
Yet again, Odisha student's death by suicide shows how India is still failing women
The incident underscored how India's reactive and punishment-focused response to violence against women is fundamentally inadequate.
The 20-year-old BEd student at Fakir Mohan Autonomous College in Balasore had set herself ablaze outside the principal's office on July 12.
Two days later, she succumbed to 95% burn injuries at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in Bhubaneswar
The student's testimonials and letters being circulated by the media show that she was harassed for months by the head of department Samir Kumar Sahu, who allegedly demanded sexual favours to clear her attendance backlogs.
Sahu was arrested on July 12 and college principal Dilip Ghosh soon after.
The student had met Balasore MP Pratap Sarangi to report the harassment. She had also posted about the harassment on her X account tagging the Odisha Chief Minister Mohan Majhi, the state's higher education minister and Union Minister of Education Dharmendra Pradhan, who is a Member of Parliament from Odisha. But her pleas went unheard.
The immediate aftermath followed a familiar script, with Majhi promising 'strictest punishment under law'.
The state government hastily directed higher education institutions to constitute Internal Complaints Committees under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, as if the absence of such mechanisms had been a sudden revelation rather than a longstanding oversight.
It shows that even basic legal mandates under the act are unaddressed in Odisha.
The opposition Biju Janata Dal and Congress held protests in Odisha demanding political accountability. But systemic accountability will not result solely from resorting to criminal law and punishing offenders. The systemic failures that enable such violence must be addressed.
However, since the 2012 Delhi gangrape, India has repeatedly turned to punitive legislation to address sexual violence.
The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, and the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018, introduced harsher penalties for sexual offences.
After the rape and murder of a trainee doctor at the state-run RG Kar Hospital in August last year, West Bengal enacted the Aparajita Woman and Child Act, 2024. But less than a year later, in July, Kolkata witnessed another violent crime: a law student was gangraped in an alleged act of revenge by a former classmate after she refused to marry one of them.
The persistence of such crimes despite severe laws underlines the futility of seeking deterrence through retributive punishment alone.
Friends of the Odisha student say her ordeal was not confined to sexual harassment by Sahu but also included verbal abuse and harassment that she endured for months. Sexual slurs and rumours of her being of 'loose' character were circulated on college WhatsApp groups. Demeaning language by her peers led to her being ostracised, possibly creating an environment of isolation and despair.
The college Internal Complaints Committee had found Sahu guilty and recommended his transfer but the directive was not implemented. These failings show that it was not just a case of individual misconduct, but a comprehensive institutional failure that pushed a young woman to the brink.
This occured despite the fact that the prevention of workplace sexual harassment law, which has mechanisms to check such incidents, includes educational institutions under its purview.
Section 19 of the act mandates employers to organise workshops and awareness programmess on sexual harassment and conspicuously display the consequences of sexual harassment as well as the manner of reporting to the internal complaints committee.
Merely focusing on punishing Sahu and the principal shifts focus away from the government's shortcomings in implementing the safeguards already in place.
However, days after the incident, the Odisha government on July 19 announced the Shaktishree programme for women's safety. Its main features include a mobile app to report complaints, an empowerment cell of female faculty and students, a code of conduct, online training on the prevention of sexual harassment at the workplace act and increased camera surveillance.
#Odisha takes a bold step with the #Shaktishree Initiative to ensure safer campuses for women. pic.twitter.com/eRzFhpeYUK
— CMO Odisha (@CMO_Odisha) July 19, 2025
The state government's technocratic approach ignores ground realities such as the fact that women, especially those from marginalised groups, have low access to smartphones and the internet. Similarly, the reliance on student-led cells, training modules and periodic visits by mentors treats sexual harassment as coordination problem rather than one requiring fundamental cultural change.
The Balasore student had already reported her harassment through existing channels to the college internal complaints committee. More reporting mechanisms would not have protected her when the system failed to act on her complaints.
