logo
Cutting 8 Percent

Cutting 8 Percent

Yahoo20-02-2025

Say what you will about Defense Secretary/former Fox News guy Pete Hegseth, but dude's interested in cutting the Pentagon's budget. Libertarians, this is what we asked for!
Hegseth has ordered top officials to draw up a plan to cut $50 billion, or roughly 8 percent, from his department's budget—8 percent each year for the next five years. Since it's the Trump administration and we can't just fully have nice things, border enforcement is one area that Hegseth has already designated as exempt from possible trims. (That said, getting the border under control and making immigration more orderly is possibly a defensible, and certainly a predictable, priority for President Donald Trump.)
It's not clear whether Hegseth is aiming for full cuts, or whether he wants certain line items cut in order to allocate the funds elsewhere within his department. Meanwhile, the Associated Press reports that Hegseth has instructed his people "to find offsets—programs that can be cut to achieve spending elsewhere—for fiscal year 2026, which starts Oct. 1." This may well be in addition to the spending cuts; we just don't know yet.
Reason has long been critical of wasteful Pentagon spending. "In 2023, the Government Accountability Office revealed that a government contractor had lost 2 million spare parts for the F-35 fighter jet, together worth tens of millions of dollars, since 2018," writes Matthew Petti in the February 2025 issue. "The Department of Defense followed up on only 20,000 of those parts. Military officials don't know how many F-35 spare parts exist in total, paid for by American taxpayers but spread out at contractor warehouses around the world." And "in 2018, the U.S. Navy found a warehouse in Jacksonville, Florida, full of parts for the F-14 Tomcat, the now-obsolete fighter jet made famous in Top Gun, and for the P-8 Poseidon and P-3 Orion, two submarine-hunting aircraft"—parts worth $126 million. Fear not, this isn't a recent trend. The federal government's been extraordinarily consistent on this front: Between 1984 and 1985 alone, Petti writes, the Navy had lost track of $394 million in parts.
One encouraging tidbit: In his piece, Petti cites a policy wonk named Dan Caldwell, who argues that "we have a defense budget that is disconnected from a coherent grand strategy. A lot of policymakers and a lot of individuals in the national security think tank community think that a topline spending number—whether it's a total spending number or a percentage of GDP—they think that in and of itself is a strategy." Caldwell was just plucked out of his think tank role and tapped by Hegseth to serve as a senior adviser.
What's happening at the border? The month Trump got elected, illegal border crossings noticeably slowed. "Though overall crossings ticked up slightly in December, the daily averages were the lowest since summer 2020, according to a senior U.S. Customs and Border Protection official who spoke on the condition of anonymity" to The New York Times. In January, Border Patrol made 29,000 arrests, compared with the prior month's 47,000. (Reuters is reporting that number, whereas the Associated Press is reporting 21,000.) There's early evidence that the Trump administration is changing the asylum-seeking process—including closing down CBP One, the app by which migrants were able to schedule appointments with immigration officials—and increasing the number of deportation flights, as well with deals with countries like Panama, Costa Rica, and Venezuela to take returned or ejected migrants in, has had a real impact on people's attempts to enter the country illegally. When those actions have still not deterred all would-be border-crossers, law enforcement is seemingly catching the remainder.
The White House, meanwhile, is touting apprehensions (different than arrests) as more evidence of their success: "According to newly released data from Customs and Border Protection (CBP), just 61,465 illegal aliens were apprehended at the southern border during the entire month of January—a 36% decline from the previous month. That number includes 29,116 apprehended along the border—the lowest since May 2020—and 32,349 at ports of entry."
This is all a marked change from what was happening during prior administrations. The Biden administration averaged 311 arrests per day from September 2023 to September 2024 (a time with high border-crossing volume). The Obama administration averaged 636 daily arrests in 2013 (a time with low border-crossing volume). Now, Immigration and Customs Enforcement under Trump is averaging 710 daily arrests. That number will surely go down once total crossings fall even further as more would-be illegal immigrants and asylum-seekers receive the message that their claims won't be processed and that the risk of deportation is higher than before.
Regardless of which metric you use, there's a lot of evidence to indicate that chaos at the border is easing.
Ding dong, the congestion pricing is dead! Or at least being duked out in court. The policy, which had charged car commuters $9 per day to enter Manhattan below 60th St., is apparently being ended by President Donald Trump, who has instructed the Department of Transportation (DOT) to rescind the agreement with the city that authorizes the tolling structure (and, since he's so very himself, Trump followed that up with "LONG LIVE THE KING!"):
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy wrote in a letter to New York Gov. Kathy Hochul that "New York State's congestion pricing plan is a slap in the face to working class Americans and small business owners," and that "every American should be able to access New York City regardless of their economic means. It shouldn't be reserved for an elite few."
The increased toll revenues, per the design of the program, are supposed to pay for subway system improvements. But "commuters using the highway system to enter New York City have already financed the construction and improvement of these highways through the payment of gas taxes and other taxes," writes Duffy. "Now the toll program leaves drivers without any free highway alternative, and instead, takes more money from working people to pay for a transit system and not highways."
Perhaps the most confusing part about this is that the feds apparently have authority over New York's tolling system, or at least believe themselves to have authority over it. The Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) has, of course, immediately sued the DOT; courts will decide who has the ultimate say here. Janno Lieber, the MTA's chair and chief executive, told The New York Times the pricing would "continue notwithstanding this baseless effort to snatch those benefits away." Meanwhile, I'm being a naughty libertarian by being kinda jazzed about my household budget possibly returning to normal. Sorry!
On Just Asking Questions, we spoke with Aaron Sibarium and talked through the new executive orders that end diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives within the federal government. "A nonpartisan, logical assessment of the topic, is this allowed?" praises one viewer. Check it out for yourself:
Major scoop from Pirate Wires on the pro-Palestine astroturfing of Reddit:
The word for this is based: "China has accused the Trump administration of 'serious regression' in its position on Taiwan, after the State Department removed a line from its website stating that the US does not support Taiwan independence," reports CNN. The State Department has long included boilerplate language on U.S. government websites to placate China; the removal is quite a provocation!
"The Internal Revenue Service will begin laying off roughly 6,000 employees on Thursday as part of the Trump administration's push to downsize the federal work force," per The New York Times.
What's going on with Trump's Russia/Ukraine war stance?
Inside the gun-for-hire industry, courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.
The post Cutting 8 Percent appeared first on Reason.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk's father says Elon made a mistake going nuclear on Trump, predicts prez ‘will prevail'
Musk's father says Elon made a mistake going nuclear on Trump, predicts prez ‘will prevail'

