"Thank You For The Ride": Denmark Company Returns Tesla Cars, Blames Elon Musk
The Danish company shared an update on LinkedIn with a post titled "Tscherning changes gears and drives in a new direction."
The company said it decided to stop using Tesla cars, and it's not because they are bad, but because of Musk's controversial politics.
"At Tscherning, we not only decide how we drive, but also who we drive with. That's why we've chosen to hand over the keys to our Tesla company cars - not because Tesla has become a bad car, but in light of Elon Musk's political commitment and the opinions he has publicly expressed, which are increasingly hard to overlook," the company wrote.
"We as a company have chosen to say, 'Thank you for the ride," it added.
The company highlighted that Musk's political views were becoming harder to ignore, adding it didn't want to be connected to the political values that aligned with the Tesla brand.
The post further read, "We do not want to be associated with the values and political direction that currently accompany the Tesla brand. Therefore, we have chosen to replace our Tesla cars with the European alternatives."
People on social media appreciated the company's decision. One commented, "Good initiative, but now Tesla is also just another shoddy American car."
Another wrote, "Strong signal to support European production."
"A brave and exciting decision. If nothing else- lots of signal value," commented another.
Musk this year spun off the famous slogan "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) used by Donald Trump and made it a new version for Europe called "Make Europe Great Again" (MEGA).
But there weren't many takers for it, with people expressing concerns that it promoted policies and ideas against immigration and minority rights and could bring political instability to the countries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
Rubio: Trump-Putin progress warrants Zelenskyy, European leaders' Washington meeting
Talks between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin have created enough momentum for a follow-up meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders in Washington. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed progress on key issues, including borders, security guarantees, and Ukraine's military alliances, though he warned significant compromises would be required from both Russia and Ukraine. Talks between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin sparked enough momentum to warrant a meeting with Ukrainian and European leaders, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told CBS on Sunday. Rubio also stated that both Russia and Ukraine would have to make compromises to stop the war, and that the US may be unable to create a situation that ensures peace. European leaders will accompany Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to Washington on Monday, hoping to buttress him as Trump urges Ukraine to accept a speedy peace accord following his meeting with Putin on Friday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I'm not saying we're on the verge of a peace deal, but I am saying that we saw movement, enough movement to justify a follow-up meeting with Zelenskyy and the Europeans,' Rubio told the 'Face the Nation' show. Rubio's comments were among the first by senior US officials present at the talks with Putin. In a social media post, Trump wrote, 'BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA. STAY TUNED!' he gave no details Speaking separately to Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' program, Rubio said the talks had narrowed down the key issues. These included drawing borders, long-term security guarantees for Kyiv, and which military alliances Ukraine could have, he said, adding 'there's a lot of work that remains.' Putin has ruled out Ukraine becoming a member of NATO. Article 5 of the alliance's charter is a mutual defence pact obliging allies to defend a member from attacks. Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy to Russia, told CNN that the US side had won 'the concession that the United States could offer Article Five-like protection.' Pressed for details, he said, 'the United States is potentially prepared to be able to give Article Five security guarantees, but not from NATO, directly from the United States, and other European countries.' This would be one of the topics for discussion on Monday, he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to sources, Trump and Putin discussed proposals for Russia to relinquish tiny pockets of occupied Ukraine in exchange for Ukraine ceding a swathe of fortified land in the east and freezing the front lines elsewhere. 'We may not like it, it may not be pleasant, it may be distasteful, but in order for there to be an end of the war, there are things Russia wants that it cannot get, and there are things Ukraine wants that it's not going to get,' said Rubio. In a separate interview with ABC, Rubio said if a deal could not be reached to end the war, existing US sanctions on Russia would continue, and more could be added. When Zelenskyy visited the White House in February, the meeting ended in a shouting match. Rubio, speaking to CBS, dismissed the idea that the European leaders were coming to Washington to protect Zelenskyy. 'They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskyy from being bullied. They're coming here tomorrow because we've been working with the Europeans,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We invited them to come.'
