Unfriending India? Trump's 25% tariffs on India deal a body blow to major sectors—and raise costs for US consumers
The latest move by US President Donald Trump is likely to have a significant impact on several sectors, including textiles, gems and jewellery, seafood, agricultural products, leather, and electronics.
iStock Trump previously labelled India as the 'Tariff King,' an unfair allegation, according to experts and industry players, as he overlooks high duties imposed by the US on varied items. In an 'unfriendly' turn of events, US President Donald Trump on Thursday imposed a 25% tariff on goods imported from India, along with an additional penalty for buying oil from Russia. Effective August 1, this imposition is expected to adversely impact some of the major employment-generating sectors, which were optimistic for a more balanced tariff regime with the US.The latest move by Trump is likely to have a significant impact on several sectors, including textiles, gems and jewellery, seafood, agricultural products, leather, and electronics. 'Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers of any country,' Trump stated in a post on the social media platform Truth Social, while also noting India has always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia.Trump previously labelled India as the 'Tariff King,' an unfair allegation, according to experts and industry players, as he overlooks high duties imposed by the US on varied items. As per data by the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the US levies duties as high as 350% on beverages and tobacco, 200% on dairy products, and 132% on fruits and vegetables, among others.The recent announcement—by no means an expected one—has dealt a severe blow to various industries that rely on the US as a key market, raising concern about their survival again.
Textiles
Look at the textiles sector, for instance, which is predominantly comprised of MSMEs that make up nearly 80% of it. Before the recent India-UK FTA, the sector faced stiff competition from countries like Bangladesh. The FTA, by removing the duty disadvantage of 10-12%, provided the much-needed boost to the sector. However, just when the sector was beginning to find its footing, tariffs imposed by the US, a key market for Indian exporters, have once again threatened to hinder its growth.
'This shift in the US market is certainly a challenge, especially for companies working on tight margins. The impact on MSMEs could be more pronounced, as many smaller players rely heavily on US orders and may face greater strain. We have started looking closely at markets in Latin America. These are new regions for us, and while there are challenges, much depends on how we shape our business approach and respond to the way global trade is changing,' Suketu Shah, CEO of Vishal Fabrics, says.In fact, the impact has already started playing out on the ground. Vikas Singh, Director of the Home Textile Exporters' Welfare Association (HEWA), details how buyers have started putting new orders on hold. 'Even previously confirmed dispatches already manufactured and ready for shipment are being held back by the buyers. Many have now started demanding a flat 10% to 15% discount on these consignments. Moreover, the tariff advantage between India and China has also narrowed significantly, 25% on Indian goods versus 30% on Chinese goods. As a result, the short-term advantage that India previously enjoyed has effectively disappeared,' he states.
Gems and jewelleryThings are looking no better for the gems and jewellery industry, which has been reeling under pressure from the Russia-Ukraine and Israel wars, resulting in a significant decline in business. Jayanti Savaliya, Regional Chairman, Gems and Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC), states that out of $33 billion in exports, the US market makes up $9 billion, representing 28% of the total.However, he adds that the US will also face the impact of such a measure. 'It will be expensive for US consumers, so they are at a losing proposition as well with this announcement. We are also the biggest supplier to the US. In the case of India, we expect a drop in export numbers in the times ahead. We will need to consciously look at new markets to counter this scenario,' he emphasises.The gem & jewellery industry had tried to absorb the 10% tariffs that had come in, however the present tariffs of 25% is a steep percentage for them to digest, he says.
Leathers Affirming such sentiments, experts in sectors such as leather say that such measures are not sustainable in the long term. 'The US simply cannot manufacture labour-intensive consumer goods like footwear domestically at competitive costs. Any tariff increase is ultimately a burden on their own consumers,' says Puran Dawar, Regional Chairman of the Council for Leather Exports (CLE), expressing optimism that the matter will be resolved diplomatically in due course.The USA is the largest importer of leather and leather products from India. In FY24 (April-December), it accounted for 21.82% of India's total leather exports. During FY25 (April-December), the total export of leather products to the USA was valued at Rs 6,870 crore ($795.55 million), an increase of 16.30% year-on-year.
Electronics In the case of electronics, Abhishek Malik, Executive Director, Calcom Vision Ltd, says that the 25% tariff on Indian-manufactured goods by the US introduces new variables for exporters, particularly in sectors such as electronics where supply chains are globally integrated. 'These measures may lead to increased cost structures and could influence future investment decisions and planning. As trade dynamics evolve, companies may look to adapt by enhancing R&D, improving quality benchmarks, and developing more integrated manufacturing capabilities to remain aligned with global market expectations,' he says. When asked how much cost pressure these additional levies may put on their electronic products, Malik puts the figure at over 25%.The value of India's electronic exports to the US is roughly between $12 billion and $13 billion.
