Heavier penalties await bullies as amended laws come into force
According to the Prime Minister's Department legal affairs division, the Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2025 and the Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) Act 2025 were passed in the Dewan Rakyat on Dec 10, 2024 and in the Dewan Negara on Dec 16, 2024.
It said that the enforcement of both Acts is an ongoing effort by the government to strengthen the country's legal system and to keep pace with current needs and new challenges in the modern criminal landscape.
"The implementation of these two Acts is to streamline legal procedures, improve the efficiency of the criminal justice process and allow for faster and stricter action against those who break the law," it said in a statement on Friday (July 11).
The amendments to both Acts introduce specific provisions that allow for stricter legal action against bullies in line with the government's commitment to protect society, especially vulnerable groups such as children, adolescents and individuals put under mental harassment by bullies.
In addition, the amendments also introduce new sections such as Sections 507B to 507G, which specifically provide for proportionate punishment for offences of threatening, insulting or defamatory communications intended to cause emotional distress or fear to the victim.
"It also includes the offence of distributing personal information without permission or doxing, which is now classified as a serious crime and punishable by up to three years in prison," read the statement.
In addition, the introduction of the special provision stems from a review of the shortcomings in existing laws, which were found to be insufficient to address various forms of psychological and emotional threats in the increasingly challenging digital environment.
The government will also continue to ensure that the enforcement of this law is implemented fairly and equitably without affecting the right to freedom of expression as guaranteed by the Constitution.
"With the implementation of this Act, the Madani Government remains committed to ensuring that the country's laws remain relevant and responsive to the challenges of the digital world in the interest of safety, well-being and justice for all Malaysians," it stated. – Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
14 minutes ago
- Focus Malaysia
Digital paedophilia is still child abuse—even if the child is virtual
DIGITAL paedophilia refers to the sexual exploitation of children in virtual spaces, through tools like artificial intelligence, deepfakes, cartoons, and virtual reality. These images may be digitally generated, and the children portrayed may not even exist in real life. Yet, the intent is deeply exploitative, the gratification it feeds is criminal, and the harm it causes individually and socially is undeniable. While this form of abuse doesn't always involve contact with a child, it normalises the sexualisation of minors, perpetuates a dangerous fantasy, and fuels demand in underground networks. As a criminologist, I've seen how what initially began as 'just digital content' has the potential to desensitise consumers and eventually lead to real-world offending. It systematically erodes the legal, ethical, and societal safeguards established to protect the rights and dignity of children. This threat is amplified by the pervasive culture of online sharing. Many individuals, including parents, are drawn to posting their daily lives on social media, treating platforms like Facebook and TikTok as digital diaries. While these platforms foster connection and self-expression, they also expose users—particularly children—to serious risks. It is disturbingly easy to download images from Facebook and extract videos from TikTok, even without the content owner's knowledge or consent. Once uploaded, these digital footprints can be stolen, altered, and weaponised for exploitation. Digital paedophilia can take many forms, for instance AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) that mimics realistic children in sexual scenarios; deepfakes that superimpose children's faces—often taken from social media—onto adult bodies in explicit content; illustrated pornography (such as hentai or lolicon) that sexualises underage characters; and virtual reality simulations that allow users to act out child abuse fantasies in immersive settings. What makes this even more dangerous is that it's easy to access, easy to share, and hard to trace. The perpetrators hide behind screens, usernames, and encrypted platforms. And yet, the damage is far from virtual. Malaysia has made commendable strides with the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017, the Penal Code, and the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998—all of which provide mechanisms to combat traditional forms of child sexual abuse, including live-streamed exploitation. However, these laws still fall short when it comes to digital creations. Many of these materials are not technically illegal under current definitions of CSAM, because no real child was involved in their creation. But does that make them any less harmful? I would argue not. These depictions, no matter how 'virtual', are created with the intent of sexualising minors and should be recognised as forms of child sexual exploitation. Other countries have taken this step. The UK, Canada, and Australia have criminalised virtual child pornography, recognising that a legal definition limited only to real, identifiable victims is inadequate in the face of emerging technology. Therefore, Malaysia must consider doing the same. The harms of digital paedophilia are not hypothetical. Every