logo
LA man creates device to deter homeless from sleeping outside his condo — but is it the best solution?

LA man creates device to deter homeless from sleeping outside his condo — but is it the best solution?

Yahoo3 days ago

In West Hollywood, a new device called the "Blue Chirper" is stirring controversy as it aims to deter homeless individuals from settling near businesses.
Invented by Santa Monica resident Stephen McMahon, the device emits a chirping sound and flashes blue light when it detects motion. McMahon describes it as a non-aggressive deterrent.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
"We're not trying to punish anybody," he told NBC Los Angeles. "We're just trying to divert them."
The Blue Chirper, priced at about $400, was developed after McMahon experienced homeless encampments outside his condominium complex's storage area. He also noted a break-in and a neighbor with her infant daughter being assaulted, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Local news channel KTLA5 says McMahon has sold about two dozen devices to business owners and residents in various Southern California locations, including the 3rd Street Promenade in Santa Monica.
In West Hollywood, it was recently placed near a Trader Joe's on Santa Monica Boulevard. While some area residents appreciate the effort to keep sidewalks clear, others find the constant chirping and flashing lights disruptive.
'It's so annoying,' grocery shopper Jeffrey Howard told the Los Angeles Times. 'It's like an alarm from a smoke detector that you're just waiting for somebody to turn off.'
Another shopper, Travis Adam Wright, called it a bad look for West Hollywood. It feels like 'a jerk's first response to people living on the street,' he said.
The city has received no official complaints, but a code enforcement officer is set to assess the situation.
As one local woman pointed out, it may be more impactful to address the root of the issue rather than just one symptom.
'It makes me sad that that's what we're doing to get people to move on. On the other hand, this is someone's business, it's their livelihood,' she told NBC. 'We need just a better solution to the homeless situation.'
Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it
This local initiative comes amid a national surge in homelessness. According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), over 770,000 people were experiencing homelessness on a single night in January 2024, marking the largest number since data collection began and 19% more than in 2007.
Factors contributing to this rise include rising inflation, stagnating wages among middle- and lower-income households and a severe shortage of affordable housing, with median rent increasing by 18% since 2020, says the National Alliance to End Homelessness, and a deficit of over 7 million affordable rental homes nationwide, according to National Low Income Housing Coalition estimates.
Notably, the baby boomer generation is facing homelessness at unprecedented rates. People aged 65 and older are now the fastest-growing group among the homeless population, with Justice in Aging projections indicating their numbers will peak by 2030. Many in this demographic struggle with rising housing costs on fixed incomes.
In fact, in the 2024 HUD report, about one in five people experiencing homelessness on a single night was 55 or older. Almost half of adults in this age group (46%) were experiencing homelessness in "places not meant for human habitation."
While a chirper may get rid of people occupying public stairways, it does nothing to address the broader issue at large — and a substantial solution remains to be seen.
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ryanair says passengers are ‘suffering' in 2.5 hour queues due to Portuguese border control delays
Ryanair says passengers are ‘suffering' in 2.5 hour queues due to Portuguese border control delays

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Ryanair says passengers are ‘suffering' in 2.5 hour queues due to Portuguese border control delays

