
Women face medical gaslighting for chronic pain, experts say
Women's health
Chronic diseasesFacebookTweetLink
Follow
EDITOR'S NOTE: The views expressed in this commentary are solely those of the writers. CNN is showcasing the work of The Conversation, a collaboration between journalists and academics to provide news analysis and commentary. The content is produced solely by The Conversation.
For people with chronic gynecological pain conditions, pain can be constant, making everyday activities like sitting, riding a bicycle and even wearing underwear extremely uncomfortable. For many of these people — most of whom identify as women — sexual intercourse and routine pelvic exams are unbearable.
Endometriosis and vulvodynia, or chronic genital pain, are common gynecological conditions that can cause severe pain. They each affect about 1 in 10 American women.
Yet many women face skepticism and gaslighting in health care settings when they seek care for this type of pain.
READ MORE: Ovarian cysts can be painful when they burst. When do you need to see a doctor?
We know this well through our research on social cognition and on how people with misunderstood health conditions manage difficult conversations with their doctors and family, as well as through volunteer work alongside people living with these conditions.
We've consistently found that medical gaslighting around chronic gynecological pain is a complex societal problem, fueled by holes in medical research and training.
A 2024 study of patients who went to a clinic for vulvovaginal pain — pain experienced in the external female genitals and vagina –- found that 45% of these patients had been told that they 'just needed to relax more' and 39% were made to feel that they were 'crazy.' A staggering 55% had considered giving up on seeking care.
These results echo what one of us — Elizabeth Hintz — found in her 2023 meta-synthesis: Female patients with chronic pain conditions frequently hear this 'it's all in your head' response from doctors.
Another study followed patients in two different major US cities who were seeking care for vulvovaginal pain. The researchers found that most patients saw multiple clinicians but never received a diagnosis. Given the challenges of seeking medical care, many patients turn to social media sources like Reddit for support and information.
These studies, among others, illustrate how people with these conditions often spend years going to clinician after clinician seeking care and being told their pain is psychological or perhaps not even real. Given these experiences, why do patients keep seeking care?
'Let me describe the pain that would drive me to try so many different doctors, tests and treatments,' a patient with vulvovaginal pain said to her doctor. For her, sex 'is like taking your most sensitive area and trying to rip it apart.'
'I can now wear any pants or underwear that I want with no pain,' said another patient after successful treatment. 'I never realized how much of a toll the pain took on my body every day until it was gone.'
Many patients worldwide experience medical gaslighting — a social phenomenon where a patient's health concerns are not given appropriate medical evaluation and are instead downplayed, misattributed or dismissed outright.
Medical gaslighting is rooted in centuries of gender bias in medicine.
Women's reproductive health issues have long been dismissed as psychological or 'hysterical.' Genital and pelvic pain especially has been misattributed to psychological rather than biological causes: A century ago, Freudian psychoanalysts incorrectly believed that female sexual pain came from psychological complexes like penis envy.
These historical views help shed light on why these symptoms are still not taken seriously today.
In addition to the physical toll of untreated pain, medical gaslighting can take a psychological toll. Women may become isolated when other people do not believe their pain. Some internalize this disbelief and can begin to doubt their own perceptions of pain and even their sanity.
This cycle of gaslighting compounds the burden of the pain and might lead to long-term psychological effects like anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress symptoms. For some, the repeated experience of being dismissed by clinicians erodes their sense of trust in the health care system. They might hesitate to seek medical attention in the future, fearing they will once again be dismissed.
Although some chronic gynecological pain conditions like endometriosis are gaining public attention and becoming better understood, these dynamics persist.
Part of the reason for the misunderstanding surrounding chronic gynecological pain conditions is the lack of research on them. A January report from the National Academies found that research on diseases disproportionately affecting women were underfunded compared with diseases disproportionately affecting men.
This problem has gotten worse over time. The proportion of funding from the National Institutes of Health spent on women's health has actually declined over the past decade. Despite these known disparities, in April the Trump administration threatened to end funding for the Women's Health Initiative, a long-running women's health research program, further worsening the problem.
READ MORE: The Women's Health Initiative has shaped women's health for over 30 years, but its future is uncertain
Without sustained federal funding for women's health research, conditions like endometriosis and vulvodynia will remain poorly understood, leaving clinicians in the dark and patients stranded.
