Amazon Prime price hike is coming... as experts predict how much your bill will increase by and when
JP Morgan analyst Douglas Anmuth found that Amazon customers may need to pay $159 instead of the usual $139 annually for a Prime membership starting next year.
'A $20 U.S. Prime price increase is seen driving about $3 billion in incremental annualized net sales,' according to a note via TheStreet.
The numbers come from Anmuth's estimated value of a Prime subscription, which came out to $1,430 per year. He did not clarify whether price hikes from tariffs were taken into account.
According to the analyst, the new total was a 6 percent jump compared to last year's price tag and more than double the value compared to the 2016 membership cost.
The prediction is also based on Amazon's pattern of raising prices on significant features every four years.
Besides the price changes, J.P. Morgan expects around 350 million shoppers will have Prime memberships this year.
The prediction comes following Amazon's Prime Day event preparations, which will be a four-day sale instead of the usual two.
Amazon Prime has been going strong for 20 years despite price hikes, leaving shoppers threatening to delete their accounts.
Customers were furious in 2018 once the company raised its monthly plan to $12.99 from $10.99.
The company's membership fee grew again in 2022 to $14.99, amounting to a $139 annual cost.
Prices have stayed put ever since, but the company has opted to make other Prime changes that have also left shoppers threatening to cancel their memberships.
This year's backlash started up by streamers slamming an 'unbearable' Prime update, a greater number of ads the company warned its members about last year.
It worsened after the company axed its Try Before You Buy service a month after discontinuing same-day delivery from select stores, and hiked the price of its Amazon Music Unlimited ad-free subscription program.
Amazon's decision to cut jobs in favor of Artificial Intelligence hasn't won the hearts of customers either.
Although the company has had a habit of infuriating members, things could be looking up now that Amazon is expanding its same-day and next-day delivery services to over 4,000 small cities, towns, and rural communities in the US.
Amazon faced backlash from Prime members multiple times this year over unfavorable changes
The fury over the elimination of perks that lured in customers didn't stop the company from having a successful first quarter.
Its net sales increased 9 percent to $155.7 billion, while its operating income increased to $18.4 billion from last year's first quarter total of $15.3 billion.
Around 220 million shoppers worldwide have Amazon Prime memberships, with about 180 million being in the US.
The company expects to gain more members this year, and retail expert Neil Saunders revealed that with a potential higher membership price could come more benefits.
'Amazon's whole manta on Prime is to ensure it delivers fantastic value for money. This means the benefits have to outweigh the cost, which they currently do,' Saunders told DailyMail.com.
'A price rise would not be something Amazon does lightly as it would disrupt the value equation. That said, there is some scope for higher Prime fees as Amazon has added a lot more benefits to Prime over recent years.'
While Amazon has not confirmed if it will raise prices next year, it has launched early Prime Day offers, including a three-month trial of Audible for $0.99.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘A billion people backing you': China transfixed as Musk turns against Trump
Few break-ups have as many gossiping observers as the fallout between the once inseparable Donald Trump and Elon Musk. The ill-fated bromance between the US president and the world's richest man, which once raised questions about American oligarchy, is now being pored over by social media users in China, many of whom are Team Musk. The latest drama comes from Musk's pledge to found a new political party, the America party, if Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill, which Musk described as 'insane' passed the Senate this week (it did). Musk had already vowed to unseat lawmakers who backed Trump's flagship piece of legislation, which is expected to increase US national debt by $3.3tn. On Wednesday, hours after the bill passed the US Senate, the hashtag #MuskWantsToBuildAnAmericaParty went viral on Weibo, a Chinese social media platform similar to Musk's X, receiving more than 37m views. 'If Elon Musk were to found a political party, his tech-driven mindset could inject fresh energy into politics. The potential for change is significant – and worth watching,' wrote one Weibo user. 'When you've had enough, there's no need to keep putting up with it,' wrote another. One comment summed up the mood on the platform: 'Brother Musk, you've got over a billion people on our side backing you.' Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, is widely venerated in China for his business acumen and technological achievements. Tesla's electric vehicles are the only western brand on Chinese roads that can rival domestic firms, and the company's biggest factory by volume is in Shanghai. Musk is known to have a close relationship with China's premier, Li Qiang, while Musk's mother, Maye Musk, is a social media celebrity in her own right in China. Musk's popularity in China follows a well-established trend of Chinese audiences enthusiastically embracing US tech innovators. Walter Isaacson's biography of Steve Jobs was a bestseller in China, as was his biography of Musk. Trump, however, is seen by many as being an unpredictable funnyman who has launched the most aggressive trade war on China in recent history. Some internet users commented that Trump and Musk should grow up. 'These two grown men argue nonstop over the smallest things – and the whole world ends up knowing about it,' wrote one user, while another joked: 'Every day, Musk is basically live-streaming 'How Billionaires Argue''. The conversation has been allowed to flourish on China's tightly controlled social media, suggesting that at least some censors are betting that the US political chaos could be no bad thing for China. Additional research by Lillian Yang
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Wall Street has faith in Trump. It could all end in tears
