
The CIA Using YouTube To Recruit 'Disillusioned' Chinese Officials
The United States Central Intelligence Agency, or CIA as it is more commonly known, is looking to recruit disillusioned Chinese officials as "spies" for the USA. That fact isn't especially newsworthy, as the intelligence community is always trying to recruit foreign individuals.
What is noteworthy is the means the CIA is now going about it. The agency produced a video, or rather two, which were posted on the video sharing service YouTube and other social media platforms on Thursday that were aimed at disillusioned officials with the Chinese government. The Mandarin-language videos followed similar efforts earlier this year that encouraged Russians to share secrets with U.S. officials.
"Today, the CIA released Mandarin-language videos aimed at recruiting Chinese officials to steal secrets," CIA Director John Ratcliffe said in a statement. "No adversary in the history of our Nation has presented a more formidable challenge or capable strategic competitor than the Chinese Communist Party. Our Agency must continue responding to this threat with urgency, creativity, and grit, and these videos are just one of the ways we are doing this."
The release of these new videos comes about six months after the CIA shared a text-only video in Mandarin that explained to Chinese citizens how to reach out to the CIA via the "dark web," NBC News reported. According to the CIA, the video has been seen around 900,000 times since it was first released.
This new content is very much aimed at Chinese Communist Party officials. The first video is meant to speak to lower level officials within the CCP, highlighting the wealth gap that currently exists in the People's Republic of China between party elites and the general populace; while the second shows a more senior party official at a formal dinner who believes his colleagues are maneuvering against him, a not too uncommon scenario in the RPC.
Both videos are based on the very real situation that exists within the PRC, but they were also produced because the traditional recruitment method of Chinese officials is increasingly nonexistent.
"This unprecedented online recruiting drive reflects the difficulty now faced in HUMINT (human intelligence) operations," explained Dennis Wilder, a former senior American intelligence official and professor of practice at Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service. "With ubiquitous surveillance operating in all of China's major cities, meeting potential recruits among China's Communist Party elites becomes extremely difficult and dangerous."
At the same time, the political situation is ideal.
"President Xi has purged six politburo members, 35 central committee members, over 60 generals, and 3.5 million party members since coming to power eleven years ago," Wilder added. "Given that his campaign against political opponents and corruption within the Party has not abated, there may be fertile ground for this new and innovative approach to recruitment of the Chinese elite."
Employing social media as a recruiting effort wouldn't have been possible in the pre-digital age. Moreover, it is taking advantage of the fact that while China has gone to great lengths to stop the flow of outside information into the country, it is nearly impossible to do so.
The CIA is taking advantage of that fact.
However, what is unique is this campaign is that the agency has made it so public, yet, part of the point may be to create a level of curiosity, helping ensure that the videos will find their way to Chinese eyeballs.
"When the CIA rolled out Mandarin-language videos on YouTube urging Chinese Communist Party insiders to consider a career change – ideally one involving a burner phone and encrypted messaging – it was less of a surprise and more of a moment of strategic transparency," said geopolitical analyst Irina Tsukerman, president of threat assessment firm Scarab Rising.
She noted that we are very much in an age where TikTok dances can trigger cultural revolutions and memes can influence elections.
"Why wouldn't Langley get into the influence game? Subversion, after all, has entered the social media era – and it's multilingual," Tsukerman suggested.
"It is not a surprise the CIA is openly recruiting for sources online," added Nicholas Eftimiades, assistant teaching professor in the iMPS Homeland Security Program at Penn State University.
It follows similar efforts being carried out by Beijing, Eftimiades noted.
"China's Ministry of State Security publicly started advertising about a year ago. It is called 'a walk-in' when a person volunteers their services to the intelligence community," said Eftimiades. "The CIA is just opening a public channel to do that using current technology. They will bear the burden of having to sort through and determine which persons may have useful information. The CIA will likely identify more people for debriefing than for use as actual spies. It is a very good idea and replaces the spotting and assessing phase of strategic debriefing programs conducted by several intelligence agencies."
Even though these videos could be seen hundreds of thousands of times, the campaign isn't being directed to the masses in the PRC. Rather the campaign is very targeted.
"It's not about winning hearts and minds across the Middle Kingdom. It's about planting seeds of doubt in the minds of the right people: the mid-level cadre who's disillusioned with party politics, the bureaucrat tired of watching friends disappear for thought crimes, the state-owned enterprise manager who wonders if maybe – just maybe – he could do more with his life than rerouting data to the MSS," said Tsukerman.
