Annual Jeth Mela in Bahraich cancelled
Bahraich: The annual Jeth Mela held at the shrine of
Syed Salar Masud Ghazi
in Bahraich will not be held this year. The district administration has denied permission for the mela on law and order grounds. The administration has taken into account a report from the Local Intelligence Unit (LIU) advising against the event being organised citing
law and order concerns
.
In a video statement on Saturday, Bahraich city magistrate Shalini Prabhakar said the permission has been denied for the mela which was scheduled to begin on May 18. The Dargah committee has been informed about the decision, she added.
In March, the auction of contracts for the Jeth Mela had been postponed by the Dargah committee citing "unavoidable reasons".
In its report, the LIU said that about 15 lakh devotees attend the month-long fair held in May-June, with footfall reaching up to 5 lakh over the weekends. The report expressed concern that managing such a massive gathering may pose a challenge to the law and order situation given the tension in the country over the
Pahalgam terror attack
.
The report also pointed out concern over the Chittaura lake, where many pilgrims bathe. The lake is adjacent to a memorial and temple of Maharaja Suheldev, a revered Hindu figure. The Hindu groups have long regarded Maharaja Suheldev as a historical icon, while labelling Syed Salar Masud as an invader. They also claim the venue of the fair is actually 'Surya Kund'.
Bahraich police officials said the situation remains delicate due to various recent developments, including statewide protests against the Waqf Amendment Bill and the Pahalgam terror attack.
Syed Salar Masood Ghazi, a semi-legendary figure, is believed to be the nephew of Mahmud of Ghazni and served as his military commander. The main source of information about him is contained in Mirat-i-Masudi, a Persian-language hagiography written by Abdur Rahman Chishti during the reign of Jahangir.
According to Mirat-i-Masudi, Ghazi was killed in a battle with Maharaja Suheldev of Shravasti at Bahraich in 1034 CE. Where he is believed to have been buried is now the Dargah Sharif in Bahraich.
Though Ghazi doesn't find mention in any contemporary 11th century Ghaznavid chronicles, he had become a well-known figure in Delhi Sultanate by the 12th century, when the pilgrimage to his tomb in Bahraich appears to have started.
Masud is believed to have been buried at what is now the Dargah Sharif in Bahraich. Legend holds that the burial site was once the ashram of Balarak Rishi, near a pond known as Surya Kund. For at least a hundred years, the annual Jeth Mela has been held at this site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
Productive discussions on connectivity, security, terrorism: Jaishankar at India-Central Asia Dialogue
New Delhi [India], June 6 (ANI): External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, chairing the 4th India-Central Asia Dialogue in Delhi on Thursday, reaffirmed India's commitment to deepening its strategic partnership with Central Asian nations, with a special focus on connectivity, security, and technological collaboration. The session brought together top diplomats from Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan, reflecting a growing determination to address shared regional challenges and opportunities. Following the meeting, Jaishankar posted on X, stating, 'Delighted to chair the 4th India-Central Asia Dialogue in Delhi this morning. Thank my Central Asian colleagues DPM & FM Murat Nurtleu, Deputy Chairman & FM Rashid Meredov, FM Zheenbek Kulubaev, FM Sirojiddin Muhriddin and FM Bakhtiyor Saidov for their assessments and views. Expressed India's appreciation on Central Asian partners condemning the heinous terrorist attack in Pahalgam. Held productive and wide-ranging discussions on themes of connectivity, regional security & terrorism, technology cooperation, development partnership and people-to-people exchanges. Confident that our deliberations today would lead to forging an even closer and deeper India-Central Asia partnership.' In his opening remarks at the Dialogue, Jaishankar thanked the Central Asian countries for their show of solidarity following the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam. 'I appreciate that your countries stood by India and condemned the heinous terrorist attack that took place in April in Pahalgam,' he said. The minister emphasised that this unity reflected the depth of mutual trust between India and its regional partners. He noted that India's ties with the region were rooted in a shared civilisational history. 'India deeply cherishes its millennia-old civilisational and cultural ties with Central Asia. These age-old bonds forged through trade, exchange of ideas, and people-to-people contacts have strengthened over time, evolving into a partnership which is defined by shared aspirations, shared opportunities and common challenges,' he said. Jaishankar recalled that India and Central Asia marked 30 years of contemporary diplomatic relations in 2022 and that Prime Minister Narendra Modi's landmark visits to all five Central Asian capitals in July 2015 had significantly boosted ties. He pointed out that the nature of engagement has evolved steadily, especially over the last decade, with enhanced trade, tourism, and educational exchanges. Improved connectivity through direct flights has spurred two-way movement of tourists and businesses. The presence of a large number of Indian students in Central Asian universities was also highlighted as a marker of growing people-to-people ties. Underscoring India's role as a reliable development partner, Jaishankar said that beyond the well-known I-Tech training slots and ICCR scholarships, India has been supporting high-impact community development projects. 