Iran will never surrender to the US: Khamenei
Tehran
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has said Iran will 'never surrender' to the United States, striking a defiant tone in his first remarks since a ceasefire with Israel took hold.
Khamenei, 86, claimed victory after 12 days of war, culminating in an Iranian attack on the largest US military base in the Middle East, in Qatar, after the US joined the Israeli assault.
'The US President [Donald] Trump unveiled the truth and made it clear that Americans won't be satisfied with anything less than surrender of Iran … such an event will never happen,' Khamenei said.
Khamenei's remarks come two days after a ceasefire halted the war between Iran and Israel – the foes' deadliest and most destructive confrontation – and mark his first public appearance since June 19.
The speech also comes amid conflicting accounts in the US over the extent of the damage inflicted by US strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan during the conflict. US President Donald Trump said the strikes 'obliterated' the nuclear facilities.
But Khamenei said Trump had 'exaggerated' the impact of the attacks and said the US 'gained nothing from this war,' claiming the US strikes 'did nothing significant' to Iran's nuclear facilities.
'The Islamic republic won, and in retaliation dealt a severe slap to the face of America,' he said, a reference to Iran's missile attack targeting the US airbase in Qatar, which caused no casualties.
Al Jazeera's Resul Serdar, reporting from Tehran, said Khamenei also focused on the country's armed forces, to offer them congratulations and counter the claims around the world and in Iran that the army 'has received huge blows from the Israeli attacks'.
While Iranians who fled Tehran during the war have been gradually returning to the city, 'there is a common anxiety among the Iranian people here as well because they believe this was only the first wave of the war,' said Serdar.
'Many are questioning the efficiency of Iran's air defence systems' and feel that Iran could be more vulnerable to a potential future attack from the US and Israel, added Serdar.
Khamenei said that the Iranian army successfully targeted military and non-military positions, and caused extensive damage in Israel and added that 'if Israel attacks us again, they will see a further destruction', added Serdar.
Khamenei said that the country's nuclear programme remains largely in place – contrary to US statements, said Serdar.
'He said that most of the sites are still in place and that Iran is going to continue its nuclear programme.'
Both Iran and Israel have claimed victory in the 12-day war, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailing on Tuesday a 'historic victory' for Israel.
The Israeli strikes on Iran killed at least 627 civilians, Tehran's health ministry said, while official figures indicate Iran's attacks on Israel killed 28 people. A state funeral will be held on Saturday in Tehran for top commanders and nuclear scientists killed in the war.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
10 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
What is Israel's ‘most moral army in the world' doing in Gaza?
The Israeli military, which styles itself as the 'most moral army in the world', may be routinely committing war crimes, according to analysts in Israel and doctors who have worked in Gaza. While killings, beatings and the arbitrary arrest of Palestinians are not new to the Israeli army, a long process of dehumanisation, the infiltration of far-right ideologies in the army and a lack of accountability have led to a scenario where Israeli soldiers can do as they please without even needing an operational reason, analysts said. 'As far as I can see, this is a new phenomenon,' Erella Grassiani of the University of Amsterdam, who has written on what she referred to as the moral 'numbing' of Israeli soldiers during the second Intifada of 2000. 'It's not as if Israeli soldiers haven't beaten and arrested children for throwing stones before, but this is new,' she said. 'Previously, there were some kind of rules of engagement, even if they were loosely followed, but they were there. What we're seeing now is completely different,' she said. War as sport Accusations of casual brutality by Israeli soldiers in Gaza, and the occupied West Bank, are longstanding. Israeli soldiers have posted social media videos of themselves wearing the dresses of women whose homes they have raided, or playing with their underwear. And there are accounts of soldiers shooting civilians for 'target practice' or simply to stave off boredom. In early August, the BBC investigated the cases of Israeli soldiers killing children in Gaza. Of the 160 cases examined, 95 children had been shot in the head or the chest – shots that could not be claimed as 'intended to wound only'. In addition to killing children, there are accounts suggesting that Israeli soldiers have been using the civilians who gather around aid distribution sites run by the self-styled GHF for target practice. 