a blanket measure. To that end, the standard threshold for drivers to be slapped with a speeding fine is 10 per cent plus two miles per hour. This was changed to four miles per hour for the new 20mph roads, as requested by GoSafe, who called on chief police officers to be more lenient on drivers as they adjust to the nationwide proposal. This means that if a driver is caught speeding at 24mph in the 20mph zone, they will not be fined. Major Speed Limit Changes on Scottish Roads However, a penalty charge notice could be issued if they're caught at 26mph. But reports now suggest changes could be introduced to amend this threshold and could see drivers fined if they're travelling at 24mph. According to Wales Online, chief police officers were set to review the policy in March. The former leader of the Welsh Conservatives, Andrew RT Davies MS, Senedd Member for South Wales Central, said: "Dropping this threshold would be utter madness. "The 20mph policy is crackers enough without implementing a low threshold which is hard to match at low speeds. "Labour's failed 20mph experiment should be dropped." In 2024, 48,203 offences were recorded in Mid and South Wales, while 36,710 were given out in North Wales. In total, 84,913 offences were recorded across the country. Average offence speeds peaked in April for Mid and South Wales at 30.4mph, while North Wales saw the average offence speed peak at 32.7mph in May. Throughout 2024, the GoSafe road safety partnership revealed that 13,443 engagement sessions had taken place in which the Welsh Fire and Rescue Services delivered a 10-minute presentation about the speed limit changes. A spokesperson for GoSafe said: "While the public get used to the change in default limit, chief police officers have allowed us to increase this to 10 per cent plus 4mph in 20mph only, meaning we start to prosecute at 26mph in a 20mph limit. "This allows us to concentrate on offences more significantly over the speed limit. "The increased enforcement threshold is scheduled to be reviewed by Chief Officers in March 2025, however, they will continue to monitor it and may review it before this date. Any change will be communicated in advance through official sources."
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Builth anger as public toilets miss out in Powys upgrades
BUILTH Wells Town Council says it will contact authorities after the town's public toilets were not included in a £500,000 upgrade along key Powys travel routes across announced last week. Half a million pounds will be spent on upgrading public toilets in Powys, as part of a Welsh Government grant, awarded to Powys County Council (PCC). The money will enable the refurbishment of toilets across Knighton, Llandrindod Wells, Llanwrtyd Wells and Rhayader, with the work expected to be completed by next year. Builth Town Council, however, has questioned why town centre toilets in Builth are not part of the upgrade, considering it is a key location in Powys – the town is a busy crossroads where the A470 and A483 meet. 'This £500K does not include Builth. We will be contacting Powys County Council and Jane Dodds to ask for an explanation as to why Builth was not included,' the council said in a post on its Facebook page on June 7 – the same day the grant was announced. 'They seem to have not considered Builth as a key travel route, despite it being a crossroads of the A470 and A483, as well as our current toilets being a key asset to visitors and locals.' In response to the post, Anna Jarvis, whose husband Lee organises the weekly Groe Parkrun event every Saturday, added: 'I know for a fact the toilets are essential for Parkrun every week. 'The money and tourists that it brings to town, without all the other needs for them, PCC should definitely be including Builth in this.' The funding was secured through the budget deal between the Welsh Government and Jane Dodds, Leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats. Improvements will be made to six public facilities in total, with Llandrindod also expected to become the first town in Mid Wales to offer a changing places toilet alongside individual cubicles. All sites will see disabled facilities improved and redecorated and, where not currently available, baby changing stations will be added. In a joint statement Councillor Jackie Charlton, cabinet member for a Greener Powys, and Councillor James Gibson-Watt, cabinet member for a More Prosperous Powys, said: 'This funding is extremely welcome. We know how important it is for public conveniences to be reliable, accessible and welcoming. 'This investment will help ensure these toilets are truly fit for purpose and meet the future needs of our communities and visitors to our beautiful county.' Modernisation plans include efforts to install solar PV panels where possible, to help reduce energy costs – with water harvesting systems also added to ensure the facilities are more self-sustainable. The Welsh Government said the changes will mean families, residents, tourists and commuters between North and South Wales with severe disabilities will, for the first time, be able to explore the local area knowing they can rely on a fully accessible, welcoming facility that meets their needs. 'We love to welcome visitors to Wales, with our promise of amazing scenery and experiences,' said cabinet secretary for economy, energy and planning, Rebecca Evans. 'But we also know that getting the basics right is essential, which is why these improvements are so important. 'Quality infrastructure such as public toilets are vital for accessibility and are essential for allowing us to extend our warm, Welsh welcome to everyone.'
