
New analysis says Trump budget plan will take from poorest 40 percent to give to wealthy
Researchers Harris Eppsteiner and John Ricco of Yale's Budget Lab found that the proposed GOP budget whose framework was supported last month in a vote by the House would include $4.5 trillion in tax cuts that would largely benefit the wealthy, along with $1.5 trillion in spending cuts, including to benefits for the public, including the poorest.
Approximately $230 billion of those cuts would come from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — often shorted to SNAP — which helps poor families afford food.
Another $880 billion would come from cuts to Medicaid, which provides assistance for individuals with limited resources to pay for healthcare. It's also the program that covers most costs for 60 percent of elderly Americans in nursing homes.
Both cuts would occur over a 10-year period.
"The overall effect of these policy changes would be regressive, shifting after-tax-and-transfer resources away' from households at the 'bottom of the distribution towards those at the top," Eppsteiner and Ricco wrote in their analysis.
After-tax-and-transfer income refers to the income remaining after deducting all taxes and adding back government 'transfers,' such as Social Security, Medicare, unemployment benefits, and so on.
Taxed households at the 'bottom of the income distribution would see a reduction in after-tax-and-transfer income of 5 percent, those in the middle of the distribution would see a modest increase of 0.6 percent, and those in the top 5 percent of tax units [household] would see an increase of 3%,' wrote Eppsteiner and Ricco.
'More than 100 percent of the net fiscal benefit would accrue to the top quintile, ' the analysis added.
Donald Trump has repeatedly insisted that he will not cut Medicaid, but independent analysts have reported that the Republicans cannot achieve their budget without making severe cuts to the program.
Proposed Republican changes to Medicaid have already caused protests in several parts of the nation.
In addition to the cuts, the proposed Republican budget would also renew expiring provisions of Trump's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which itself was the largest transfer of wealth from the poor to the ultra-rich in U.S. history.
The report notes that the proposed plan it analyzed may change between now and whenever it may be passed in the future.
"As noted above, the Resolution passed by the House on February 25 does not specify how each committee is to meet its specified target. As such, the committees may ultimately endorse policy changes that substantially differ from those analyzed in this blog post," the authors wrote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
27 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Glasgow Airport wins two key Italian routes with Wizz Air
Airport keen to stem flow of west coast travellers to rivals Edinburgh Sign up for the latest news and analysis about Scottish transport Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Underdog Glasgow Airport has secured two significant new European routes amid rivals Edinburgh's increasing dominance of Scotland's air links. Flights to Rome Fiumicino and Milan Malpensa from the west coast airport are to be launched on October 27, Wizz Air announced on Thursday. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The new Rome and Milan routes will start on October 27 | Wizz Air News of the three-times-a-week service to both Italian destinations comes two days after Glasgow won a weekly route to the Greek island of Kos with Jet2 next summer. It already has a Wizz Air route to Budapest. Glasgow has hemorrhaged routes to Edinburgh over the past few years, including when Ryanair axed most of its Glasgow routes in 2018 and has since become Edinburgh's biggest airline with around 70 routes. The west coast airport is now without New York flights while Edinburgh has up to four a day, and also lost its long-established Virgin Atlantic route to Orlando to its rival. Edinburgh benefits from a more central location, west of the capital, than Glasgow Airport, which is also west of its city, and seen as a more attractive destination for tourists, especially Americans. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It also has benefited from improved transport links such as direct buses from Glasgow city centre and a tram link that connects with ScotRail trains at Edinburgh Park. Both Easyjet and Ryanair fly to Milan from Edinburgh, which also has Rome flights with Ryanair and Jet2. Glasgow's new routes come four months after Kam Jandu, chief executive of parent firm AGS Airports, pledged to 'strengthen connectivity', naming Milan among European routes 'we need to get back'. He also mentioned Copenhagen and Madrid. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Jandu emphasised that making the airport efficient was key to attracting new routes, which is part of a £350 million improvements package he announced for AGS's Glasgow, Aberdeen and Southampton airports. He said: 'We are in consultation with our existing airlines and potential new ones to make sure we are meeting turn-around space requirements that fit their aspirations because the low-cost airlines want to turn their aircraft relatively quickly.'


Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
What will happen after Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska?