As hard as it is for any female patient to have their pain believed and treated, gaining recognition for chronic pain is even harder for those who face discrimination based on class or race.
One 2016 study found that half of the white medical students surveyed endorsed at least one false belief about biological differences between Black and white patients, such as that Black people have physically thicker skin or less sensitive nerve endings than white people. The medical students and residents who endorsed these false beliefs also underestimated Black patients' pain and offered them less accurate treatment recommendations.
Studies show that women are more likely to develop chronic pain conditions and report more frequent and severe pain than men. But women are perceived as more emotional and thus less reliable in describing their pain than men. Consequently, female patients who describe the same symptoms as male patients are judged to be in less pain and are less likely to be offered pain relief, even in emergency settings and with female clinicians. Compared to male patients, female patients are more likely to be prescribed psychological care instead of pain medicine.
These lingering erroneous beliefs about gender and race are key reasons patients' pain is dismissed, misunderstood and ignored. The very real-life consequences for patients include delayed diagnosis, treatment and even death.
Correcting these problems will require a shift in clinical training, so as to challenge biased views about pain in women and racial minorities and to educate clinicians about common pain conditions like vulvodynia. Research suggests that medical training needs to teach students to better listen to patients' lived experiences and admit when an answer isn't known.
In the meantime, people navigating the health care system can take practical steps when encountering dismissive care.
They can educate themselves about chronic gynecological pain conditions by reading books like 'When Sex Hurts: Understanding and Healing Pelvic Pain' or educational information from trusted sources like the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health, the International Pelvic Pain Society and the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease.
Although these steps do not address the roots of medical gaslighting, they can empower patients to better understand the medical conditions that could cause their symptoms, helping to counteract the effects of gaslighting.
READ MORE: Endometriosis pain leads to missed school and work in two-thirds of women with the condition, new study finds
If someone you know has experienced medical gaslighting and would like support, there are resources available.
Organizations like The Endometriosis Association and the National Vulvodynia Association offer support networks and information — like how to find knowledgeable providers. Additionally, connecting with patient advocacy groups like Tight Lipped can provide opportunities for patients to engage in changing the health care system.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SelectQuote to Release Fiscal Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings on August 21
OVERLAND PARK, Kan., August 07, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--SelectQuote, Inc. (NYSE: SLQT), a leading distributor of Medicare insurance policies and owner of a rapidly growing Healthcare Services platform, today announced it will release its fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results before market open on Thursday, August 21, 2025. Chief Executive Officer, Tim Danker, and Chief Financial Officer, Ryan Clement, will host a conference call on the day of the release (August 21, 2025) at 8:30 am ET to discuss the results. To register for this conference call, please use this link: After registering, a confirmation will be sent via email, including dial in details and unique conference call codes for entry. Registration is open through the live call, but to ensure you are connected for the full call, we suggest registering a day in advance or at minimum 10 minutes before the start of the call. The event will also be webcasted live via our investor relations website or via this link. About SelectQuote: Founded in 1985, SelectQuote (NYSE: SLQT) pioneered the model of providing unbiased comparisons from multiple, highly-rated insurance companies, allowing consumers to choose the policy and terms that best meet their unique needs. Two foundational pillars underpin SelectQuote's success: a strong force of highly-trained and skilled agents who provide a consultative needs analysis for every consumer, and proprietary technology that sources and routes high-quality leads. Today, the Company operates an ecosystem offering high touchpoints for consumers across insurance, pharmacy, and virtual care. With an ecosystem offering engagement points for consumers across insurance, Medicare, pharmacy, and value-based care, the company now has three core business lines: SelectQuote Senior, SelectQuote Healthcare Services, and SelectQuote Life. SelectQuote Senior serves the needs of a demographic that sees around 10,000 people turn 65 each day with a range of Medicare Advantage and Medicare Supplement plans. SelectQuote Healthcare Services is comprised of the SelectRx Pharmacy, a Patient-Centered Pharmacy Home™ (PCPH) accredited pharmacy, SelectPatient Management, a provider of chronic care management services, and Healthcare Select, which proactively connects consumers with a wide breadth of healthcare services supporting their needs. View source version on Contacts Investor Relations: Sloan Bohlen877-678-4083investorrelations@ Media: Matt Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Medscape
6 minutes ago
- Medscape
Four Ways Doctors Do Retirement Wrong
