logo
Attorney says data hack case by ex-U-M coach of female athletes is just 'tip of the iceberg'

Attorney says data hack case by ex-U-M coach of female athletes is just 'tip of the iceberg'

Yahoo15-04-2025

The Brief
The attorney for over 40 former female college athletes impacted by a data hack allegedly from an ex-Michigan coach held a press conference.
A former college softball player came forward to share her story about the data hack from which she says she was a victim of.
Attorney Jon Marko says the case's victims may grow into the thousands and says the University of Michigan never notified them of the breach.
FOX 2 - A hacked data breach lawsuit press conference against a former University of Michigan football coach, involving more than 40 women and expanding, was held Monday in an investigation the attorney compared to like peeling back layers of a rotten onion.
Big picture view
Matthew Weiss is facing a federal indictment for allegedly accessing potentially thousands of female athletes' personal information, private photos, social media, email, and cloud storage accounts, as early as 2015, before he worked at U of M. Authorities said he continued to do so until 2023.
"Like I said, this is the tip of the iceberg," said Attorney Jon Marko. "I think as we peel back the layers of this rotten onion that the University of Michigan has created, that we're going to discover that, that there's going to be different entanglements out there, that there's going to be additional, women and individuals."
Weiss is facing a lawsuit for allegedly hacking the accounts of numerous female athletes and accessing private photos. He was fired in 2023 after failing to cooperate with the university's investigation into the case, was recently charged with 24 federal counts, including unauthorized access to computers and aggravated identity theft.
There are more than 40 women involved in the lawsuit filed by Marko Law, also named the University of Michigan, the Regents of the University of Michigan, and Keffer Development Services, LLC.
Weiss allegedly obtained access without authorization to student athlete databases of more than a hundred colleges and universities. According to court documents Matt Weiss kept notes on individuals whose photos and videos that he looked at — comments on their bodies and sexual preferences.
Marko said the lawsuit is being amended to add more individuals.
"This affected not only our athletes here in Michigan and not only the Wolverines, but this affected women all over the country who've been exposed and had their data breached," he said. "When (the university) found out about it, they've done nothing in the past three years to try to notify these women."
Dig deeper
McKenzie Johnson, one of the former female athletes impacted, is being represented by Marko, and shared her story publicly as part of the lawsuit.
"Miss Johnson and others had to be notified by the Department of Justice that their data have been exposed and that there was a breach and that their most private, sensitive, intimate videos, data, and photos have been taken by a strange man and are now apparently on servers at the University of Michigan," Marko said.
Johnson said she now works professionally with a Fortune 500 company. From 2015 to 2019, she played softball at Grambling State University.
She said she recently learned that her private information was stolen by Weiss and that her personal email and social media accounts were hacked into, in 2022.
"I don't know yet what information was stolen, so I have a great deal of fear and uncertainty about this situation, honestly," she said. "The University of Michigan has never notified me about this privacy violation, so I had no opportunity to personally protect myself."
Marko said for the past three years there was no notification of the data breach for the women.
Related:
Hacking investigation: Ex-Michigan, Ravens coach had thousands of intimate images
Lawsuit filed against University of Michigan, Matt Weiss after allegations he hacked female athletes' accounts
"That would have been a nice time to tell these thousands, tens of thousands, potentially of people that their data could have been exposed and were sitting on servers and out there," he said.
Marko said that just because there is a criminal court case underway, it doesn't mean that the university doesn't still have civily responsibility.
"First of all, we have a lot of beef with U of M, so this was an employee of U of M," he said. "The university's responsible. They have an obligation to protect their students and others.
"A police investigation doesn't relieve the university for years of failing to protect the individuals who are subject to the data breach. So, the FBI has to do what the FBI has to do. The university has to do with the university should do, and they failed to do it in this case."
Marko Law and Hurwitz Law filed a temporary restraining order to place the personal data of those impacted in a "secure, trusted, neutral third party."
"We know that they seized Matthew Weiss's electronic devices, including that data," said Marko. "And so we need, confirmation, in order that, this will be disgorged and secured outside of the university. It should not be in the university's hands."
The University of Michigan issued this statement:
"While the federal indictment asserts that Matt Weiss improperly accessed online accounts of unsuspecting individuals between approximately 2015 and January 2023, Weiss was employed by the University of Michigan for less than 2 years, from February, 2021 to January, 2023.
"Count 23 of the indictment is specific to the University of Michigan and alleges that Weiss accessed protected UM computers without or in excess of authorization from December 21, 2022 to December 23, 2022.
"Upon learning of potentially concerning activity in its systems, the University promptly placed Mr. Weiss on leave, forwarded this matter to law enforcement authorities and moved forward with Mr. Weiss' termination on January 21, 2023."
The Source
Information for this report came from a press conference with attorney Jon Marko and previously reported details of the indictment and investigation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Miami ex-Proud Boy got a get-out-of-jail-free pass. Now he wants to cash in?
Miami ex-Proud Boy got a get-out-of-jail-free pass. Now he wants to cash in?

