Can state make officers show their faces during protests? Experts appear doubtful
As officers across California clash with protesters of immigration raids, two Bay Area lawmakers proposed legislation Monday that would make it a crime for state or federal police to wear masks.
'We do not need secret police in California,' state Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, said at a news conference on the steps of City Hall announcing the introduction of Senate Bill 627.
'It's important that we know who are carrying out law enforcement operations,' said the bill's co-author, Sen. Jesse Arreguin, D-Berkeley, chairman of the Senate Public Safety Committee. 'People are afraid. Families are being torn apart.'
Under the measure, which would take effect next year, a masked officer could be charged with a misdemeanor, punishable by a jail sentence and a fine. The only exemptions would be for medical masks, masks needed to protect against smoke from wildfires and other dangerous conditions, and police emergency squads known as Special Weapons and Tactics teams, or SWAT.
SB627 would also require officers to wear a name or badge on their uniform to identify them to the public. It would not prohibit them from wearing visors that left their faces visible. And it would apply only to law enforcement officers, and not to the National Guard troops that President Donald Trump has sent to the streets in Los Angeles while their deployment is challenged in court.
Asked whether the state could regulate the clothing or conduct of federal officers, Wiener cited court rulings upholding state and local 'sanctuary' policies that prohibit federal immigration agents from requiring police and jail officials in California to hold undocumented immigrants in custody for deportation. But some law professors were skeptical about applying a state mask ban to U.S. government officers.
'Generally the state cannot dictate how federal law enforcement operates,' said Laurie Levenson, a criminal law professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles and a former federal prosecutor.
'The state can't tell the feds what to do,' said Robert Weisberg, a Stanford law professor and co-director of the school's Criminal Justice Center.
Citing violence in some of the immigration protests in Los Angeles, Trump declared federal control of the California National Guard last week and sent 8,000 guard troops and 700 U.S. Marines into the city streets.
In a lawsuit by the state, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled Thursday that the president had acted illegally by failing to show that the takeover was needed for public safety and failing to consult with Gov. Gavin Newsom. But Breyer's order to remove the National Guard troops was quickly blocked by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has scheduled a hearing on Tuesday.
Wiener said the federal government's actions in California 'have created an atmosphere of profound terror.' He said federal officers have covered their faces, badges and names, and some have worn 'police' tags on their jackets, impersonating local officers. In addition to Los Angeles, Wiener said, the raids have been conducted in San Francisco, San Diego and Concord.
There was no immediate comment on SB627 from organizations representing local police. But they have said officers are already required to wear badges and have questioned the need for further requirements.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
Officers who cover their faces could be charged with a misdemeanor under California proposal
Local, state, and federal law enforcement officers who cover their faces while conducting official business could face a misdemeanor charge in California under a new proposal announced Monday. If approved, the bill would require all law enforcement officials to show their faces and be identifiable by their uniform, which should carry their name or other identifier. It would not apply to the National Guard or other troops and it would exempt SWAT teams and officers responding to natural disasters. The Department of Homeland Security called the proposal 'despicable' in a post on X, saying ICE officers are facing a 'more than 400 percent increase in assault.' State Sen. Scott Wiener, a Democrat representing San Francisco, and State Sen. Jesse Arreguin, a Democrat representing Berkeley and Oakland, said the proposal seeks to boost transparency and public trust in law enforcement. It also looks to protect against people trying to impersonate law enforcement, they said. 'We are seeing more and more law enforcement officers, particularly at the federal level, covering their faces entirely, not identifying themselves at all and, at times, even wearing army fatigues where we can't tell if these are law enforcement officers or a vigilante militia,' Wiener said. 'They are grabbing people off our streets and disappearing people, and it's terrifying,' he added. In Los Angeles, a series of immigration raids June 6 by federal officers, some with face coverings, triggered days of turbulent protests across the city and beyond and led President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard troopsand Marines to the LA area. More than 100 people were detained during those raids and immigrant advocates say they have not been able to contact them. The state senators said that in recent months, federal officers have conducted raids while covering their faces, and at times their badges and names, in Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, Concord, Downey and Montebello. 