The goal also isn't to gather details on China's hypersonic missiles, sixth-generation fighter aircraft or the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier that may now be in development. While the CIA wouldn't pass up on finding a way to garner such intelligence, this is about what could be seen as more mundane information that can still be difficult to obtain.
"Lots of Chinese language requirements are unclassified, such as Open Source Center, or minimally classified requiring only a secret level clearance," said Eftimiades.
The recruiting effort on social media is no different from that of extremist groups today, even if the message is a bit different. The core concept is built around reaching out to those who are disgruntled, disillusioned and who believes they can somehow make a difference.
"The message is sleek, emotionally calibrated, and just ambiguous enough to pass under the radar in tightly surveilled digital spaces," said Tsukerman. "It's not asking for revolution. It's asking for a quiet conversation behind closed doors – one that starts with 'We understand' and ends with a passport and a new identity. The goal isn't mass defection; it's strategic vulnerability. Psychological warfare, with a user-friendly interface."
The PRC certainly won't sit back and let Western intelligence carry out the recruiting effort. Beijing may respond in waves, and that could include more than firewalls. Tsukerman said the PRC's infamous Great Firewall could become a "Great Fortress," while the MSS will likely conduct its own operations to stop the message from getting through.
"VPNs will be hunted down like rare Pokémon, AI filters will be fine-tuned to catch Western phrasing, and any whiff of foreign influence will be memory-holed before it hits 100 views," Tsukerman suggested.
That could be followed by a the government engaging in its own "performance art" that could include a surge of videos with public pledges, and state-sponsored TikTok clones extolling party purity, where loyal factory workers are seen wiping away tears of patriotic pride.
"Expect the government to out-drama the CIA, flipping the recruitment campaign on its head and turning it into an excuse for another wave of nationalist fervor," warned Tsukerman. "And then, the darker stuff: publicized espionage trials, televised confessions from unlucky souls caught cooperating with foreign intelligence, and a smattering of new legal provisions criminalizing – whatever the Party decides is suspicious that week. This is about deterrence by example. Turn against the state, and you'll be made into a very public, very frightened example of what happens next."
There could also be new laws that are fast-tracked to make merely reading the CIA's recruitment page a treasonous act. But those actions may also be what the CIA hopes to see happen from its video campaign, as it will create further resentment within the PRC.
"The CIA's campaign won't win Oscars. It may not even produce a single defector of value," said Tsukerman. "But in the high-stakes chessboard of 21st-century intelligence, sometimes a well-placed pawn destabilizes the board more effectively than a queen. Beijing knows that – and that's why it's already preparing to knock over the table."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump gets tariffs; Americans get price hikes
By David Gaffen and Marleen Kaesebier (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump is getting his tariffs. Companies are making it clear how they intend to deal with it - passing them on to American consumers. Throughout the spring, big retailers and consumer product makers warned that levies on imported goods would squeeze their operations, forcing them to choose between lower earnings and passing on higher costs to customers. In the case of Procter & Gamble and others, it is both of those things. On Tuesday, the packaging giant, which makes household basics spanning from Bounty paper towel to Tide detergent, issued a sour outlook for 2025 and sent a message to big retailers like Walmart that it would have to raise prices on some U.S. goods from next week. This challenge facing companies in coming quarters will likely feed through to everyday consumers. P&G said it would raise prices on about a quarter of its products in the U.S. to help offset the cost of new tariffs. Price hikes are in the mid-single digits across categories, a spokesperson for the company said. While U.S. stock indexes have soared to record highs this year, built on massive investment in technology shares, many consumer bellwethers have struggled. Since Trump's April 2 "Liberation Day" tariff announcements, P&G shares have declined 19%; Nestle is down 20%; Kimberly-Clark has lost 11%, and PepsiCo is off nearly 7%, while the benchmark S&P 500 stock index has gained more than 13%. Consumer goods, food and drink companies have struggled with lackluster sales since the pandemic, as shoppers have balked at increasingly expensive name-brand packaged food. Nestle said last week that consumers in North America remained wary of paying more at the cash register. More price hikes will deepen investor worries about how big brands are navigating the combined challenge of thrifty consumers and hefty costs created by Trump's trade war. "You're going to see companies like Walmart, Amazon, and Best Buy forced to pass price increases to consumers," said Bill George, former chairman and CEO of Medtronic and executive education fellow at Harvard Business School. "Main Street has yet to see the fallout from increased tariffs - and they're going to go higher." Between