Majhi, while announcing the Shaktishree programme, did not say whether the government has the capacity to deliver these measures, and in what timeframe. It also is not clear how everyday incidents will be prevented while this new initiative is put into place.
Women as citizens
Implementing both, the prevention of sexual harassment at the workplace act and the Shaktishree initiative requires political will grounded in the recognition of women's rights as citizens, not daughters, sisters or mothers.
This is difficult in Indian society where close-knit family relations and caste and religion markers determine the worth of women, creating a pervasive rape culture.
In another incident in Odisha earlier in July, BJP legislator Santosh Khatua used sexual slurs against Lekhashree Samantasinghar, a senior leader of the opposition Biju Janata Dal.
After Samantasinghar's complaint, the police filed a case against Khatua. But the ruling BJP did not admonish its legislator or criticise his behaviour.
In March, after the Congress alleged that crimes against women in the state had increased, the state government refused to constitute a house committee to consider this phenomenon.
This political apathy creates an enabling environment in which violent crimes against women flourish with impunity, provoking public outrage only when they breach the narrow boundaries of respectability.
In the case of the Balasore student, this culture of impunity proved fatal, as political leaders turned a blind even as the student pleaded with them to intervene.
The path forward demands the strict implementation of the orders of the internal complaints committee, mandatory gender sensitisation programmes, regular institutional audits, robust grievance redressal mechanisms, psychosocial support and a cultural transformation that challenges deep-rooted social prejudices.
Unless these are addressed, preventable tragedies such as the death of the young woman in Balasore will continue.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
P Chidambaram Responds To Controversy Over 'Evidence' Remarks On Pahalgam Terror Attack
Congress leader and former Union Minister P Chidambaram has addressed the political storm surrounding his recent comments on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. Chidambaram, in an interview, questioned why the attackers have not been apprehended or their identities revealed, asking, 'Why have you not apprehended them? Why have you not even identified them?' This led to accusations by the BJP, notably Amit Malviya, who claimed that Chidambaram and the Congress were giving a "clean chit" to Pakistan. Responding to the controversy on social media, Chidambaram criticized what he called the 'worst kind of troll'—those who distort interviews by sharing only selective clips. He stated that such actions misrepresent his position and spread misinformation. He also noted the lack of comprehensive official information about the case, highlighting that details have been released only piecemeal by various officials, while there has been silence from top ministers. The National Investigation Agency (NIA), meanwhile, has arrested two local men alleged to have assisted the terrorists and maintains that the attackers were Pakistani nationals, although their names have not yet been released. Chidambaram continues to challenge the narrative, suggesting that the possibility of 'homegrown terrorists' should not be dismissed without clear evidence and transparency from the authorities. Chidambaram is scheduled to participate in the upcoming parliamentary debate on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor, where these issues are expected to be discussed in detail.


