South Korea prosecutors indict ex-president Moon Jae-in for bribery
Moon was indicted for bribery, while former lawmaker Lee Sang-jik was indicted for bribery and breach of trust, Jeonju District Prosecutors' Office said in a statement.
Prosecutors had been investigating whether Lee's appointment as the head of an SMEs and Startups Agency was in exchange for Moon's former son-in-law getting a job and receiving a salary at the Thai-based corporation that Lee controlled in 2018-2020, the statement said.
The prosecution alleged that the salary Moon's son-in-law received as an executive director was irregular and constituted a bribe to the then-president.
Moon, Lee and their legal representatives could not immediately be reached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Firoz warns against corruption as 1,919 officers graduate
Cachalia told the graduates to be the officer who sets the right example of a trustworthy policing professional. New police recruits were delivered a stern warning against corruption during their graduation ceremony in Bhisho on Friday by newly appointed acting Police Minister Firoz Cachalia. His address came as 849 officers graduated in Bhisho and 1 919 nationwide completed their training under the introductory police development learning programme. 'Just because 'everyone is doing it' does not make it right,' Cachalia told the graduating officers. 'Peer pressure is not a defence for misconduct. Corruption, abuse of power, negligence – these things erode public trust and endanger lives.' His remarks carried particular weight given the recent turmoil in the police service's leadership ranks. Political policing crisis backdrop Cachalia's warnings follow explosive allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi against former police minister Senzo Mchunu during a press briefing on 6 July. Mkhwanazi publicly accused Mchunu of attempting to dismantle the province's political killings task team, allegedly to protect individuals connected to politically linked crime syndicates. The provincial commissioner also claimed that a Gauteng-based drug cartel was influencing a high-level criminal syndicate with connections reaching into the South African Police Service (Saps), the judiciary and other law enforcement agencies. These allegations have triggered significant institutional responses. Mchunu has been placed on special leave pending the outcome of a judicial commission of inquiry led by former Constitutional Court judge Mbuyiseli Madlanga. Parliament has also established an ad hoc committee with a 90-day deadline to investigate Mkhwanazi's claims. READ MORE: 'Same as Phala Phala' – Police committee member not optimistic about Mchunu investigations Call for integrity Speaking to the new recruits, Cachalia emphasised the importance of maintaining professional standards despite peer pressure. 'Stand your ground. Be firm in your values. Be the officer who sets the right example of a trustworthy policing professional – not the one who follows the crowd into wrongdoing,' he said. Saps acknowledged the calibre of the new officers, noting they arrived with qualifications in criminology, policing, forensic investigation, law and other relevant fields. #sapsEC [Bhisho #PassingOutParade] Boots polished, uniforms sharp, the largest parade in the country is underway. Today, fresh hands, hearts & minds join the fight against crime.#PoliceTrainees #MoreBootsOnTheGround — SA Police Service 🇿🇦 (@SAPoliceService) August 15, 2025 ALSO READ: Police trainee applications reach nearly 1 million, less than 1% will get the job Saps new graduates warned of challenges ahead Cachalia painted a sobering picture of the challenges facing South Africa's police service. He warned that criminals are becoming increasingly organised, violent and daring. He noted that the country continues to grapple with high crime levels, including violent crime, gender-based violence and femicide, and organised criminal networks that pose serious threats to community safety. 'You enter into service at a time when our country faces immense challenges,' he told the graduates. 'As the Saps, we have a great task before us – one we dare not fail in. The people of South Africa are looking to us for leadership, protection and justice.' ASLO READ: Sibiya sets sights on Mkhwanazi after court bid to return to work – report Mission and responsibility Cachalia emphasised the gravity of the responsibility now resting with the new officers. 'To the 849 proud men and women standing before us today – congratulations. You have walked a demanding journey and today marks the culmination of six months of rigorous training,' Cachalia said. He reminded them of their choice to serve. 'You are not here by accident. You are here because you chose to serve. You chose to be counted among those who step forward, not back – even when the danger is great and the path uncertain.' Cachalia gave the new officers a clear directive on the proper use of their authority and resources. 'You have been given tools of the trade – equipment, training, resources. Use them as intended – not for fear, not for abuse – but to protect, to serve and to uphold the rule of law. 'Do right – not when it is easy, but especially when it is hard. Be in service of our people – not in word only, but in action. Respect every individual's rights, and never abuse the authority that now rests with you.' The graduation ceremony occurs amid ongoing investigations that will deliver preliminary findings within three months and a final report within six months. READ NEXT: Here are some of the rules outlining Parliament's Mkhwanazi allegations probe