The average middle-class American retires at age 62. Physicians, apparently, aren't average. Twenty percent of practicing clinical physicians in America are older than 65 years — and another 22% are between 55 years and 64 years. More than half the survey respondents in Medscape's 2025 Retirement Report said they don't expect to retire until their mid-60s or later. One reason: For many physicians, practicing medicine isn't just a job. 'No group is perfect, but as a group we tend to be kind, caring, compassionate helpers,' said Debra Atkisson, MD, a psychiatrist who's also certified as an executive coach. 'We embrace that identity as a calling and work very, very hard. We get on that treadmill, and before you know it, 25 years goes by.' That's why you should prepare for retirement, which you know — but you're busy. Listen to these doctors and other experts to help you avoid common missteps and make the most of your post-practice years. Misstep #1: You think retirement means just not working. After more than 20 years as a doctor in eastern Kentucky, Jack Piercy, MD, retired this past June at the age of 49 years. 'The way I think of it is, I'm looking for Act Two. I've always respected people who do one thing and then do something else,' he said. 'I'm not retiring to do nothing.' Piercy embraced a concept known as protirement: retiring so you can move on to something else you find fulfilling. Even if you wait until a more traditional retirement age, that may mean work of some kind. In medicine, that could mean teaching or locum tenens, (filling in for others) or working in another field. Or you might plan to devote time to volunteering, expanding friendships you didn't have time for while in practice, seeing the world, or embracing a new challenge. Piercy, for instance, is writing a novel. 'Physicians' identity is so tightly attached to what they do, they have a hard time conceiving of doing anything else,' said Peter S. Moskowitz, MD. He's well into his own protirement, as a career transition coach for physicians in Palo Alto, California. 'Open your mind and heart to the possibilities. You want to continue to grow and develop in the time you have after stepping away.' Misstep #2: You're blasé about your finances. The physicians in Medscape's Retirement Report estimated they'd need around $4 million for retirement, double what most Americans aim for. The vast majority expressed confidence they'd have enough money when the time came, but the average respondent older than 40 years had amassed less than half that. 'Certified financial planners used to say your plan should generate 80 to 100 percent of your current annual income,' Moskowitz said. He thinks 90%-100% is a smarter goal, given the rising cost of homes, travel, and other expenses. To reach a goal that large, it makes sense to start early — even from day one — and work with a certified financial planner. Piercy opted not to. 'That might be my only regret, wishing I'd sat down with somebody,' he said. 'I probably could've had more peace of mind, set things up a little better.' And look beyond your own financial needs, Atkisson suggested. 'Physicians tend to be caretakers in general, and that's not just our patients. It includes our families. There can be a lot of financial dependency needs. You have to think about who depends on you.' Misstep #3: You don't honor your emotional connection to your patients. If you've been treating a patient for years, even decades, it makes sense that you'd feel something for them. 'For the patient it can be devastating to lose their physician, but we don't often think about what it feels like for the physician to let go,' said Michelle Pannor Silver, PhD, chair of the Department of Health and Society at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. She's published several papers related to physician retirement. 'You've given so much over the years, maintained boundaries of course, but there's a human aspect. You derive a sense of self-worth from taking care of those patients, and relationships form. It leaves you with a gap when they're not in your life.' Advance planning as you approach retirement can help you andyour patients. It gives you time to discuss their charts with the practitioner taking over your cases, so you can be confident they'll receive the same level of care. And you'll be able to talk through the transition with the people you treat. After your role changes, you may want to form a new kind of relationship, meeting for coffee or a shared interest. Misstep #4: You don't prepare for your new identity. Younger generations may not feel so strongly, but if you're Gen X or a baby boomer, odds are your professional and work identities are thoroughly intertwined. Retirement calls for leaving a significant sense of yourself behind. That will take some getting used to. 'When you put that white coat on, it's a familiar feeling,' Atkisson said. 'I'm a Texan, so the metaphor I like to use is, if you've got a pair of 15-year-old cowboy boots, they fit like a glove. When you get a brand-new pair, you've got to break those suckers in — they're not comfortable.' The lack of structure also figures in. Odds are, your current schedule is jam-packed, planned out to the quarter-hour. In retirement, your time is your own, without the intense highs that come from, say, a successful surgery. That can feel bewildering at first. 'I suggest people practice before they do it,' Silver said. She recommends taking a month off to see what it feels like, a mini-sabbatical. 'Physicians are really good at practicing. Think about what your day or week is going to look like. There are tons of ways to retire. Let yourself feel what it's like.' Moskowitz pointed out that your significant other probably sees your identity much the way you do, which can cause trouble if it changes abruptly. 'It doesn't work when a doctor walks in one morning and says to their spouse, 'Gee honey, I think I'm going to quit,'' he said. 'It's like hitting your partner with a sledgehammer.' If you have at least a decade until retirement, start imagining what retirement might be. Are you dreading it, or looking forward to it? Ask again at the 5-year mark, and adjust your timing if you're dreading it. As the date gets closer, ease yourself — and your significant other — into it. Reduce your hours by 25% for 6 months to a year, until you're comfortable, then reduce another 25%, and so on, until you're ready to step away completely. It helps if you don't view retirement as a fixed situation. If you could do anything with your time, what would it be? The answer may change as you go. 'Recognize that going into medicine, you weren't great on day one. It took years and years. That's the key,' Silver said. 'Retirement is a dynamic experience. It's a chapter in life, not a destination, different for everyone. If it's not a great fit, you adjust.'