'Law enforcement officers are public servants and people should be able to see their faces, see who they are, know who they are. Otherwise, there is no transparency and no accountability,' Wiener said. Videos of raids showing masked officers using unmarked vehicles and grabbing people off the streets have circulated on social media in recent weeks. DHS defended the officers' wearing of masks in its post on X. Besides an increase in assaults, DHS says people have launched websites to reveal the identifies of ICE officers. 'While ICE officers are being assaulted by rioters, a sanctuary politician is trying to outlaw officers wearing masks to protect themselves from being doxed and targeted by known and suspected terrorist sympathizers,' the statement says. Ed Obayashi, a special prosecutor in California and an expert on national and state police practices, said the proposed legislation would be tough to enforce because federal officers can't be prosecuted by state courts for activities performed during their official duties. 'If they are following federal directives, they are following federal law,' Obayashi said. He said that when it comes to local and state officers, they are already required by law to have identifiable information and department insignia on their uniforms. Todd Lyons, ICE's acting director, has defended his officers using facemasks, saying they wear them to protect themselves from death threats and online harassment. 'I'm sorry if people are offended by them wearing masks, but I'm not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line, their family on the line because people don't like what immigration enforcement is,' he said at a news conference earlier this month in Boston to announce nearly 1,500 arrests in the region as part of a monthlong 'surge operation.'
CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
Officers who cover their faces could be charged with a misdemeanor under California proposal
Local, state, and federal law enforcement officers who cover their faces while conducting official business could face a misdemeanor charge in California under a new proposal announced Monday. If approved, the bill would require all law enforcement officials to show their faces and be identifiable by their uniform, which should carry their name or other identifier. It would not apply to the National Guard or other troops and it would exempt SWAT teams and officers responding to natural disasters. The Department of Homeland Security called the proposal 'despicable' in a post on X, saying ICE officers are facing a 'more than 400 percent increase in assault.' State Sen. Scott Wiener, a Democrat representing San Francisco, and State Sen. Jesse Arreguin, a Democrat representing Berkeley and Oakland, said the proposal seeks to boost transparency and public trust in law enforcement. It also looks to protect against people trying to impersonate law enforcement, they said. 'We are seeing more and more law enforcement officers, particularly at the federal level, covering their faces entirely, not identifying themselves at all and, at times, even wearing army fatigues where we can't tell if these are law enforcement officers or a vigilante militia,' Wiener said. 'They are grabbing people off our streets and disappearing people, and it's terrifying,' he added. In Los Angeles, a series of immigration raids June 6 by federal officers, some with face coverings, triggered days of turbulent protests across the city and beyond and led President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard troopsand Marines to the LA area. More than 100 people were detained during those raids and immigrant advocates say they have not been able to contact them. The state senators said that in recent months, federal officers have conducted raids while covering their faces, and at times their badges and names, in Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, Concord, Downey and Montebello. 'Law enforcement officers are public servants and people should be able to see their faces, see who they are, know who they are. Otherwise, there is no transparency and no accountability,' Wiener said. Videos of raids showing masked officers using unmarked vehicles and grabbing people off the streets have circulated on social media in recent weeks. DHS defended the officers' wearing of masks in its post on X. Besides an increase in assaults, DHS says people have launched websites to reveal the identifies of ICE officers. 'While ICE officers are being assaulted by rioters, a sanctuary politician is trying to outlaw officers wearing masks to protect themselves from being doxed and targeted by known and suspected terrorist sympathizers,' the statement says. Ed Obayashi, a special prosecutor in California and an expert on national and state police practices, said the proposed legislation would be tough to enforce because federal officers can't be prosecuted by state courts for activities performed during their official duties. 'If they are following federal directives, they are following federal law,' Obayashi said. He said that when it comes to local and state officers, they are already required by law to have identifiable information and department insignia on their uniforms. Todd Lyons, ICE's acting director, has defended his officers using facemasks, saying they wear them to protect themselves from death threats and online harassment. 'I'm sorry if people are offended by them wearing masks, but I'm not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line, their family on the line because people don't like what immigration enforcement is,' he said at a news conference earlier this month in Boston to announce nearly 1,500 arrests in the region as part of a monthlong 'surge operation.'