New York Post

time19 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Musk's father says Elon made a mistake going nuclear on Trump, predicts prez ‘will prevail'

Tech mogul Elon Musk's father lamented his son's scorched-earth war of words with President Trump as a 'mistake' and warned that the US leader would ultimately prevail in the nasty spat. Errol Musk, who has had a strained relationship with his billionaire son, explained that Elon had been under tremendous stress and was optimistic the two personality giants could patch things up. 'They've been under a lot of stress for five months. And it gives them a break. You know, they've had to get rid of all the opposition, try and put the country back on track, and do normal things and so forth,' Errol told Russian media, per Izvestia. 'They're very tired and stressed. And so you can expect something like this. It's not unusual,' the elder Musk added. 'Trump will prevail. He's the president. He was elected as the president, so Elon made a mistake, I think. But he's tired. He's stressed.' Elon had slowly begun to split with Trump and Republicans publicly last month over the One Big Beautiful Bill Act due to his concerns about its impact on the deficit. 4 Errol Musk seemed optimistic that President Trump and Elon Musk could reconcile. 4 Elon Musk's time as a special government employee ended last month. AFP via Getty Images It started with some swipes during an interview on CBS's 'Sunday Morning Show.' Then, Musk ramped up his attacks on the marquee GOP megabill, ripping it as 'pork-filled' and a 'disgusting abomination.' Finally, last Thursday, Musk went nuclear on Trump. The world's richest man argued that without his help, 'Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' At one point, Musk appeared to back impeachment against Trump and then dropped a 'big bomb,' claiming that the president was in the Epstein files, in a since-deleted post. During the epic public feud, Trump threatened to sever lucrative federal contracts with Musk's companies and the tech baron suggested he'd decommission the Dragon spacecraft, the government's main method of getting into orbit, before reversing course. 4 Elon Musk and President Trump had forged a public alliance to trim government waste and bloat. AP Musk's time as a special government employee wrapped up late last month, and Trump gave him a chummy send-off in the Oval Office. Musk had seemingly also grown incensed after the president withdrew his nomination of Jared Isaacman to helm NASA. 'Elon wants to stick to the principles of not giving in to the Democrats [and] their stupid ideas,' Errol added. 'It's normal, it's just a small thing, [it] will be over tomorrow.' Errol was in Moscow to address the Future Forum 2050, an event to promote Russia's development championed by diehard nationalist Alexander Dugin, who is known as 'Vladimir Putin's philosopher.' Trump has publicly downplayed the breakup with Musk, but warned the billionaire that there will be 'consequences' if he starts dipping into his deep pockets to help Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections. Elon has expressed openness to working to patch things up with the president and Vice President JD Vance had been optimistic they could bring the tech baron back into the fold. 'No, I don't have any plans,' Trump replied when asked by reporters if he had plans to reconcile with Musk, adding that he's 'not really interested' in such efforts. 'I'm not thinking about Elon. You know, I just wish him well.' 4 Elon Musk went berserk on President Trump last week as tensions boiled over. The president suggested that Musk had 'lost his mind' and gone 'crazy.' Privately, Trump bashed Musk as a 'big-time drug addict,' according to the Washington Post. Musk denies being addicted to drugs. Errol, who has a frosty relationship with his son, has long been a backer of Trump. The South African engineer had briefly been a politician, serving on the Pretoria City Council as an Independent and then later a member of the Progressive Federal Party, which opposed apartheid.

