&w=3840&q=100)
Will Japan see a new PM soon? Polls suggest Ishiba unlikely to pass this week's election test
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba attends a joint press conference with US President Donald Trump in the East Room at the White House in Washington, US, February 7, 2025. Reuters file
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is staring at widespread unpopularity as polls show he is less likely to pass the upcoming upper house elections, effectively ending his premiership after less than a year.
Ishiba, 68, has led the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which has dominated Japanese politics for decades, but saw its worst general election last year.
Since the October debacle, Ishiba called the early elections after winning LDP leadership in September, his coalition has been in a minority.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This has obliged the prime minister to rely on opposition parties to pass legislation, and losing the upper house majority would put him in a bind there, too.
What have polls shown?
The recent surveys indicate that the LDP and the smaller Komeito party's coalition could lose popular support and the upper house majority in the Sunday elections, where 125 out of 248 seats are up for grabs.
The poll, conducted by Kyodo News, says that Ishiba's ruling bloc is 'on course' to lose the majority, which would likely 'trigger calls for Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's resignation.'
Voters have expressed discontent over rising inflation, particularly the increase in rice prices. They have also not reacted favourably to LDP's internal scandals.
The influential Nikkei business daily also said the ruling bloc was projected to 'lose significantly' and its prospects to keep the majority were in doubt.
Small, opposition parties with anti-establishment messages are seen as peeling support away from the LDP.
Why don't people like the ruling bloc?
Last week, a poll by public broadcaster NHK showed Ishiba and his Cabinet's popularity dipping. Support for Ishiba's cabinet stood at 31 per cent, down from 34 per cent a week ago and 39 per cent in early June.
To help the public cope with rising prices, Ishiba is proposing one-off cash handouts, while most opposition parties have pledged in their campaign platforms to cut or abolish the sales tax.
The NHK survey showed 52 per cent of those polled prefer sales tax cuts or abolition of cash handouts, while 17 per cent said they prefer cash handouts.
With inputs from agencies
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
17 minutes ago
- India.com
India's friend has changed war strategy against China, the name is..., will include missile, advance fighter jets and...
Chinese President Xi Jinping Defence of Japan 2025 white paper update: In a significant development impacting the security situation in the Indian Ocean, Japan, known as the country of samurais has published its Defence of Japan 2025 white paper. Discussing about the details escalating threats from a more united bloc of authoritarian countries, specifically China, Russia, and North Korea, the white paper has been sanctioned by Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's cabinet. Here are all the details you need to know about Japan's recent step against China. What does Defence of Japan 2025 white paper say on China? Cautioning about a swiftly deteriorating security landscape in the region caused by increasing military collaboration among these nations, the Defence of Japan 2025 white paper delivers a straightforward evaluation of China, labelling it as the 'greatest strategic challenge' facing Japan. In addition to this, the official white paper of Japan emphasises that China's military aspirations present an 'unprecedented and greatest strategic challenge' to both Japan and the global community. As per a report by the Eurasian Times, the document warns that China's expanding military presence, assertive maritime actions, and strengthening connections with other authoritarian governments could 'seriously impact' Japan's national security. This white paper scrutinises CRINK, a loosely connected bloc that some observers refer to as the 'Axis of Upheaval.' Although not a formal alliance, the rising diplomatic, military, and economic collaboration among these four nations is perceived as a significant threat to the rules-based international order, according to the Eurasian Times. What has Japan's Defence Minister said on China? Japan's Defence Minister Gen Nakatani expressed strong concerns: 'The current international order is being profoundly challenged, and Japan is in the most challenging and intricate security situation of the post-war period.' Notably, Japan has delivered its most severe warning to date regarding China's growing military footprint, stating in the white paper that activities from Beijing now pose a 'serious impact' on national security. (With inputs from agencies)