'The GHF sites are set up as death traps,' British surgeon Nick Maynard, who returned in July from his third trip to Gaza since the war began, told Al Jazeera. 'They're compounds containing enough food for a family to eat for a few days, but not for all of the thousands of people they keep waiting outside. They then open the gates and let the chaos, fighting and even rioting happen, which they then use as a justification to fire into the crowd,' he said. The nature of the shooting became clear to the doctors and emergency room medics at nearby Nasser Hospital, where Maynard was working. 'I was operating on a 12-year-old boy, who later died,' Maynard said. 'He'd been shot at one of the GHF sites. I had a conversation about it with a colleague in the Emergency Room later, who told me that he and other medics had seen repeated and strong patterns of wound grouping,' he explained. Wound grouping refers to the phenomenon where several patients present with an injury to the same part of their body. The following day, many patients come in with a wound on a different part of the body, suggesting to Maynard that Israeli snipers were either playing or using civilians to improve their aim, as he told Sky News previously. An investigation by the Israeli magazine +972 in July 2024 painted a bleak picture of Israeli soldiers with no restrictions on their ability to shoot at civilians in Gaza. 'There was total freedom,' a soldier who served in Gaza for months told +972. 'If there is [even] a feeling of threat, there is no need to explain – you just shoot … it is permissible to shoot at their centre of mass [their body], not into the air', the anonymous soldier continued. 'It's permissible to shoot everyone, a young girl, an old woman.' Of the 52 probes that the Israeli army said it carried out into crimes it has been accused of committing in Gaza or the West Bank between October 2023 and June 2025, 88 percent were stalled or were closed with no action taken, according to a study by Action on Armed Violence (AOAV). Only one had resulted in a prison sentence against the accused. According to AOAV, the 52 cases they examined involved the killing of 1,303 people, the wounding of 1,880 people and the reported torture of two more. Even when there was footage of an incident, such as what appeared to be the gang rape of a Palestinian prisoner at the Sde Teiman Israeli prison facility, public pressure, including from members of the Israeli cabinet, led to the accused's eventual release. Accusations that the Israeli army routinely tortures Palestinians date back to at least 1967, when the Red Crescent documented the systematic torture of prisoners in Nablus Prison in the West Bank. There has also been an increase in the dehumanising language used to refer to Palestinians that researchers now say is commonplace within the army. As far back as 1967, Israeli figures such as David Hacohen, one-time Israeli ambassador to Burma, now Myanmar,, were recorded denying that Palestinians were even human. In 1985, a survey of 520 books in Hebrew children's literature found that 86 depicted Palestinians as 'inhuman, war lovers, devious monsters, bloodthirsty dogs, preying wolves, or vipers'. Twenty years later, when many of those now deployed to Gaza were likely at school, 10 percent of a sample batch of Israeli children who were asked to draw Palestinians depicted them as animals. 'The dehumanisation of Palestinians is a process that goes back decades,' Grassiani of the University of Amsterdam said. 'But I'd say it's now complete. 'We've seen incredibly cruel acts from the first day to now, with Israeli soldiers seeking revenge for [the Hamas-led attack of] October 7,' she said. 'It's like a snowball running down a hill to which there's no bottom,' Haim Bresheeth, author of An Army Like No Other, a book about the Israeli military. 'Every year, the violence is ratcheted up,' he said. 'The idea of using civilians as target practice is the logical outcome. 'It's a new sport, a blood sport, and these sports always develop from the bottom up,' he said of Israel's infantry. 'It's twisted, murderous, and it's sick.'
