Why aren't pro-Palestine protesters allowed to march across Brisbane's Story Bridge?
The two parties entered mediation on Tuesday ahead of a planned 24 August rally at the bridge as part of nationwide protests to demand an end to what they, alongside UN experts and special rapporteurs, Israeli and international human rights groups and scholars of genocide, describe as the starvation and genocide of the people of Gaza.
Organiser Remah Naji says she hopes that a third-party mediator will resolve police concerns about the Story Bridge march, but that protesters were 'willing to go ahead with a court case' should talks break down.
Justice for Palestine Magan-djin (Brisbane) has been holding regular protests in the city for the last 22 months since the escalation of the conflict in Gaza after Israel responded to Hamas' attack on 7 October 2023 with a full-scale invasion, bombardment and blockade of aid in the Gaza Strip.
Police and protesters have worked together to ensure the demonstrations have been lawful and peaceful, with organisers promoting a family friendly atmosphere.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
But with Israel poised to launch a major operation to seize Gaza City, an ever mounting death toll of Palestinian civilians and international aid workers and reporters – including the killing of prominent Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif and four of his colleagues on Sunday – and continued widespread malnourishment of children, Naji says it is time for the Justice for Palestine movement to 'step up'.
'It is not enough for us to just take our protest to the city and do a loop and come back,' Naji says.
'No, we need to reflect the urgency of the situation. We need the whole city to understand that we are standing against this genocide and that we demand more from our government, that it uphold our obligation under international law as signatory to the Genocide Convention.
'What we're hoping to do is to make sure that this protest is visible and it is powerful and communicates the urgency of the situation in Gaza.'
Police say they would not authorise the Story Bridge march 'due to public safety concerns and significant disruption to the rights and freedoms of other members of the community'.
But, the QPS says it is 'committed to working with organisers to identify an alternate route' and to 'engaging with people from across our culturally diverse society'.
'The QPS respects the right to peacefully assemble; however, this must be balanced with the need to ensure public safety and minimise disruption to the broader community,' the QPS said in a statement.
Police in New South Wales sought to deny legal protection to a planned protest over the Sydney Harbour Bridge earlier this month – but that bid was overturned by the NSW supreme court at the 11th hour.
Police say 90,000 people marched across that iconic structure, organisers put the figure at closer to 300,000 – regardless, the scale of the turnout ranks the protest as historic and the day went ahead without major incidents.
In Melbourne on the same day, in contrast, pro-Palestine protesters were met by a wall of police in riot gear behind barricades and backed by a row of mounted officers and riot squad vans when they sought to cross the King Street Bridge.
Should mediation between QPS and protest organisers fail, the matter will be escalated to the Brisbane magistrates court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Feds say migrants at ICE facility in Manhattan can't have toothbrushes because they can be ‘improvised as weapons'
After a federal judge commanded Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials to improve conditions inside a crowded detention space in New York City, government lawyers pushed back on orders to make sure immigrants detained there have access to toothbrushes. Giving detainees a toothbrush could be a 'potential safety concern,' officials told a judge Thursday. In court filings attached to a lawsuit against the facility, detainees reported spending as much as three weeks inside without a chance to bathe or brush their teeth. But 'providing toothbrushes, rather than teeth-cleaning wipes, presents a potential safety concern for other aliens in custody as well as ICE personnel because toothbrushes can be readily improvised as weapons,' according to a letter to the judge from Manhattan U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton. District Judge Lewis Kaplan said Thursday he will continue to allow ICE to ban toothbrushes from the facility, for now, while a legal challenge continues. While jails are notorious for hand-made knives carved from toothbrush handles, it's unclear how serious a threat they actually pose inside the facility at 26 Federal Plaza. They're easily available at many jails across the country — people jailed inside Metropolitan Detention Center in nearby Brooklyn can buy them for less than a dollar. Immigrants in detention centers across the country are also 'routinely' provided with toothbrushes, and 'ICE's own policies provide for them,' according to attorneys for detainees in the Manhattan facility. The agency's national detention standards state that 'each detainee shall receive, at a minimum … one tube of toothpaste' and 'one toothbrush.' 'There is no basis to deny individuals detained at 26 Federal Plaza basic hygiene products that are customarily made available at other immigration detention facilities across the country,' attorneys wrote. Immigrants' rights groups, lawyers and lawmakers have warned for weeks about deteriorating conditions inside the building, which also houses immigration courts. The 'hold room' is not intended to hold people for longer than 12 hours, according to ICE's internal guidance. In May and June, when arrests at courthouses began to skyrocket, immigrants were being held inside the room for 29 hours on average, according to a review from New York City news outlet The City. Within those two months, 81 people were detained there for four days or more at a time. Detentions peaked on June 5, when 186 people were held there overnight, The City found. Detainees are fed inedible 'slop' and were forced to sleep in cells surrounded by the 'horrific stench' of sweat, urine and feces in rooms with open toilets, according to the lawsuit. Thousands of people across the country have faced arrest after showing up for court-ordered ICE check-ins and immigration court hearings as part of Donald Trump administration's mass deportation agenda. Unlike federal district court judges, immigration court judges operate under the direction of the attorney general's office. The Department of Justice's Executive Office for Immigration Review has issued guidance to judges to grant motions from government lawyers to immediately dismiss immigrants' cases, making them easy targets for arrest and removal. Half of all immigration court arrests nationwide were in New York City between May and June, The City found. On Thursday, New York District Judge Dale Ho ripped into the Trump administration's 'arbitrary' practice of arresting immigrants as they leave their immigration court hearings, creating what he calls a 'game of detention roulette' that violates due process. Hazmat teams were deployed to the building Thursday evening after envelopes containing a mysterious white powder were allegedly discovered, according to city officials and federal law enforcement agencies. ICE personnel reportedly found envelopes containing 'an unknown white powder' on the 9th floor, according to the FBI. Five envelopes were allegedly found in the mail room of ICE's Enforcement and Removal Operations headquarters.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Stop heavy-handed treatment of Palestine protesters, equality watchdog warns