July 16 and 25, companies in the Reuters global tariff tracker said they expected to lose a combined $7.1 billion to $8.3 billion for the full year. GM, Ford and other carmakers have absorbed the cost of tariffs - totaling billions of dollars - so far. Many companies shipped more goods and raw materials into the U.S. before tariffs hit. Economists and analysts reckon that hoarding has helped some delay hiking prices until later in the year and explains why tariffs have not yet shown up in U.S. inflation data. Andrew Wilson, International Chamber of Commerce deputy secretary general, estimates inflation will be felt once companies have run down inventory, but that might not be until the fourth quarter or first quarter of next year. Others like Ray Ban-maker EssilorLuxottica have already hiked prices. Swiss watch and jewelry maker Swatch increased prices by about 5% after Trump announced tariffs in April with "zero impact" on sales, CEO Nick Hayek told Reuters recently. High-end brands like Tissot watches are less price sensitive to increases. Customers wanting to splash out on an expensive watch might also buy abroad when travelling where taxes are lower, he said. "You cannot do this with cars. You cannot do this with machines. But you can do this with watches. So it's not so problematic for us," he said. Sign in to access your portfolio


Fast Company
6 minutes ago
- Fast Company
EPA seeks to repeal ‘holy grail' finding for climate regulation
IMPACT The 'endangerment finding' is the legal underpinning of a host of climate regulations under the Clean Air Act for motor vehicles, power plants, and more pollution sources. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin attends a Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission Event in the East Room of the White House, Thursday, May 22, 2025, in Washington. [Photo: AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File] BY Associated Press Listen to this Article More info 0:00 / 0:00 President Donald Trump 's administration on Tuesday proposed revoking a scientific finding that has long been the central basis for U.S. action to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change. The proposed Environmental Protection Agency rule would rescind a 2009 declaration that determined that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. The 'endangerment finding' is the legal underpinning of a host of climate regulations under the Clean Air Act for motor vehicles, power plants and other pollution sources that are heating the planet. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the proposed rule change on a podcast ahead of an official announcement set for Tuesday in Indiana. Subscribe to the Daily Company's trending stories delivered to you every day Privacy Policy | Fast Company Newsletters Repealing the endangerment finding 'will be the largest deregulatory action in the history of America,' Zeldin said on the Ruthless podcast. 'There are people who, in the name of climate change, are willing to bankrupt the country,' Zeldin said. 'They created this endangerment finding and then they are able to put all these regulations on vehicles, on airplanes, on stationary sources, to basically regulate out of existence, in many cases, a lot of segments of our economy. And it cost Americans a lot of money.' The EPA proposal must go though a lengthy review process, including public comment, before it is finalized, likely next year. Environmental groups are likely to challenge the rule change in court. Zeldin called for a rewrite of the endangerment finding in March as part of a series of environmental rollbacks announced at the same time in what he said was 'the greatest day of deregulation in American history.' A total of 31 key environmental rules on topics from clean air to clean water and climate change would be rolled back or repealed under Zeldin's plan. He singled out the endangerment finding as 'the Holy Grail of the climate change religion' and said he was thrilled to end it 'as the EPA does its part to usher in the Golden Age of American success.' Tailpipe emission limits also targeted The EPA also is expected to call for rescinding limits on tailpipe emissions that were designed to encourage automakers to build and sell more electric vehicles. The transportation sector is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Environmental groups said Zeldin's action denies reality as weather disasters exacerbated by climate change continue in the U.S. and around the world. 'As Americans reel from deadly floods and heat waves, the Trump administration is trying to argue that the emissions turbocharging these disasters are not a threat,' said Christy Goldfuss, executive director of the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'It boggles the mind and endangers the nation's safety and welfare.' Under Zeldin and Trump, 'the EPA wants to shirk its responsibility to protect us from climate pollution, but science and the law say otherwise,' she added. 'If EPA finalizes this illegal and cynical approach, we will see them in court.' advertisement Three former EPA leaders have also criticized Zeldin, saying his March announcement targeting the endangerment finding and other rules imperiled the lives of millions of Americans and abandoned the agency's dual mission to protect the environment and human health. 