Powys County Council's budget black hole value queried
Calls were made to clarify the figures that the council is using to explain their predicted financial black hole during a joint meeting of all of the council's scrutiny committee's on Wednesday, June 11.
At the meeting, councillors looked at the council's draft Corporate and Equalities Strategic Plan which has been updated from the version that was agreed earlier this year.
The plan sets out the council's well-being objectives, and what action they need to take to deliver them up the next local election in 2027.
All the departmental strategies, action and business plans are linked by a 'golden thread' into this document which encompasses them all.
This plan is supposed to keep track of how the council is performing against the three objectives of the Liberal Democrat/Labour cabinet's Stronger Fairer, Greener agenda.
Cllr Gareth E Jones (Powys Independents) highlighted the problem and said: 'If you go to the leader and deputy leader's introduction (to the document) there's a statement there that the funding gap is £60 million but on the MTFS (Medium Term Financial Strategy) the funding gap on those assumptions is shown as £39.1 million.
'I think they two figures need to be the same for consistency.'
Director of corporate services and section 151 officer, Jane Thomas replied: 'We can and will amend that to the latest figure, it should reflect what was approved in council back in February.
'We will see the gap change quite often now as we go through the years and we develop our five year plans.'
Making sure that the figure changes forms one of the recommendations made by councillors at the meeting – which will be added to the report when it goes before cabinet at a later date.
Another recommendation by councillors is that members of the Liberal Democrat/Labour cabinet should attend the joint scrutiny meeting to explain and if needed defend the council's performance.
Cllr Jones said: 'It was very disappointing about the number of cabinet members that were present today, we should have a recommendation at future meetings that they have more presence.
'This is the council's performance document ,officers develop the plan but cabinet member sign it off.'
Learning and skills committee chairman who chaired the joint-scrutiny meeting, Cllr Gwynfor Thomas (Conservative) said: 'I'm happy to do that as they (cabinet members) are the line holders and are responsible for the different measures and things.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
22 minutes ago
- ITV News
'Please don't move us': Epping asylum seeker speaks to ITV News after High Court ruling
After Tuesday's High Court ruling that migrants should be removed from a hotel in Essex, ITV News understands that 24 other councils are now considering their own legal challenges. ITV News UK Editor Paul Brand reports An asylum seeker living in the Bell Hotel in Epping has told ITV News he feels "helpless" after the High Court ruled that migrants should be moved out of the hotel. In the first interview with an asylum seeker in the hotel since the council won a legal challenge on Tuesday, Khadar Mohamed told ITV News his message to the people of Epping was: "Please don't do this to us". "Please don't move us, if you move us everyone else will want to do the same to us," he said. It comes as more than 20 other local councils told ITV News they were looking closely at the ruling to consider their next steps. And Conservative party leader Kemi Badenoch is encouraging Tory councils to fight asylum hotels in their areas. In a letter to all Conservative controlled councils, she welcomed the ruling in favour of Epping Forest District Council, writing: "I am encouraging Conservative council leaders to take the same steps if your legal advice supports it." However, for Mohamed, 24, who is from Somalia, said the High Court decision was "scary" and "emotionally painful". He told ITV News Senior Producer Nathan Lee he was surprised by the mass protests outside the Essex hotel in recent weeks. "I never thought I'd be coming here and then that would be happening to me, people not wanting me there," he said. On Tuesday, a High Court judge ruled the former Bell Hotel in Epping must stop housing asylum seekers by September 12. The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied the charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences, while several other men have been charged over disorder outside the hotel. Mohamed told ITV News that since the arrests, he had found the situation "hostile" and "difficult". "Everything changed," he said. "Now we're seen as criminals, before we were just normal people." But Mohamed said he wanted to speak out because - "I want to make the people know that I'm not what they say I am". "After the incident, people look at you and they're scared for their life, they're scared for their kids and pushing them behind their backs. "I'm not here to harm anybody, I'm here to look for safety, to look for a better life," he insisted. Mohamed travelled through Turkey, Austria and Germany before crossing the channel to get to the UK, and has now been granted asylum. He said he thinks the people of Epping "have a reason to be mad" because of the number of asylum seekers coming to the area. "I know they're mad over the whole thing about the government and how they dealt with this - I'm sorry, but I'm not at fault, I'm looking for a better life," he said. "I'm not trying to take anything from them, not trying to make their lives difficult," Mohamed insisted. "The only offence I've committed is coming to this country illegally, I'll confess to that. But I had to do it - I had no option," he told ITV News. Th e government says it is looking at "contingency options" for asylum seekers at the Bell Hotel in Epping, insisting it will also "find alternative locations" for other asylum seekers in hotels across the country. Responding to the ruling, Home Office minister Dan Jarvis said: "We're looking very carefully at the court ruling that was handed down yesterday, we'll want to identify a range of contingency options for how those people can be appropriately accommodated elsewhere." Jarvis refused to say what the alternative locations for asylum seekers would be, insisting "it would vary depending on different locations", and the government will "have to look at a range of different scenarios". Multiple councils are now considering the Epping ruling to see whether they could mount similar legal News has contacted every council across the country to ask how they intend to respond to the High Court judgement. So far, 24 said they were looking closely at it to consider their next steps, leaving open the option of taking their own legal action. A Labour Party spokesperson, responding to Kemi Badenoch's letter to Tory councils on asylum hotels, said: "This is desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system.