The Wire
2 hours ago
- The Wire
The Inscrutability of Partition
Books Sam Dalrymple does an exemplary job at putting a human face to the dissolution of the British India empire. Unfortunately, he misunderstands the governance structure and history of imperial dissolution. Sam Dalrymple does a fine job telling a complex history of the unravelling of the British Empire from the 1920s to 1971 in . Using a plethora of anecdotes, Dalrymple fleshes out the lives of the many characters who shaped and lived through the collapse of the British Indian empire – one that stretched from present day Yemen to Burma/Myanmar. The book tries to do three things: to make explicable the decision-making that affected, and continues to affect, the billions that live in the region (at that time, only hundreds of millions); to put a human face to the hopes, tragedies, and heroics of the people involved; and to broaden an idea of an 'India' that was, and could be, much larger. It succeeds to some degree in the first ambition, very well at the second, and fails horribly at the last. 'Shattered Lands : Five Partitions and the Making of Modern Asia', Sam Dalrymple, Fourth Estate India, 2025. Dalrymple is at his best when it comes to empathy, of digging out a factoid or anecdote from history, and with scrupulous care showing the human angle to a particular situation. There is a visceral description of Indian refugees fleeing Burma/Myanmar in the wake of the Japanese invasion in World War II, and the thoughtful choice of the Gujrati businessman Dhirubhai Ambani choosing to leave Aden as nationalism and Nasserite appeal rose in Yemen. The book is studded with these stories, told in a fine style, interspersed with key quotes. Unfortunately, the same style does a disservice to major historical characters. Both Gandhi and Jinnah come across as caricatures. To be fair, Jinnah's romance and heartbreak over his wife, Ruttie, is well told, but Jinnah's engagement with the Congress and disillusionment over its tactics as Gandhi became the pre-eminent leader is a mess. Taking just one quote, that Jinnah vowed to 'show Nehru' as a stand-in for Jinnah's motives is facile at best. Gandhi is portrayed as erratic and eccentric from 1930 onward, a strange categorisation for a man who was the principal steering power of the Congress. The Khilafat Movement – Gandhi's first major agitation which disgusted and alienated Jinnah as well as undercut him as a 'Muslim' leader – is not even mentioned in passing. Instead, the idea of a Hindu imagining of Bharat is highlighted as part of Gandhi's reason for not opposing the separation of Burma/Myanmar from India. Putting it like this, though, does not do justice to the book. Dalrymple is a fine writer, and has done an excellent job at archival research. His writing and knowledge make you feel as if you are in the midst of the action. I felt this in particular as he wrote about the Burma front during World War II, where my grandfather served from 1940-45. The problem is that trying to capture major historical actors in a few broad brushes, based on anecdotes and personal histories, rarely does justice to the complex, conflicted human beings that they were. Much of the problem is also the argument that undergirds Dalrymple's book – which is that there was a distinct political reality of the areas administered as 'India' by the British in 1928. This notion is undercut by the book itself in one of the best written chapters of collapsing the princely states into India and Pakistan (the Fourth 'Partition' of the book) when V.P. Menon is quoted as noting, 'For the first time India has become an integrated whole in the real sense of the term.' The British Indian empire of which Dalrymple writes was anything but an integrated whole. Yes, it was part of a cosmopolitan whole governed by the British, but then so were parts of Africa and the Caribbean, where Indians worked for generations. Simply because the areas that Dalrymple writes about were under the oversight of the India Office does not mean that present day Gulf Arab states shared any deep sense of belonging to an 'India,' or that Burma did. Bhutan is referred to as part of this 'India' but Dalrymple ignores the fact that British India explicitly excluded Bhutan from its domain because it did not want to have a border with China and thus its only form of governance there was in the shape of Political Agent whose principal duties was overseeing Sikkim and not interfering in Bhutan's affairs. He also refers multiple times to the tomb of Bahadur Shah Zafar in Rangoon, but never asks the obvious question that if the idea of India coincided with British rule in South Asia, why Zafar was exiled to Burma, well within British control, or why Zafar would write, ' Kitna hai badnaseeb Zafar dafn