Property owner hit with steep penalties for crime in nearby marshlands — here are the details
A man in Australia is facing the consequences of ignoring policies put in place to protect marshlands near his home with a looming $20,000 fine.
Hassan Ibrahim of Sydney pleaded guilty to seven counts of harming marine vegetation in a protected area without a permit, according to a report from The Daily Telegraph.
Officers from New South Wales Fisheries conducted an initial investigation of the property owned by Ibrahim after being tipped off to the illegal land clearing on the 20 hectares (49.4 acres) he owns.
On their first pass, they found mangrove trees cut down, a wooden boardwalk built to the Hawkesbury River, and overturned bread crates being used to create a platform. During a follow-up via drone, they saw earth-moving equipment "possibly being used on the property to reclaim water, land, and hundreds of square meters of salt marsh appeared to have been harmed."
During an in-person inspection with Ibrahim present, they found more damage, including a stormwater system that inhibited the natural tidal flow of the area as well as more details of the mangroves and vast swaths of marshlands that had been cut down and the boardwalk.
"I don't know what saltmarsh is; it's all just grass," Ibrahim told officers, per the Telegraph.
Ibrahim told the court his father had initially mowed the grass to "recover" from floods, and he was doing similar maintenance. He also said the boardwalk was built to allow children to fish safely.
He was urged by Magistrate Elizabeth Ellis to get a lawyer instead of continuing to represent himself, as he faces $20,000 in legal costs and damages to the salt marsh, as well as removal of the boardwalk and replanting of the mangroves.
Salt marshes play a crucial role in filtering contaminants, recycling nutrients, and improving water quality, especially important for the nearby Great Barrier Reef. According to Australia's Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, about 50% of the salt marsh has been lost since European colonization.
Currently, 31% is protected in places like national parks, while the rest is vulnerable to human activity, such as vehicles, drainage, levees, and unauthorized clearing.
The Climate Proofing Coastal Saltmarsh project has been working since 2019 to help protect the habitat, through a variety of methods, including, perhaps most importantly, education so that people understand the value of the grasses and think twice before cutting down "just grass."
Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty?
Definitely
Only in some areas
No way
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Tulsi Gabbard tells ‘Pod Force One' about life on TSA watchlist: ‘Makes zero sense whatsoever'
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard opened up to The Post's Miranda Devine about being harassed and followed by federal law enforcement after her name was added to a since-scrapped Transportation Security Administration watchlist. 'I was certain … that it was politically motivated,' Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii and ex-Democratic National Committee vice chair, said on the latest episode of Devine's 'Pod Force One,' out Wednesday. 'There was no other explanation for it, other than that. 'When I spoke to TSA agents in multiple airports who were just doing their jobs, but who, as they went through this extreme and in-depth search of me — and oh, by the way, my husband was also placed on this domestic terror watch list — they were like, 'Why are we doing this with you?'' the DNI recalled. Advertisement ''You are still serving as a lieutenant colonel in the US Army Reserve. You're a former member of Congress. This makes zero sense whatsoever.'' Gabbard and her husband, Abraham Williams, were flagged under the Quiet Skies program, in which federal air marshals would surveil individuals on domestic and international flights who were not already on existing watchlists. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem ended the Quiet Skies program in June of this year, claiming it failed to prevent a single terrorist attack. Advertisement 4 Tulsi Gabbard alleged that the government was weaponized against her when she was placed on a watchlist. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post 4 The Quiet Skies program has since been ended. AP Gabbard's inclusion on the list was triggered by her attendance at a Vatican event in July 2024 that was organized by a European businessman who was on an FBI watch list, the New York Times reported in January. It is unclear why the businessman was of interest to federal authorities. As a result, the DNI told Devine, she was subject to intense searches of her clothing and luggage — 'sometimes 30-minute long, 40-minute long' before getting on any flight. Advertisement '[They would search] the lining of my luggage, after everything was removed; feeling down every jacket that I had, feeling down the seams of every single inch of my clothing,' Gabbard recalled. 'Again, these guys were doing what they were told to do. I wouldn't want them to be fired for not doing their job. But when you look at the consequences again of this politicization of intelligence, this is another example.' 4 Tulsi Gabbard wasn't sure whether a Clinton ally got her put on the Quiet Skies surveillance list. Getty Images The DNI also said that air marshals were ordered to 'surveil me and follow me and look at how many times did I pick up my phone while I'm in flight. Did I talk to any other people? Did I have any interesting conversations? Was there any movement that I made that seemed a little out of the ordinary? How many times do you get up and go and use the bathroom?' 'I didn't know until later the extent of how many air marshals they required to watch me and who had to type up reports … …from drop off, to move through the airport, to get on the plane, to landing at my destination and out to the curb.' Advertisement 'The real implication here is people will see me on TV criticizing Hillary Clinton's foreign policies, criticizing Kamala Harris' foreign policies,' Gabbard later added, 'and then very publicly [see] how the government and the intelligence is being weaponized against me, it can have a very chilling effect.' 