Donald Trump 'highly unlikely' to fire Federal Reserve's Jerome Powell
Trump confirmed that in a White House meeting Tuesday night with about a dozen House Republicans he had discussed the 'concept' of dismissing Powell, long a target because of his refusal to lower interest rates as Trump wants.
'Almost every one of them said I should,' Trump said about the lawmakers who had come to talk to him about crypto legislation.
He indicated he was leaning in that direction, according to a White House official. During that session, Trump waved a letter about firing Powell, but a person familiar with the matter said it was essentially a prop drafted by someone else and that the Republican president has not drafted such a letter.
Neither source was authorized to publicly discuss the private meeting and they spoke only on condition on anonymity.
Trump made his comment about being 'highly unlikely' to dismiss Powell — 'unless he has to leave for fraud' — during an Oval Office meeting with Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the crown prince of Bahrain.
In recent days, White House and administration officials have accused Powell of mismanaging a $2.5 billion renovation project at the Fed, adding to months of efforts by Trump try to rid himself of the politically independent central banker.
U.S. stocks were shaky as Trump spoke about Powell on Wednesday. The S&P 500's modest gain in the morning became a drop of 0.7% after initial reports that the president may fire the Fed chair. Stocks then trimmed their losses after Trump's later comment.
Treasury yields also swiveled in the bond market but remained mostly calm.
Those at the White House meeting were among the more far-right lawmakers, including members of the House Freedom Cause whose views are not always shared by other Republicans. In the Senate, Republicans have taken a more guarded approach. Some have backed Powell's performance at the Fed as they await an inspector general's review of the construction project.
In a speech Wednesday, Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said if Powell is dismissed, 'you are going to see a pretty immediate response'
'If anybody thinks it would be a good idea for the Fed to become another agency in the government subject to the president, they're making a huge mistake," said Tillis, who has announced that he is not running for reelection.
Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said this week that Powell 'has done a decent job.'
"I don't think he's been perfect,' he said, adding that there have been times they disagreed, but 'I do believe that the chairman is calling them like he sees them.'
Republicans on the House Financial Services Committee had been scheduled to meet with Powell on Wednesday evening in a gathering set months ago, but it was abruptly canceled due to votes in the House, according to a committee aide granted anonymity to discuss a private meeting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump hails ‘historic agreement' as Columbia prepares to pay $221 million to regain federal funding
US President Donald Trump has hailed a new deal with Columbia University as a 'historic agreement', after the Ivy League school agreed to pay $221 million to the US government to restore access to federal research funding and resolve civil rights allegations. In a detailed statement on Truth Social, Trump said the agreement includes the rollback of Columbia's DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) policies, compensation for Jewish employees, and sweeping changes to campus governance and student admissions. 'Columbia has agreed to pay a penalty of $200 million to the United States Government for violating federal law, in addition to over $20 million to their Jewish employees who were unlawfully targeted and harassed,' Trump wrote. 'Columbia has also committed to ending their ridiculous DEI policies, admitting students based ONLY on MERIT, and protecting the civil liberties of their students on campus.' Columbia's deal with the Trump administration comes after the Education and Justice Departments froze or cancelled more than $400 million in federal grants in March 2025. With this agreement, the university will regain access to the 'vast majority' of that funding. In his Truth Social statement, Trump also warned that further action is forthcoming: 'Numerous other higher education institutions that have hurt so many, and been so unfair and unjust, and have wrongly spent federal money… are upcoming.' He credited Secretary Linda McMahon and Columbia's leadership, writing: 'I want to thank and congratulate Secretary Linda McMahon, and all those who worked with us on this important deal. I also want to thank and commend Columbia University for agreeing to do what is right.' Under the agreement, Columbia has pledged major institutional changes, including: However, Columbia has not admitted wrongdoing. Acting President Claire Shipman said: 'This is an important step forward after a period of sustained federal scrutiny and institutional uncertainty.' More than 70 students were disciplined following a May 2025 pro‑Palestinian protest involving a library occupation. US Education Secretary Linda McMahon described the Columbia agreement as 'a seismic shift'. Federal scrutiny under the Trump administration has affected Harvard, Brown, Princeton, Cornell, and Northwestern, with over $2 billion in grant funding frozen or reviewed. Deportation proceedings have also been initiated against international students involved in anti‑Israel protests. (With inputs from Reuters, AP)