ke liye do gaz zamin bhi na mili kuu-e-yaar mein /How unfortunate is Zafar that he could not receive even two metres to be buried in the land of the Beloved'. The blunt truth is that, as Manan Ahmed Asif illustrates in his The Loss of Hindustan, a political reality existed before the British, and six centuries of the creation of a Hindustan, from the 13th to 19th century, preceded the British in South Asia. This area, largely analogous to, but not constrained within, the borders of the Sultanate and Mughal Empire had some sense of shared laws, history, and political imagination. Compared to this, the British Indian empire that Dalrymple maps from 1928, and which had its first partition in 1937, is a mere blip in history. There are other empires that have dissolved, with far longer histories and deeper integration. The dissolution of the British India empire of 1928 led to only 12 successor states, and although the violence has been immense, it pales in comparison to the violence from the dissolution of Austro-Hungarian Monarchy after World War I, which saw far more partitions and led to World War II. Even the dissolution of the Soviet Union – which also existed far longer than the British India empire and was much more institutionally integrated – saw more partitions, creating some successor states that would be appalled at being reintegrated into an imagined post-Soviet space. One of them – Ukraine – is fighting a massive war not to be reintegrated. The romantic notion in much of South Asia that partitions are 'bad' is unsupported by evidence. Its force comes from the catastrophic mishandling of the partitions in the region, most notably between India and Pakistan, but as Dalrymple demonstrates, also India and Burma/Myanmar and others. Borders do not need to mean violence, as the European Union has demonstrated, but too frequently they do because nationalisms are enmeshed with the dehumanisation of 'others' based on race or creed. This, really, is the tragedy of our partitioned globe, and despite the problems of Dalrymple's book, it does a great job in showing how nasty and insane humans can be when they drink from that poison. Omair Ahmad is an author. His last novel, Jimmy the Terrorist, was shortlisted for the Man Asian Literary Prize, and won the Crossword Award. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Shipbuilding cluster at Dugarajapatnam to give fillip to A.P.'s maritime sector
Andhra Pradesh (A.P.) will have a shipbuilding cluster established at Dugarajapatnam in Tirupati district, adjacent to the upcoming seaport there in the near future. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is likely to make an announcement of the project in August and ground-breaking might happen a little later, if everything goes as per plan. It will be one of the three such clusters proposed to be developed in India, the other two being in Tamil Nadu and Gujarat. The proposal to have the cluster at Dugarajapatnam is set to be placed before the Union Cabinet for its approval, according to Secretary (Industries & Commerce) N. Yuvaraj, who told The Hindu that a 2,000-acre land parcel has already been identified at Dugarajapatnam, and the process of acquiring land and commissioning other civil works will begin after the Centre gives the green signal. Half the land will have the shipbuilding facility, and the remaining 1,000 acres will be allotted to the downstream industries. The Government of India (GoI), the A.P. government and private shipbuilders will sign a tripartite agreement and float a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for taking the project forward. The GoI's role will be to construct the seaport while the State government gives land to the ship builders, who will develop the cluster. The land lease rent will be the revenue for the SPV. Mr. Yuvaraj said most of the commercial shipbuilding and repairs in the world are being done by the Japanese and Koreans, with companies such as Imabari Shipbuilding Co. Ltd, Hyundai and Kawasaki Shipbuilding Corporation being the dominant players. As on date, commercial vessels exceeding 1.50 lakh deadweight tonnage (DWT) are not built in India. Larger ships are being constructed only in the defence sector. The A.P. government is batting for the development of the shipbuilding cluster at Dugarajapatnam due to the availability of the required 2,000 acres of land there. Machilipatnam and Bhavanapadu are also potential locations, but only 500 and 300 acres are available. Moreover, Dugarajapatnam has a higher draft of 14 meters compared to 10 meters each at the other two places. Given the fact that a seaport is to be built at Dugarajapatnam as per the A.P. Reorganization Act, 2014 and its advantages over the other two identified locations, the shipbuilding cluster will in all likelihood start taking a tangible shape there in the foreseeable future.