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Protesters in Serbia's north demolish ruling party offices
In Novi Sad, Serbia's second-largest city, police and SNS supporters loyal to populist President Aleksandar Vucic were absent as dozens of anti-government protesters smashed the windows of the party's offices, threw out furniture and SNS paraphernalia, and splashed paint across the entrance. 'He's gone,' protesters chanted in unison, referring to Vucic's 13-year-long rule. Police in full riot gear later cordoned off several blocks in Novi Sad's city centre and used tear gas to disperse the crowd. Daily protests across Serbia, sparked by the deaths of 16 people when the roof of a renovated railway station in Novi Sad collapsed last November, have rattled the popularity of Vucic and the SNS. In Belgrade, hundreds of protesters and SNS supporters threw flares and firecrackers at each other on one of the city's main boulevards. Police in full riot gear charged the anti-government protesters and used tear gas to force them to leave the area, a Reuters witness said. Interior Minister Ivica Dacic accused protesters of attacking police in Novi Sad and Belgrade, and towns of Pancevo and Sabac. At least five police officers were injured, he said. 'Police had to act … to avert attacks,' he told a news conference in Belgrade. 'We are urging everyone to leave the streets.' In a live broadcast, the Belgrade-based N1 TV showed at least five protesters being detained by police. Vucic pledged more arrests after the protests. 'I think it is clear they did not want peace and Ghandian protests. There will be more arrests,' he said in a live broadcast by Belgrade-based private Informer TV. The opposition Party of Freedom and Justice said that Pedja Mitrovic, its parliamentary deputy, was injured during the protests and hospitalised. 'This is the handwriting of this government and Aleksandar Vucic, this is how they see Serbia,' the party said in a statement. Similar protests were held in towns across the country. Earlier on Thursday, Dacic said that 27 police officers and around 80 civilians were injured in Wednesday's clashes, and 47 people had been detained. Protesters have blamed corruption for the Novi Sad railway station disaster and are demanding early elections in hopes of ousting Vucic and his party. Students, opposition groups, and anti-corruption watchdogs have accused Vucic and his allies of ties to organized crime, using violence against political rivals, and suppressing media freedoms—allegations they deny.
Daily Maverick
18 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Trophy hunting in the greater Kruger area — what the study overlooks
Trevor Oertel is an Executive Committee member of the Sustainable Use Coalition of Southern Africa (SUCo-SA) and has represented SUCo-SA at CITES meetings both in Panama and Geneva. He has served under various ministers of Environmental Affairs on the Minister's Wildlife Forum. A recent study published in Biological Conservation Vol 309, September 2025, and amplified by Adam Cruise in Daily Maverick claims that communities near Kruger National Park reject trophy hunting and that alternative livelihood options should be explored ('Communities near Kruger Park reject trophy hunting, embrace ethical alternatives — study', 28 July 2025). Yet the very same study simultaneously acknowledges the conservation and economic benefits that trophy hunting has delivered in southern Africa for decades. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads This contradiction is at the heart of the problem: the study does not confront the source of public opposition to hunting, nor does it critically assess how representative the voices quoted actually are of the broader land use reality in the region. The paper states that 'public pressure could end trophy hunting of wildlife, potentially negatively affecting species conservation and the human communities that depend upon the revenue hunting generates'. This is not an insignificant point. In fact, it is perhaps the most important finding in the study, though the authors treat it as a side note. But who is driving that public pressure? Animal rights ideology It is not coming from the rural African communities who live alongside wildlife and bear the costs of its presence. It is driven largely by foreign NGOs and urban-based lobby groups rooted in animal rights ideology, not conservation science or socioeconomic realities. These groups wield emotive campaigns across digital media, often misrepresenting facts and vilifying hunting without