All is forgiven. Wall Street has soared to record highs just months after Donald Trump unleashed tariff chaos on the world. The S&P 500 stock index has surged nearly 25pc from the nadir it reached in the days after the US president announced his ' liberation day ' tariffs on April 2. The benchmark completed its best quarter since December 2023 on Monday as it reached a new high, even as Trump threatens to impose fresh tariffs within weeks. This will please a president who has long viewed the stock market as an unofficial straw poll on his performance. But is such a full-throated endorsement of Trump's economic plans justified? Not everyone is convinced. '[Stocks] are at an all time high and the risks are still there,' points out Luca Paolini, the chief strategist at Pictet Asset Management. 'It is not as bad as it was but it is not as good as it was a year ago. 'Our view is that it's going to get weaker and that's why we don't buy into the strength of the market.' Stocks have surged even as official data, published last week, confirmed that the US economy shrank by half a percentage point at the start of the year. 'The US economy is somewhat slowing and when you have those types of stock valuations, there's not much room for deception,' says Kevin Thozet, a member of the investment committee at European asset manager Carmignac. Stock prices on the S&P 500 are trading at about 22 times earnings, which assumes that companies will experience astonishing growth in profits in coming years. 'This recovery is driven entirely by soaring valuations rather than earnings upgrades, signalling underlying fragility,' Susana Cruz and Joachim Klement, analysts at stockbroker Panmure Liberum, have warned. The current stock market rally is 'built on shaky ground, given the deep economic uncertainty'. There are some good reasons for stocks to have roared back since Trump announced his 'liberation day' tariffs. 'Markets are always navigating a very uncertain environment. The question is, 'Is it worse or better than a few months ago?' And I think the market, correctly so, came to the conclusion that it's probably better,' says Paolini. 'The trade war that was supposed to be terrible for the global economy. It doesn't look like it is going to be that bad because there are going to be deals between the US-UK, US-India, Vietnam, probably Europe and Japan. 'So yes, there will be higher tariffs, but we are probably going to avoid a devastating trade war of everyone against everyone else.' Rory McPherson, the chief investment officer at Wren Sterling, says: 'Corporate earnings have been really strong. The earnings for the rest of the year have not been downgraded by anything like what they were downgraded in previous crises. 'Yes, they have been downgraded and the downgrade for the year is almost 4pc but that's not too far out of whack.' However, Paolini warns that the surge in stocks means there is 'very limited upside from here because equities are very, very expensive'. The big question hanging over the stock market is the future of so-called US exceptionalism – the previously self-reinforcing theory that America is unique and distinct from other nations. This belief has long helped to prop up stock markets, with investors betting that American businesses will pull through even the most difficult patches. But there are signs that this faith is being shaken. The dollar has suffered its worst first half of the year since 1973 and concerns about Trump's plans to borrow hundreds of billions have seen borrowing costs jump, prompting jokes that the president could become 'Donald Truss'. 'If I'm looking further out I think Trump's policies would lead to a lower US dollar and higher interest rates,' says Thozet of Carmignac. 'The Trump administration wants to have more manufacturing, more stuff made in the US and this comes with a lower dollar policy. And there's a risk that these higher interest rates deflates the elevated prices on US equities.' The man who could make or break the Wall Street rally is Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve. Lower interest rates would spur economic activity and help boost corporate profits. Traders are currently pricing in two cuts before the end of 2025 and a 53pc chance of a third, anticipating that policymakers will react to a slowdown in the American jobs market, which added 139,000 jobs in May, down from 147,000 in April. However, Powell warned on Tuesday at the ECB Forum in Sintra that policymakers had kept rates 'on hold when we saw the size of the tariffs'. He also warned that the 'US federal fiscal path is not a sustainable one' as the Senate edged closer to approving Mr Trump's ' One Big Beautiful Bill ', which would cut taxes and add an estimated $3.3 trillion (£2.4 trillion) to the American government deficit over the next 10 years. Those comments will infuriate Mr Trump, who has repeatedly pressured 'Too Late' Powell to cut rates. As the melodrama plays out, Wall Street waits. 'It is not blind hope,' insists McPherson. 'The US has a lot more upside from here.'
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Jury says Google must pay California Android smartphone users $314.6m
A jury in San Jose, California, said on Tuesday that Google misused customers' cellphone data and must pay more than $314.6m to Android smartphone users in the state, according to an attorney for the plaintiffs. The jury agreed with the plaintiffs that Alphabet's Google was liable for sending and receiving information from the devices without permission while they were idle, causing what the lawsuit had called 'mandatory and unavoidable burdens shouldered by Android device users for Google's benefit'. Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said in a statement that the company would appeal, and that the verdict 'misunderstands services that are critical to the security, performance, and reliability of Android devices'. The plaintiffs' attorney Glen Summers said the verdict 'forcefully vindicates the merits of this case and reflects the seriousness of Google's misconduct'. The plaintiffs filed the class action in state court in 2019 on behalf of an estimated 14 million Californians. They argued that Google collected information from idle phones running its Android operating system for company uses like targeted advertising, consuming Android users' cellular data at their expense. Google told the court that no Android users were harmed by the data transfers and that users consented to them in the company's terms of service and privacy policies. Another group filed a separate lawsuit in federal court in San Jose, bringing the same claims against Google on behalf of Android users in the other 49 states. That case is scheduled for trial in April 2026.