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Body language of beaten man': Martina Navratilova calls out Donald Trump following failed peace talks with Vladimir Putin
Martina Navratilova calls out Donald Trump following failed peace talks with Vladimir Putin (Image via Getty) Martina Navratilova, the tennis legend, spoke up on August 15, 2025, after the meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, came without a peace deal. The meeting, held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, ended in a standstill. Trump walked away from reporters with no answers, and Martina said his posture looked like someone who had lost. She called him 'the body language of a beaten man.' This comment caught attention around the world. Martina Navratilova calls Donald Trump 'a beaten man' after Alaska summit with Vladimir Putin Martina Navratilova used a short, simple phrase to show what she thought. She wrote on X that the way Donald Trump walked away and avoided questions looked like a 'beaten man.' She saw him leaving the reporters, not giving answers, and that made her say what she felt. This reaction came right after the failed meeting in Anchorage on August 15, where Trump and Vladimir Putin talked for about three hours but could not agree on stopping the war in Ukraine. Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin fail to reach a Ukraine peace deal in Anchorage meeting On the same day and place, August 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, Donald Trump met face to face with Vladimir Putin. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like India to host free stock market courses Mister Market Pro Undo They talked for hours but did not sign a deal to pause the war in Ukraine. Also Read: 'Trump Let This Convicted Killer Free': Martina Navratilova Criticizes Donald Trump After Venezuela Prisoner Swap Vladimir Putin said there was an 'understanding,' but Donald Trump said plainly , 'There's no deal until there's a deal.' After their talk, Donald Trump backed away from pushing for a cease-fire and seemed to support Russia's idea of a broader peace plan first. European leaders reacted fast. They welcomed Trump's attempt to talk, but said that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy must take part in any real talks. They stressed that Ukraine's land should not be decided without Ukraine being there. A Reuters source says Trump told Zelenskyy that Putin wants to freeze the current lines if Ukraine cedes Donetsk. Zelenskyy strongly said no. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
How saying yes to overwork can hinder success: 5 lessons professionals need to learn
Modern workplaces run on an unspoken currency: Employees' willingness to say 'yes.' Yes to staying late, yes to filling in for colleagues, yes to tasks far removed from one's actual role. For decades, this readiness has been celebrated as ambition, commitment, even loyalty. But a new report exposes the darker side of this culture: workers are paying a heavy price for carrying burdens that extend well beyond their job descriptions. LiveCareer's Hidden Costs and Rewards of Extra Work Report (December 2024), based on a survey of 1,160 US employees, lays bare a paradox that defines today's labour force. On the surface, saying 'yes' can open doors, sharpen skills, promotions beckon, and paychecks fatten. But beneath that thin layer of reward lies a corrosive truth: Overwork is pushing nearly all employees toward burnout, leaving them stretched, fatigued, and disillusioned. The findings challenge one of the most enduring myths of modern careers, that extra work is always the highway to success. Instead, the survey paints a portrait of a workforce trapped in a cycle of pressure, compliance, and exhaustion, where the costs often outweigh the gains. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo A culture of overextension The numbers from the report paint a sobering picture. 77% of employees take on responsibilities outside their role at least weekly, with more than a third facing such requests daily. Only 3% say they are never asked to do more. The concept of 'extra' work, once seen as occasional, has become structurally embedded in workplace operations. This isn't about 'going the extra mile,' it's about a workplace survival strategy that relies on stretching human capacity until boundaries blur. Burnout: The hidden epidemic The toll is undeniable. A staggering 93% of employees report burnout as a direct consequence of accepting extra work. Nearly 60% say they frequently feel drained because they cannot say no. Burnout has become less of a red flag and more of a badge employees are forced to wear, a silent marker of endurance in an unforgiving environment. The normalization of this fatigue raises a critical question: When exhaustion becomes the default, is the system itself broken? Why saying 'no' rarely happen Despite the consequences, most employees still comply. 56% admit they feel pressured into saying yes, while 27% cite direct managerial influence. Recognition (24%), the desire to be seen as a team player (23%), and career ambitions (18%) also drive compliance. Only 11% set boundaries and refuse additional work. This imbalance underscores a workplace psychology where declining requests is equated with jeopardizing one's future. In a precarious labour market, self-preservation often means self-sacrifice. Where the work comes from What makes this overextension even more insidious is its source. It isn't limited to one layer of authority: 23% of requests come from direct managers, 22% from senior leaders, 22% from coworkers, 21% from other team managers, and even 13% from HR. The expectation to do more is everywhere, woven into every layer of hierarchy. The tasks themselves are telling, administrative duties, event planning, overtime, mentoring, or covering for absent colleagues. These aren't career-advancing stretch projects; they're organizational gaps papered over by human labor. The rewards that keep people hooked Yet, the story isn't entirely bleak. One in three employees credits extra work with skill development, financial rewards, or closer colleague relationships. About 31% even report career advancement opportunities. In fact, 90% of respondents feel fairly compensated for their additional contributions, and more than half believe their efforts are critical to business survival. But the benefits are uneven. Older workers (41+) are far more likely to see fairness and advancement opportunities than their younger counterparts, who often perceive the trade-off as thankless. A question of sustainability The dual reality is stark: Extra work brings rewards, but also crippling burnout. When nearly every employee admits to being overburdened, the problem ceases to be individual; it is systemic. The culture of relentless 'yes' may keep businesses afloat in the short term, but it breeds long-term instability, eroding mental health, engagement, and retention. Redrawing the boundaries What LiveCareer's report uncovers is more than statistics; it is a mirror held up to modern workplaces. Saying 'yes' has become a default response, not out of enthusiasm, but compulsion. Companies may celebrate it as commitment, but in truth, it reflects a structure built on overreliance and exhaustion. The task ahead is twofold: Employees must find the courage to draw boundaries, and employers must confront their dependence on burnout economics. Until then, the corporate culture of 'yes' will remain less about opportunity and more about erosion of energy, balance, and dignity at work. Lessons professionals need to learn In today's hyper-competitive workplace, many professionals believe that saying yes to every task is the surest way to climb the ladder. Yet, the reality is often the opposite. Overcommitment drains energy, blurs focus, and creates a cycle where effort outweighs achievement. True success lies not in endless hustle, but in mastering balance and discernment. Boundaries safeguard growth Agreeing to every request leaves little room for strategic work. Setting boundaries allows professionals to channel time and energy into projects that drive meaningful results. Productivity isn't about hours logged Staying late may look impressive, but output matters more than optics. Professionals who focus on efficiency often deliver stronger results than those stuck in the cycle of overwork. Burnout destroys long-term potential Short-term wins earned through exhaustion come at the cost of health, creativity, and sustainability. Protecting well-being ensures careers last and flourish. Selective commitments build credibility Saying yes to everything dilutes quality. By prioritizing key responsibilities, professionals establish a reputation for reliability and excellence. Rest is a competitive advantage Recovery sharpens judgment, strengthens resilience, and boosts leadership potential. In a world that glorifies busyness, choosing rest can set professionals apart. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