engaging the voices of landowners, conservation professionals or rural custodians. The resulting 'public pressure' is thus manufactured by narrative, and not grounded in local truth. The paper correctly identifies that banning hunting could harm both people and wildlife, yet it fails to interrogate why public opinion is being manipulated against a practice that has demonstrably conserved habitats, maintained viable populations of wild animals and their habitats, and generated revenue for landholders and communities. A prominent example of this group is World Animal Protection (WAP), a multimillion-pound UK-based animal rights group that has consistently lobbied against all forms of hunting, including regulated and sustainable hunting. Besides the study that Cruise cites being funded by WAP, it fails to clearly disclose up front that at least three of its authors are either employed by or have formerly been employed by WAP, calling into question the neutrality of the research and its conclusions (the authors' biographies are disclosed in hyperlinks, not in an up-front disclaimer). When those crafting the questions, framing the data and interpreting the findings are aligned with an organisation vocally opposed to hunting in any form, one must ask: Is this research or advocacy under the banner of science? The Daily Maverick article and the study it draws from focus on communities bordering Kruger National Park in the north-eastern Lowveld of South Africa. However, it is also worth asking: 'How much actual trophy hunting happens in this area?' The answer is very little, particularly on communal lands in the immediate vicinity of the park. Hunting in this region is constrained by land tenure, regulation and land-use policies. This means most households surveyed in the study have had minimal, if any, direct experience of benefits from hunting in general, and specifically from trophy hunting. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads It is therefore not surprising that many interviewees do not see hunting as a livelihood opportunity — they have not been given the opportunity to benefit from it in the first place. Deeper issue This raises a deeper issue — is this study truly about assessing trophy hunting, or is it part of an agenda to explore alternatives in an area where hunting hasn't really been implemented or tested as a sustainable revenue model? The study proposes alternatives like vegetable farming, sewing or craft-making — all worthy initiatives, but hardly equivalent in income potential, ecological compatibility or explaining how they would incentivise conservation in any way. Hunting alongside photographic tourism aligns livelihoods with managing wildlife and its habitats. Generating income from vegetables, sewing or crafts moves communities away from wildlife and disincentivises conservation. For instance, vegetable farming in buffer zones around protected areas risks increasing human-wildlife conflict. Water access, crop raiding by elephants or baboons, fencing costs and soil degradation are real constraints. Yet the paper glosses over these very practical concerns. In contrast, hunting incentivises keeping wild land wild, placing value on intact ecosystems and large, free-ranging species. It doesn't require land clearance or conflict with the ecosystem — it works with it. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Instead of using communities' limited exposure to hunting as proof of rejection, the study could have investigated: Why opportunities from hunting have not reached these communities. How to expand access and equity in hunting revenue, including governance reforms. How existing conservation success in neighbouring areas like APNR (Associated Private Nature Reserves) or KwaZulu-Natal community hunting initiatives could serve as models. The Daily Maverick article is penned by Adam Cruise, who is well known for his opposition to trophy hunting. In this instance, Cruise's tone borders on celebratory. However, as a journalist Cruise would do well to temper his personal biases and acknowledge the full scope of the study's findings, including its clear warnings that banning hunting could harm both conservation and local livelihoods. The study paradoxically confirms that ending trophy hunting could harm both conservation and communities, yet it aligns itself with a movement that is pressuring governments to do just that, without addressing the source of that pressure or the sociopolitical power imbalance behind it. Real conservation solutions must be led by local needs, backed by science and sound conservation management, and shielded from ideological interference. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Disregarding proven conservation industries like hunting simply because of foreign sentiment, often divorced from African realities, risks sacrificing both people and wildlife for the sake of fashionable morality. The debate about trophy hunting should not be about emotion or optics. It should be about what actually works for conservation and for the people who live with wildlife every day. DM
