It's Donald Trump vs. Rupert Murdoch
The letter carried the name of 'Donald'. Trump had vehemently denied the charge implied in the report that he was friends with Epstein and knew about his scandalous background. Trump wrote in his social media portal Truth Social, 'We have just filed a POWERHOUSE Lawsuit against everyone involved in publishing the false, malicious, defamatory, FAKE NEWS 'article' in the useless 'rag' that is The Wall Street Journal.'
He went on to say in the same post, 'I hope Rupert and his 'friends' are looking forward to the many hours of depositions and testimonies they will have to provide in this case.' A Dow Jones statement said, 'We have full confidence in the rigour and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit.'
Trump's confrontation with Murdoch is one with serious implications for the two and more fatal than Trump's clash with Elon Musk, the tycoon who owns the electric carmaker Tesla, Space X, which operates the space shuttle, and Starlink, the low orbit communications satellite network. The clash between Trump and Musk was one of egos, and partly on differences over the tariffs issue. Musk has been a confidant of Trump for the first few months of Trump's second term as president.
Murdoch has kept himself aloof, and he has not befriended Trump the way he did Great Britain's Labour leader and prime minister, Tony Blair, in the late 1990s. Murdoch is drawn into a battle with Trump without intending to do so. Murdoch is not a liberal media tycoon. He takes sides, and when he does not want a story to be printed it will not be printed. He will replace defiant editors wihout compunction.
The fact that The Wall Street Journal carried this explosive report implicating Trump is evidence that Murdoch quietly gave the nod. Murdoch is a shrewd businessman, who has built his media empire from Australia through Hong Kong to Britain and India. Murdoch is not a natural opponent of Trump, standing with the liberals. It is interesting as to why Murdoch chose to throw down the gauntlet as it were.
The reason for Trump's belligerent response is understandable because the Epstein story about Trump's connection with Epstein has not gone down well with his core support base of Make America Great Again (MAGA), who are conservative Christians, who believe in family values. The MAGA support base strongly disapproves Trump's connection with Epstein. And there is the danger that it will spiral out of control and undermine his political credentials.
It is not surprising that Trump is a worried man, and instead of his customary bluster what is on display is uncharacteristic panic in his response to the story published in The Wall Street Journal. The demand for $10 billion is the largest ever claimed in a defamation case in the United States. But Trump's lawyers will have to prove that The Wall Street Journal has published the story about Trump with maliciousness and despite knowing that it was false.
The courts will allow for a genuine mistake if the reporters and the newspaper editors did not know that it was a false story. Trump's lawyers will have to prove intentional malice of The Wall Street Journal. It is not an easy thing to do. So, it is a tough legal battle with Trump and Murdoch ranged against each other.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Dubai Eye
an hour ago
- Dubai Eye
Trump says many are starving in Gaza, vows to set up food centres
US President Donald Trump said on Monday many people were starving in Gaza and suggested Israel could do more on humanitarian access, as Palestinians struggled to feed their children a day after Israel declared steps to improve supplies. As the death toll from two years of war in Gaza nears 60,000, a growing number of people are dying from starvation and malnutrition, Gaza health authorities say, with images of starving children shocking the world and fuelling international criticism of Israel over sharply worsening conditions. Describing starvation in Gaza as real, Trump's assessment put him at odds with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said on Sunday "there is no starvation in Gaza" and vowed to fight on against Hamas - a statement he reposted on X on Monday. However, Netanyahu later on Monday described the situation in Gaza as "difficult", saying his country was working to ensure aid delivery to the besieged strip. "Israel will continue to work with international agencies as well as the US and European nations to ensure that large amounts of humanitarian aid flows into the Gaza Strip," Netanyahu said, according to a statement from his office. Trump, speaking during a visit to Scotland, said Israel has a lot of responsibility for aid flows, and that a lot of people could be saved. "You have a lot of starving people," he said. "We're going to set up food centres," with no fences or boundaries to ease access, Trump said. The US would work with other countries to provide more humanitarian assistance to the people of Gaza, including food and sanitation, he said. A White House spokesperson said additional details on the food centres would be "forthcoming". On Monday, the Gaza health ministry said at least 14 people had died in the past 24 hours of starvation and malnutrition, bringing the war's death toll from hunger to 147, including 88 children, most in just the last few weeks. Israel announced several measures over the weekend, including daily humanitarian pauses to fighting in three areas of Gaza, new safe corridors for aid convoys, and airdrops. The decision followed the collapse of ceasefire talks on Friday. Two Israeli defence officials said the international pressure prompted the new Israeli measures, as did the worsening conditions on the ground. UN agencies said a long-term and steady supply of aid was needed. The World Food Programme said 60 trucks of aid had been dispatched - short of target. Almost 470,000 people in Gaza are enduring famine-like conditions, with 90,000 women and children in need of specialist nutrition treatments, it said.