Ryanair has blasted Portuguese border control, saying its passengers have 'suffered' through long delays or have missed flights due to staff shortages. The budget airline carrier called on the Portuguese government to 'urgently fix' border control staff shortages at some of the country's busiest airports, including Faro, Lisbon and Porto. Ryanair said that passengers, many of whom are travelling with young families, are 'suffering' due to unnecessary border control delays of up to two and a half hours. The airline added that over the last two weeks alone, from 26 May to 9 June, over 270 passengers travelling from Faro, Lisbon or Porto airports have missed their flights. It blames this on border control delays due to a lack of staff. The airline has called on the government to adequately staff border control, especially during the peak morning period. Ryanair's COO, Neal McMahon said said that the staff shortages are 'unacceptable'. 'Over 270 passengers have missed their flights just because the airport operator, ANA, has not ensured that adequate staff are in place to manage border control at Faro, Lisbon, and Porto Airports – some of Portugal's main airports,' he added. 'This is not good enough, and the problem will only worsen as we go further into the summer season and traffic numbers increase.' Mr McMahon said that Ryanair calls on the new government 'to urgently intervene' so that 'Portuguese families will not be forced to suffer 2.5-hour-long queues just to get away on their well-deserved holidays.' Ryanair's statement comes a week after Faro Airport announced it would roll out e-gate access for British arrivals. Faro is a popular destination for Brits to visit, being the gateway to the Algarve region, dotted with golf courses and long, sandy beaches backed by dramatic cliffs. The UK government expects that British holidaymakers in their 'millions' will be able to use e-gate technology this summer. Prime Minister Keir Starmer struck the deal last month. He said that 'for holidaymakers wanting to get out this summer, they will want to know that they can do so easily and without delay and chaos'. However, British passengers at Faro Airport say they are still caught up in long queues of nearly half an hour at border control. Francisco Vieira Pita, director of ANAl, told local media last month that border control authorities are in the process of updating the Internal Security System (SSI). 'That upgrade is, in fact, causing longer wait times in some cases. ANA is working closely with the relevant authorities to minimise the impact on passengers' experience,' he said. According to local press, Portugal's PSP police force announced it would be deploying 500 new officers to boost border control in Portuguese airports by July, hoping to fix the issue amid the summer tourist boom. The Independent has contacted Vinci Airports, owner of ANA, for comment.

‘Everything we had': LA family devastated after losing millions in bold Hollywood-style heist of jewelry store
‘Everything we had': LA family devastated after losing millions in bold Hollywood-style heist of jewelry store

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

‘Everything we had': LA family devastated after losing millions in bold Hollywood-style heist of jewelry store

It seems like a plotline out of a Hollywood blockbuster: thieves cutting through a concrete wall in the middle of the night to break into a neighboring jewelry store and steal more than $2 million in cash and jewels. But that's what happened in a brazen heist to family-owned 5 Star Jewelry and Watch Repair in Simi Valley, California, according to ABC7 Eyewitness News. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) 'I feel bad because this was my life, my retirement … they got everything we had,' Jacob Youssef told KTLA5. At 71 years old, he was about to retire and had already left the business to his son Jonathan in 2015. 'I cannot rebuild what I did in my lifetime.' Since the store was priced out of insurance, they've now lost everything. A security camera shows one of the thieves crawling on his stomach through the neighboring store to avoid motion sensors and then spray-painting the camera lens. 'This wasn't random,' Ted Mackrel, owner of Dr. Conkey's Candy and Coffee told KABC. 'They sawed a hole in our roof Sunday evening of Memorial Day weekend and managed to dodge all security systems.' From there, the thieves dropped into the shop's bathroom, shimmied along the floor and spent at least three hours cutting through a concrete wall and then a heavy safe. Mackrel says the break-in was discovered on Monday morning when staff reported 'a big hole in the wall leading to the jewelry store.' According to Jacob and Jonathan, the thieves stole all of the gold and jewelry in the safe, as well as customers' heirloom pieces — including a Rolex watch — that they were repairing at the time of the break-in. But that wasn't all they lost. 'It's a hit,' Jonathan, who now runs the family business, told KTLA5. 'It's [my dad's] retirement, my future. I have a young family and three daughters. It's a lot to have to rebuild from, especially because my dad is 71. He can't work forever.' Since the incident, the local community has started a fundraiser to help the family get back on their feet. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it This event reveals a critical vulnerability that many small business owners face: relying entirely on their business as their retirement plan. Recent Gallup research found that most small business owners don't have a succession plan, yet 74% of employer-business owners have plans to sell or transfer the ownership of their business for retirement. An earlier 2025 survey by SCORE found that 34% of entrepreneurs have no retirement savings plan for themselves, with 18% planning to sell their business and use the money to fund their retirement. Another 21% have already used their retirement savings to invest in their business. But this strategy comes with risks, including a lack of diversification, liquidity challenges and even the myth of the eventual sale. 'Of the approximately 77 million baby boomers in the U.S., an estimated 12 million have ownership in privately held businesses,' according to a whitepaper by Butcher Joseph & Co. and ITR Economics. At the same time, about 10,000 baby boomers reach retirement age every day. But many are facing a similar problem, since 'their would-be heirs would rather have the proceeds of a sale than take over the family business.' Another problem, however, is that with an influx of baby boomers looking to sell, 'we're entering an environment where buyers have the upper hand,' according to Entrepreneur. That may be good news for young entrepreneurs looking to buy an established business, but perhaps less so for small business owners dependent on the sale for their retirement. If you're self-employed or run a business, you may want to avoid putting all your retirement eggs in one basket. If you're self-employed and don't have any employees, consider a solo 401(k) to beef up your own retirement savings. If you have employees, a Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) IRA can help both owners and their employees contribute toward their retirement. You may also want to consider contributing to personal investment accounts separate from the business. The more diversified you are, the better. And don't forget about liquidity. If you can't sell the business right away, what would that mean for your retirement goals? It's well worth consulting with a financial advisor as well as experts in succession planning to make sure you have an exit strategy that leaves you with options. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