4 The DNI is now in charge of coordinating government surveillance efforts and other intelligence operations. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post Gabbard, 44, also opened up about her drift from the Democratic Party. 'I joined the Democratic Party back in my early 20s because I had to pick one, and what I saw and was attracted to was really the values that I saw Dr. Martin Luther King promoting, the values that President John F. Kennedy, talked about … I saw a party that fought for the struggling, working man and woman in America, those who were just trying to take care of their families and put food on the table and provide a better future for their kids,' she recalled. 'Fast forward to where we are now, where you have people talking about this guy, [Zohran] Mamdani in New York, as the future of the Democratic Party, and he's a self-proclaimed socialist,' she went on. 'You look at AOC, same thing. 'If only the Democratic Party of today had the intellectual honesty to really question themselves about what party would President John F. Kennedy most align with in today's world that we live in.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Property owner hit with steep penalties for crime in nearby marshlands — here are the details
Property owner hit with steep penalties for crime in nearby marshlands — here are the details A man in Australia is facing the consequences of ignoring policies put in place to protect marshlands near his home with a looming $20,000 fine. Hassan Ibrahim of Sydney pleaded guilty to seven counts of harming marine vegetation in a protected area without a permit, according to a report from The Daily Telegraph. Officers from New South Wales Fisheries conducted an initial investigation of the property owned by Ibrahim after being tipped off to the illegal land clearing on the 20 hectares (49.4 acres) he owns. On their first pass, they found mangrove trees cut down, a wooden boardwalk built to the Hawkesbury River, and overturned bread crates being used to create a platform. During a follow-up via drone, they saw earth-moving equipment "possibly being used on the property to reclaim water, land, and hundreds of square meters of salt marsh appeared to have been harmed." During an in-person inspection with Ibrahim present, they found more damage, including a stormwater system that inhibited the natural tidal flow of the area as well as more details of the mangroves and vast swaths of marshlands that had been cut down and the boardwalk. "I don't know what saltmarsh is; it's all just grass," Ibrahim told officers, per the Telegraph. Ibrahim told the court his father had initially mowed the grass to "recover" from floods, and he was doing similar maintenance. He also said the boardwalk was built to allow children to fish safely. He was urged by Magistrate Elizabeth Ellis to get a lawyer instead of continuing to represent himself, as he faces $20,000 in legal costs and damages to the salt marsh, as well as removal of the boardwalk and replanting of the mangroves. Salt marshes play a crucial role in filtering contaminants, recycling nutrients, and improving water quality, especially important for the nearby Great Barrier Reef. According to Australia's Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, about 50% of the salt marsh has been lost since European colonization. Currently, 31% is protected in places like national parks, while the rest is vulnerable to human activity, such as vehicles, drainage, levees, and unauthorized clearing. The Climate Proofing Coastal Saltmarsh project has been working since 2019 to help protect the habitat, through a variety of methods, including, perhaps most importantly, education so that people understand the value of the grasses and think twice before cutting down "just grass." Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty? Definitely Only in some areas No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Business Wire
a day ago
- Business Wire
Class Action Against FIFA and EU Football Associations on Behalf of Football Players Launched Today by 'Justice for Players', a Dutch Foundation
AMSTERDAM--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Justice for Players Foundation ('JfP'), a Dutch Foundation has today launched a class action on behalf of professional football players who have been affected by the FIFA Regulations. The claim against FIFA and several national football associations, including the KNVB, the Football Association of the Netherlands, will be filed at the District Court of Midden-Nederland. JfP intends to represent all professional footballers who are playing or who have played in clubs in the European member states and the United Kingdom and who have been adversely affected by FIFA's unlawful rules from 2002 to the present. Preliminary estimates indicate that the number of affected footballers may comprise approximately 100,000 players. This case is being brought in the Netherlands under the Dutch Act on the Settlement of Mass Damages in Collective Action (WAMCA), which allows this legal action to be launched by JfP on behalf of a large group of professional footballers. The case has been launched following the CJEU judgment in October 2024 in the case brought by football player Lassana Diarra and FIFPRO Europe/FIFPRO World against FIFA, which found that the FIFA Regulations seriously infringed EU competition law and the right to free movement of workers, making it extremely challenging for a player to terminate their employment contract without just cause. In short, the CJEU ruled that the FIFA Regulations violated two core principles of European law: free movement of workers and fair competition. By stating unequivocally that FIFA's rules were unlawful and that those rules caused all players to suffer a financial loss, the CJEU in its judgement gave the green light to a Europe-wide class action. This is a classic follow-on claim, in line with the EU Representative Action Directive, that seeks to ensure that the rule of law is upheld, that FIFA is held to account and that all players receive the compensation