Dollar gains against major peers after US-EU trade pact
U.S. President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reached a framework trade agreement, which provides for an import tariff of 15% on EU goods, half the rate Trump had threatened from August 1.
That follows last week's U.S. agreement with Japan, while top U.S. and Chinese economic officials will resume talks in Stockholm on Monday aiming to extend a truce by three months and keep sharply higher tariffs at bay.
The dollar rose against the safe-haven Swiss franc , up 0.82% at 0.80155 francs. It rose against the Japanese yen , up 0.29% at 148.12.
The euro was last down 0.81% at $1.164275 , set for its biggest daily loss since mid-May, reversing an initial knee-jerk rise in Asia trade as investors' focus shifted to what an easing in global trade tensions meant for the dollar overall.
"While the USD's strength today may reflect the perception that the new US-EU deal is lopsided in favor of the US, the USD's strength may also reflect a feeling that the US is reengaging with the EU and with its major allies," Thierry Wizman, global FX & rates strategist at Macquarie Group, said in an investor note.
"Rather than the 'divorce' between the US and its partners that was seemingly foretold in February-June, the US and its key partners are instead in 'marriage counseling', and thus still 'talking about their feelings.'"
The dollar tumbled sharply earlier this year, particularly against the euro, as fears that dramatically higher tariffs on trade with most of its major partners would hurt the U.S. economy caused investors to consider shifting out of U.S. assets.
Normally the gap between yields on government bonds is a major factor for currency moves, but at present the euro is significantly higher than the gap between U.S. and eurozone yields would imply.
"If you think about what we expected in the beginning of the year, no one really thought that the euro is going to be so strong. We all thought that, especially post Liberation Day, that the dollar will remain strong," said Anthi Tsouvali, multi-asset strategist at UBS Wealth. "We continue to see the dollar weakening, it has consolidated recently a little bit but we think that in the long term it will get weaker."
The euro fell against the yen and sterling, having hit a one-year high on the Japanese currency and a two-year high on the pound at the start of trade. ,
The dollar strengthens against the pound, which was 0.24% lower at $1.3422.
As concerns subside about the economic fallout from punishing tariffs, investor attention is shifting to corporate earnings and central bank meetings in the United States and Japan in the next few days.
Both the Fed and the Bank of Japan are expected to hold rates steady at policy meetings this week, but traders will watch subsequent comments to gauge the timing of the next moves.
Investors will also be watching to see Trump's reaction to the Fed's decision.
The U.S. president has been putting the Fed under heavy pressure to make significant rate cuts, and Trump appeared close to trying to fire Powell last week, but backed off with a nod to the market disruption that would likely follow.
In addition, quarterly results are due in coming days from Apple, Microsoft, Amazon and Facebook parent Meta Platforms META.O, opens new tab, four of the whose stocks heavily influence benchmark indexes.
They matter for currency investors if strong results cause an acceleration of flows back into U.S. assets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Economy is getting worse under Trump's leadership, Americans say in new poll on eve of his tariff D-Day
A new poll shows Donald Trump underwater on the issue of his tariff agenda as Friday's enforcement deadline looms for the 'Liberation Day' measures he announced in April. In 2024, Trump won election to a nonconsecutive second term, boosted by the same issues that propelled him to victory the first time around. Concerns over immigration and the economy were at the forefront of voters' minds, though he received a key boost from the implosion of Joe Biden's campaign. But in a Times of London/YouGov poll out Thursday, the president's tariff agenda is one of the biggest anchors driving down his approval numbers. Some 48% of Americans graded Trump's job performance over the first six months of his administration as poor, compared to just 21% who rated it excellent, 16% who rated it good and 11% who rated it as fair. On the core issue of tariffs, Trump is clearly tanking — despite months of pronouncements from the White House of America's impending 'Golden Age.' Four in ten Americans say that Trump's tariffs will make the country poorer and stifle economic growth. Just 26% believe the White House's line about economic prosperity coming down the pike. And most alarmingly for the White House, inflation still ranks as the No. 1 issue for voters. That could prove to be dangerous ground for the president as the summer concludes with potentially sharp increases to consumer prices stemming from the president's reciprocal tariffs, which are currently set as high as 50% with at least one trading partner, Brazil. A CBS News poll further dove into the president's declining numbers on the economy. Six in 10 of voters under 30 now say that Trump's policies are harming the economy, and making them worse off financially. Seven in 10 voters in the same category say that they didn't believe the president is focused enough on lowering prices for consumers. If Donald Trump is losing ground with the younger voters he peeled off from Democrats in 2024, Republicans are set for trouble in the midterm