The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Apple cites U.S. Supreme Court's birthright ruling in fight over Epic Games injunction
Apple is hoping a new U.S. Supreme Court ruling curbing the power of federal judges to issue nationwide orders will help the technology giant win an appeal in a lawsuit requiring it to revamp its lucrative App Store. In a court filing on Tuesday, Apple told the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the Supreme Court's June order in a case involving birthright citizenship bolsters the iPhone maker's arguments in a high-stakes standoff with 'Fortnite' game developer Epic Games. The Supreme Court limited when judges can issue so-called universal injunctions that apply broadly, and not just to the parties in a lawsuit. The justices did not rule on whether the Trump administration can legally terminate the right to citizenship for people born on U.S. soil, but the decision was a win for the administration, which had complained about individual lower courts blocking its policies nationwide. Even though the case at the high court had nothing to do with Apple, its appeal could test the scope of the justices' ruling. Apple and Epic did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Apple in its appeal is challenging a U.S. district judge's order in April that said the company must open its App Store to more competition, allowing all developers — not just Epic — more freedom to steer consumers to alternative payment options outside of an app. The appeal also challenges the judge's finding that Apple was in contempt for violating a prior injunction in the same case. Epic Games sued Apple in 2020 to loosen its control over transactions in applications that use its iOS operating system and how apps are distributed to consumers. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in 2021 said Apple must allow developers to more easily steer consumers to potentially cheaper non-Apple payment options. Apple defied that court order to maintain a revenue stream worth billions of dollars, Gonzalez Rogers ruled in April. Apple has denied any wrongdoing, and defended its compliance with the court's orders. Apple told the 9th Circuit that, after the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship decision, judges no longer have freestanding authority to issue universal injunctions. Apple also noted that Epic pursued its lawsuit on its own, not as a class action on behalf of a larger group. Epic told the appeals court in May that Apple's App Store changes will have wide-reaching benefits for the industry and consumers. 'The sky has not fallen. Instead, developers and consumers are finally beginning to see the long-awaited benefits of increased competition,' Epic said.
The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Jimmy Kimmel claps back at Trump's cancellation claim with Epstein dig
Jimmy Kimmel has fired back at U.S. President Donald Trump after the latter predicted Kimmel would be the next late-night host to face cancellation, following the announced end of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. CBS recently confirmed that Colbert's show would wrap after the 2025–26 season, citing budget constraints amid a shrinking late-night economy. Trump, however, celebrated the development as a personal victory and used it as an opportunity to target his usual media critics. Taking to Truth Social, Trump posted, 'The word is, and it's a strong word at that, Jimmy Kimmel is NEXT to go in the untalented Late Night Sweepstakes and, shortly thereafter, Fallon will be gone.' He also called the late-night trio — Kimmel, Colbert, and Jimmy Fallon — 'no-talent' hosts who had 'ruined what used to be great television.' Trump praised Fox News personality Greg Gutfeld as superior to all of them and took a direct swipe at Fallon, calling him 'the moron on NBC.' Kimmel responded on Instagram just hours later. 'I'm hearing you're next. Or maybe it's just another wonderful secret,' he wrote, referencing a recent Wall Street Journal exposé about a 2003 birthday letter Trump wrote to Jeffrey Epstein. That letter, described in detail by the WSJ, was reportedly typed within the outline of a naked woman and signed 'Donald' beneath the waist. It ended with the phrase, 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.' Kimmel's comeback ties Trump's late-night feud to the wider controversy surrounding his past relationship with Epstein. It comes amid growing scrutiny after WSJ also reported that former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi told Trump his name was referenced in the Epstein files — records the Justice Department recently declined to release. While CBS has denied any political motive in ending Colbert's show, the announcement came shortly after Colbert criticised Paramount for settling a lawsuit with Trump over a 60 Minutes segment, calling the $16 million payout a 'fat bribe.'