What Happens if the Department of Education Goes Away?
What Happens if the Department of Education Goes Away?

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

What Happens if the Department of Education Goes Away?

In March, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to essentially abolish the department she runs. "Closing the Department of Education would provide children and their families the opportunity to escape a system that is failing them," reads Trump's order. "Ultimately, the Department of Education's main functions can, and should, be returned to the States." Actually killing the department requires congressional approval. McMahon has, though, moved to at least shrink it. Shortly before Trump signed the executive order, she cut its staff in half following almost 2,000 layoffs and buyouts. "This is a significant step toward restoring the greatness of the United States education system," McMahon said in a March press release. While McMahon can't erase the Education Department on her own, Congress could step in and administer a coup de grâce. What that would look like isn't exactly clear. The department directs a wide range of federal programs and commanded a budget of more than $200 billion last year. It administers the behemoth federal student loan program, enforces federal law in education, and gives grants to public K-12 schools and universities, not to mention running a battery of smaller programs. Abolishing the department, however, would not necessarily mean abolishing its functions. "Most of the discussion from the administration and in Congress is about moving Department of Education functions to other departments," says Neal McCluskey, director of the Cato Institute's Center for Educational Freedom. "If that is what is done, it will not change what the federal government does in education, only which agencies do those things." According to McCluskey, federal funding to K-12 schools and colleges would likely just move to another department, though he notes there are "proposals to consolidate, at least, programs and turn them into block grants to states, which would cut down on bureaucratic compliance costs." The federal student loan program "would likely go to the Treasury Department or possibly the Small Business Administration, both of which have experience with financial instruments, including loans," he adds. "Almost everything the Department of Education does is unconstitutional," McCluskey says. "The Constitution gives the federal government only specific, enumerated powers, and authority to govern in education is not among them. So almost all the spending and activities should go away." McCluskey does see a few exceptions. "First, under the 14th Amendment, the federal government has a responsibility to enforce civil rights, especially discrimination by government—states and school districts. This includes sex-based discrimination, which is addressed by Title IX. Washington has often taken this authority too far, with excessive investigations and peeling away rights for people accused of sexual assault at educational institutions, but the basic authority to act is there." He also points out the federal government has authority over the military, the District of Columbia, and Native American tribal lands, meaning that "the feds could supply funding for D.C., military, or Native American families to choose private schools and be within constitutional bounds." McCluskey also thinks that while the federal student loan program inflates college costs and should be eliminated, the program shouldn't be shuttered overnight. "The programs could be phased out over a few years," he says, "because people make long-term plans to pay for college based on these loans existing, and suddenly ending them would be very disruptive for students and schools alike." If Congress really did abolish the Education Department, most of what the department does would likely stick around, for better or for worse. But it would at least "end a cabinet-level education department, which is grossly unconstitutional and a direct conduit to the president for education special interests," according to McCluskey. "It would also be symbolically important, sending a message that education is not a federal responsibility." The post What Happens if the Department of Education Goes Away? appeared first on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store