Miami Herald

time43 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Miami ex-Proud Boy got a get-out-of-jail-free pass. Now he wants to cash in?

Let's get this straight. The ex-Proud Boy leader from Miami, Henry 'Enrique' Tarrio, was convicted of seditious conspiracy in the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol and then pardoned by President Trump. And now he's turning around and suing the government, along with four other J6-ers, for $100 million? That certainly puts Trump in an awkward spot. His administration has to either defend the decision made by the Biden administration to prosecute Tarrio and the others, or hand over a hefty wad of cash to settle the case. The timing is lousy, too, with the lawsuit coming just as the president is trying to make the case in Congress for all of those controversial DOGE spending cuts, like cutting food stamps for the poor. Would the government be taking food off the table for the poor while giving money to those who ransacked our Capitol in an attempt to overturn the election? Even worse, what happens in this lawsuit is part of the continuing push by the Trump administration and the Jan. 6 rioters to rewrite the damning history of that day. Maybe they have forgotten, but we cannot: the appalling sight of lawless mobs smashing their way into the Capitol and battling police, erecting a gallows and chanting, 'Hang Mike Pence.' There were seven deaths, including suicides, and 150 police officers were injured. There was damage to the Capitol, where members of Congress fled in fear for their lives. And yet Trump has called the rioters 'political prisoners' and 'hostages.' The lawsuit was filed Friday in Orlando. Tarrio and four others from the far-right militant group claim in their complaint that they were the victims of 'egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump.' The suit claims the men were arrested with insufficient probable cause, the Associated Press said. Rather than simply walking away with the undeserved get-out-of-jail-free passes they received from Trump, who pardoned nearly all of the 1,500 people who stormed the Capitol, Tarrio and the others are trying to cash in. And they're doing it at our expense as taxpayers. Don't forget that Tarrio was convicted of seditious conspiracy and other crimes on grounds he helped to orchestrate the riot that sought to stop Congress from certifying former U.S. President Joe Biden's win over Trump in 2020. He was sentenced to 22 years in prison, the longest sentence for anyone tried for the events of Jan. 6. The other four in the suit are Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, Ethan Nordean and Dominic Pezzola. They each were sentenced to between 10 and 18 years in prison. Biggs, Rehl and Nordean were all convicted of seditious conspiracy. Pezzola, acquitted on the conspiracy charge, was convicted of stealing a police officer's riot shield and using it to smash a window. Trump pardoned Tarrio and commuted the sentences of the others. This legal action comes on the heels of the settlement in the Ashli Babbitt case. The Trump administration has agreed to pay a $4.975 million settlement to the family of the Jan. 6 rioter, who was killed by a Capitol police officer. She was shot while attempting to enter the Speaker's Lobby through a shattered window. That brings up another question: If other rioters seek legal recourse for their prosecutions, how many more suits will the country face? If the U.S. settles the Proud Boy case, how many more cases will be in the pipeline after this? Potentially hundreds. A settlement would also set a bad example in other ways. If other extremists see a lawsuit payout as proof that they have the backing of the Department of Justice or the president, that could embolden them to commit other acts of political violence. And if that happens, so much for Republicans' claim on the label of the 'law and order' party. The rioters broke our precious tradition of the peaceful transfer of power, a critical component of a democracy. We cannot reward that behavior, especially not with hard-earned taxpayer dollars. Click here to send the letter.

