Our jawans will win the war against Naxalism, says Shah
'I have full faith that it is the bravery and tireless efforts of our security forces that make the battle against Naxalism a success….I know that what our jawans set out to achieve, they always accomplish,' he added. Mr. Shah asserted, 'It is the trust in our security forces inspired by which I keep reiterating that we will eradicate Naxalism before March 31, 2026,' he said.
Slavery for decades
He said Naxalism led to the death of nearly 40,000 people over the last 35 years, while many more had been left disabled. Naxal violence deprived the poor tribal population of basic necessities such as food, electricity, education, housing, toilets, and clean drinking water — let alone any possibility of industrial development. Entire regions were forced to live in conditions akin to slavery for decades, and the root cause of this suffering was Naxalism.
Mr. Shah expressed satisfaction that as Naxalism was being eliminated from various regions, the Chhattisgarh government was ensuring the delivery of food, healthcare, education, electricity, housing, sanitation, and clean drinking water — thereby connecting people with the mainstream of development.
'When a child picks up a pencil instead of a gun and begins writing 'Ka, Kha, Ga' [the Devnagri alphabets], it doesn't just change the future of that child, but of the entire nation,' he said. 'That moment is near.'
The Home Minister said that when the country would become free from Naxalism in March 2026 under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, it would be one of the most significant moments since Independence.
Mr. Shah released a book 'Leor Oyna' in Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The book is based on the lives of victims of Naxal violence. According to an official statement, the book would help in 'understanding the pain of those innocent and unarmed people who fell prey to the ruthless violence inflicted by Naxalites. It will also open the eyes of those who show sympathy towards Naxalites in the name of human rights and will be instrumental in exposing them'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Cong doing politics like urban Naxals, taking contracts to defame country: BJP
Bhopal: The ruling BJP on Wednesday reacted strongly to the Congress' allegations of vote theft during the elections. Minister for youth affairs Vishwas Sarang, while addressing a press conference at the state BJP office on Wednesday, said the Congress ruled the country for a long time and it was defaming the country's democracy and impartial constitutional institutions from the beginning. "By using words like vote theft, Rahul Gandhi is insulting the country's democracy, which is just an attempt to divert the attention of the public from his sure defeat in the Bihar elections," Sarang said. "I want to tell Rahul Gandhi that just using the Gandhi surname will not work; along with that, the intention should also be good. He should think that if there was some flaw in the election process in the states, how then were the Congress govts formed?" Sarang asked. He said the allegations made by Rahul Gandhi and Congress leaders were refuted by the cooperative minister of the Karnataka govt, Rajanna. "Minister Rajanna has accused his own govt of the vote theft. When the minister said that the Congress govt made a mistake in the voter list, he was dismissed. He was not even given a chance to explain. This shows how bad the internal democracy of Congress is," Sarang argued. Sarang further said, "I feel that Rahul Gandhi and Congress leaders are doing politics like urban Naxalites by taking contracts to defame the country. Rahul Gandhi's allegations are similar to the way Naxalites try to create discontent against the system without any information or facts. Rahul Gandhi's politics of lies and deceit is a part of these efforts. Congress has never lodged any objection before the Election Commission or the court; only allegations are made through the media. " Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Add a word to the preamble, don't subtract two
When India won freedom in 1947, some of the finest and most far-sighted ideas in the realm of anti-colonial thought lost out in the struggle for power at the helm of the post-colonial state. Foremost among these was the imperative of power-sharing arrangements between the federal centre and the constituent units. Partition, with its religious connotation, obfuscated the provincial political dynamics that had made imaginative ideas of a federation such an irresistible goal for a cross-section of anti-colonial nationalists. We need to engage in a creative process of historical retrieval of visions for substantive democracy and federal union during the struggle for freedom that remained unrealised during the post-colonial transition. On June 26, leaders of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh suggested considering removal of the terms 'secular' and 'socialist' from the preamble of the Indian Constitution. These two words had been inserted as part of the 42nd Amendment railroaded through parliament during the authoritarian interregnum of the Emergency. The erasure of 'secular' would be a symbolic victory for the proponents of a Hindu republic and consigning 'socialist' to the dustbin of history would be appropriate in an era that brazenly revels in increasing socio-economic inequality. Both secularism and socialism had been adduced by Indira Gandhi as ideological pillars of centralised state authority. As these columns have cracked and crumbled in formally democratic India, religious majoritarianism has been harnessed in the service of centralised authoritarianism. If symbolism in the preamble matters, it may be much wiser to add a word rather than subtracting two. On November 15, 1948, K T Shah had brought an amendment to Article 1 to proclaim: 'India shall be a secular, federal, socialist union of states.' The preamble was not up for debate at that stage of the proceedings, hence Shah wanted to bring clarity by amending the first article. 'Lest the term 'union' should lead anyone to imagine that it is a unitary government,' Shah stated, 'I should like to make it clear, in the very first article, the first clause of that article, that it is a 'federal union'.'