'Such projects have included equipping schools with computers and providing hospitals with medical equipment,' he said. He further stressed the growing scope of engagement across sectors, noting that cooperation has expanded since the 2022 virtual summit, which brought the partnership to the leaders' level. Today, regular exchanges between trade ministers, culture ministers, and national security advisers have become hallmarks of this partnership, along with special training programmes for diplomats. Jaishankar also mentioned discussions held a day prior at the India Central Asia Business Council on deepening collaboration in digital technology, fintech, and inter-bank relations, to help overcome existing impediments and realise the full potential of economic cooperation. 'India and Central Asian partners are committed to advancing mutually beneficial cooperation across all sectors, particularly trade and investment, defence, agro processing, textiles, pharmaceuticals, regional connectivity, security, education, culture, people-to-people exchanges, as well as new and emerging technologies,' he said, expressing confidence that the day's deliberations would pave the way for a stronger, broader partnership. (ANI)
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
TMC MLA calls 'Operation Sindoor a drama in coordination with Pakistan', BJP demands action
Kolkata: Major controversy erupted over comments of Trinamool Pandabeswar MLA Narendranath Chakraborty 's on ' Operation SIndoor '. The TMC MLA called "Op Sindoor as India's gameplan and drama in coordination with Pakistan", which was scripted. Meanwhile, BJP has gone on an all-out attack against the MLA with Leader of Opposition (LoP) Suvendu Adhikari and BJP state President Sukanta Majumdar attacking the ruling party lawmaker. BJP Minority cell has lodged a complaint in Kulti Police Station against Chakraborty. The Pandabeswar MLA of Trinamool Congress , during a public rally, said, 'How did Sindoor Khela have been started by the BJP government! It is a war-war game. There has been a settlement done with Pakistan.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villa For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search ads Learn More Undo 'If you have gone to Kashmir, you must have seen an army standing with guns at every ten feet distance,' the Trinamool MLA said, adding, 'It is not only Pahalgam but in every tourist spot in Kashmir, heavy security arrangements are witnessed. Barbed wires can be seen as road blockades. But a few days before the terror attack in Pahalgam, all forces were removed. It is a drama,' the MLA alleged. 'The terrorists have killed so many people. What was said before killing? Are you Hindu, do you wear sindoor or can you read Kalma ? If they said 'no', came 'boom'…They (the Centre) could not find the terrorists as it is a game plan and they played a Hindutva game, a script which was enacted. Everything was fitting,' Narendranath Chakrabarty said. Chakraborty is also District President of Trinamool's Paschim Bardhaman Organizational District. Live Events 'The terrorists could not be traced. They will never be found. It is a game plan,' the MLA said. BJP Minority cell has lodged a complaint in Kulti Police Station against Narendranath Chakraborty LoP Suvendu Adhikari said the lawmaker should be taken into custody by NIA and quizzed. Responding to Pandabeswar Trinamool MLA's comments, Adhikari said, 'When the Pandabeswar MLA knows everything about Operation Sindoor, Chakraborty should be summoned by the NIA. He should be kept in custody and interrogated. The Pandabeswar MLA was close to Mamata Banerjee . He is an international expert now." Adhikari took to the X Handle and said, '…If an elected representative like Chakraborty has prior knowledge or insights into such a heinous act, it is imperative that the NIA take him into custody for questioning to uncover the source and credibility of his information.' 'The outrageous and condemnable remark made by Pandabeswar's TMC MLA Narendranath Chakraborty clearly reveals the extent to which the Trinamool Congress is trying to spread anti-national venom in West Bengal. Wearing the party's scarf and standing on a public stage with the symbol, he shamelessly claimed that 'India had a fitting with Pakistan'! This statement is not just objectionable—it is blatantly anti-national. Sadly, he is not the first. Several other TMC leaders, including the failed Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee herself, have made indecent and disgraceful remarks about 'Operation Sindoor,' BJP State President Sukanta Majumdar posted in his X Handle.