Dubai Eye
an hour ago
- Dubai Eye
Trump sets new deadline of 10 or 12 days for Russia to act on Ukraine
US President Donald Trump set a new deadline on Monday of 10 or 12 days for Russia to make progress toward ending the war in Ukraine or face consequences, underscoring frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin for the conflict. Trump has threatened both sanctions on Russia and buyers of its exports unless progress is made. The fresh deadline suggests the US president is prepared to move forward on those threats after previous hesitation to do so. Speaking in Scotland, where he is holding meetings with European leaders and playing golf, Trump said he was disappointed in Putin and shortening a 50-day deadline he had set on the issue earlier this month. "I'm going to make a new deadline of about ... 10 or 12 days from today," Trump told reporters during a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "There's no reason in waiting... We just don't see any progress being made." There was no immediate comment from the Kremlin. In a post on X, former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of Putin, said Trump was playing "a game of ultimatums" that could lead to a war involving the US. Medvedev wrote: "Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with (Trump's) own country." Ukraine welcomed Trump's statement. Andriy Yermak, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's chief of staff, thanked Trump in a social media post for "standing firm and delivering a clear message of peace through strength." Trump, who has expressed annoyance also with Zelenskyy, has not always followed tough talk about Putin with action, citing what he deems a good relationship that the two men have had previously. On Monday, Trump indicated he was not interested in more talks with Putin. He said sanctions and tariffs would be used as penalties for Moscow if it did not meet Trump's demands. "There's no reason to wait. If you know what the answer is going to be, why wait? And it would be sanctions and maybe tariffs, secondary tariffs," Trump said. "I don't want to do that to Russia. I love the Russian people." Ukraine had proposed a summit between Putin and Zelenskyy before the end of August, but the Kremlin has said that timeline was unlikely and that a meeting could only happen as a final step to clinch peace. Russia's foreign ministry said on Saturday that if the West wanted real peace with Ukraine, it would stop supplying Kyiv with weapons. Trump has repeatedly voiced exasperation with Putin for pursuing attacks on Ukraine despite US efforts to end the war. He has played up successes in other parts of the world where the United States has helped to broker peace agreements and has been flattered by some leaders who suggest he should be given the Nobel Peace Prize. "I'm disappointed in President Putin," Trump said on Monday. "I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen." Trump, who is also struggling to achieve a peace deal in Gaza, has touted his role in ending conflicts between India and Pakistan as well as Rwanda and Congo. Before returning to the White House in January, Trump campaigned on a promise to end Russia's conflict with Ukraine in a day. "We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever," Trump said. "And I say that's not the way to do it."
Sharjah 24
2 hours ago
- Sharjah 24
Trump slams London mayor again on UK visit
Asked by a reporter if he intended to come to London in September during a state visit, Trump responded affirmatively but then clarified: "I'm not a fan of your mayor. I think he's done a terrible job." "The Mayor of London... a nasty person," he added. The comments prompted Starmer to state: "He's a friend of mine, actually." But doubling down on his view of Khan, Trump went on: "I think he's done a terrible job. But I would certainly visit London." There is no love lost between Trump and Khan, like Starmer a member of the Labour Party. In January, on the eve of Trump's return to the White House, Khan penned an article warning of western "reactionary populists" posing a "century-defining challenge" for progressives. During his first term in power, Khan also became embroiled in a war of words after speaking out against a US travel ban on people from certain Muslim countries. Trump then accused Khan, the first Muslim mayor of a Western capital when he was first elected in 2016, of doing a "very bad job on terrorism", calling him a "stone cold loser" and "very dumb". In a podcast recorded before Trump's re-election on November 5, 2024, Khan accused the incoming president of targeting him because of the colour of his skin. "He's come for me because of, let's be frank, my ethnicity and my religion," he said. But in a interview with AFP in December, Khan said the American people had "spoken loudly and clearly" and "we have got to respect the outcome of the presidential elections". In a statement later Monday, a spokesperson for Khan said the mayor was "delighted that President Trump wants to come to the greatest city in the world". "He'd see how our diversity makes us stronger not weaker; richer, not poorer," he added.