Qatar Tribune
20 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Resistance isn't a real strategy for the Democrats
Clive Crook Nearly nine months after Donald Trump's reelection, Democrats still can't make sense of it. Only the faintest glimmers of a reset are visible. The only thing that might pass for a strategy seems to be the hope that, given time, voters will finally come to their senses: It's the people who need to think again, not the politicians who are asking for their support. Given Trump's recklessness, this approach isn't in fact doomed to fail — yet his opponents need to do better. How, exactly? What should a Democratic reset look like? Let's move quickly past what's obvious, or ought to be. First, address the voters whose minds you want to change — people who voted for Trump — with respect. They don't like being called idiots and bigots. Acknowledge the elements of validity in Trump's account of what needs to change. Insist that support for Trump is a mistake, but neither groundless nor intelligible only as a consequence of racism or stupidity. Second, renounce — don't just decline to discuss — the provably unpopular woke nonsense that party extremists have set as an ideological litmus test. Sex is a social construct. Color-blindness is racist. Speech is violence. Equality is a fraud. Capitalism is evil. Immigrants can't be 'illegal.' The country's true founding was in 1619. And so forth. Democrats should stand for compassion and fairness, but not for an encompassing theory of systemic oppression that most Americans don't recognize and rightly view as unhinged. So much for the easy part. Equally important, though, is framing a popular and workable policy agenda — and this is less straightforward. Democrats stand for nothing if not redistribution, regulation of market excesses, equal opportunity and support for the less fortunate. But these noble and desirable purposes all involve trade-offs, which Democrats often prefer to ignore. That's a mistake. Voters need to be persuaded that such policies won't do more harm than good and that reformers understand the drawbacks. The party needs to line up with policies that express its values while reassuring voters it knows what it's doing. Woke is the opposite of reassuring, but anti-woke isn't enough to project competence. The themes I'd recommend are opportunity and security — as opposed to 'justice' or 'equity,' which imply (deliberately or otherwise) fundamental failures of market-based economies and a desire for root-and-branch transformation. Persuadable Trump voters, the target audience, don't despise the rich or long for a progressive utopia. They want pragmatic, intelligible interventions that engage with their economic goals and anxieties. The most promising ideas address both at once. Dislocation caused by trade and innovation is a main cause of economic insecurity. Historically, innovation has been by far the more disruptive of the two — and the advent of AI could be especially so. Trying to stop such disruptions would be folly, but when jobs are lost, the U.S. should do more to cushion the victims and help them find new, better ways to make a living. The US has only ever flicked at this, with half-hearted programs such as Trade Adjustment Assistance, too narrowly purposed and seriously underfunded. A bigger and more comprehensive program, delivering income support during the transition from job to job, help with moving costs and associated complications, and guidance on training and further education still won't make economic disruption win-win — but it would spread the costs more broadly and, through upskilling and better allocation of labor, raise productivity and add to the overall gains. Better schools are critical for advancing opportunity for children of the poor and low-paid. One of America's biggest public-policy anomalies is that government-run schools in prosperous areas are far better financed than schools in poor areas (where financially stressed parents can't make up the difference). Equality of opportunity means using federal money to redress this imbalance. Probably even more important is to raise the quality of teaching and management in schools that serve the less well-off. Some Democrats may balk, because it means recognizing (as parents did during the pandemic) that teachers' unions put their members' interests above those of the children they teach. The remedy is to empower parents with vouchers and force schools to compete. Ideally, the alliance between Democrats and public-sector unions — and with teachers above all — would be scrapped entirely. That's unimaginable, but the terms of this partnership need to be revised. Ensuring that work pays should be a central part of the Democrats' opportunity agenda. Make low-wage subsidies such as the earned-income tax credit more generous. Simplify taxes and benefits to reduce unintended disincentives (as when a small increase in wages triggers a big loss of income). Grasp the nettle of Social Security reform and redesign the payroll tax, which kicks in at the first dollar of earnings. In my dreams, the payroll tax is replaced with a value-added tax, which is less regressive, less anti-work and less anti-saving — but the Democrats