LTBA asks FBR to expedite final tax return notification
In a letter to the FBR chairman, Rana noted the tax body had published the draft income tax return through SRO 1212(I)/ 2025 on July 8, 2025, under Rule 34A of the Income Tax Rules, 2002, which requires the final return to be issued within 30 days. However, despite the expiry of the statutory period, the final return has yet to be released, creating uncertainty for taxpayers and practitioners ahead of the September 30 filing deadline.
Rana warned that delays in issuing the return and persistent system errors could disrupt compliance, hinder revenue collection, and undermine public trust in tax administration. He highlighted key technical issues in the draft return, including IRIS's failure to open forms for non-residents, non-adjustment of tax withheld under Section 235 for associations of persons (AOPs), and inconsistent treatment of tax withheld under Sections 148 and 154.
He said that when users select 'non-resident' in the system, based on their stay in Pakistan, the return form fails to open, preventing non-residents from filing. Additionally, system-generated errors are blocking proper credit for certain withholding taxes and causing unnecessary hardship for filers.
The LTBA president stressed that prompt issuance of the final return and immediate rectification of technical issues were essential for maintaining taxpayer confidence and facilitating compliance.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
13 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Urgent intervention sought to resolve Customs clearance delay
LAHORE: Customs agents are perturbed over undue delay in the clearance process of their Baggage Declarations, seeking immediate intervention of relevant authorities to resolve the issue. According to a complaint, the BD was filed on July 28, 2025, and the physical examination of the shipment was conducted on August 1, 2025. However, as of August 8, 2025, the BD status remains 'Assessment in Process,' despite repeated follow-ups with concerned officers. Such delays, according to sources, have resulted in substantial Shipping Line Detention and Port Demurrage Charges, amounting to approximately Rs 50,000 per day, which is increasing daily. The trading firm attributes the financial burden entirely to administrative delay, causing severe hardship to the importer. They said there is an urgent need to complete the assessment process and clear the shipment without further delay, determine the cause and responsibility for the delay and take corrective action to prevent recurrence and provide relief to the importer for the financial losses incurred due to the unjustified delay. They have further added that importers are facing such hassle despite the claim of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) of introducing faceless system. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
14 hours ago
- Business Recorder
FBR sets Rs 200,000 cash payment limit, e-commerce CoD orders
ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has fixed transaction limit of Rs 200,000 for cash-based payments made at retail outlets in markets and e-commerce Cash on Delivery (CoD) orders. In this regard, the FBR has issued Circular No. 02 of 2025-26 (Income Tax) on Friday. Pakistan's e-commerce sector faces operational costs surge amid new taxes According to the income tax circular issued on Friday, in order to promote the government's overall objective of cashless economy and in line with the provisions of section 21 (s) of the Income Tax Ordinance. 2001, it is reiterated that the same principle on transaction limits for cash-based payments as for retail outlets to be followed for e-commerce COD orders as well. The limit for cash transaction for both shall be Rs. 200,000/- for this purpose, FBR added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
FBR procurement plan: IHC-ordered automated IT refund system missing
ISLAMABAD: Despite assurance from Member (Policy) Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), Islamabad High Court's landmark judgment for effective enforcement of an automated income tax refund system under Section 170A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 has not been implemented and no provision has been provided in the annual procurement plan released by the FBR. The court's directive aimed to facilitate taxpayers and minimise interaction with tax functionaries when there is an issue of returning taxpayer money in the shape of refund, but the FBR has failed to take concrete steps in this regard. It is reliably learnt that a landmark order issued by IHC remained unimplemented by the FBR despite lapse of considerable time. Automated income tax refund system: FBR has failed to enforce IHC's directive When contacted tax lawyer Waheed Shahzad Butt who has argued the case before IHC told Business Recorder that a report titled 'Findings and Recommendations of Committee for Effective Enforcement of Section 170A' was submitted to the IHC, outlining comprehensive recommendations for implementation. However, despite assurances from Member (Policy) FBR that these recommendations would be implemented, no progress has been made till date. Waheed Butt further added that FBR's inaction is particularly surprising given the government's efforts to digitize tax processes. The failure to implement the automated refund system as directed by the IHC raises concerns about the FBR's commitment to transparency and efficiency. The FBR's lack of progress on this front is a missed opportunity to streamline tax processes and improve the overall taxpayer experience. This will not only enhance transparency and efficiency but also demonstrate the FBR's commitment to upholding the rule of law and respecting the directives of the judiciary, Waheed added. IHC order states: 'The FBR has submitted a report. The report and recommendations appear fairly comprehensive, and the Member (Policy) FBR appearing today has stated that these recommendations will be implemented in accordance with the USD 25 million loan from an international donor agency.' The objective of this petition seems to have been achieved. The petition is accordingly disposed of, leaving it open for the petitioner to approach the Court again if the recommendations are not implemented, the IHC ordered. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
