What are the rules on photographing people in the street in France?
have filed a complaint with Paris police
, saying that they were attacked with mini Eiffel Towers when they attempted to film some of the capital's unlicensed street vendors. The case followers that of a Czech influencer who says he was threatened when he filmed scammers on the street.
We should emphasise that physical attacks or even threats are very rare, and these cases are the exception rather than the rule.
That said, France does have strict privacy laws which cover street filming, as well as a culture which is more inclined to individual privacy - even when you are in a public space like the street.
CCTV, drones and doorbells - France's privacy laws explained
Here's what the law says;
France's privacy law introduces the concept of the
droit à l'image
- or the right to your own image - and states that everybody has a basic right not to have images of themselves published against their will. This includes photos or film that are taken in a public space such as on the street or in a park.
Advertisement
For ordinary members of the public, general consent is required, unless the publication is in the public interest or if the person is pictured or filmed as part of a large crowd, for example at a demonstration.
For minors under the age of 18, taking and publishing photos is subject to strict rules and typically parental authorisation.
It's also worth noting that 'publishing' includes putting pictures on social media, or streaming video onto social media or channels like YouTube.
The
droit à l'image
gets a little trickier when it is applied to public figures such as politicians or celebrities – essentially, it is broken down again into this idea of public v private space.
When it comes to photos taken in a private space, the photographer usually requires the consent of their subjects when they can be identified. France's penal code states that taking or publishing a photo of somebody, taken in a private place without their consent, is punishable by up to a year in prison and a €45,000 fine.
It is worth noting that a car is considered a private space, which is why a French court ordered Closer magazine to pay damages to actress Julie Gayet, after publishing a photo of her allegedly on her way to meet then-president François Hollande, with whom she was having an affair.
Photographing versus publishing
The law is clear that consent is required to take photos or film in a private space. However when it comes to the public sphere the rules are more concerned with publication of the photos or film - although as noted that does include posting them on social media.
Photography or filming is therefore not specifically illegal, but because of the strictness of the laws, French people do have a greater expectation of privacy and openly filming or photographing someone without their consent is considered unacceptable.
But that doesn't mean that tourists can't take photos in public - as evidenced by a trip to hotspots like the Eiffel Tower or Mont Saint Michel - it's just a question of balance. Naturally if you're taking a photo of a crowded public space then there will be people in the background, but you should try to avoid photographing or filming people in close up, unless they agree.
Advertisement
You might also see some people in tourist areas who have signs up specifically prohibiting filming - for example street artists or stallholders at a market. If you see someone you particularly want to photograph or film - perhaps an especially talented busker - then it's polite to ask them first.
If people ask you to stop photographing or filming them, then it's courteous to respect their wishes.
This is also the sensible course of action if the person in question is doing something illegal - many of the street vendors selling souvenirs in areas such as the Eiffel Tower are unlicensed, so they will be unlikely to welcome being filmed. Some are also
sans papiers
(undocumented immigrants) so are likely to be worried about being filmed or photographed.
France does not have a tradition of vigilante justice - if you see something that you think is illegal, it's best to report it to the police and let them deal with it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
7 minutes ago
- LeMonde
France discussing 'unjustified' arrest of citizen in Mali
France's Foreign Ministry said on Saturday, August 16, that it was in talks with Mali over the arrest of a Frenchman accused of working with intelligence services to "destabilize" the country, calling the claims "unjustified." "Discussions are underway to clear up any misunderstanding" and obtain the "immediate release" of the French embassy employee in Bamako, the ministry said. Mali authorities said Thursday that the French national had been arrested on suspicion of working for the French intelligence services, and accused "foreign states" of trying to destabilize the country. The West African country's ruling junta, which came to power after back-to-back coups in 2020 and 2021, also said that dozens of soldiers had been detained for allegedly seeking to overthrow the government. France's Foreign Ministry said the arrested employee was covered by the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, meaning he should be released. Impoverished Mali has been gripped by a security crisis since 2012, fueled notably by violence from groups affiliated with Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State jihadist group, as well as local criminal gangs. The junta, led by President Assimi Goita, has turned away from Western partners, notably former colonial power France, to align itself politically and militarily with Russia in the name of national sovereignty.