that is owed to them. In particular, the CJEU noted that the FIFA Regulations had the effect of restricting the free movement of workers and competition by: establishing unlawful criteria for determining the severance 'compensation' a player must pay to their former club; allowing the national federation of the former club to withhold the issuance of an International Transfer Certificate (ITC), without which a player cannot play for a new club; making the player's new club automatically jointly and severally liable for the compensation to be paid to the former club and allowing FIFA to impose disciplinary sanctions on the player and their new club. The unlawful FIFA Regulations granted FIFA complete control over how and when players leave their current football clubs and under what conditions, effectively enforcing an extremely restrictive 'no-poaching agreement'. A preliminary analysis by economists at Compass Lexecon has estimated that affected professional footballers have earned approximately 8% less over the course of their career than they would have if the FIFA Regulations had not been unlawfully restrictive. Lucia Melcherts, Chair of the Board Member of Justice for Players, said: ' All professional football players have lost a significant amount of earnings due to the unlawful FIFA Regulations. 'Justice for Players' is bringing this claim to help achieve justice for footballers and fairness. The past and even current system unduly favours FIFA who has far too much unilateral power. In any other profession, people are allowed to change jobs voluntarily. The same should be true in football, particularly as the average career span of a professional footballer according to a FIFPro study is only 8 years long.' Franco Baldini, Board Member of Justice for Players, said: ' As a former professional footballer, agent and someone who has worked in football in various managerial capacities, I have had first hand experience, in particular with the Mexes case in 2004, of how much control and power FIFA has over the players. So I am very proud to be part of the Foundation 'Justice for Players' and to be part of something that could help change the existing system and make football more inclusive and more sustainable. ' Dolf Segaar, Board Member for Justice for Players said: ' This claim against FIFA brought by 'Justice for Players' is an important and necessary next step that will allow footballers to assert their rights as EU workers and receive compensation from an organisation that for far too long has willingly ignored the rule of EU law. The CJEU ruled in a crystal-clear manner that the FIFA Rules on termination of contracts and transfer were blatant violations of EU competition law and free movement of workers. And the CJEU also made clear that such unlawful rules had caused players to suffer financial losses. Under EU law, victims of such violations are entitled to compensation for the losses they have suffered and that is an important part of what this class action is about.' Koen Rutten, Partner at Finch Dispute Resolution, said: ' For over 20 years, FIFA has enforced unlawful rules at the expense of professional footballers. Finch is supporting 'Justice for Players' so that FIFA can be held accountable and ordered to compensate footballers whose earnings have been impacted by these unfair and illegal rules. Not only are we seeking damages for footballers who have been disadvantaged by the rules that mainly benefit FIFA and the football associations, but through this legal action we are seeking changes to the FIFA Rules so that professional players can finally have greater control over their careers.' For further information please visit: Notes to Editors About Justice for Players Justice for Players was founded to advocate for the interests of professional footballers across Europe. The board comprises of three members: Lucia Melcherts, Dolf Segaar and Franco Baldini. Lucia Melcherts has been the chair of Stichting Massaschade & Consument (Foundation for Mass Damages & Consumers) since 2021. She also holds the position of Coordinating Specialist Advisor at the Dutch Ministry of Justice and Security. Dolf Segaar founded his own law firm Segaar Law in July 2021, specialising in governance and litigation, with a strong focus on sports law. Franco Baldini is a former professional footballer and agent and spent over 20 years in different senior management roles at top international clubs and organizations, including AS Roma, Real Madrid, Tottenham Hotspur and the England National Team. He currently runs his own consulting firm IC20 Ltd. About Finch Finch Dispute Resolution is an independent Dutch litigation boutique law firm, founded in 2022. With a team of around 18 specialised litigators and 5 partners based in Utrecht, the firm handles corporate, commercial, financial, and class-action disputes—domestically and internationally. About Dupont-Hissel Jean-Louis DUPONT and Martin HISSEL are specialists in European law, particularly as applied to the sports sector. Together they have defended hundreds of cases, acting on behalf of all stakeholders in the professional sports sector, before the CJEU, the European Commission, the European Court of Human Rights, national competition authorities, national courts, international (including CAS) and national arbitration tribunals, and the internal judicial bodies of national and international sports associations. In particular, they have led and co-managed cases that resulted in landmark judgements of the CJEU regarding sports governance in the EU and beyond: Bosman (1995), Meca-Medina (2006), Royal Antwerp FC (2023), European Super League (2023), Lassana Diarra (2024) and RFC Seraing (2025). About Deminor Founded in 1990, Deminor is a leading international litigation funder with offices in Brussels, London, Hamburg, New York, Hong Kong, Madrid, Milan, Stockholm and Luxembourg. Combining skill sets from 19 different nationalities and 22 languages, Deminor possesses a highly respected and diverse team of legal and financial specialists across a range of specialisms including arbitration, enforcement, intellectual property, competition, investments & tax, corporate & post-M&A.