The stakes are high for Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin when the pair meet in Alaska on Friday to discuss ending the war in Ukraine. The US President and his Russian counterpart will sit down at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in the largest US state – a site chosen due to its close proximity to Russia. Addressing reporters at the White House last week, Trump suggested an agreement would involve some exchange of land between Ukraine and Russia. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both,' the Republican president said. But Volodymyr Zelensky has pushed against that, saying Ukrainians 'will not gift their land to the occupiers'. In a video address to the nation posted on his Telegram channel on Saturday, the Ukrainian President said any decisions without Ukraine would be decisions against peace. He added: 'They will not bring anything. These are dead decisions. They will never work.' When Trump revealed his plans for a meeting with Putin last week, he also floated a potential second meeting where Zelensky would join them. Following a virtual chat with European and Nato leaders yesterday afternoon, the US President again suggested the trilateral could take place soon after the Alaska summit. Trump and Putin would use their initial tete-a-tete to 'find out where we are and what we're doing', he said, adding: 'We'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky and myself, if they'd like to have me there.' The Kremlin has confirmed additional details of the summit between the two leaders on Friday. Presidential aide Yuri Ushakov said they will initially meet one-on-one with interpreters at 11.30am local time, which is 8.30pm UK time. Afterwards, five additional members from each delegation will join Trump and Putin. The pair will then hold a joint press conference. Donald Trump notoriously promised he would be able to bring the war between Russia and Ukraine to an end on day one after being re-elected. Of course, that didn't happen – and after some success in bringing violence to a stop between Israel and Iran as well as other countries, he may see this conflict as something like a white whale. Negotiations between US and Russian officials so far this year have failed to bring the bloodshed in Ukraine to an end. Trump is a big believer in his deal-making talents, and he thinks getting himself into a room with Putin may present the best shot at nailing down a result. The meeting will also touch on co-operation and trade between the US and Russia, so the two presidents may be hoping for broader results. The likelihood of the trilateral taking place may depend heavily on the outcome of the Friday bilateral. Trump has said there will be 'very serious consequences' if Russia does not agree to a ceasefire, though he did not specify what they were. If the long-awaited three-way meeting does take place, one of the leaders will come to the table at a significant disadvantage, according to British Foreign Policy Group think tank director Evie Aspinall. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Aspinall said Trump is 'feeling relatively confident about the situation' after weeks of trumpeting his role in stopping conflicts between Israel and Iran, India and Pakistan, and several other regions around the world. She told Metro: 'I think in his mind, he's managed to bring Putin to the table, and he's going to use it as an opportunity to really cement himself as this deal maker and as someone that is able to secure peace in the world. 'And so what he wants, really, is a ceasefire. He wants an end to the war in Ukraine. His intent is fairly straightforward. He wants to see the war end, and he wants to be seen as the man that makes that possible.' Ultimately, the summit is 'as much as anything, an image thing' for Trump, she argued, as it would also mean disentangling the US from a global conflict. Putin, meanwhile, is 'making huge progress militarily' in Ukraine and is able to use the meeting to secure two big objectives – demonstrating to Trump he is 'reasonable' enough to negotiate, and buying time on the battlefield. Aspinall said: 'Putin will be building up his resources so that he is in the best position possible for when a ceasefire or full negotiation then happens. 'He wants to use this as an opportunity to show that he's on Trump's side.' The US President may have appeared to sharpen his stance against his Russian counterpart in recent weeks, notably hitting India with punitive tariffs for buying Russia's oil. But Aspinall explained it's likely a shrewd move from Putin to sit down for talks at this point in time. She said: 'I think Putin is playing quite well for the Russians. By coming to negotiating table, he's managed to get Trump to wait, step back from the threats of sanctions for now. 'What he'll be hoping is that he presents himself as reasonable in these meetings, and then Trump doesn't go on with the sanctions that are supposed to hit imminently.' For Zelensky, the summit will be much more of a high-wire act with far more risks. Aspinall said: 'I think there is possible progress. The problem with the progress is it will be on Putin's terms, rather than Zelensky's terms. 'I think there is a world in which you see Trump and Putin come out saying, 'This is a deal that would work,' and then you have Europe and Ukraine pushing back very heavily on that, and a negotiation over that deal.' The Ukrainian President's best bet might be to challenge Putin's position as the 'reasonable actor' in the negotiations by pressing hard on the Russian leader's red lines – such as agreeing to Ukraine joining Nato. This could 'push Putin into a corner', suggested Aspinall, which might be Zelensky's best chance at leverage. More Trending But she was clear Ukraine has more to lose in a likely deal. Russia could be flexible on territory swaps, and offer them in exchange for Putin's bigger prizes: blocking Ukrainian Nato membership, shrinking the size of its military, and forcing elections that would 'inevitably be biased by Russian disinformation'. Aspinall said: 'the Territory part is the part that they will probably be softer on, as a way for Trump to come out and say, we're not giving Putin everything. We've got the territory back, for example. 'But Putin can sell it as you know, we no longer have an aggressor on our doorstep. We have a supporter and ally of Russia on our doorstep.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Trump and Putin to discuss 'huge untapped potential' for Russia-US economic gains MORE: Fans slam iconic 80s rockers for calling Trump appointment 'great honour' MORE: Keir Starmer embraces Volodymyr Zelensky on Downing Street ahead of Trump-Putin meeting


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Swiss gold industry warns against Swatch boss's US gold tax proposal
ZURICH, Aug 14 (Reuters) - Switzerland's gold industry on Thursday voiced scepticism about a proposal by the boss of watchmaker Swatch (UHR.S), opens new tab to introduce a levy on gold exports to the United States in retaliation for U.S. tariffs on Switzerland. U.S. President Donald Trump last week imposed tariffs of 39% on imported Swiss goods, causing shock and dismay in the Alpine republic, a major refining and transit hub for gold. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection afterwards said Washington might put tariffs on the most widely-traded gold bullion bars in the United States. However, Trump said on Monday that gold would not face tariffs. Swatch CEO Nick Hayek told Swiss newspaper Blick that Trump's announcement indicated that tariffs on gold would be painful for the U.S. president. "Now is the time to go on the offensive. Switzerland should order a 39% export tax on gold bars for the United States," Hayek told the paper. "That's where we have to get at him. That's his Achilles' heel." The Swiss Association of Manufacturers and Traders in Precious Metals (ASFCMP) said that while ideas to better balance bilateral trade were welcome, careful consideration needed to be given to Switzerland's longer-term interests. "An export tax on Swiss gold destined for the USA would not only harm Switzerland economically, but also damage the reputation of a country that has consistently promoted and defended free trade," ASFCMP President Christoph Wild said. The Swiss Economy Ministry declined to comment on the proposal, but said the support of business representatives was in general welcome and helped underscore the close economic ties between the U.S. and Switzerland. Trump justified his 39% tariff by pointing to Switzerland's sizeable trade surplus with the United States. Part of that is due to gold exports. Hayek said that even if a gold levy failed to move Trump, it would cut the U.S. trade deficit with Switzerland. "If Trump doesn't give in to our pressure, we'll at least improve the trade balance with the U.S. if the Americans no longer import gold bars via Switzerland," he told Blick. Switzerland is continuing to hold talks with U.S. officials aimed at lowering the U.S. tariffs.