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Sylvie Kauffmann: 'Putin can pretend to negotiate and engage in endless talks that never lead anywhere'
A bilateral meeting lasting under three hours, followed by a 12-minute joint press conference with no announcements: The Friday, August 15, summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska left many questions unanswered. By Saturday morning, as European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky began reacting, Le Monde columnist Sylvie Kauffmann spoke with readers during our live coverage of the war in Ukraine. Pierre: Diplomacy is sometimes a theater, with each side seeking to claim success and assign blame in case of failure. Trump had gotten us used to breaking with tradition. Today, he is acting out a classic scenario. Isn't that already a sign that this summit has failed? Sylvie Kauffmann: Calling the summit a failure depends on what was expected of it. If people were hoping Vladimir Putin would commit to a serious ceasefire, then yes, it was clearly a failure. But I do not think that was a reasonable expectation. At this stage, with no results announced, it is neither a success nor a failure. We will have to judge based on the reactions of Europeans, so far very cautious, and the Trump-Zelensky meeting on Monday. There is, however, a significant risk, well known to Europeans: Putin can buy time by pretending to be ready to negotiate and engage in endless talks that never lead anywhere, while his army continues to gain ground and bomb Ukraine. That was essentially the tactic he used after the annexation of Crimea and the first invasion of Ukraine in 2014, during the Minsk negotiations with France, Germany and Ukraine. Let's discuss: How should we interpret the welcome given to President Putin as he came off his plane – with the red carpet, applause and a show of military strength featuring American jets in the background? S.K.: Trump is fascinated by Putin as a figure – he generally gets along well with "strongmen," but he is particularly interested in the Russian leader. He calls him by his first name, Vladimir, which he never does with Zelensky. All of this staging, on a US military base, was meant both to demonstrate American power to Putin and to treat him as the leader of another major power, worthy of every honor. This treatment is all the more ironic since Putin is not only the aggressor of an independent country, in violation of international law, but also subject to an arrest warrant for war crimes. Dodochampion: On the Russian side, did this summit have any other ambitions beyond relaunching Russia's international trade? S.K.: Putin's goal at this summit was first to gain respectability and second to buy time. On both counts, he succeeded: The welcome by the US president on American soil, with great ceremony, rehabilitated him on the international stage, even if he is a pariah in Europe. Furthermore, by engaging in this form of dialogue with Trump, he managed to get the ultimatums and the threat of further sanctions against Russia lifted – at least for the time being: Trump said on Fox News that the issue of sanctions was off the table for two or three weeks. That matters to Putin because the Russian economy is showing serious signs of weakness. And in the meantime, he can keep bombing Ukraine and continue his offensive in the east of the country. On the other hand, Putin failed to turn this meeting into a major Russo-American summit on economic and trade relations or on strategic dialogue regarding arms control. Nice: The statements from Trump and Putin were devoid of substance, suggesting there was no progress. On the US side, shouldn't this lead to a North Korea scenario – that is, the United States losing interest in the matter (and leaving it to the Europeans)? S.K.: Yes, that's possible. Several American experts have drawn a parallel with the 2018 Trump-Kim Jong-un meeting, in which Trump invested a great deal (with the difference that he also wanted to invite Kim to ride with him in The Beast, the presidential limousine, but at the time his advisers convinced him not to – which was not the case with Putin...). Then he lost interest in the North Korea issue after there was no progress. If Trump decides to lose interest in the Ukrainian issue, it will be up to the Europeans to handle it alone. The question then is what level of American military assistance they can still count on, particularly in intelligence and satellite reconnaissance. But they now know that under Trump, the US will disengage from Europe. Vice President JD Vance stated clearly last week that the US would no longer fund Ukraine's defense. So the dynamic is clear. Patrick: Don't you think Trump's attitude puts the US in a position of weakness? It's obvious Trump is afraid of Putin, which puts the latter in a position of strength, with the likely consequence of destabilizing the West for Russia's benefit. What cards does the West have left to ensure its own survival and that of Ukraine? S.K.: You raise a crucial point, but first, speaking of "the West" raises the question of whether that concept still exists under Trump. Clearly, the fate of Ukraine does not have the same meaning or importance for the current Washington administration as it does for the majority of Europeans. For Europe, Ukraine's survival as a sovereign and independent state is existential; for Trump's America, it is not. Yes, the American president is impressed by Putin, and that may seem like a weakness to us, but he sees Putin as a "strong" leader of another major power that, incidentally, has "a lot of land, a lot of rare earths and oil," and with whom he believes he can do "great things," as he has said. The cards the Europeans can play are unity and firmness, particularly in defense, a field where they have a lot of ground to make up, but which they have started to address. That will require significant political effort.
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
After the Trump-Putin summit, Europe must make a move
Everything unfolded just as the Europeans had expected. The summit on Friday, August 15, between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, ended without any concrete prospects for a ceasefire in Ukraine. However, it worked to the advantage of the Russian president, who found himself rehabilitated on the world stage thanks to the event. The aggressor of an independent country, Ukraine, which he claims as his own, and wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, Putin was treated on Friday by the United States with all the honors reserved for a respected leader of a major power. Greeted as he stepped off the plane by President Trump, invited to walk the red carpet with him to the American president's limousine and then invited inside, the Russian president clearly appreciated these gestures. To express his gratitude to Trump, he echoed two grievances dear to the Republican president: that the 2020 presidential election, won by Joe Biden, was fraudulent, and that the war in Ukraine would never have started if Trump had been president. As for the rest, while describing the meeting as very "productive" and on "the path to peace in Ukraine," Putin merely reiterated, during a brief joint appearance before the press, the "underlying causes" of his conflict with Ukraine. The talks lasted just over two and a half hours, whereas the Kremlin had planned for "six to seven hours" of discussions. The scheduled lunch did not take place, journalists were not allowed to ask questions and the exchanges apparently did not touch on commercial or economic matters, nor on arms control – contrary to Moscow's wishes. For his part, Trump showered "Vladimir" with praise, calling him "a strong guy (...) tough as hell." He spoke of a "very productive" meeting where there were "many points that we agreed on," except for one, "probably the most significant," which he did not specify. The American president, who had threatened Russia just a few days earlier with "very severe consequences" if it failed to achieve a ceasefire in Ukraine, stated on Fox News on Friday that the question of new sanctions was not under consideration for the time being, but that he might have to think about it in two or three weeks. In light of this lack of results, the ball is now in the Europeans' court. On Saturday morning, Trump briefed them, as well as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, on his discussions and the points of agreement he mentioned. Even before speaking to them, he offered this advice to Zelensky on Fox News after the summit: "Make a deal!" From the way Putin and Trump presented matters in Anchorage, it can be inferred that the proposed "deal" is not in Kyiv's favor. Echoing Trump, Putin said he hoped the Europeans "won't throw a wrench in the works and not make any attempts to use some backroom dealings to conduct provocations to torpedo the progress." Keen not to miss any chance to end the war, the Ukrainian president nonetheless responded positively to the idea of a three-way meeting with Putin and Trump, and decided to travel to Washington on Monday to discuss it. The scenario Europeans have feared – a settlement hashed out behind their backs by the Russian and American leaders – cannot be ruled out. However, unlike Trump, Putin acknowledged that they, together with Kyiv, have cards to play. The time has come to use them, and to do so with resolve.
