Heineken sells less beer after fraught pricing talks with retailers
The company, which also makes Birra Moretti and Amstel, reported a 1.2% slump in beer volumes in the first six months of 2025, driven by declines in Brazil, the US and parts of Europe.
It said European volumes dropped by 4.7% after a number of retailers, primarily in France, the Netherlands, Germany and Spain, pulled the brand due to planned price increases.
Heineken said the talks with retailer groups took longer than expected to be resolved.
Group revenues dropped by 5% to 16.9 billion euros (£14.6 billion) for the half-year.
The company said it also saw weaker sales in the US over the period, with beer volumes down by 'high' single digits due to weak consumer sentiment.
It comes as the company is set to be impacted by the proposed 15% tariff on all EU products imported into the US.
In the UK, net revenues, before exceptional items and amortisation, increased by 'low single digits' over the half.
Beers and cider volumes dropped, despite strong growth from its Cruzcampo lager brand.
Its Murphy's stout brand also saw further growth after being boosted by improved distribution and new draughts.
The brand benefited from supply issues from rival stout brand Guinness late last year following soaring demand.
Dolf van den Brink, chief executive and chairman, said: 'We continued to invest in future-proofing our business, strengthening our footprint and brand portfolios, funded by productivity savings.
'Our volume performance improved across all regions in the second quarter and continued to be of high quality.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
HAMISH MCRAE: New Trump tariffs spoil the party
Donald Trump has proved a bit of a party pooper. There we were last week, celebrating strong results from Microsoft and other members of the 'magnificent seven' clan, plus some decent figures here from several of our biggest enterprises, and pretty spectacular ones from Rolls-Royce. The S&P 500 and FTSE 100 indexes of leading shares touched all-time highs. Trade negotiations seemed to be plodding along, with a decent deal between the US and the EU, even if businesses on the Continent were upset that it wasn't as good as the agreement that we in the UK got. Then, bang, the full list of tariffs was announced, coming into effect on Thursday for any country that had not closed a trade deal with the US. It includes some beefy figures. Switzerland was stunned to discover that it would be hit by a 39 per cent levy. You may not feel sorry for what is one of the richest countries in the world but it's rough on others. For example, South Africa gets 30 per cent and India 25 per cent. These figures will almost certainly be negotiated down and there are all sorts of exceptions. But meanwhile there is huge disruption. Until the end of last week the view of the markets was that global business was nimble enough to cope. Now they are not so confident. And it isn't only the Swiss enterprises that are being hit; it is also American ones. You see that best in the impact on Amazon. It produced some stunning results on Thursday and the shares were trading around their all-time high, valuing the company at well over $2.5 trillion (£1.9 trillion). Then came the details of the tariffs. Its share price fell by more than 7 per cent. It's silly to read too much into one day's market movement, but it's a useful reminder that Americans are being hit by Trump's trade policy, not just foreigners. We don't know how the cost of the tariffs will be carried. Some may be absorbed by exporters. But they can only do that for a while as we have seen when there are sharp currency movements. If the dollar suddenly weakens and they therefore receive less money in their own currency, exporters to the US eventually will have to increase their prices. What we do have is a feel for the extra revenue the US expects to receive. Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, estimates it will be an extra $300 billion a year. That's equivalent to about 1 per cent of national output. If a third of that ends up being paid by importers squeezing their margins and two-thirds by consumers in higher prices, that's a noticeable dent on living standards. Some items will go up by a big amount, and while many won't, the headlines will shock. The tax revenue will be useful, of course, but as the US federal budget deficit is running at 6 per cent of national output, it doesn't go far towards closing the gap. What happens next? Disruption is never good and even if, as seems realistic, world trade does settle down, there will be lasting costs from the tariff war. What will matter even more is whether, irrespective of all this, the US economy continues to grow at a decent clip. It managed to do so in the second quarter, at an annual rate of 3 per cent. But there are worries. Every time there's a weak number, as there was on Friday with jobs growth, the markets wobble. The housing market has gone soft in many areas. Consumer sentiment is fragile, though up a little in recent months thanks to booming share prices. So markets need to stay strong to maintain consumer confidence – and vice versa. It's a virtuous circle, but as we all know, that could flip. You can see why Trump is so hostile to the Federal Reserve chairman, Jerome Powell. The one thing that might ensure the boom continues a while longer would be a cut in interest rates. The Fed didn't move last week, while here the Bank of England is widely expected to reduce rates on Thursday. It was a stunning July for British investors and shares here remain solid value compared with US markets. The UK will probably gain from US tariffs, given the favourable deal we negotiated. But August will, I am afraid, be a less comfortable month.