Britain's human rights watchdog has warned police against using 'heavy-handed' tactics on pro-Palestine protesters. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has written to Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, and Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, about 'blanket policing approaches' that risk having a 'chilling effect' on protest rights. The EHRC's warning comes as protesters continue to take to the streets across the UK in almost weekly demonstrations against the war in Gaza. The letter, from Baroness Kishwer Falkner, the commission's chairman, raised concerns about 'reports of police engagement with individuals participating in forms of protest that are not linked to any proscribed organisation'. The commission referenced reports about a woman said to have been threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act in July for holding a Palestinian flag and signs saying 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide'. The woman was reportedly told by police that her demonstration in Canterbury, Kent, expressed views supportive of Palestine Action, an organisation which has been banned by the Government. She said neither of her signs mentioned Palestine Action and that she had told police she did not support any proscribed organisations. Kent Police confirmed it had 'received correspondence from a legal firm representing a person spoken to by officers in Canterbury on July 14 2025' after the Guardian reported the woman is taking legal action against the force. Baroness Falkner said any interference with protest rights 'must be lawful and assessed case-by-case'. She said: 'Heavy-handed policing or blanket approaches risk creating a chilling effect, deterring citizens from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of expression and assembly through fear of possible consequences. 'This concern extends beyond those directly affected by police engagement to the broader health of our democracy, because the perception that peaceful protest may attract disproportionate police attention undermines confidence in our human rights protections.' The EHRC said Government and police authorities must 'ensure that all officers receive clear and consistent guidance on their human rights obligations' when it comes to protests. 'This guidance should ensure that the appropriate balance is maintained between public safety and the protection of essential human rights,' Baroness Falkner added.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
The ultra-wealthy have exploited Australia's tax system for too long. It's time to ensure everyone pays their fair share
Unions want to tackle intergenerational inequality by reforming Australia's tax system. For the first time in living memory, younger Australians risk facing lower living standards than those before them. This is not acceptable to the union movement, so our one big idea is to rebalance the tax system so that productivity gains are fairly shared, housing becomes more affordable, and essential services are properly funded. Australia's current tax system is exploited by big business and the ultra-wealthy, entrenching intergenerational inequality and placing affordable housing out of young workers' reach, which threatens the services and infrastructure we all rely on. We need a minimum 25% tax on gas export revenues, a minimum 25% tax for trust funds and individuals earning more than $1m, and a one investment property limit for negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount benefits, with the grandfathering of current arrangements for five years. These changes have a simple intention: to make sure everyone pays their fair share, so productivity gains flow across society fairly. These proposed reforms would help restore fairness and opportunity for young Australians to get ahead in their lives. For the past 25 years, productivity increases have gone back into company profits, shareholder dividends, share buybacks and executive bonuses. Working people know that every time they check their bank accounts, there is no 'direct debit system' where the extra profits generated by increased productivity are automatically shared with them. Australia is a rich country but, for decades, as the 'economic pie' has got bigger, corporations have not just taken their own bigger slice, they have been eating into ours. The way to stop this is to make sure workers have strong rights at work to get the pay rises they deserve and to make sure our tax system ensures everyone – not just the ordinary worker – pays their fair share of taxes. There are flaws in our tax system that disadvantage younger Australians and reinforce inter-generational inequity. Just 1% of taxpayers own 25% of investment properties, fuelling house prices, skyrocketing rents and putting home ownership out of reach. House prices have gone up at twice the rate of wages in the last 25 years. The result? Workers can no longer afford to live near their jobs, while young people face high rents and are priced out of buying homes. It is true that housing supply needs to increase, but the tax system is adding to the affordability problem and that needs to change. The loudest complaints will come from those who have gamed the system to accumulate enormous economic and political power. Australia's economy is dominated by an artificially inflated property market, in addition a small number of large companies in a small number of industries. Claims that working people will automatically be better off if productivity increases are wrong. Dr Jim Stanford's recent paper on productivity shows that if real wages had grown at the same rate of productivity since 2000, average wages would be 18% – or $350 per week – higher than they are now. What you won't hear from big business is the real reason productivity growth in Australia has been slow: they have prioritised distributing profits rather than investing in capital, research and people. Workers' rights are not 'red tape', they are the way we get pay rises and limits on working hours. They are essential to workers benefiting from the productivity gains our hard work creates. If we take them away, workers will get even less. Our proposed reforms are targeted and achievable. These are simple changes that close loopholes and restore balance, because we recognise that the problem isn't everyday investors who are looking to build a nest egg with a housing investment, the problem is that the current tax system rewards investing in housing as an asset class so the richest mega-investors are accumulating a large number of properties, tying up capital that could be invested in things that contribute to productivity growth and forcing property prices up beyond what any ordinary working person can afford. Working people pay their fair share of tax, we just want everyone else to as well. Ninety-one people with an income over $1m paid no income tax in 2022-23. Not one cent! When the very wealthy pay less tax than a bus driver or an aged care worker, something is very wrong. Trust funds have also become tax minimisation schemes for rich people, and mega-profitable resource companies are also getting away with paying little or no corporate tax. Our proposals are about ensuring the economy works for those who actually keep it running: working people. Sally McManus is a trade unionist and political activist who has served as the secretary of the Australia Council of Trade Unions since 2017
