Israel furious after France orders black partitions at Paris air show over Gaza war, tensions with Iran
France's government ordered black partition walls erected around Israeli defence industry exhibits at the Paris Air Show displaying offensive weapons, because of the war in Gaza and rising tensions in the Mideast. Israel's Defence Ministry demanded an immediate reversal of the decision.
A French appeals court had ruled Friday against activist groups who sought to block Israeli companies from participating in the show due to Israel's actions in Gaza. The Paris Air Show, held at Le Bourget north of Paris, is one of the world's largest and most prestigious events for the aerospace and defence industry.
The black walls appeared overnight ahead of the show's opening Monday, visually isolating Israeli booths from dozens of other international exhibitors.
French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said the decision was made to allow Israeli companies to display their aviation technology but no offensive weapons, "given the situation in the region, the extreme tensions ... given France's diplomatic choices, notably concern about Gaza."
Bayrou said the Israeli Embassy and companies were informed in advance of the restriction and that some complied, but others didn't. As a result the displays were covered up, "I hope temporarily."
The Israeli Defence Ministry said the demand to remove offensive weapons displays came at the last minute.
'The French are hiding behind supposedly political considerations to exclude Israeli offensive weapons from an international exhibition — weapons that compete with French industries,' the ministry said in a statement Monday, calling the action 'ugly and improper.'
An array of offensive weapons are on display elsewhere at the Paris Air Show, among the most prominent being French, including its Rafale fighter jets, cruise missiles and other hardware. Bayrou officially opened the air show Monday, visiting several stands, and as he spoke, his voice was partially drowned out by the roar of overhead aircraft.
A French official said the decision came from the General Secretariat for Defense and National Security, under the prime minister. The official said Israeli exhibitors were told weeks ago that they couldn't exhibit offensive weaponry, and that the walls were erected as a last resort when five didn't comply. Four others did and are allowed to exhibit. The official spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorised to discuss the details.
The French prime minister drew a distinction between Israel's recent attacks on Iran and its actions in Gaza.
"I have never underestimated the risk that Iran and Iran's preparation of nuclear weapons creates for the whole region, for the whole world," Bayrou said.
'The situation in Gaza, it touches, it injures, it repulses a large number of our compatriots, including those who are friends of Israel," he said.
Israel's actions in Gaza since the Hamas attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023, have drawn protests and concerns in France, especially the blockage of humanitarian aid in recent months.
Sylvain Pavillet, a lawyer working with the air show organisers, said the final decision on which countries are allowed to exhibit lies with the French government, not the show itself.
Two women angry with the French decision drew an Israeli flag and graffiti on the black partitions around the stand for Israeli company Rafael, accusing the French government of discrimination. Security personnel then covered up the graffiti with black plastic.
Shlomo Toaff, head of Rafael's air defence systems division, said he couldn't even enter his company's small display area Monday morning.
'These weapons are used by the Israeli government in a legal way in order to to protect our people and in order to free the hostages," he told the AP.