Daily Mirror
11 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Liverpool exit to take summer transfer sales to £146m to help fund signings
Liverpool could soon see a boost to their transfer funds for boss Arne Slot after they agreed to sell academy graduate midfielder Tyler Morton to Lyon this summer Liverpool are set to see their transfer pot replenished even further after agreeing a £15million deal to sell Tyler Morton to Lyon. The midfielder looks to be on the way to Lyon after a package including a 20 per cent sell-on clause was deemed worthy of the player's exit. Morton, 22, helped England win the European under-21 Championships this summer and had been linked to Ipswich Town but nobody has matched Lyon's offer. The academy graduate has been present in Arne Slot's pre-season plans but failed to make a Premier League appearance under the Dutchman last term. The departure will continue a summer that has seen a number of exits from Anfield as Liverpool haul in fees to supplment their significant spending. The Reds have already raked in £65m for Luis Diaz from Bayern Munich, £35m from Bayer Leverkusen for Jarell Quansah, £18m for Caoimhin Kelleher, £10m for Trent Alexander-Arnold and £3m for Nat Phillips. The sale of Morton will take Liverpool's earnings to £146m. A significant sum, albeit short of the £150m it has been touted Newcastle might require for star striker Alexander Isak. Nevertheless, after only seeing Federico Chiesa arrive last summer, Liverpool have splashed the cash this year and the departures will go some way to offsetting their spending — particularly in relation to the Premier League's profit and sustainability rules. The Reds have already made in the region of £330m worth of signings and more work is to be done. READ MORE: While Slot has indicated that Ryan Gravenberch and Wataru Endo could feature in the centre of defence, it would be no surprise if Liverpool moved for a new defender. With Joe Gomez out injury, the Dutch coach has only two senior centre halves in Virgil van Dijk and Ibrahima Konate at his disposal. The Merseyside club have indicated they will not return with another offer for Newcastle forward Isak, after having a £110m bid turned down. But any boost to their transfer coffers will help negotiators should they be encouraged to return for the Sweden international. Isak has trained alone in Sociedad as Newcastle's pre-season tour of Asia continues. The 25-year-old is expected to link back up with the squad next week. 'I know where he is, really, through the media," Magpies boss Eddie Howe said in a press conference in Seoul. 'From that perspective, it's difficult for me to go into any kind of detail. The situation is far from ideal and is quite complex." 'I was made aware of a bid yesterday (Friday) and that bid was turned down, all before I'd even heard about it," he added. 'People back in England are dealing with the situation. I don't know what happens next. From our perspective, we still support Alex in every way and my wish is that we see him in a Newcastle shirt again.'
The Guardian
13 hours ago
- The Guardian
Europe's trade deal with the US was dead on arrival – it needs to be buried. Here's how to do it
Ursula von der Leyen's Turnberry golf course deal has been rightly called a capitulation and a humiliation for Europe. Assuming such an accord would put an end to Donald Trump's coercion and bullying was either naive or the result of a miserable delusion. The EU should now steel itself and reject the terms imposed by Trump. Is this deal really as bad as it sounds? Unfortunately, it is, for at least three reasons. The blow to Europe's international credibility is incalculable in a world that expects the EU to stand up for reciprocity and rules-based trade, to resist Washington's coercion as Canada, China and Brazil have, rather than condoning it. Economically, it's a damaging one-way street: EU exporters lose market access in the US while the EU market is hit by more favoured US competition. Core European industrial sectors such as pharma and steel and aluminium are left by the wayside. The balance also tilts in the US's favour in important sectors such as consumer goods, food and drink, and agriculture. Tariffs tend to stick, so this is long-term damage. The EU even gives up its right to respond to future US pressures through duties on digital services or network fees. To top it off, von der Leyen's defence and investment pledges (for which she had no mandate) go against Europe's interest. The EU's competitiveness predicament is precisely one of net investment outflows. As international capital now reallocates under the pressures of Trumponomics and a weakening dollar, the case for Europe to become a strategic investment power was strengthening. Von der Leyen's promise of $600bn in EU investment in the US is therefore disastrous messaging. How could this happen? All EU member states wanted to avoid Trump's 30% tariff threat and a trade war, but none perhaps as much as Germany and Ireland, supported by German carmakers and US big tech firms. Yet Irish sweetheart digital tax deals, as well as BMW and Mercedes's plans to move production hubs to the US (also to serve the EU market), cannot be Europe's future. EU governments were distinctly unhelpful in building the EU's negotiating position. But in the end, it was von der Leyen who blinked and she has to take responsibility. Her close team took control in the closing weeks and went into the final meeting manifestly prepared only to say yes, which made Trump's steamrolling inevitable. Let's think of the counterfactual: if von der Leyen had stepped into the room and rejected these terms, Trump's wrath and some market turmoil may have ensued. But ultimately it would very likely have come to a postponement, a new negotiation and, at some point, a different deal that would not be so lopsided or unilaterally trade away deep and long-term European interests and principles. Instead, von der Leyen became a supplicant to a triumphant Trump. The situation is reminiscent of the final rounds of the Brexit negotiations five years ago when von der Leyen similarly was giving in to unacceptable demands from Boris Johnson, only to U-turn under pressure from a steelier EU chief negotiator and a quartet of member states. Today, von der Leyen runs Brussels with a strong presidential hand and has largely done away with internal checks and balances inside the commission. That is her prerogative and her style, but the upshot should not be weak, ineffective and unprincipled dealings on Europe's major geopolitical challenges, from Trump to Gaza. The 'deal' in Scotland is in reality an unstable interim accord. Nothing is yet inked or signed; Washington and Brussels are already locking horns on its interpretation and negotiations on the finer (and broader) points are ongoing. The 27 EU governments will inevitably get involved as the final deal needs to be translated into an international agreement and EU law. Some big powers – Germany and Italy seemingly – are on board, reluctant or not. However, internal political dynamics may change their calculations. Opposition parties and rightwing contenders who are a real political threat to leaders in Germany and France are already lambasting the deal. Unless von der Leyen strikes a dirty bargain with the member states, the European parliament will also have a say. The longtime chair of its trade committee, Bernd Lange, has set the tone for how the deal would be viewed there, calling it 'asymmetry set in stone' and even 'a misery'. As details seep out on what von der Leyen has really agreed to and what the US expects from the EU, and all the consequences become clear, an already unpalatable deal may become even more so. Weakening US economic data and returning stock market jitters show that Trump's negotiation footing is fragile. His new tariff threats come with new extensions, up to 90 days in the case of Mexico, as his position is overstretched. For Europe, the lesson from the Brexit negotiations – one that von der Leyen ought to have grasped before now – is that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. There is now an opportunity for EU governments and the European parliament to course correct and salvage something from this train wreck. Georg Riekeles is the associate director of the European Policy Centre, and Varg Folkman is policy analyst at the European Policy Centre