day, images of real children—often taken innocently by their parents and shared online—are stolen, manipulated, and repurposed into sexual content. This is a profound violation of dignity, privacy, and safety. These children may never know what was done to their image, but the psychological and reputational damage can be lifelong. Unlike Denmark, which recognises an individual's legal right to their own image and personal likeness through robust copyright and data protection laws, Malaysia currently lacks explicit legal provisions that grant individuals—particularly children—ownership and control over the use of their personal images. This legal vacuum leaves Malaysian children especially vulnerable to digital exploitation, with limited recourse or protection under current frameworks. Moreover, digital abuse fuels cognitive distortions in those with paedophilic tendencies. Studies show that repeated exposure to virtual CSAM lowers inhibition, increases desensitisation, and can serve as a gateway to contact offences. As a society, we cannot afford to wait until a physical child is harmed to institute any action. The damage begins long before that. Therefore, an effective and urgent response is required. This includes amending existing laws to explicitly cover digitally created and AI-generated child sexual abuse material. We must criminalise intent and impact, not just physical involvement. Social media platforms, app developers, and AI companies must also be held accountable for detecting, reporting, and removing exploitative content—technological innovation must not come at the expense of child safety. Digital literacy should no longer be seen as optional. Parents, children, and educators must be equipped with the knowledge to understand the risks of oversharing online and how personal images can be misused. Every policy, investigation, and reform effort must place the child at the centre—not merely as a legal category, but as a human being deserving of dignity, protection, and justice. Digital paedophilia sits at the intersection of technological progress and moral regression. As artificial intelligence and virtual reality continue to advance, so too does the capacity to simulate harm, commodify children, and conceal abuse behind layers of code. But just because the abuse is virtual does not mean it is any less real. The law must evolve to meet this challenge because every child, whether real or digitally represented, deserves to be safe from sexual exploitation. ‒ July 24, 2025 Dr Haezreena Begum Abdul Hamid is a Criminologist and Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Malaya. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Unsplash/jin Woo Lee
Barnama
an hour ago
- Barnama
Fees (Pengkalan Kubor Ferry) (Validation) Bill 2025 Tabled For First Reading
KUALA LUMPUR, July 24 (Bernama) -- The Fees (Pengkalan Kubor Ferry) (Validation) Bill 2025, which aims to validate the collection of ferry service fees between Pengkalan Kubor, Malaysia, and Takbai, Thailand, was tabled for first reading in the Dewan Rakyat today. Minister of Works Datuk Seri Alexander Nanta Linggi, when tabling the bill, said that the second and third readings will also be conducted during this session. The bill seeks to validate the fees which were charged and collected by the Public Works Department and paid into the Consolidated Fund in respect of ferry services between Pengkalan Kubor, Malaysia, and Takbai, Thailand, from jan 1, 1999, to Dec 31, 2024.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
House arrest law can ease prison overcrowding, says Saifuddin
KUALA LUMPUR: The government is mulling house arrest – which includes the use of electronic monitoring devices – for remand detainees to address overcrowding in prisons, says Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail. The Home Minister revealed that the current prison population is 83,808, with 35% comprising remand prisoners. "Something must be done," he said during the wrap-up of debates on the Suhakam 2023 report in Parliament on Thursday (July 24). He also said that the government is focusing on rehabilitation and reintegration programmes, which have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing recidivism. Saifuddin said among these are the Licensed Prisoner Release and Corporate Smart Internship Programme that provide job opportunities in five economic sectors, namely plantations, service, construction, manufacturing and agriculture. "After reintegration and serving their sentences, only one out of 800 prisoners is a re-offender," he said. Saifuddin also said legislative amendments would be needed, saying there are ongoing efforts to redefine "restraint devices" to include electronic monitoring devices. "We have had the policy approval, now we need to develop the amendment matrix. Just like the format of a Bill," he said. On the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma), Saifuddin said there is continuous engagement to review the law. He said this included reviewing what constitutes bailable, non-bailable and unbailable offences under Sosma, with 13 out 73 offences under Section 13 of the Act identified for removal from the list. "On having a special court to hear Sosma offences, the engagement will continue… we will study the recommendations," he added. During debates, several MPs raised concerns over Sosma detainees. Hassan Karim (PH-Pasir Gudang), said that the Actm which provides for detention without bail and delayed trials could lead to a violation of human rights. He told the Dewan Rakyat that detainees held under Sosma are not allowed bail under Section 13 of the Act, with some facing long delays before their trials begin.