'We hope that maybe somebody will come to their senses and reopen our show," he added. 'Anybody that is for a free world, free business, freedom of speech should be outraged by this.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
All about GBU-57, the 30,000-pound U.S. beast that could help Israel neutralize Iran's deepest threat
Live Events Why Fordo Remains Intact Meet the GBU-57: America's Deepest Bunker Buster Will the U.S. Join the Fight? (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel As Israel intensifies its military campaign against Iran, attention is shifting to a powerful American weapon that may be key to ending Tehran's nuclear ambitions: the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), a 30,000-pound "bunker buster" designed to destroy deeply buried targets like Iran's Fordo uranium enrichment days into its surprise offensive targeting Iran's military and nuclear infrastructure, Israel appears to be expanding operations. The Israeli military has ordered evacuations of over 330,000 civilians from central Tehran — a densely populated area home to around 10 million people — in what analysts see as preparation for further Israeli Air Force claims to have achieved full aerial dominance over Tehran's skies and reported the destruction of over 120 surface-to-surface missile launchers, as well as two Iranian F-14 fighter jets. The Israeli military also claimed it had eliminated Gen. Ali Shadmani, the newly appointed head of Iran's Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters. Iran has yet to confirm the Israel struck 10 command centers belonging to Iran's Quds Force and issued evacuation warnings to areas housing government facilities, including state television and major Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that Israel's strikes had set Iran's nuclear program back 'a very, very long time.' However, one critical target still eludes destruction: Iran's heavily fortified Fordo enrichment deep within a mountain near Qom, the Fordo facility is considered nearly impervious to conventional airstrikes. To take it out, Israel would need the GBU-57A/B — a bomb it neither possesses nor can by Boeing, the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator is the most powerful non-nuclear bomb in the U.S. arsenal for targeting underground facilities. Key specifications include-Weight: Over 13,600 kg (30,000 pounds)Length: 6.2 metersExplosives: Carries 2,500 kg of high explosivesPenetration Depth: Can burrow through 60 meters of reinforced concrete or rockDelivery Platform: Only deployable by the U.S. Air Force's B-2 Spirit stealth bomberThis bomb was specifically engineered to destroy hardened bunkers, tunnel networks, and nuclear facilities that conventional munitions can't suggest that former U.S. President Donald Trump cut short his appearance at the G7 summit, possibly to attend a National Security Council meeting on the Middle East crisis. This has fueled speculation that the U.S. might intervene — or at least authorize Israel to use or be supported with the GBU-57 in a joint military analysts believe multiple MOPs would be required to seal off Fordo completely — a move that would mark a turning point in the shadow war between Israel and any U.S. involvement could trigger broader regional escalation and domestic political fallout, especially among isolationist voices warning against abandoning the 'America First' doctrine.
NDTV
40 minutes ago
- NDTV
'Friends' No More? Amid War, Iran Israel Pivot From Allies To Enemies
New Delhi: On June 13 morning Israeli forces targeted nuclear sites and military installations across Iran, killing nuclear scientists and senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps officers. Residential areas were also hit and there were civilian casualties, a furious Tehran claimed. The attacks preceded Iran-United States talks over the latter's escalating uranium enrichment, which Tehran insists is for peaceful purposes but Tel Aviv views as "threats" to its survival. And by June 13 evening Iran responded, firing ballistic missiles at Israeli military sites, including those used to refuel warplanes. Some even snuck past Israel's famed 'Iron Dome' air defence, hitting parts of central Tel Aviv, which is where the Israeli Defence Forces is headquartered. The conflict between the two is now in its fifth day and shows no sign of stopping; on Monday more Israeli missiles pounded Tehran and Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly said the war could only end with the death of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The attacks also marked the latest military escalation in the West Asia region since Israeli strikes on Gaza - the result of Hamas' October 7 terror attacks - began in 2023, and heightened fears of an all-out armed conflict between nations that were once friends, even allies. Their more recent history, though, is mired in animosity and conflict, with Netanyahu pointing to Tehran's controversial nuclear programme and painting Iran as "the greatest threat... to Israel's very survival." And Iran has accused Israel of repeated sabotage attacks and assassinations. When They Were 'Friends' Back in 1948, most Muslim-majority countries in West Asia refused to recognise the newly created country