News18
42 minutes ago
- News18
Atomic Ambitions: Geopolitical Impact Of India's Nuclear Energy Reforms
India's move to open up nuclear power sector to private companies represents a notable shift in its energy strategy and a potential opportunity for private players Embracing adaptability in policymaking is crucial for navigating the complexities of a constantly changing world and ensuring that policies remain relevant, effective, and responsive to the needs of society. India is taking steps to open its nuclear power sector to private companies—a significant shift from its historically state-controlled approach. While the Atomic Energy Act of 1962 had restricted nuclear power generation to government-owned entities, recent policy changes and budget announcements indicate a push toward private sector involvement and global outreach. Union Minister Jitendra Singh, who oversees the Department of Atomic Energy, recently said that India will be able to address the apprehensions of the private sector globally about investments in the civil nuclear sector, which was opened up to achieve the ambitious target of producing 100 GW of atomic power by 2047. He also stressed that changes in relevant rules and legislation will have to be made to facilitate the entry of the private sector in the field of nuclear energy, which is currently under the tight control of the government. This policy shift is driven by the need to attract private capital, potentially increasing India's nuclear capacity and reducing reliance on fossil fuels. It is a move that would require amendments to existing laws, and India is considering changes to the Atomic Energy Act of 1962 and the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act of 2010 to allow private companies to build, own, and operate nuclear power plants. It may be recalled that in February this year, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, introducing the Union Budget for 2025, announced the creation of a new Nuclear Energy Mission for 'Viksit Bharat' and indicated amending laws that are limiting nuclear industry growth. Viksit Bharat 2047 represents the government's vision to transform India into a developed entity by its 100th Independence anniversary in 2047. The Finance Minister said that generating at least 100 GW of nuclear energy by 2047 is 'essential for our energy transition efforts." She added: 'For an active partnership with the private sector towards this goal, amendments to the Atomic Energy Act and the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act will be made." She also said that a Nuclear Energy Mission for research & development into Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) will be set up with an investment of Rupees 20,000 crores ($2.3 billion). At least five indigenously developed SMRs will be operational by 2033, she said. Many countries allow private sector participation in nuclear power generation, though the extent of this involvement varies significantly. The United States is a prime example, with large private sector participation in its civil nuclear industry. Some countries like Finland and the UK have also seen varying degrees of privatization in their nuclear sectors. Others, like China, Japan, and the United Arab Emirates, are also exploring or implementing public-private partnerships for nuclear power projects. Thus, it is a positive development that India is also taking the necessary steps to gradually open up to private investment in nuclear power by announcing plans to invite private companies to invest in nuclear electricity projects. Currently, the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) is the sole operator of nuclear power plants in India. The Atomic Energy Act of 1962 prohibits private sector control of nuclear power generation. The government is actively working to ease restrictions and attract private investment to expand India's nuclear capacity, and private investment is seen as crucial to achieving this goal. Amendments to existing laws are needed to allow private players to participate. The government is believed to be engaging with private firms like Reliance Industries, Tata Power, Adani Power, and Vedanta Ltd. to potentially invest in new nuclear power plants. Under this proposed model, private companies could acquire land and water resources, invest in plant development, and undertake construction activities in areas outside the reactor complex. However, the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) would still retain the rights to build and operate the plants and manage fuel. Private companies are expected to earn revenue from electricity sales, while NPCIL would operate the projects for a fee. India is also opening its nuclear power sector to foreign investment, allowing up to 49 per cent foreign direct investment, perhaps starting with a 26 per cent cap and increasing it in phases. It is estimated that the opening up of the nuclear sector could create a $100 billion market, attracting global players. Some companies (like Holtec International of the US) are seeking to transfer Small Modular Reactor (SMR) technology to India. India is also looking to diversify its uranium fuel sources and expand its vendor base for specialised nuclear equipment. India's decision to open up its nuclear power sector to private and foreign investment has been met with a mix of positive reactions and cautious optimism globally. While some see it as a crucial step toward bolstering India's energy security and achieving its ambitious climate goals, others express concerns about potential risks and regulatory hurdles. Concerns remain about the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act of 2010, which is considered by some to have been a barrier to foreign investment in the past due to its potential for high operator liability in case of accidents. The Indian Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act of 2010 is a law establishing a framework for civil liability in the event of a nuclear incident. It aims to provide prompt compensation to victims and facilitate India's