have a long way to go before voters would trust them with such a radical change. Helping those on low incomes to save is about security as well as opportunity: Living paycheck to paycheck is stressful. Existing savings reliefs and incentives tilt heavily in favor of the better off, and are inordinately complicated to boot. Democrats should propose subsidized auto-enrollment plans for saving, to supplement Social Security in retirement and to meet unforeseen expenses; they should design them with those on low pay uppermost in mind. Health-care costs — Obamacare notwithstanding — are still a principal cause of financial insecurity. Democrats have proposed various kinds of 'public option' health insurance. They should dare to press this idea again. This, too, is treacherous terrain because Democrats would be taking their own reform, which many voters unfairly perceive as a failure, back to the drawing board. 'What if they come up with something even worse?' But it's necessary, because the existing system, even after Obamacare's improvements, is still a disgrace: expensive, complicated, anxiety-inducing because of the link to employer-provided coverage (lose your job, you're uninsured), yielding poor health outcomes (by international standards), and failing, above all, to shield people of limited means from the risk of financial catastrophe. Two last things — falling again under the heading of 'should be obvious.' First, fiscal discipline. The policies sketched above will cost money. (Remember trade-offs?) Democrats must explain how they'll fund their plans. 'Let the top 1% pay' won't cut it. Nor will 'public debt doesn't matter.' Much of the burden will fall on the middle class. The challenge will be to explain why, on balance, the middle class will be better off as a result. Second, Americans want the border secured and are entitled to choose who they welcome as immigrants. Merely turning up at the border isn't a qualification for eventual citizenship. Whatever else they do, Democrats must bring themselves as a party to care about the distinction between legal and illegal immigration. That's a lot to discuss. The party, still firmly in resistance mode, is barely even thinking about it. Democrats must understand that resistance isn't a programme for government — which is what beating the Republicans might well require. (Clive Crook is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and member of the editorial board covering economics.)
Qatar Tribune
20 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Israel attacks displacement shelters to force Palestinians to southern Gaza
Agencies Gaza Since announcing plans to invade northern Gaza and expel Palestinians again to the south, Israel has attacked displacement shelters in the Gaza City neighbourhood of Zeitoun, according to an investigation by Sanad, Al Jazeera's verification unit. Since August 13, Sanad has found that Israel stepped up the bombardment and shelling of Zeitoun, and often directly hit displacement shelters. The siege and ongoing violence have compelled thousands of Palestinians to close their tents in the camps and flee further south, according to satellite imagery obtained by Sanad. The indiscriminate bombardment of civilian homes and displacement shelters is part of a broad pattern of Israeli war tactics that make no distinction between civilians and fighters. Human rights groups, United Nations experts and numerous legal scholars believe Israel's nearly two-year war on Gaza amounts to genocide. Israel's Western allies – who have long defended it from criticism by claiming it has the 'right to defend itself' – are becoming increasingly alarmed at the humanitarian crisis unfolding in the enclave. Many are calling on Israel to end the war and warning that its plan to seize northern Gaza could further exacerbate the suffering of civilians. The mass displacement and bombardment of Zeitoun encapsulate the atrocities resulting from Israel's invasion. There are about 11 displacement shelters in Zeitoun, each sheltering 4,000 to 4,500 besieged and hungry Palestinians. Most live on just 3.2sq km (1.2sq miles), which makes up just 32 percent of the pre-war size of Zeitoun. At the start of the war, Israel dug trenches in and around the neighbourhood, claiming it was creating a 'buffer zone', and built the Netzarim Corridor, which has split Gaza into two zones. Israel's recent bombardment of the neighbourhood is terrifying civilians into fleeing south, leading to another cycle of forced displacement that may amount to ethnic cleansing due to Israel's attempt to destroy all livable facilities and structures. According to Sanad, there is clear evidence that Israel is pursuing that policy in and around Zeitoun. Between August 11 and 16, sources documented Israel's attack on al-Falah School in Zeitoun and a tent camp on al-Lababidi Street. Both the Majida al-Wasila school in the Nassr neighbourhood and tents in the Sheikh Ajilin neighbourhood were also hit. This pattern of direct attacks on tents and school shelters – the last refuge for hundreds of thousands of Palestinians – may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity, since these structures are protected under international humanitarian law.