of Israel. The big exception was Shia-majority Iran and Turkey, Islamic states that recognised the sovereign state of Israel. The connection was the US. At the time Iran, with Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi at the helm, had shifted consciously closer to the West, proving itself a key regional ally of the US during the Cold War. The newly formed state of Israel, requiring American support to stay afloat, seemed to find a natural partner. And then, over the next couple of decades ex-Israel Prime Minister David Ben Gurion led the country through his Periphery Doctrine - an effort to ally with non-Arab states. Iran, Turkey, and Ethiopia emerged as the key players. The four nations expected to benefit from economic cooperation, including arms sales, and intelligence sharing, particularly between Israel's Mossad and Iran's SAVAK. Iran also supplied Israel with crude oil after the Six Day War resulted in Arab nations boycotting the latter. And trade and infrastructure growth in Iran were supported by Israel. All seemed to be going well. But then the Islamic Revolution swept through Iran in 1979 and there was a fundamental shift in Iran-Israel relations, a change underpinned by the overthrow of the Shah and the establishment of the Islamic Republic under Ayatollah Ruhollah Khamenei. The Break Up The break-up had been coming. Even during times of cooperation there were Islamist elements in Iran that were advocating for Palestinians, often raising funds for their use. After 1979 there was a sharp break; Iran refused to accept Israeli passports, for example, and Iranian passport holders were banned from travelling to "occupied Palestine". And so, Israel was declared an 'enemy of Islam' and 'Little Satan'. In the 1980s and 90s Iran emerged as a sponsor of armed groups - initially Hezbollah in Lebanon and then others, like the Houthis in Yemen and later Hamas in Gaza - moving from funding to active training, and then arming them to launch attacks on Israel. The bad blood intensified over the next decade; in December 2000 Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called Israel a 'cancerous tumour' that should be removed from the region and, five years later, said 'Palestine belongs to Palestinians... fate should be determined by the Palestinian people'. The Hezbollah and Hamas were targeted and decimated by Israel after the 2023 attack. And, after Iran launched a pair of missile attacks on Israel last year, Israel responded with strikes of its own, including one that destroyed Iranian missile sites and weakened air defences. The collapse of that proxy network, coupled with Iran's new vulnerability, created an opportunity for Israel to strike, and write another bloody chapter in Iran-Israel ties.
NDTV
40 minutes ago
- NDTV
The Two Elements Of Surprise In The Iran-Israel Escalation
It was bound to happen. The decades-long shadow war between Iran and Israel has finally turned into a full-blown struggle. In hindsight, it was probably coming all along. There are, however, two elements of surprise here. The Timing The first is that of Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear and military installations in the wee hours of June 13, almost on the eve of the sixth round of negotiations between Iran and the US over the former's nuclear programme. US President Donald Trump's demand is that Iran not enrich uranium under any nuclear deal. Iran found this unacceptable. While it has always stated that it did not seek nuclear weapons - as per the diktat against weapons of mass destruction by its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei - Iran has always maintained its right to nuclear energy. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu justified these "preemptive" strikes on Iran, saying how "in recent months, Iran has taken steps ... to weaponise its ... enriched uranium...". The strikes also killed a number of Iran's nuclear scientists, several high-ranking personnel of the elite Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the Chief of Army Staff, and other personnel. US intelligence officials, however, have said that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon and that Supreme Leader Khamenei had not authorised the nuclear weapons programme suspended in 2003. Iran's Response This Time The second element of surprise has been Iran's response to the strikes. Many analysts, including this writer, had expected angry rhetoric and possibly some symbolic strikes against Israel. This is how Iran had responded last year in the aftermath of Israeli strikes on its diplomatic complex in Damascus. Israel, too, responded by undertaking tit-for-tat strikes against Iran, though it was careful not to escalate tensions. However, this time, it has been the fourth day now that Iran, without a common border with Israel, has been raining drones and missiles on its adversary, simultaneously showing up the gaps in Israeli air defence systems, targeting Tel Aviv as well as the strategic and western most Israeli port city of Haifa, and striking both military and civilian sites. In response, Israel has widened its targets, hitting radar sites, fuelling aircraft, energy infrastructure, and even a national broadcasting centre during a live broadcast. Reports have also