elections next year. Polling isn't yet registering significant voter support for the GOP budget reconciliation package, the 'big, beautiful bill', as it's been overshadowed by the president's tariffs and mass deportation agenda, among other issues. Another factor driving down Trump's numbers with younger voters is Jeffrey Epstein. The Justice Department blew up the investigation into Epstein, a convicted pedophile and sex criminal who died in 2019, when in early July the agency declared that the billionaire financier died by suicide, as had previously been found, and that no evidence linking him to accomplices, other than Ghislaine Maxwell, was uncovered. The sudden declaration that the 'Epstein Client List', which Vice President JD Vance and others in the administration pledged to release, supposedly did not exist at all erupted into a wildfire on the MAGA right, particularly among Trump's younger supporters. Trump then spent the month of July embracing a series of increasingly obvious attempts at distraction, infuriating many and driving speculation even higher. The Times/YouGov poll found that a much larger share of voters, more than four in ten, think that Trump and his team have partially or completely lied in their public statements regarding the case. Less than 20% of Americans believe them. Immigration has been another issue where the president has lost ground as the White House and Department of Homeland Security have accelerated mass deportation programs under his second term. Images of immigration enforcement raids have caused massive protests in Los Angeles and alarmed many Americans including Trump-supporting independents around the country. Nearly every poll on the Decision Desk HQ Average, with the exception of two surveys conducted by Republican outfits, now shows Trump with popularity ratings in the negative, some by double digits. Some pollsters have speculated that Trump began at a deficit other presidents escaped in their first six months due in large part to the circumstances of his 2024 victory and the rank unpopularity that the Democratic Party encouraged with its jumbled mess of a re-election campaign for Biden and later Kamala Harris. Coming into 2025, the president was already burdened by some of the highest disapproval ratings of any incoming president in history.
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's bill comes due: Tariff day is here ... but if TACO's on the menu, the charade is over
Donald Trump's tariff deadline is once again coming down to the wire but now, the bill is due — and Trump has a choice before him: enforce the levies against the nation's trading partners or TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out). The president said in July that the end of his 90-day pause would be marked by a month of last-minute dealmaking, as countries attempted to get agreements in place before the resumption of tariff enforcement on Aug. 1. As Wednesday morning dawned in DC, the president seemingly indicated that his days of 'pauses' were over. In a Truth Social post, Trump declared: 'THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE IS THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE — IT STANDS STRONG, AND WILL NOT BE EXTENDED.' Yet, at the same time, he undermined that message. A separate announcement from his Truth account declared progress in talks with Claudia Sheinbaum, president of Mexico. Greasing the wheels for those talks, Trump said, would be what he just said wouldn't happen: a tariff pause (sort of). The president wrote (in lowercase this time) that tariffs with Mexico would continue at current rates for another 90 days. 'The complexities of a Deal with Mexico are somewhat different than other Nations because of both the problems, and assets, of the Border,' Trump offered as explanation. So where does that leave American businesses, and the White House itself as it pertains to Trump's credibility on trade issues? Some experts were flummoxed on how businesses should plan for the future after enforcement begins on Friday. They pointed to the president's preference for informal trade agreements, which many argue do not constitute real agreements at all, to wit: — The White House has not released specific details or produced written agreements to back up many of the president's claims. — Because they did not receive congressional approval, there's no formal enforcement measures. — And Trump's own proclamations often differ from those of his foreign negotiating partners. David Townsend, a trade-focused litigator with Dorsey & Whitney, also noted the lack of details governing rules of origin for imported products. 'There could be different rules of origin for different products, or across the different trade agreements. From an investment and trade standpoint, it is very difficult to tell how these rules of origin will operate, what the impact will be on investments, and to particular industries. Companies will need to wait until the details are released of how the particular agreements will operate,' he told The Independent. 