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
Law doesn't ban Bakrid sacrifice, but politics thrives on pretending it does
Three direct questions are relevant in this regard: which animals are to be sacrificed on Bakrid? Where should they be sacrificed? And what should be done to the blood and carcasses of the sacrificed animals? In fact, an impression is created that qurbani not merely symbolises the violent nature of Islam—which inevitably 'hurts non-violent Hindu sentiments'—but it also crosses the acceptable boundaries of law. These popular perceptions are so powerful that one does not bother to look at the legal framework that deals with animal slaughter in general and Bakrid sacrifice in particular. The aggressive campaign for a 'Green Bakrid' revolves around the idea that this particular Muslim festival is all about killing innocent animals. The Cruelty Against Animal Act, 1960 is often invoked to legitimise the demand that qurbani (sacrifice) on the day of Bakrid—or Bakra Eid—should be made completely illegal. Which animal to be sacrificed? My book, Contested Homelands: Politics of Space and Identity, shows how Bakrid became a highly controversial festival in colonial North India. The colonial authorities evolved a legal-administrative framework to deal with the question of animal slaughter in general and the slaughter of sacrificial cows on Bakrid in particular. These mechanisms, however, placed religious practices of different communities in a binary opposition to each other while simultaneously producing a contested notion of community-space. This administrative mechanism became the guiding principle for various animal preservation laws enacted immediately after Independence. These laws were mainly related to the protection of cows and other bovine animals from slaughter, especially those that were required for the purpose of agriculture and milk production. For instance, the Central Provinces and Berar Animal Preservation Act, 1951 placed a total ban on the slaughter of cows and restricted the slaughter of buffaloes, allowing it as a subject of certification by authorities, based on age and usability in the production. The Bihar Preservation and Improvement of Animals Act, 1955 completely restricted the slaughter of all categories of bovine cattle under any circumstance. The Act does not explicitly prohibit the slaughter of goats or sheep, but it does restrict the slaughter of the animals traditionally associated with the festival in Bihar. The UP Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 also prohibited the slaughter of cows. However, it remained silent on the slaughter of other bovines. Most importantly, these laws criminalised cow slaughter, making it cognisable (arrest without warrant) and non-bailable offence. In short, almost all the state legislations passed afterwards prohibit cow slaughter, allow restricted slaughter of buffaloes, and most importantly, keep goats and sheep outside their purview. These laws, interestingly, did not problematise qurbani on Bakrid. In other words, restricted slaughter of bovine including buffalos and other animals like goats and sheep are not prohibited for qurbani on the occasion of Bakrid. Also read: Bakrid needs a makeover. India's poor need laptops & AC, not gift of meat How should it be slaughtered? The much-talked-about Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act (PCA), 1960 does not ban slaughtering of animals. This legislation seeks to prevent the infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering upon animals. It defines cruelty in the manner that includes over-loading during transportation, beating, lack of sufficient food, water, or shelter, and abandonment. The Act underlines specific guidelines in connection with slaughter of animals so that 'unnecessary pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is eliminated in the pre-slaughter stages as far as possible, and animals are killed, wherever necessary, in as humane a manner as possible.' PCA (Slaughter House) Rules, 2001 also puts responsibility on the governments and associated enforcement agencies to modernise and maintain slaughterhouses and slaughtering rules to ensure painless slaughter of animals. The PCA does not recognise qurbani as a problematic act. Section 28 of the Act provides immunity for the killing of animals for religious purposes. It says: '…Nothing contained in this Act shall render it an offense to kill an animal in a manner required by the religion of any community.' It is worth noting that the religious norms practiced by Muslim communities for qurbani are very much in line with the provisions of PCA. For instance, Islamic norms do not allow the slaughter of pregnant, sick, under-age, and/or the animals with deformities. Similarly, pre-slaughter care, which includes proper feeding and drinking and allotting resting time to the animal are given adequate attention. Prevention of cruelty during slaughter, which includes quick and painless slaughter with a sharpened knife away from the sight of other animals, also corresponds to the qurbani norms. In this sense, the very act of qurbani does not contradict the basic spirit of PCA. The Supreme Court has rejected several pleas challenging Section 28 of PCA, calling for a ban on qurbani. In July 2023, for instance, the Court ruled against an appeal filed by the Gopeshwar Gaushala Samiti, maintaining the constitutional validity of the provision under the constitutional right to religious freedom. The petition argued that after the insertion of Article 51-A—which outlines the Fundamental Duties of citizens—Section 28 of PCA cannot continue as every citizen is under constitutional obligation to show compassion for living creatures. The petition was filed against an earlier Allahabad High Court order, which had already dismissed the petition in 2017 on the same grounds. Also read: These Pakistani goats are being sold for PKR 2.5 mn. They're selfie magnets at Islamabad Mandi Where to perform qurbani? There have been no specific legal provisions regarding the place of sacrifice slaughters other than colonial bye-laws followed by different municipalities. For instance, the Bye-Laws Part III of the Delhi Municipal Committee, 1957 explains: 'No person can slaughter or cause or permit to be slaughtered at any place other than a public slaughter house an animal…this rule shall not apply to an animal intended for sacrificial slaughter on the occasion of any festival or ceremony … the slaughter of such animals shall not be carried on within the sight of the public except in the case of Zabiha in localities exclusively inhabited by Muslims.' The PCA Rules 2001 also provide that animals are not slaughtered in places other than those recognised or licensed by the concerned authority empowered under the law. However, it does not make any provisions for sacrificial slaughter. In the absence of any clear, legally designated spaces for qurbani even within the Muslim-dominated areas, Bakrid has become a contested festival in legal-administrative terms. Cleanliness and hygiene, we must remember, are also a matter of concern for urban Muslim communities living in areas already lacking basic amenities, regular water supply, proper sanitation, and community centres. However, these concerns have either been completely neglected or have now been reduced to politics over cow, meat, vague notions of vegetarianism, ahimsa (non-violence) and, above all, stereotyping minority culture and identity. The question of administrative intervention required for the efficient observance of Bakrid remains unattended. Nazima Parveen is a Senior Research Fellow at Policy Perspective Foundation. She tweets @ParveenNazima. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