Glasgow Times
27 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court
In a letter to Tory councils, Mrs Badenoch said she was 'encouraging' them to 'take the same steps' as Epping Council 'if your legal advice supports it'. Labour dismissed her letter as 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense', but several of its own local authorities have already suggested they too could mount legal action against asylum hotels in their areas. Epping secured a temporary injunction from the High Court on Tuesday, blocking the use of the Essex town's Bell Hotel as accommodation for asylum seekers on planning grounds. The decision has prompted councils controlled by Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK to investigate whether they could pursue a similar course of action. Kemi Badenoch said she would back Tory councils that wanted to pursue similar action to Epping (Lucy North/PA) These include Labour-run Tamworth and Wirral councils, Tory-run Broxbourne and East Lindsey councils and Reform's Staffordshire and West Northamptonshire councils. But Labour's Newcastle City Council and Brighton and Hove City Council have both ruled out legal action. Tuesday's High Court decision has also caused a potential headache for the Home Office, which has a legal duty to house destitute asylum seekers while their claims are being dealt with. If planning laws prevent the Government from using hotels, ministers will face a scramble to find alternative accommodation, potentially in the private rented sector. In her letter, Mrs Badenoch praised Epping Council's legal challenge and told Tory councils she would 'back you to take similar action to protect your community'. But she added that the situation would 'depend on individual circumstances of the case' and suggested Tory councils could pursue 'other planning enforcement options'. She also accused Labour of 'trying to ram through such asylum hotels without consultation and without proper process', saying the Government had reopened the Bell Hotel as asylum accommodation after the Conservatives had closed it. The hotel had previously been used as asylum accommodation briefly in 2020 and then between 2022 and 2024 under the previous Conservative government. A Labour spokesperson said Mrs Badenoch's letter was a 'pathetic stunt' and 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system', saying there were now '20,000 fewer asylum seekers in hotels than at their peak under the Tories'. The letter comes ahead of the publication on Thursday of figures showing how many asylum seekers were being temporarily housed in hotels at the end of June this year. Home Office figures from the previous quarter show there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Figures on those staying in hotels date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023, when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels. Data is not released on the number of hotels in use, but it is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023. Labour has said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210.
Western Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court
In a letter to Tory councils, Mrs Badenoch said she was 'encouraging' them to 'take the same steps' as Epping Council 'if your legal advice supports it'. Labour dismissed her letter as 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense', but several of its own local authorities have already suggested they too could mount legal action against asylum hotels in their areas. Epping secured a temporary injunction from the High Court on Tuesday, blocking the use of the Essex town's Bell Hotel as accommodation for asylum seekers on planning grounds. The decision has prompted councils controlled by Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK to investigate whether they could pursue a similar course of action. Kemi Badenoch said she would back Tory councils that wanted to pursue similar action to Epping (Lucy North/PA) These include Labour-run Tamworth and Wirral councils, Tory-run Broxbourne and East Lindsey councils and Reform's Staffordshire and West Northamptonshire councils. But Labour's Newcastle City Council and Brighton and Hove City Council have both ruled out legal action. Tuesday's High Court decision has also caused a potential headache for the Home Office, which has a legal duty to house destitute asylum seekers while their claims are being dealt with. If planning laws prevent the Government from using hotels, ministers will face a scramble to find alternative accommodation, potentially in the private rented sector. In her letter, Mrs Badenoch praised Epping Council's legal challenge and told Tory councils she would 'back you to take similar action to protect your community'. But she added that the situation would 'depend on individual circumstances of the case' and suggested Tory councils could pursue 'other planning enforcement options'. She also accused Labour of 'trying to ram through such asylum hotels without consultation and without proper process', saying the Government had reopened the Bell Hotel as asylum accommodation after the Conservatives had closed it. The hotel had previously been used as asylum accommodation briefly in 2020 and then between 2022 and 2024 under the previous Conservative government. 32,345 Asylum seekers living in hotels at the end of March 2025 A Labour spokesperson said Mrs Badenoch's letter was a 'pathetic stunt' and 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system', saying there were now '20,000 fewer asylum seekers in hotels than at their peak under the Tories'. The letter comes ahead of the publication on Thursday of figures showing how many asylum seekers were being temporarily housed in hotels at the end of June this year. Home Office figures from the previous quarter show there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Figures on those staying in hotels date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023, when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels. Data is not released on the number of hotels in use, but it is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023. Labour has said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210.