Politico
4 hours ago
- Politico
Trump promised to break California water. So far he hasn't.
SACRAMENTO, California — President Donald Trump promised to break California's water rules wide open. So far, he's mostly working within them. Five months after Trump issued a pair of directives for federal agencies to overturn state and Biden-era rules limiting water deliveries, the federal government has done no such thing. Instead, it's quietly increasing water flows following the very rules Trump once railed against — at least for now. It's a sharp contrast to Trump's otherwise confrontational posture towards California and climate policy. In just the last week, he rescinded the state's authority to phase out gas-powered vehicles and sent the National Guard into Los Angeles over Gov. Gavin Newsom's objections. It's also a sharp contrast to Trump's campaign rhetoric, when he vowed to force Newsom to reverse a lawsuit blocking his first-term effort to loosen environmental protections in the state's main water hub, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. But Trump seems mollified now, declaring victory over the state at a White House event last week. The president brought up the familiar theme of water flowing out to the Pacific Ocean instead of being used in farms and cities, called it 'ridiculous' and declared of the water: 'We got them to take it now.' What's changed? For one, California had a wet winter, which tends to smooth over political differences. And the Trump administration suffered an early headline-grabbing debacle in February when it dumped summer irrigation water from Central Valley dams in a misguided effort to send it to fires in Los Angeles. Newsom has also aligned himself more with Trump on water, as when he jilted Delta-area Democrats last month in pushing to expedite a tunnel to move more supplies from Northern to Southern California. More substantively, some of the water districts that might be expected to agitate for Trump to overturn Biden-era water rules concede that they actually allow more deliveries than Trump's version. 'Our goal really is to try and implement some of the adaptive management and other actions that are in the [Biden-era rules] that provide some flexibility to benefit water supply and the fishery as well,' said Thaddeus Bettner, the executive director of the Sacramento River Settlement Contractors, a group of municipal and agricultural water districts in the northern Central Valley. So even though Trump's January directives gave federal officials the option to redo the Biden-era rules, they haven't done that so far — avoiding both lawsuits and negative headlines. The January orders also directed federal water agencies to write a report within 90 days on how to deliver on Trump's promises, but the White House is keeping that quiet, as well, declining to release it publicly. 'Less than a month into his second term, President Trump turned on the water to prevent another tragedy like the recent California wildfires, and he has urged Democrats like Gavin Newsom to adopt policies that better maintain our nation's forests,' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in an email. 'He will continue to protect America's abundant natural resources, and updates to our water policy will come from him.' Environmental groups in the sensitive Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, however, aren't buying the quiet approach. They say the Trump administration is still violating endangered species rules, pointing to examples when federal officials pumped more water out of the Delta than state officials, killing or injuring protected species of salmon and trout in the process. 'Reclamation's behavior is cause for extreme concern for the health of the Bay-Delta and for the communities and people who care about and depend on this ecosystem,' the groups wrote in a letter last month to state water officials. (Bureau of Reclamation spokesperson Mary Lee Knecht said the agency 'continues to operate the Central Valley Project to maximize water supply and hydropower in full compliance' with the Biden-era rules.) There are a couple opportunities coming up for Trump to make more of a splash. He has yet to nominate a Bureau of Reclamation commissioner, who could sway the agency one way or the other. And on Tuesday, state and federal lawyers are due to update a judge on whether they want to continue the lawsuit Newsom lodged against Trump in 2020. Water agencies that have been mostly laudatory of Trump are still restive. Westlands Water District's general manager, Allison Febbo, called the Trump administration's latest projected increase in summer water allocations, from 50 to 55 percent, 'disappointing' given that reservoirs are filled to the brim. 'The operations quagmire that has contributed to the self-inflicted water crisis we have in this state, and reconfirmed by the Biden administration before leaving office, are still wreaking havoc on the water projects,' Johnny Amaral, chief of external affairs at the Friant Water Authority, said in a text message. 'Every minute that goes by is a lost opportunity to end the crisis, and the clock is ticking.' Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO's California Climate newsletter.