U.S. Postal Service asks pet owners to secure all dogs ahead of mail delivery
U.S. Postal Service asks pet owners to secure all dogs ahead of mail delivery

CBS News

time2 hours ago

  • CBS News

U.S. Postal Service asks pet owners to secure all dogs ahead of mail delivery

The United States Postal Service is kicking off its National Dog Bite Awareness Campaign - an opportunity to let letter carriers and dog owners know how to best protect themselves in the instance of a dog bite. This year's theme is "Secure your dog, keep deliveries on track." Incidents involving dog attacks on Postal Service employees rose to more than 6,000 cases last year. The USPS gave crucial information on how dog owners can be good stewards for safe mail delivery and ensure the safety of everyone. "Not everybody wants to pet your dog and there's nothing wrong with that," said professional dog trainer, Hector Hernandez. "In the scope of the letter carrier's jobs, they should not be touching your dog, they shouldn't, they have a job to do. What happens is we often don't know as letter carriers how these dogs are treated. If they think hands are weappns, the dog might bite their hand." All dogs regardless of breed, size or age have the potential to bite; so Hernandez offered some advice about unpredictability during his presentation. According to the most recent USPS data, Detroit ranks as the 13th highest city with 32 dog attacks last year. Michigan, overall, had the 7th most dog bites of any state. Michigan law states a dog owner will be liable for all damages restulting from a dog bite when the victim is either on public property or lawfully on private property. The USPS also issued a reminder that when a carrier feels unsafe, mail service can be stopped, which provides another reason for dog owners to keep the animals safely away from mail carriers.

Feds say they will retry state Sen. Emil Jones III on bribery charges after jury deadlocked in April
Feds say they will retry state Sen. Emil Jones III on bribery charges after jury deadlocked in April

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Feds say they will retry state Sen. Emil Jones III on bribery charges after jury deadlocked in April

Federal prosecutors announced Tuesday that they will seek to retry state Sen. Emil Jones III on bribery charges after a jury in April deadlocked on all counts, leading to a mistrial. Assistant U.S. Attorney Prashant Kolluri made the announcement during a status hearing before U.S. District Judge Andrea Wood. Jones' attorney, Victor Henderson, asked for time to inform Jones, who was not present in court. The judge did not immediately set a trial date. Jones, 46, a Chicago Democrat and son of former Senate President Emil Jones Jr., was charged with agreeing to take bribes from an executive of a red-light camera company in exchange for Jones' protection in Springfield against legislation that would hurt the company's bottom line. Wood declared a mistrial on April 24 after the jury at least twice reported they could not reach a verdict. Before doing so, she polled them individually to hear about their progress. Afterward, she reported that nearly all of them suggested that no further progress could be made. 'Considering all of the elements and the concern that there could be a prejudicial impact of continuing forced deliberations at this point … I think it's appropriate at this point to declare a mistrial,' Wood said at the time. The jury of seven women and five men had deliberated for about 24 hours over four days before announcing they were deadlocked. The mistrial came nearly six years after FBI agents confronted Jones at his Roseland neighborhood home as part of a sweeping investigation into bribery schemes involving red-light cameras, liquor licenses and other graft across the west and southwest suburbs. At the heart of the probe was Omar Maani, co-founder of SafeSpeed LLC who agreed to work undercover for federal investigators after being confronted with evidence he was paying off officials in Oak Lawn in exchange for political support to add SafeSpeed cameras at additional intersections. Maani, who was granted a deferred prosecution agreement by the U.S. attorney's office for his extensive cooperation, was the star witness at Jones' trial, testifying for the first time in public about his prolific turn as an FBI mole. That cooperation also has netted the convictions of former Crestwood Mayor Louis Presta, ex-Oakbrook Terrace Mayor Anthony Ragucci, and Jeffrey Tobolski, the former mayor of McCook and Cook County commissioner. According to the charges, Jones agreed to accept $5,000 in campaign funding from Maani in exchange for Jones agreeing not to file a bill calling for a statewide study of red-light cameras, which SafeSpeed considered potentially damaging to its bottom line. Jones also offered to 'protect' the company from his friend, then-state Rep. David McSweeney, who had filed bills of his own calling for an all-out ban of red-light cameras, according to prosecutors. The charges allege Jones also asked Maani to give his former office intern a part-time job, which led to $1,800 being paid to the intern in exchange for no work. jmeisner@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store