Seafoods Shrimp exporters are feeling the pinch of the announcement as well. In FY24, India exported 297,571 million tonnes (MT) of frozen shrimp valued at $4.8 billion to the US, according to the Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA). Divya Kumar Gulati, Chairman at Compound Livestock Feed Manufacturers Association (CLFMA) of India, says the recent imposition of US tariffs on seafood products and agricultural products like shrimp, GM corn, soybean, and more is a significant setback for India's exports since that has emerged as a key livelihood generator across coastal and rural areas. 'The shrimp export industry, a major foreign exchange earner, will be particularly impacted, disrupting the supply chain and putting pressure on farm gate prices. This will ripple through to farmers' incomes and employment, especially in rural areas,' she states.Gulati urges the government to respond with timely interventions—exploring new export destinations, simplifying compliance frameworks, and investing in infrastructure and logistics to enhance global competitiveness. 'We are committed to supporting the sector through policy advocacy, technological innovation, skill development, and market diversification in the Indian livestock and aquaculture sectors,' she adds.For now, everyone is in wait-and-watch mode. India Inc. remains both hopeful and cautious about the future, given the numerous policy overhauls that occurred during Trump's presidency.
Illustrations by Garima Bora.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
US-Japan trade deal: PM Ishiba hails ‘win-win' agreement, warns implementation challenges — Here's what he said
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said the trade deal finalised between the US and Japan last month is a 'win-win' situation for both countries. He noted that implementing the terms of the agreement could prove to be more challenging than the negotiation itself, and the government is prepared to allocate an additional budget to mitigate the economic impact of US tariffs. 'Some say that carrying the trade deal out is harder than agreeing on it. I humbly seek your continued support on this,' Bloomberg quoted Ishiba's statement in the parliament on Monday. Speaking on the extra budget allocation, Ishiba said, 'We will compile one if necessary, taking into account discussions with other parties.' Japan's chief trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, acknowledged the criticism about the lack of a written record during the parliament session. 'It's my understanding having something on paper would be helpful,' Akazawa said. He also mentioned that there is no written documentation regarding Washington's agreements with the EU and South Korea. The comments highlight the significant uncertainties surrounding the numerous global trade agreements even after a deadline for higher tariffs was reached on 1 August, the report stated. Following a setback in the upper house election last month, Ishiba, facing pressure, has committed to remaining as premier to guarantee the full implementation of the trade deal. Shortly after the election, Ishiba achieved a surprising trade agreement that resulted in relatively better outcomes for Japan compared to other countries. Last month, President Donald Trump announced a 'massive' agreement with Japan, including $550 billion of Japanese investments in the United States. Washington agreed to implement a 15 per cent flat rate levy on imports from Japan, which is lower than the previously threatened 25 per cent. In a post on the Truth Social platform, Trump wrote, 'We just completed a massive Deal with Japan, perhaps the largest Deal ever made. Japan will invest, at my direction, $550 Billion Dollars into the United States, which will receive 90% of the Profits." He added, 'this Deal will create Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs — There has never been anything like it. Perhaps most importantly, Japan will open their Country to Trade including Cars and Trucks, Rice and certain other Agricultural Products, and other things.' However, the future of auto tariffs remains uncertain. The car tariffs, now set at 27.5 per cent with an earlier 2.5 per cent rate included, have significantly impacted the Japanese economy, which relies heavily on the automotive sector as its largest export to the US and contributes about 10 per cent to the country's GDP.
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
Pressuring over Russian oil purchases, Trump staffer accuses India of ‘financing' Ukraine war
Stephen Miller, United States President Donald Trump's deputy chief of staff, on August 3 accused India of imposing 'massive' tariffs on American goods and 'cheating' the US immigration system in addition to purchasing about as much Russian oil as China, Bloomberg reported. 'President Trump, he wants a tremendous relationship and has had always a tremendous relationship with India and the prime minister. But we need to get real about dealing with the financing of this war,' Miller told reporters. 'So, President Trump, all options are on the table to deal diplomatically, financially and otherwise with the ongoing war in Ukraine, so we can achieve peace,' he added. (With inputs from Bloomberg) (Developing story, more inputs coming…)
Time of India
2 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump will slow, but may not stop the rise of electric vehicles
Sales of Teslas are plunging. General Motors and other automakers are increasing production of big pickups and SUVs. Republicans have killed incentives for electric vehicle purchases. Electric vehicles have clearly lost momentum in the United States. And combustion engine cars and trucks are enjoying a renaissance to the dismay of environmentalists who worry about air pollution and greenhouse gases. But there's reason to believe that electric vehicles will remain a significant part of the U.S. car market and that sales of these models will eventually grow again in the coming months. Electric vehicles from Tesla and some other automakers are less vulnerable to President Donald Trump's tariffs than many conventional cars because more of their parts are made in the United States. Advocacy groups are conducting marketing campaigns to emphasize the lower fuel costs and other advantages of electric vehicles. And automakers appear to realize that they cannot give up on electric cars if they hope to remain competitive globally. Washington has become hostile to electric cars. Government policy on electric vehicles has reversed since Trump was elected. For consumers, the most visible change is the elimination of tax credits of up to $7,500 for electric vehicle purchases and leases. The credits, which have existed in various forms since the early 2000s and were revived by Democrats when Joe Biden was president, will now expire at the end of September under the big policy and tax law that Trump signed in July.