Medscape
6 minutes ago
- Medscape
Common Painkiller Tied to Heart Failure Risk in Older Adults
The antiseizure medication pregabalin, which is commonly prescribed for chronic pain, has been linked to an increased risk for heart failure (HF), particularly in those with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD), new data suggested. In a cohort of more than 240,000 Medicare beneficiaries with noncancer chronic pain, initiation of pregabalin was associated with a 48% higher risk for new-onset HF overall and an 85% higher risk in those with a history of CVD than initiation of gabapentin. The study was published online on August 1 in JAMA Network Open . Widely Prescribed Medications Chronic pain affects up to 30% of adults aged 65 years or older. Nonopioid medications, such as the gabapentinoids pregabalin and gabapentin, are widely prescribed for chronic pain, the investigators, led by Elizabeth Park, MD, Columbia University Irving Medical Center in New York City, noted. Pregabalin has greater potency than gabapentin in binding to the α2δ subunit of the L-type calcium channel and therefore may be associated with an increased risk for HF through actions to cause sodium/water retention. To investigate further, investigators evaluated 246,237 Medicare beneficiaries between 2014 and 2018, including 18,622 (8%) new pregabalin users and 227,615 (92%) new gabapentin users. All patients were aged 65-89 years, had chronic noncancer pain, and had no history of HF. The researchers used inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for an extensive list of 231 covariates to reduce confounding and attempted to closely emulate a hypothetical target trial in which Medicare patients filled new prescriptions for pregabalin or gabapentin for noncancer pain. During 114,113 person-years of follow-up, 1470 patients had a hospital admission or emergency department visit for HF. The rate of HF per 1000 person-years was 18.2 for pregabalin and 12.5 — translating to roughly six additional HF events annually for every 1000 patients treated with pregabalin — with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.48. The difference was even more pronounced in patients with a history of CVD, with an adjusted HR of 1.85. An increased risk for outpatient HF diagnoses was also seen (adjusted HR, 1.27), but there was no difference in all-cause mortality between groups. The authors said the findings further support current recommendations from the European Medicines Agency to exercise caution when prescribing pregabalin to older adults with CVD. The American Heart Association currently lists pregabalin, but not gabapentin, as a medication that may cause or exacerbate HF. Immediate Clinical Implications The co-authors of an invited commentary noted that the study provides 'timely and clinically relevant insights' into the cardiovascular safety of these two widely used gabapentinoids. From a clinical standpoint, the findings have 'immediate clinical implications,' wrote Robert Zhang, MD, with Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, and Edo Birati, MD, Tzafon (Poriya) Medical Center, Poriya, Israel. For older adults with chronic pain, particularly those with CVD, 'clinicians should weigh the potential cardiovascular risks associated with pregabalin against its analgesic benefits. This is particularly relevant given the growing use of gabapentinoids in older populations and ongoing polypharmacy issues in this age group,' Zhang and Birati advised. 'Furthermore, if pregabalin use is associated with new-onset HF, it raises the possibility that the drug may unmask underlying subclinical cardiovascular disease, which suggests a need for careful cardiac evaluation prior to prescribing this medication,' they added. 'The study serves as an important reminder that not all gabapentinoids are created equal and that in the pursuit of safer pain control, vigilance for unintended harms remains paramount,' the investigators concluded.