emerged that Netanyahu was mulling eliminating Khamenei, but President Trump vetoed it. How The World Sees The Conflict At the time of writing this piece, around 24 Israelis and 240 Iranians were reported dead, with hundreds more wounded on both sides. Predictably, the sixth round of negotiations between Iran and the US, slated for Sunday in Oman, has been called off. Iranian lawmakers also announced that they were considering drafting a law that would enable their country to pull out of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Speculation has also been rife that Iran may close the Strait of Hormuz, which transports a fifth of the world's oil. Editorials in the Arab press, however, have highlighted that doing so would be a self-goal for Iran. Even so, while the world, including Trump, has urged restraint on both sides, he does not seem to be in any particular hurry to bring the war to an end, pleading instead Russia's case at the G7 meeting in Canada. The US has warned Iran against the targeting of American interests in the region. It has also deployed two B-52 bombers to the Diego Garcia island. Besides this, the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz, one of the world's largest warships, is reportedly headed to the Middle East to support the 45,000-odd American troops stationed across the Middle East. While Trump, Britain, France and the EU have defended Israel's strikes, China and Russia support its right to defend itself. Yet, increasingly, it seems both Iran and Israel, while wreaking havoc on each other, are fighting a losing battle. Why is this so? A Losing Battle? Israel's stated intention has been to destroy Iran's nuclear programme. It has boasted of air superiority over Iran, having initially destroyed much of Iran's air defence from within Iranian territory. While it has inflicted heavy damage on Iran's Natanz enrichment plant, its other main enrichment plant at Fordow is buried deep underground. The Israeli military has conceded that air power alone cannot destroy all of Iran's scattered nuclear infrastructure. It would require American help, which, according to the latest Axios report, will not be forthcoming until there is an Iranian attack on any American interests. This aligns with Trump's MAGA campaign, premised on the promise that the US will not involve itself in any more foreign wars. Meanwhile, the visuals of destruction emanating from Israel, currently under military information censorship, make for bad optics for the Netanyahu administration. It is already under fire from Israelis for the failure to free all hostages taken captive by Hamas in October 2023. Netanyahu's critics have alleged that he began the war with Iran to divert attention from Gaza and for his own political survival. Israel's Goals May Not Be Met Certainly, the attack on Iran has helped scuttle the US-Iran negotiations as well as an upcoming international conference on Gaza that France was convening. Increasingly, Israel's actions are more in line with effecting a regime change in Iran rather than eliminating the country's nuclear programme once and for all. But that may be easier said than done. While Iranian strikes may rally the people around the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) and the government for now, it will be difficult to justify the war and its impact on Israelis if the objectives are not met or if Iranian attacks continue with more destruction and loss of lives inside Israel. An Isolated Iran At the same time, Iran, with a depleted air force, destroyed air defence systems, and defanged proxies in the region except for the Houthis in Yemen, will find it hard to sustain the high-intensity conflict. In many ways, it finds itself isolated. The Sunni Arab world is tacitly supporting Israel, fed up as it is with Iran's decades-long meddling in Arab affairs and in creating parallel power centres in the region. But now, these fronts have been decimated. The Hamas in Gaza and the Hezbollah in Lebanon have been battered, while the Assad regime has been toppled in Syria. Neither Turkiye nor Azerbaijan will intervene actively in support of Iran. Russia, with which Iran recently signed a strategic partnership, is embroiled in its own war with Ukraine. It is also doubtful whether Iran's other close partner, China, will directly support Iran militarily. Iran has appealed to Britain, France, and Germany to pressure Israel to halt its military campaign. President Masoud Pezeshkian has reiterated that Iran does not seek nuclear weapons but has the right to the peaceful use of nuclear power. Iran has also reached out to its Gulf neighbours, Oman, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, to urge Trump to get Israel to agree to an immediate ceasefire. Instead, Trump has asked Iranians to flee Tehran, indicating that a major strike is imminent. Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of nine lawmakers have written to Trump, stressing that "the United States must maintain a position of absolute clarity: zero enrichment, zero pathway to a nuclear weapon". Much will depend on the international community. It is imperative for leaders meeting in Canada to effect an immediate ceasefire and push for the resumption of negotiations on Iran's nuclear programme.