'If there's an endangerment finding to be found anywhere, it should be found on this administration because what they're doing is so contrary to what the Environmental Protection Agency is about,' Christine Todd Whitman, who led EPA under Republican President George W. Bush, said after Zeldin's plan was made public. The EPA proposal follows an executive order from Trump that directed the agency to submit a report 'on the legality and continuing applicability' of the endangerment finding. Conservatives and some congressional Republicans hailed the initial plan, calling it a way to undo economically damaging rules to regulate greenhouse gases. But environmental groups, legal experts and Democrats said any attempt to repeal or roll back the endangerment finding would be an uphill task with slim chance of success. The finding came two years after a 2007 Supreme Court ruling holding that the EPA has authority to regulate greenhouse gases as air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. Passing court muster could be an issue David Doniger, a climate expert at the NRDC, accused Trump's Republican administration of using potential repeal of the endangerment finding as a 'kill shot'' that would allow him to make all climate regulations invalid. If finalized, repeal of the endangerment finding would erase current limits on greenhouse gas pollution from cars, factories, power plants and other sources and could prevent future administrations from proposing rules to tackle climate change. 'The Endangerment Finding is the legal foundation that underpins vital protections for millions of people from the severe threats of climate change, and the Clean Car and Truck Standards are among the most important and effective protections to address the largest U.S. source of climate-causing pollution,' said Peter Zalzal, associate vice president of the Environmental Defense Fund. 'Attacking these safeguards is manifestly inconsistent with EPA's responsibility to protect Americans' health and well-being,' he said. 'It is callous, dangerous and a breach of our government's responsibility to protect the American people from this devastating pollution.' Conrad Schneider, a senior director at the Clean Air Task Force, said the Trump administration 'is using pollution regulations as a scapegoat in its flawed approach to energy affordability' and reliability. He and other advocates 'are dismayed that an administration that claims it cares about cleaner, healthier and safer air is seeking to dismantle the very protections that are required for those conditions,' Schneider said. —Matthew Daly, Associated Press The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today. Explore Topics Climate change Donald Trump EPA global warming greenhouse gas emissions pollution


USA Today
6 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump, China trade talks move closer to extending tariff truce
WASHINGTON – The Trump administration and Chinese officials appear to be moving toward extending a 90-day tariff truce the two sides struck in May, but President Donald Trump still has not signed off on it. Momentum to extend the truce, in which both countries held off on imposing massive, triple-digit tariffs on imports on one another, came as a result of two days of U.S.-China talks in Stockholm. "We're going to talk to the president about whether that's something that he wants to do," U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, Trump's top trade official, told reporters in Stockholm. "It's certainly something that's been under discussion." More: Trump's trade talks intensify with tariff deadline fast approaching Trump expressed optimism about the latest round of discussions between his economic team and Chinese officials as he returned to the White House from Scotland aboard Air Force One. "They're going to brief me tomorrow. We'll either approve it or not," Trump said, referring to an extension of the truce. China's top trade negotiator Li Chenggang said that both countries agreed to push for an extension of the trade truce, without specifying when or for how long. In May, the Trump administration and China agreed to slash tariffs for 90 days in a push to de-escalate a trade war between the world's two largest economies while the two sides continued to negotiate a long-term agreement. However, a long-term deal between the United States and China still hasn't come together ahead of an Aug. 1 deadline when Trump was preparing to impose higher tariffs on goods from nearly 180 countries. Under the truce in May, the United States reduced 125% reciprocal tariffs imposed on Chinese imports by 115% to a 10% baseline tariff, which matches the tariffs the Trump administration imposed on other countries. Trump's 20% tariffs slapped on China over fentanyl production remained in effect, meaning the U.S. tariffs on China totaled 30% overall. In turn, the Chinese government agreed to reduce its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports for 90 days from 125% to 10%. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who participated in the trade talks in Stockholm, said he believes the Chinese were "surprised" by the magnitude of Trump's recently announced trade deals with Japan and the European Union. More: President Trump announces 'massive' Japan trade deal with 15% tariff "They're never compliant, but I think they were in more of a mood for a wide-ranging discussion," Bessent said, calling the tone of the talks "constructive." Bessent said Trump's team conveyed the need for the United States to improve the trade balance with China in areas such as rare earth minerals, semiconductors and medicines. "We reiterated to them: We don't want to decouple. We just need to de-risk with certain industries," Bessent said. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.