Wall Street Journal slams Vance's foreign student stance as ‘false choice'
Wall Street Journal slams Vance's foreign student stance as ‘false choice'

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Wall Street Journal slams Vance's foreign student stance as ‘false choice'

The Wall Street Journal's editorial board on Friday slammed recent comments by Vice President Vance on foreign students as a 'false choice' amid tensions between the Trump administration and higher education institutions. In an interview on Newsmax's 'Greg Kelly Reports' late last month, Vance said that an 'idea that American citizens don't have the talent to do great things, that you have to import a foreign class of servants and professors to do these things, I just reject that.' The Journal noted Vance's comments in a Friday opinion piece, alongside other comments in which he said 'we invest in our own people' and that he believes 'that's actually an opportunity for American citizens to really flourish' when it comes to international student visa restrictions. 'This is a classic false choice. Of course the U.S. has talent and should invest in it. But welcoming foreign students doesn't hinder Americans,' the editorial board said in their piece. 'The cold, hard numbers show that too few Americans are pursuing STEM fields to meet the future needs of business and government. Of all U.S. bachelor's degrees, biology and engineering fields make up about 13%,' they added. Earlier this week, limits were placed on foreign student visas at Harvard University by President Trump. 'Admission into the United States to attend, conduct research, or teach at our Nation's institutions of higher education is a privilege granted by our Government, not a guarantee,' Trump said in a Wednesday proclamation restricting the visas. In recent months, the Trump administration has targeted multiple higher education institutions over alleged inaction on campus antisemitism and policies around transgender athletes. 'Does the Trump Administration want to stop illegal immigration, or nearly all legal immigration, including foreign students? The evidence is growing that it wants the latter, which will sharply reduce the human capital the U.S. needs to prosper,' the Journal editorial board wrote. The Hill has reached out to Vance's office for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

California Democrat says National Guard in LA is ‘going to escalate the situation'
California Democrat says National Guard in LA is ‘going to escalate the situation'

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

California Democrat says National Guard in LA is ‘going to escalate the situation'

Rep. Nanette Diaz Barragán (D-Calif.) said Sunday that the deployment of the National Guard to the Los Angeles area is 'going to escalate the situation.' 'It's a concern,' Barragán told CNN's Dana Bash on 'State of the Union.' 'I mean, it's going to escalate the situation. People are going to protest because they're angry about the situation, and we have to just reiterate to people to do it peacefully.' Trump deployed 2,000 National Guardsmen to the Los Angeles area on Saturday amid protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said previously the action was due to 'violent mobs' recently attacking 'Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations.' 'These operations are essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States. In the wake of this violence, California's feckless Democrat leaders have completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens. That is why President Trump has signed a Presidential Memorandum deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester,' Leavitt said. The president blamed California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and Karen Bass (D) for the unrest that started due to ICE raids. 'This is really just an escalation of the president coming into California,' Barragán said Sunday. 'We haven't asked for the help. We don't need the help.' Newsom has called the federal response 'inflammatory' and said the deployment of soldiers 'will erode public trust.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store