'In short, it is not possible to predict how these trade agreements will work in practice, how certain businesses will be impacted by them, and what kind of import compliance challenges will arise under the new agreements,' Townsend said. CNN's Richard Quest summed up his own feelings: 'I stand by my comment that the trade deals being announced are largely garbage because they are so uncertain with no mechanisms for enforcement or even any idea of how to make them happen.' The uncertainty around what the trade landscape will look like come Monday could be the reason why the Dow Jones Industrial Average stalled this week and didn't seem to react upon news of Trump's tariff extension with Mexico. But experts across the board agree that it seems as if Trump's reciprocal tariffs are now here to stay in some fashion — the only question remaining is how high they will go. Trade groups representing industries targeted by individual tariff rates continue to push for zero-to-zero tariff rates, but those seem out of reach after the announcements of recent handshake-deals with the EU and UK. With those new tariff rates, it's also a certainty that consumers will continue to feel the price hikes that American retailers began exhibiting over the summer, only to a higher degree. The bill is finally coming due. Gemma Thompson, a senior consultant with a firm specializing on supply-chain logisitics, explained: " For EU exporters, the challenge now is how to absorb or pass on the additional cost. Where margins are tighter, we're likely to see knock-on effects to US consumers.' Given the murkiness around enforcement measures and the unequal 'reciprocal rates,' Thompson noted, US importers will also likely explore routing goods through lower-tariff countries acting as middlemen. With Trump putting his foot down on Thursday, it's clear that the coverage of Wall Street's derisive 'TACO' nickname irked the president, or at the very least drove home the notion that he risked his credibility crossing further self-drawn red lines. But what remains to be seen is how much damage was already done by the president's 90-day pause and the general campaign to keep his supporters on his side Trump has launched since January. Amid a firestorm around Jeffrey Epstein and after the exhausting marathon fight to pass the 'big, beautiful' budget reconciliation package, many businesses and even some trading partners around the world could be gambling that the US president is running low on political capital. A sudden downturn in the markets or painful consumer price hikes could be more than the president can handle, in the view of his critics.
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Trump's tariffs: both a political and an economic threat
Donald Trump's 1 August tariffs deadline did what it was always intended to do. It kept the markets and the nations guessing amid last-minute uncertainty. It attempted to reassert the global heft of the United States economy to take on and master all comers. And it placed President Trump at the centre of the media story, where he always insists on being. In the event, there were some last-minute agreements struck this week, few of them fair or rational in trade terms, most of them motivated by the desire to generate some commercial order. Some conflicts are still in the balance. There were 11th-hour court challenges too, disputing the president's very right to play the trade war game in this way. Even now, no one, probably including Mr Trump himself, knows whether this is his administration's last word on US tariffs. Almost certainly not. That's because Mr Trump's love of tariffs is always more about the assertion of political clout rather than economic power. Mr Trump's antipathy towards the European Union drives one example. The pact agreed by Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland last weekend underlines that the EU's aspirations as a global economic superpower exceed its actual clout. The EU could not prevent Mr Trump making European goods 15% more expensive if they sell on US markets. Nor could it stop Mr Trump getting EU tariffs on US goods withdrawn. Equally eloquent about the global balance of economic power is that Mr Trump has not been able to force China to bend the knee in the manner of the EU. China has responded aggressively to Trump's tariff threats, retaliating with tariffs of its own and blocking the sale of commodities, including rare-earth minerals, that the US most covets. Unsurprisingly, this standoff has not produced one of Mr Trump's so-called deals. Friday's deadline has been reset for later in the month. It would be no surprise if it was eventually pushed back further. Mr Trump is not imposing tariffs on the rest of the world in order to promote global trade or even to boost the US economy. He is doing it, in part, because Congress has delegated this power to him, allowing the president to impose or waive tariffs at will. He uses this power for many purposes. These include raising government income without congressional oversight and also, because tariffs are regressive, shifting the tax burden away from the very rich, like Mr Trump himself, on to the middle and working class. But economics also comes way down the field in the list of reasons why Mr Trump is wielding the tariff weapon internationally. US talks with Brazil – with which the US runs a trade surplus, not a deficit – have been hijacked by Mr Trump's grievance over the prosecution of its former president Jair Bolsonaro for trying to overturn his 2022 election defeat. Talks with India are deadlocked because Mr Trump wants to penalise Delhi for buying energy and weapons from Russia. Those with Canada have been hit by Mr Trump's objections to Ottawa's plan to recognise Palestine. The ultimate test of the policy, however, will indeed be economic. For now, financial markets appear to have decided that Mr Trump's tariffs are manageable. If tariffs now raise the cost of goods on US high streets, slowing growth and feeding inflation, as they may, the wider market response could change quickly. In that event, the mood among American voters might even shift too. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