participation in international agreements regarding nuclear damage. The operator of a nuclear installation is held liable for damages, regardless of fault, in a nuclear incident. The government is looking to address concerns around liability and safety regulations to encourage private investment. The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act imposes significant liability on operators, which may need to be addressed to encourage private investment. The history of nuclear regulation demonstrates a progression toward tighter controls and greater public and environmental protection, driven by lessons learned from past incidents like Chernobyl and Fukushima. The current regulatory framework and ongoing advancements in safety protocols aim to ensure that nuclear power remains a safe and reliable energy source. In the United States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) plays a key role in ensuring safety when private companies operate nuclear facilities. Thus, ensuring robust safety protocols and regulatory oversight is crucial when private companies operate nuclear facilities. The Indian Nuclear Insurance Pool (NIP) was established in 2015 to address liability concerns, creating a more secure environment for foreign investors. The Pool provides capacity for insurance coverage to operators and suppliers for any nuclear liability toward third parties under the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act. India's nuclear energy ambitions could have broader geopolitical implications, particularly in its relationship with countries like the US. The US has expressed intentions to remove barriers to civil nuclear cooperation with India, recognizing its potential for growth in the sector. In March 2025, the US Department of Energy approved the proposal from Holtec International to share Small Modular Reactor (SMR) technology with India, removing a key hurdle that had delayed the deal. French and US companies have also expressed interest in partnering with Indian companies on SMR projects. The Russian nuclear company Rosatom has also offered its expertise in building SMRs in India. India has signed agreements with many countries for collaboration on nuclear energy, including the development of advanced reactors. Russia continues to be a key partner, involved in projects like Kudankulam and exploring areas like floating nuclear power plants and Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). As regards the US, the 2008 Civil Nuclear Agreement and more recent regulatory clearances, like the one granted to Holtec International for SMR technology transfer to Indian firms, are facilitating deeper engagement. France is collaborating in the proposed Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project located in Maharashtra and exploring collaboration in SMRs and research reactors. The Jaitapur plant will have six reactors, each with a capacity of 1,650 MW and involves technical cooperation with Electricité de France. With Canada, India has a uranium supply agreement and potential for collaboration in CANDU reactor technology and related services. CANDU is a type of nuclear reactor known for its use of heavy water (deuterium oxide) as a moderator and coolant, and natural uranium as fuel. CANDU reactors are a significant part of Canada's energy production, with some reactors also operating in other countries including Argentina, China, South Korea, Romania, India, and Pakistan. With South Korea, India has signed an intergovernmental agreement for civil nuclear cooperation, potentially opening avenues for South Korean companies to participate. top videos View all Summing up, the Indian government's move to open up the nuclear power sector to private companies represents a notable shift in its energy strategy and a potential opportunity for private players to contribute to the nation's nuclear power growth. This policy shift, alongside legislative amendments, aims to boost nuclear power generation and facilitate private sector participation, including international collaborations. The move is expected to attract foreign capital and technology, potentially transforming India's nuclear energy landscape. Addressing public concerns about nuclear safety and waste management is essential. While challenges remain, the government is taking the right steps to address concerns about liability, safety, and regulations to attract private investment and achieve its ambitious nuclear energy goals. Adapting to changing needs is indeed a cornerstone of effective policymaking. The writer is a retired Indian diplomat and had previously served as Consul General in New York. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 28, 2025, 13:58 IST News opinion Opinion | Atomic Ambitions: Geopolitical Impact Of India's Nuclear Energy Reforms Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Indian forces would have captured PoK if they had more time: Akhilesh Yadav
Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav on Monday congratulated the Indian forces for their bravery during Operation Sindoor and said they would have even captured Pakistan Occupied Kashmir if they had more time. Talking to reporters in the Parliament complex, Yadav said that while the government talks about Pakistan to garner votes, China is the real threat. "We congratulate the forces for their bravery during Operation Sindoor and the kind of situations they face. If they had more opportunity, perhaps they would have even taken Pakistan Occuped Kashmir," Yadav said. The Samajwadi Party chief questioned why the terrorists responsible for the Pahalgam attack were still at large. "Where did the terrorists disappear?" he asked. Stating that China is a bigger threat than Pakistan, he urged the Union government to bring a policy to ban import of goods from China. "The government should decide to put a ban on imports from China for 10 years. They should make a plan to adopt Swadeshi," he said, adding, "They talk about Pakistan because they want votes, but the real danger is from China. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)