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Asim Munir, Yunus, Pannun...: How US is laying a trap to encircle India on all sides; experts say New Delhi paying the price for...
(File) India-US relations have hit their lowest point in the last two decades, especially since US President Donald Trump began his newfound tryst with Pakistan, spewed anti-India rhetoric, and ultimately imposed 50% tariffs on Indian goods. However, experts believe that the seemingly radical shift in US' stance against India is not sudden, but has been simmering for years since the previous Biden administration, as Washington is reportedly upset with New Delhi for not taking an aggressive stance against China, which is what the US wanted. What was US' plan for India? According to US strategic experts, Washington had plans to prop up India as a regional proxy against China, but New Delhi strategically avoided landing in such as situation in view of its geographical, economic and strategic constraints. New Delhi believes fighting a direct war would cause long-term economic loss, and avoided confrontation with Beijing, a policy which reportedly frustrated the Biden administration, who wanted the QUAD alliance of India, US, Japan, and Australia, to become a bulwark against China, says American geo-strategist Rust Kohle. However, India did not fall into the US trap and always refrained from positing the QUAD as a military alliance akin to the US-led NATO, he said. Kohle revealed that in 2024, the Biden administration decided that the US will not help India's development if New Delhi doesn't stand against China, and the Trump administration has taken that policy to a whole another level by essentially downgrading India-US relations. Why US wanted to pit India against China? Notably, all four QUAD members have their own issues with China. Japan has territorial disputes in the East China Sea and conflict with China over sea routes, while Australia's problems are related to trade, investment and political interference. The US wants to maintain its military dominance in the Indo-Pacific and freedom of navigation in the South China Sea and Taiwan, while India's issues with Beijing are multifaceted as the two countries share borders. However, none of the QUAD nations are ready to open a joint, aggressive front against China, with Australia, Japan, and US wanting to pit India against Beijing without openly siding with New Delhi. There is a broad consensus among Indian and American strategic experts that New Delhi is paying for not towing the US' line as Washington is now exacting 'vengeance' by surrounding India with hostile forces from all sides, including support for Khalistani Sikh separatists like Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, an anti-India regime led by Muhammad Yunus in Bangladesh, and building closer ties with Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir. How India can prepare for eventual face-off with US and China? Analysts believe that India needs to achieve self-reliance in defense manufacturing if it hopes to confront two superpowers like US and China in the near future. 'India's biggest challenge is to avoid confrontation with both US and China, but at the same time maintain its strategic autonomy. New Delhi needs a new, more careful method to implement its 'multi-alignment' policy,' says Dr. Manan Dwivedi, Professor, Indian Institute of Public Administration. Meanwhile, renowned Indian geo-strategist Dr. Brahma Chellaney has raised questions about the future of QUAD, saying that it seems highly unlikely that US President Donald Trump would visit India for the QUAD summit later this year. Experts believe that an open confrontation with China can take a toll on India's economy, border security and regional relations, while distancing itself from the US will have a profound impact on the country's technology, defense and investment. Thus, experts suggest that India needs to walk a fine line to maintain strategic yet cautious ties with both Beijing and Washington, while avoiding a complete alliance with either country.
